Gentlefolks
The California State law says that you can buy only 1 new gun per month. So in one year (12 months) you could in theory buy 12 new guns from a store.
I use to joke with my wife that unless you buy 1 new gun per month, you would be in violation of the law.

I have an admission to make... I didn't 'follow the new gun law' this year... in the sense that until last month, I didn't buy my quota of new guns this whole year. Damn... I didn't buy any gun at all in the whole year.
:'(
But that changed with my new acquisition: HK USC in .45ACP.
The motivation: growing up in the 80's and watching the movies, I learned about the HK MP5 and it would be the dream to buy one in full auto glory, but we cannot have that unless you are filthy rich (thanks Reagan!) and find one pre 1985 and pay $20K to $30K for it.
The civilian version (HK SP5:
https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/sp5/) is really hard to find and crazy expensive. The new imports are sold as a pistol, and thanks to the California micro-stamping law, we cannot buy them... unless you pay 3x more (think $8K, e.g.
http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/showthread.php?t=1756797&highlight=HK+SP5) from someone that is free of the restriction i.e. LEO.
The more affordable alternative to the MP5 is the UMP, which being full auto is not sold to civilians... but there is the USC (
https://hk-usa.com/hk-models/usc/) to save the day.
It is the civilian version of the UMP45 (
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heckler_%26_Koch_UMP), made 'safe' thanks to the combination of Germany export laws plus the ban on imports of non sport rifles (thanks Bush!) with added assault rifles ban (thanks Clinton!).
Some people hate it, because it is a pale shade of what the UMP is... but I can't complain, it is the closest thing I can legally buy in the occupied California that won't break the bank.
Of course, being California that also means that the carbine has to be featureless i.e. has to have an atrocious fin wrapped around the grip and you cannot add a forward grip.
Enough bitching about the law, let's talk about the gun.
Range report: shot 150 rounds of Federal Premium FMJ 230gr.
The gun worked flawlessly, extremely precise.
What draw may attention was:
a) It is really quiet, I guess the combo of sub-sonic ammo + long barrel helps.
b) What you feel is basically the 'thump' of the bolt group moving back during the cycle (a bit too heavy in my personal view given it is just shooting a pistol caliber).
c) The rifle is so light. Seriously, makes my Marlin 1894 feel comparatively heavy.
The iron sights work fine, I was shooting initially at 25 yards and next at 50 yards. I think 100 yards should work fine with this gun (limitation will probably be the ballistics of the .45acp).
The ergonomy is not great though, mostly due to the fan in the grip plus the fact that the buttstock doesn't allow adjustments.
I'm 6ft1 and felt that the gun is kinda short for me... it would be nice to be able to change the buttstock and make it a bit longer (but I guess that would probably somehow violate CA laws?).
Cleaning and lubbing is a breeze, just 2 allen bolts (requires a 5mm wrench) to remove the buttstock and the gun has basically 4 main parts:
a) Upper receiver with the attached barrel.
b) Bolt assembly.
c) Lower receiver with the trigger group.
d) recoil spring.
I've ordered some picatinny rails from HDPS, planning to add a red dot.
So far, a really nice rifle.
Its limitations when compared to a semi UMP45 (small magazines, fixed buttstock, etc) are due to federal and Cal laws (fin) but it is a good value offered by HK to us who are bound to such limitations.
I can understand though why lots of people invest the money and the time to convert it to a semi UMP5 which is its original form (
https://tommybuilttactical.com/usc-to-ump-conversion/).
In any case, I'm having a good time being able to do the 'hk slap' and shooting such fun carbine.
:-)