Surprise surprise

[baldo]

Well, believe it or not, two threads were deleted today. Threads that were factual and current.

These threads were about a pandemic that affects all of us. And they were about how we were all lied to, which made things exponentially worse.

Now I don't know for sure why they were deleted. I know I kept my comments respectful and on point. The only thing I can imagine is that others may not have been so reserved. If so, those individual comments should have been removed, not the whole thread.

[shadowsoftime]

GIAFB !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Moonshot_1]

"These threads were about a pandemic that affects all of us. And they were about how we were all lied to, which made things exponentially worse."


I wouldn't consider that statement factual. Not in the least. Perhaps that was the issue.

[f6john]

Threads leading nowhere are going to end in the waste can as I see it. The beating the dead horse meme in one of those thread was very appropriate.

[Jersey mike]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

[baldo]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

I think I did respond to you. Of course, now that it's gone, I can't say for sure.

If I don't respond to a comment, it's because I either don't have the energy or time to research the point. Or it's total bullshit and I ignore it.

[Jersey mike]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

I think I did respond to you. Of course, now that it's gone, I can't say for sure.

If I don't respond to a comment, it's because I either don't have the energy or time to research the point. Or it's total bullshit and I ignore it.

I’ll have to go with the most recent which I’m aware of.

First was the thread regarding President Trump being nominated for Nobel Peace Prize and the photo you posted of Henry Hill.

The second was a response in the thread that was removed.

I responded with a comment regarding Woodward to which you responded with a somewhat agreeable comment to which I also replied with some fact regarding China and The WHO and the role they played.

In that thread it appeared you just skipped over replying and moved on down the line to comment on a lesser degree of conversation.

Like I said, it seems like you enjoy the hit and run style instead of an actual discussion of fact.

[..]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

Usual modus operandi

[baldo]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

I think I did respond to you. Of course, now that it's gone, I can't say for sure.

If I don't respond to a comment, it's because I either don't have the energy or time to research the point. Or it's total bullshit and I ignore it.

I’ll have to go with the most recent which I’m aware of.

First was the thread regarding President Trump being nominated for Nobel Peace Prize and the photo you posted of Henry Hill.

The second was a response in the thread that was removed.

I responded with a comment regarding Woodward to which you responded with a somewhat agreeable comment to which I also replied with some fact regarding China and The WHO and the role they played.

In that thread it appeared you just skipped over replying and moved on down the line to comment on a lesser degree of conversation.

Like I said, it seems like you enjoy the hit and run style instead of an actual discussion of fact.

In that case, it sounds like the former. Didn't have the time or energy to research. As far as going on to a "lesser degree of discussion" it probably didn't need that time expenditure to respond.

[Big Rig]

And this thread will be removed in 3...2...1...

Go Ride!!!

[Jersey mike]

Really, in both threads I presented 2 openings for direct discussion and you failed to address either.

I’ve noticed you do not like to respond to direct questions or facts countering what you post, you seem to like hit and run comments.

I’ve tried several times in many threads to engage in discussion but never really get a discussion out of you.

I think I did respond to you. Of course, now that it's gone, I can't say for sure.

If I don't respond to a comment, it's because I either don't have the energy or time to research the point. Or it's total bullshit and I ignore it.

I’ll have to go with the most recent which I’m aware of.

First was the thread regarding President Trump being nominated for Nobel Peace Prize and the photo you posted of Henry Hill.

The second was a response in the thread that was removed.

I responded with a comment regarding Woodward to which you responded with a somewhat agreeable comment to which I also replied with some fact regarding China and The WHO and the role they played.

In that thread it appeared you just skipped over replying and moved on down the line to comment on a lesser degree of conversation.

Like I said, it seems like you enjoy the hit and run style instead of an actual discussion of fact.

In that case, it sounds like the former. Didn't have the time or energy to research. As far as going on to a "lesser degree of discussion" it probably didn't need that time expenditure to respond.

Ok, if that’s your position so be it.

I know it’s the “in thing to do” but your use of meme’s while amusing do nothing for actual discussions/conversations. Granted a meme can be a fast reply to represent your feelings on a topic but using your own actual words in a discussion is far more convincing to represent your position.

We’re all adults here not kids who can’t figure how to express their point of view on a specific topic.

[The emperor has no clothes]

I only do memes for Serk's benefit. He's very "visual". 

[Smokinjoe-VRCCDS#0005]

Chinese cooties end in November after the election when Trump wins by a landslide and a couple weeks later they claim that brain dead waterhead Biden the President with the mail in BS.