Mother breast feeding 3 year old on cover of Time Magazine!

[Chiefy]

I really don't know what to think.  On the one hand, for a country that thinks it's so modern and forward thinking, we seem to be moving backwards when it comes to the human body.  I suppose thinking it's wrong to see a boobie makes it that much more fun to see one.

The few times I've seen a mom nurse in public, she was covering up.  Not sure if they were modest, or just didn't want to give the gawkers something to see.

To my thinking, 3 years old is a bit old to be doing this.  But I don't really know that either.  But what leaves me cold is that *I heard* this woman is a model, and some that know her are questioning if she did this to get attention to further her career.  If that's the case it seems that she's exploiting her own child.

I don't have a problem with this magazine cover.  Don't buy it if you don't want to .  Even if a store displays it openly and a child sees it, so what?  Their head isn't going to explode.  This isn't porno.

[Bama Red]

Ummmmmmmmm........that kid's old enough to have teeth, ain't he?

[texaninsouthfl]

Just saw the cover pic.  It is a bit much don't you think?

The mother is the MILFiest MILF EVER!  And, the kid looks like he's getting away with something.

Well now that I've seen the mom.... I'd knock the kid to the side for a turn. Happy Meal indeed!

[Psychotic Bovine]

I think this is much more humorous.
And pretty darn true.

[G-Man]

Laughing too hard to submit coherent comment: