|
Title: another bailout Post by: stormrider on March 23, 2009, 05:28:20 AM whoop tee do! Let em fail. Aren't they in business to make money? If they make money they dsure as he__ doen't share it with me. And if they make bad business decicions shouldn't they be the ones to lose? Then why all the bailouts? I've done jobs that when done I didn't make a dime but I sure didn't expect the customer to "bail" me out nor anyone else. It was "my" fault. Doesn't anyone at the top understand that concept?
http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/toxic-asset-plan-near-completion/355265 (http://money.aol.com/news/articles/_a/bbdp/toxic-asset-plan-near-completion/355265) Title: Re: another bailout Post by: Probie (Scooter57) on March 23, 2009, 06:28:06 AM It's all about control and power...
Bail out the banks and you then can control them (http://i173.photobucket.com/albums/w56/vicki_berson/bl/bl0209.gif) (http://www.satisfaction.com/codes/pimp-bling-money-graphics-comments-1.php) Title: Re: another bailout Post by: Jack on March 23, 2009, 06:48:04 AM A recession is when you lose your job. A depression is when I lose mine.
It angers me when I read the morning paper. The balloon has burst. Title: Re: another bailout Post by: fiddle mike on March 23, 2009, 09:36:27 AM "There is no doubt that the government is taking risk," said Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "You cannot solve a financial crisis without the government assuming risk."
Since the government has no money, government is not assuming the risk. We are still trying to explain to Obamists that the only money the Feds have is what they take from us. They Feds expect to assume control anywhere they've directed our money. |