Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
August 14, 2025, 12:45:25 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
MarkT Exhaust
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Irony ? Hypocrisy ? Who knows ?  (Read 1818 times)
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #40 on: March 01, 2019, 12:08:55 PM »

Why does anyone care what his grades or anyone's grades are?  crazy2
good question
Logged
¿spoom
Member
*****
Posts: 1447

WI


« Reply #41 on: March 01, 2019, 12:10:57 PM »

There's a simple two-part plan for more pleasurable VRCC viewing  angel
Ask Mr. Meathead to change his handle to Meato.
Block all handles ending in O


I can honestly say I don't want to block anyone and I absolutely enjoy occasionally subscribing to spirited discourse. While I tend to disagree with a certain amount I see here (I think my tendencies fall more along Serk's)  I actually do appreciate hearing different points of view but many times here  it just becomes so tedious and predictable, no real new information is discussed, just the same drawings of the same battle lines. But hey, I guess if you guys actually ENJOY that then have at it. I just don't get it, thats all.
I think you do get it. It's like robo calls starting out, "I'm calling from your card company". AANNKK! Thanks for playing. Serk is a great example of one who actually DOES wish to have discourse vs dogma. I'm in agreement with many of Serk's description of Trump's shortcomings.
Logged
Bighead
Member
*****
Posts: 8654


Madison Alabama


« Reply #42 on: March 01, 2019, 04:11:44 PM »

There's a simple two-part plan for more pleasurable VRCC viewing  angel
Ask Mr. Meathead to change his handle to Meato.
Block all handles ending in O


I can honestly say I don't want to block anyone and I absolutely enjoy occasionally subscribing to spirited discourse. While I tend to disagree with a certain amount I see here (I think my tendencies fall more along Serk's)  I actually do appreciate hearing different points of view but many times here  it just becomes so tedious and predictable, no real new information is discussed, just the same drawings of the same battle lines. But hey, I guess if you guys actually ENJOY that then have at it. I just don't get it, thats all.
I think you do get it. It's like robo calls starting out, "I'm calling from your card company". AANNKK! Thanks for playing. Serk is a great example of one who actually DOES wish to have discourse vs dogma. I'm in agreement with many of Serk's description of Trump's shortcomings.
But are you in agreement with his strong suits?
Logged

1997 Bumble Bee
1999 Interstate (sold)
2016 Wing
phideux
Member
*****
Posts: 574


« Reply #43 on: March 01, 2019, 04:37:11 PM »

We can make this easy, just make all records of politicians public record. Including tax records, real estate holdings, school records, financial records of any business or charitable organizations they are part of, everything.
Let's have a truly transparent government.
Logged
Jess from VA
Member
*****
Posts: 30571


No VA


« Reply #44 on: March 01, 2019, 05:04:45 PM »

I disagree with that.  Citizen politicians are still entitled to all the protections every one else is.

It's hard enough to get good honest people to run as it is, without requiring everyone running to give up any semblance of personal privacy. 

Logged
phideux
Member
*****
Posts: 574


« Reply #45 on: March 01, 2019, 07:51:27 PM »

I disagree with that.  Citizen politicians are still entitled to all the protections every one else is.

It's hard enough to get good honest people to run as it is, without requiring everyone running to give up any semblance of personal privacy. 



I disagree with that, The government can dig into and access any information about us at any time, we should be able to do the same with our Government.
Logged
scooperhsd
Member
*****
Posts: 5774

Kansas City KS


« Reply #46 on: March 02, 2019, 07:32:24 AM »

I disagree with that.  Citizen politicians are still entitled to all the protections every one else is.

It's hard enough to get good honest people to run as it is, without requiring everyone running to give up any semblance of personal privacy. 



I disagree with that, The government can dig into and access any information about us at any time, we should be able to do the same with our Government.

+1. If you have something to hide, then don't run for office.
Logged
fudgie
Member
*****
Posts: 10614


Better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6.

Huntington Indiana


WWW
« Reply #47 on: March 02, 2019, 09:12:51 AM »

I disagree with that.  Citizen politicians are still entitled to all the protections every one else is.

It's hard enough to get good honest people to run as it is, without requiring everyone running to give up any semblance of personal privacy. 



I disagree with that, The government can dig into and access any information about us at any time, we should be able to do the same with our Government.

+1. If you have something to hide, then don't run for office.
Everyone has a past. Its good or bad depending on who is looking at it.
Logged



Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR
ValkStrom
Member
*****
Posts: 60


Westerville, OH


« Reply #48 on: March 03, 2019, 03:05:19 PM »

I disagree with that.  Citizen politicians are still entitled to all the protections every one else is.

It's hard enough to get good honest people to run as it is, without requiring everyone running to give up any semblance of personal privacy. 



True....but some pasts of people are much much worse than others, and too many of these people are in powerful political positions. Obviously I'm not referring to the President, his past is no more different than many, and perhaps even some or many here.

I disagree with that, The government can dig into and access any information about us at any time, we should be able to do the same with our Government.

+1. If you have something to hide, then don't run for office.
Everyone has a past. Its good or bad depending on who is looking at it.
Logged

97 yellow/black custom, 15 V-Strom 650XT
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13555


South Jersey


« Reply #49 on: March 03, 2019, 03:19:51 PM »

In 1969, Hillary Rodham wrote a 92-page senior thesis for Wellesley College about community organizer Saul Alinsky entitled "There Is Only the Fight . . . : An Analysis of the Alinsky Model." The thesis is now available.[1]

While the work by Rodham as a college student was the subject of much speculation in articles and biographies of Hillary Rodham Clinton in the 1990s, access to the thesis was limited by the college, at the request of the Clinton White House, during her time as first lady.

Rodham researched the thesis by interviewing Alinsky and others, and by conducting visits to low-income areas of Chicago (nearby to her hometown, Park Ridge, Illinois) and observing Community Action Programs in those areas.[2] Her thesis adviser was Wellesley professor of political science Alan Schechter

The thesis was sympathetic to Alinsky's critiques of government antipoverty programs, but criticized Alinsky's methods as largely ineffective, all the while describing Alinsky's personality as appealing.[4] The thesis sought to fit Alinsky into a line of American social activists, including Eugene V. Debs, Martin Luther King, Jr., and Walt Whitman.

In early 1993, the White House requested that Wellesley not release the thesis to anyone.[4] Wellesley complied, instituting a new rule that closed access to the thesis of any sitting U.S. president or First lady, a rule that in practice applied only to Rodham.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Rodham_senior_thesis

It was during Alinsky’s involvement in organizing the Chicago Seven riots that Hillary Rodham became actively involved with Alinsky. Rodham first became aware of Alinsky in April 1962 at the age of 14. At that time, her Park Ridge, Illinois youth minister Don Jones had introduced her to a version of Methodism which drew parallels between Marxist utopianism and liberal Christianity.

At Yale, Rodham became affiliated with the radical Yale Law Review of Law and Social Action, cofounded by Robert Borosage of the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS), a Communist think tank linked to domestic terrorist groups such as the Weathermen and Venceremos Brigade and to Soviet, East German, and Cuban intelligence agents. In 1970, through her work for the Review, Rodham became involved in defending Black Panther members on trial for murdering a police officer. She met the Panthers’ attorney Charles Garry, who had defended the Chicago Seven, and Garry’s assistant Robert Treuhaft, former attorney for the California Communist Party.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3457384/posts
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
¿spoom
Member
*****
Posts: 1447

WI


« Reply #50 on: March 04, 2019, 09:49:30 AM »

There's a simple two-part plan for more pleasurable VRCC viewing  angel
Ask Mr. Meathead to change his handle to Meato.
Block all handles ending in O


I can honestly say I don't want to block anyone and I absolutely enjoy occasionally subscribing to spirited discourse. While I tend to disagree with a certain amount I see here (I think my tendencies fall more along Serk's)  I actually do appreciate hearing different points of view but many times here  it just becomes so tedious and predictable, no real new information is discussed, just the same drawings of the same battle lines. But hey, I guess if you guys actually ENJOY that then have at it. I just don't get it, thats all.
I think you do get it. It's like robo calls starting out, "I'm calling from your card company". AANNKK! Thanks for playing. Serk is a great example of one who actually DOES wish to have discourse vs dogma. I'm in agreement with many of Serk's description of Trump's shortcomings.
But are you in agreement with his strong suits?
Of course, I'd vote for him again tomorrow, if that was election day.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: