History Repeats Itself: Lenin Steals the 1917 Election same as democrats

[98valk]

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/history-repeats-lenins-actions-steal-1917-election-russia-eerily-similar-democrats-steal-today/

sound familiar??

The energy of the Bolsheviks and the promises of Lenin were insufficient to win the election (they only garnered 23%) of the vote.

But Lenin’s cunning campaign continued after the sunset on the election day. There was corruption in the balloting. There were “extensions” to allow more ballots. There was a long and strong public propaganda messaging to the public that the Bolsheviks had won when they had lost. The agenda to “transform” Russia into the first Marxist governed nation did not cease after the polls closed on the “election day.”

Violence, manipulation of the news, vociferous protests, armed vandals, and an attack upon the Russian governing structure increased. Eventually the Russian Provisional Government was absolved and the tyranny of 70 years slavery to Marxist dogmas resulted.

The civil war that was inevitable between Red and White Russians attest to the fact that weaponry was accessible. No, contrary to many opinions today, Lenin’s success was not because “guns were outlawed.”

The success of Lenin’s transformation of Russia can be laid at the feet of the Russian population. The nation assented to and conformed complacently with the dictates of a vocal and violent minority. The nation resigned its “free election” and surrendered to the prevailing propaganda! The actual facts did not influence the population. They accepted what they were told and complied without any question.

[bentwrench]

CWII, Sucks but it's coming!
If the bourgeoisie had AR-15s, the bolshiveks would have been a little footnote in history.

[98valk]

CWII, Sucks but it's coming!
If the bourgeoisie had AR-15s, the bolshiveks would have been a little footnote in history.

The Russian population was well armed (probably more weapons were in Russia than any other nation at that time) and many of the Russians had military experience having faced the Kaiser’s army on the eastern front. So, the presence of weaponry and veterans was not a factor in opposing the Bolsheviks. The civil war that was inevitable between Red and White Russians attest to the fact that weaponry was accessible. No, contrary to many opinions today, Lenin’s success was not because “guns were outlawed.”

[Robert]

I am encouraged that the general population is wakening and taking an active step in the discontent at the fraud in the election.

Ecc 1:9  History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new.
Ecc 1:10  Sometimes people say, "Here is something new!" But actually it is old; nothing is ever truly new.
Ecc 1:11  We don't remember what happened in the past, and in future generations, no one will remember what we are doing

[98valk]

I am encouraged that the general population is wakening and taking an active step in the discontent at the fraud in the election.

Ecc 1:9  History merely repeats itself. It has all been done before. Nothing under the sun is truly new.
Ecc 1:10  Sometimes people say, "Here is something new!" But actually it is old; nothing is ever truly new.
Ecc 1:11  We don't remember what happened in the past, and in future generations, no one will remember what we are doing

Amen. Praise the Lord.

my public high school freshman history teacher, taught us 'Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it.'   The quote is most likely due to writer and philosopher George Santayana, and in its original form it read, "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

 he taught us about communism and how they were trying to take over the country.

many of the past classmates I meet and know are all conservatives and understand the above.