Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
June 28, 2025, 06:18:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: a break in the dam? The decision below  (Read 958 times)
Oss
Member
*****
Posts: 12591


The lower Hudson Valley

Ossining NY Chapter Rep VRCCDS0141


WWW
« on: August 12, 2021, 04:40:41 PM »

I got a feed that said SCOTUS knocked out the NY eviction ban 6-3


But more disturbing is just ONE client is willing to pay me to go to court to force NYC Civil court to calendar my cases with appearance dates   I have had 12 rejected since aug 1st and no dates assigned   There is no plan to hear cases even if you are being threatened with death by a squatter, not even a lawful occupant

I asked 500 a person  from people losing 2000 plus a month and still people wont pony up  If they dont care why should I

I have just read the text  it is a TRO pending appeal   Lets see if NYS tries to extend the ban

Money has nothing to do with my cases and I am pissed at the dissent which says basically someone can rape you if it is only temporary

here is the order of judge sotomayer  (surprise !)

Cite as: 594 U. S. ____ (2021) 1
BREYER, J., dissenting
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES _________________
No. 21A8
_________________
PANTELIS CHRYSAFIS, ET AL. v.
LAWRENCE K. MARKS
ON APPLICATION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
[August 12, 2021]
The application for injunctive relief presented to JUSTICE
SOTOMAYOR and by her referred to the Court is granted
pending disposition of the appeal in the United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit and disposition of
the petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is timely
sought. Should the petition for a writ of certiorari be denied, this order shall terminate automatically. In the event
the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the order shall
terminate upon the sending down of the judgment of this
Court.
This order enjoins the enforcement of only Part A of the
COVID Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention
Act (CEEFPA). 2020 N. Y. Laws ch. 381. That is the only
relief applicants seek. See Case No. 2:21-cv-02516, ECF
No. 1 at 9; Emergency Application for Writ of Injunction 7,
40. If a tenant self-certifies financial hardship, Part A of
CEEFPA generally precludes a landlord from contesting
that certification and denies the landlord a hearing. This
scheme violates the Court’s longstanding teaching that ordinarily “no man can be a judge in his own case” consistent
with the Due Process Clause. In re Murchison, 349 U. S.
133, 136 (1955); see United States v. James Daniel Good
Real Property, 510 U. S. 43, 53 (1993) (due process generally
requires a hearing).
This order does not enjoin the enforcement of the Tenant
Safe Harbor Act (TSHA), which applicants do not challenge.
2 CHRYSAFIS v. MARKS
BREYER, J., dissenting
2020 N. Y. Laws ch. 127, §§1, 2(2)(a). Among other things,
TSHA instructs New York courts to entertain a COVIDrelated hardship defense in eviction proceedings, assessing
a tenant’s income prior to COVID, income during COVID,
liquid assets, and ability to obtain government assistance.
§2(2)(b). If the court finds the tenant “has suffered a financial hardship” during a statutorily-prescribed period, then
it “shall [not] issue a warrant of eviction or judgment of possession.” §2(1).
JUSTICE BREYER, with whom JUSTICE SOTOMAYOR and
JUSTICE KAGAN join, dissenting from grant of application
for injunctive relief.
The New York Legislature has passed two laws regulating evictions during the COVID–19 pandemic. The first is
the Tenant Safe Harbor Act, which provides tenants who
have “suffered a financial hardship during the COVID–19
covered period” with a defense in eviction proceedings.
2020 N. Y. Laws ch. 127, §2.2.(a) (McKinney). The second
is the COVID–19 Emergency Eviction and Foreclosure Prevention Act of 2020 (CEEFPA). CEEFPA simplifies the process for tenants to invoke financial hardship during the
pandemic as a defense to eviction. Tenants who wish to assert the defense must provide a sworn attestation stating
that they are experiencing financial hardship or health impacts as a result of the pandemic. 2020 N. Y. Laws ch. 381,
pt. A, §4. The attestation pauses eviction proceedings until
the time that CEEFPA expires, namely the end of August
2021. §§2, 4, 6, 8; 2021 N. Y. Laws ch. 104 (establishing
CEEFPA’s August 31, 2021, expiration date). Pending eviction proceedings are stayed, new eviction proceedings cannot be filed, and outstanding eviction warrants cannot be
executed until that date. 2020 N. Y. Laws ch. 381, pt. A,
§§2, 4, 6, 8. Eviction proceedings may resume after August
31, 2021.
Only CEEFPA is before us. Applicants, five New York......."




So I will do it for my client who was by my side for 12 weeks while I protested in front of Bx Supreme Court  I think Gordon Lucky 13 is taller than this man showing once again grit is not measured by height or weight but by one's heart

As Highbinder said once to me, a true friend is one who, if you ask him to go back for ammunition during a firefight, you know he will return with the goods

« Last Edit: August 12, 2021, 06:22:26 PM by Oss » Logged

If you don't know where your going any road will take you there
George Harrison

When you come to the fork in the road, take it
Yogi Berra   (Don't send it to me C.O.D.)
carolinarider09
Member
*****
Posts: 12410


Newberry, SC


« Reply #1 on: August 12, 2021, 06:37:47 PM »

Ok,, I tried to read the response and frankly not sure what it is telling me/you.

So, can you give me/us a "layman's version?

Smiley
Logged

Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16197


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2021, 08:21:57 PM »


I asked 500 a person  from people losing 2000 plus a month and still people wont pony up  If they dont care why should I
  cooldude
I whole heartedly agree.   Your services are worth something.

Rams
Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
ridingron
Member
*****
Posts: 1179


Orlando


« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2021, 09:35:55 PM »

Quote
I asked 500 a person  from people losing 2000 plus a month and still people won't pony up.  If they don't care why should I?  

Is that a one time fee? At $2000 a month, what's another $500?
« Last Edit: August 12, 2021, 09:47:05 PM by ridingron » Logged

Oss
Member
*****
Posts: 12591


The lower Hudson Valley

Ossining NY Chapter Rep VRCCDS0141


WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2021, 03:57:31 AM »

If you have seen my :"rant" video,  by a resident of an apt, legal illegal no matter, and typing a name on the form or signing a form, the owner is barred from entry to court until whenever the NYS czar says so

The owner could have a judgment and warrant from 2019 she is trying to execute upon, no matter

She could have bought the house from prior owner who refuses to move out so she can move in with her family

The person signing has no obligation to pay the rent whatsoever, nor to explain what her hardship is and there will be no hearing to determine the truth or veracity of the statement

SHES A WITCH  BURN HER   only in reverse

It is an unconstitutional taking pure and simple, so simple even I saw it

and yes a one time fee of 500 is what I asked of people who may not get an eviction for another year or more  What is 500 against another 24000 of loss?  I figured about 100 hours to get it done, I will be working for McDonald's wages or less
Logged

If you don't know where your going any road will take you there
George Harrison

When you come to the fork in the road, take it
Yogi Berra   (Don't send it to me C.O.D.)
Willow
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 16608


Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP

Olathe, KS


WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2021, 08:03:07 AM »

...
I asked 500 a person  from people losing 2000 plus a month and still people wont pony up  If they dont care why should I
... 

FWIW I paid $1500 for the law firm to work my eviction (and that after losing $7,000 of bargain rent income).
Logged
Serk
Member
*****
Posts: 21816


Rowlett, TX


« Reply #6 on: September 19, 2021, 01:08:09 PM »

Hey OSS, they found a loophole that makes it okay to evict tenants (Even if they're fully paid up!)

It's okay to evict the unvaccinated evidently!

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dems-support-florida-landowner-evicting-unvaccinated-tenants
Logged

Never ask a geek 'Why?',just nod your head and slowly back away...



IBA# 22107 
VRCC# 7976
VRCCDS# 226

1998 Valkyrie Standard
2008 Gold Wing

Taxation is theft.

μολὼν λαβέ
3fan4life
Member
*****
Posts: 6958


Any day that you ride is a good day!

Moneta, VA


« Reply #7 on: September 19, 2021, 01:32:33 PM »

Hey OSS, they found a loophole that makes it okay to evict tenants (Even if they're fully paid up!)

It's okay to evict the unvaccinated evidently!

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/dems-support-florida-landowner-evicting-unvaccinated-tenants

I don't care for the tactic but I admire his ingenuity! 


Reading through the comments I found this one:

Quote
Eric Garcia for Congress
@EricG1247
Replying to
@Coldrain76
 
@OccupyDemocrats
 and
@DaryRezvani
I would imagine most people who rent can't afford a lawyer, hell I have a mortgage and I can't afford a lawyer. Instead of using compassion to sway people's minds he is using force. He would be better giving a month off rent with proof of vaccination but then again it's about $


Can you believe this A$$ Wipe?

Does he really believe the bull crap that he's spewing?

And this idiot is running for Congress:

https://www.ericgarciaforcongress.com/

To beat all he's a former Marine.
Logged

1 Corinthians 1:18

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: