Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
June 25, 2025, 03:53:30 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
MarkT Exhaust
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Old cars we've had  (Read 3347 times)
Wizzard
Member
*****
Posts: 4043


Bald River Falls

Valparaiso IN


« Reply #40 on: July 26, 2022, 11:19:44 AM »

My first was a 55 Chev 2dr hardtop with a 265 V8
Second was a 63 pontiac catalina 2dr with a tri power set up.
Next was a 68 olds 442 hurst
Then a 73 chevelle 2dr vinyl top 350

Fav was the 442

all that before 18 yrs old
Logged


VRCC # 24157
DIGGER
Member
*****
Posts: 3775


« Reply #41 on: July 26, 2022, 11:27:32 AM »

Don't yall laugh.....my most fun car was my first new car...an American Motors Gremlin.    Small car with a American Motors 305 v8 with 3 speed on the floor.    It was a very fast car.   small car with a v8.   1974 was my first new car.    Could run as fast as the camaros and firebirds of the time.   It was small and didn't weigh much and would absolutely fly.    The first year of the Gremlin you could get it stock with a 401 v8.    They were bad boys.   They quit making the stock 401 v8 after the first year they came out as too many people were crashing them due to too much power.    My 305 v8 came out after that and they only made them a few years and then went to a 4 cylinder I think.    It was a fun car.  



Shortly after we bought it my new wife (the same one still with me after 48 yrs) went home to East Texas small town of Pineland Texas.  Her old friends there she grew up with were all making fun of her little car till she challenged them and beat everyone there through about a 1/4 mile.   They called in another guy who was king of the fast cars there in a chevy pickup with I think she said it was a 454 v8 and she out ran him.     They quit laughing.


The AMC’s were 304’s, just saying. cooldude  Never saw a 401 Gremlin but they would be big money today. The Roadkill boys recently put a 426 hemi in a Gremlin but I haven’t seen those episodes let.

you are probably right.....it had a "5 liter" emblem on the back.  I was coming home from work back when I had my Gremlin and saw a lady on the side of the road in a Gremlin and she had hit a mattress that had fallen off a truck and was stuck all in the frontend.   I stopped and in helping to get the mattress untangled I had to open the hood and there was the 401 engine.   Only one I ever saw.  I just googled the Gremlin with the 401 engine and there are some for sale around.  Ck this youtube out....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9w2e8SzuMc
« Last Edit: July 26, 2022, 11:31:24 AM by DIGGER » Logged
scooperhsd
Member
*****
Posts: 5703

Kansas City KS


« Reply #42 on: July 26, 2022, 11:42:24 AM »

While I was going to College, my parents got me and my youngest brother a 1972 Gremlin with a straight 6 and 3 speed automatic that had been a campus cop car. We shared that sleeper until I bought my Ensignmobile (1983 Ford Ranger (2.8L V6 with 5 speed manual). I took that pickup to St Louis, Pensacola, Norfolk, Newport /Boston, Jacksonville FL, and to Dc - most of them towing a trailer that I had my motorcycle at the time on it.

We got married in Mayport FL on the ship I was stationed on, she brought a 78 Pontiac Lemans to Boston and Jacksonville. While we were in Jacksonville, we bought our 1988 Acura Integra (4 doors 5 speed manual, 1.6L 4 banger) . While we were in DC, we spent many weekends in Pinto Md visiting her Grandma - the trip there was always lots of fun with curves Smiley. While in DC we also got rid of the Ranger and bought a 1990 Honda Civic Station wagon (1.5L 4 cyl, 5 speed manual). We eventually took both of these to Raleigh NC, where I had 45 / 60 mile one way commutes to work, then shorter. We bought the 2000 Beetle in March 2003 with 65,000 miles (still driving - currently at 382,400 miles), and we bought the Golf new in 2015. The Civic overheated one summer day and locked up about .5 miles from the dealer (leaking coolant hoses), and we gave the Integra to someone who wanted it when we came to KC in August 2018. That person fixed it up some and is still driving it as his daily driver.

The Beetle has had quite a history with us. At 252,000 miles, the 4 speed automatic crapped out and we had it replaced with a 5 speed manual (and had an instant jump of 8 MPG). At 297,000 miles the fuel pump crapped out (an $1100 item), and we got some much larger than stock fuel injector nozzles that had a slight impact on power and a LARGE increase in the amount of smoke it produced. The next summer, we had the ECU tuned and it makes 170% of stock horsepower / torque - while still getting 42-45 MPG highway.

The Golf was part of the VW Dieselgate - so all it has had done is the ECU tuning to fix that . (and this gave us an 11 year 165,000 mile warranty on anything under the hood).
Logged
f6john
Member
*****
Posts: 9336


Christ first and always

Richmond, Kentucky


« Reply #43 on: July 26, 2022, 12:14:24 PM »

Well, my bill on the Impala SS came to $1,400 dollars. More than I really needed to spend but as hoped for less that what Serks Wing bill is estimated to be. That’s only the third time in 27 years I’ve paid anyone to work on the car for me. Maybe I can handle the rest a little at a time.



Spinning happily away on 4+ year old gas with a dose of Seafoam thrown in for good measure.

All new brake rotors, calipers and braided lines back before she laid down on me.







Logged
Beer van Huet
Member
*****
Posts: 432


Netherlands


WWW
« Reply #44 on: July 27, 2022, 07:52:02 AM »

During my 2 year stay in 1994 in Moreno Valley, CA I bought a Lincoln Continental from the lemon lot.
Previous owner was an elderly man who took it to the golfcourse once in a while.
I think I paid $3000,- for it.
Car was in excellent shape and went to see most part of California with it.
Fantastic car, guzzler perhaps but I didn't care.
I was amazed by gadgets like a rain sensor, etc which I was not used to previously.
Sold it for the same price when I left.



Logged
Jess from VA
Member
*****
Posts: 30407


No VA


« Reply #45 on: July 27, 2022, 09:11:18 AM »

I visited all the lemon lots (used car lots) on my various bases.

The cars were mostly in better condition and nicer shape than off base, and priced reasonably for quick sales, and you might even find motorcycles there.

Before going overseas, I was going to put my old Ford on the lot until I got an offer from work.  

I shipped this over instead.  (with a matching silver camper shell)



Unfortunately, by 1979, the SS model 350 4-bolt main had been downgraded to a 305 2-bolt (but it still moved out pretty well).  Drove it within miles of the Russian (Georgia) and Syrian borders in Turkey.  The Turk Jandarma (military police with machine guns) would not let you get to the borders.

The first owner had been the long serving female dispatcher for the Montgomery Police Dept, and they had already removed the catalytic converter and hacked out the gas hole to take leaded gas.  There was no such thing as unleaded gas over there, so it had to be done to any car shipped over.  Win, win.

When I returned to the States and the car arrived back, US Customs bungled the paperwork, so it never got restored to politically correct.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2022, 09:18:42 AM by Jess from VA » Logged
Bret SD
Member
*****
Posts: 4306


***

San Diego, Ca.


« Reply #46 on: July 27, 2022, 11:09:56 AM »

Don't yall laugh.....my most fun car was my first new car...an American Motors Gremlin.    Small car with a American Motors 305 v8 with 3 speed on the floor.    It was a very fast car.   small car with a v8.   1974 was my first new car.    Could run as fast as the camaros and firebirds of the time.   It was small and didn't weigh much and would absolutely fly.    The first year of the Gremlin you could get it stock with a 401 v8.    They were bad boys.   They quit making the stock 401 v8 after the first year they came out as too many people were crashing them due to too much power.    My 305 v8 came out after that and they only made them a few years and then went to a 4 cylinder I think.    It was a fun car.   



Shortly after we bought it my new wife (the same one still with me after 48 yrs) went home to East Texas small town of Pineland Texas.  Her old friends there she grew up with were all making fun of her little car till she challenged them and beat everyone there through about a 1/4 mile.   They called in another guy who was king of the fast cars there in a chevy pickup with I think she said it was a 454 v8 and she out ran him.     They quit laughing.

A friend of mine had the big block version, that car scared the crap outta me.. it was incredibly fast.
Logged

Bret

02 Standard -- Blue & White
82 Aspencade -- Red
“No man has the right to be an amateur in the matter of physical training. It is a shame for a man to grow old without seeing the beauty and strength of which his body is capable.” Socrates
DIGGER
Member
*****
Posts: 3775


« Reply #47 on: July 27, 2022, 11:40:43 AM »

Don't yall laugh.....my most fun car was my first new car...an American Motors Gremlin.    Small car with a American Motors 305 v8 with 3 speed on the floor.    It was a very fast car.   small car with a v8.   1974 was my first new car.    Could run as fast as the camaros and firebirds of the time.   It was small and didn't weigh much and would absolutely fly.    The first year of the Gremlin you could get it stock with a 401 v8.    They were bad boys.   They quit making the stock 401 v8 after the first year they came out as too many people were crashing them due to too much power.    My 305 v8 came out after that and they only made them a few years and then went to a 4 cylinder I think.    It was a fun car.  



Shortly after we bought it my new wife (the same one still with me after 48 yrs) went home to East Texas small town of Pineland Texas.  Her old friends there she grew up with were all making fun of her little car till she challenged them and beat everyone there through about a 1/4 mile.   They called in another guy who was king of the fast cars there in a chevy pickup with I think she said it was a 454 v8 and she out ran him.     They quit laughing.

A friend of mine had the big block version, that car scared the crap outta me.. it was incredibly fast.

I never got to ride in the 401 version but bet it did have a lot of get up and go.  
Another American Motors car that was quick was the Javelin AMX with a 390 I think it was.   Muscle car.
« Last Edit: July 27, 2022, 11:42:43 AM by DIGGER » Logged
f6john
Member
*****
Posts: 9336


Christ first and always

Richmond, Kentucky


« Reply #48 on: July 27, 2022, 12:28:45 PM »

The first and second generations of AMX cars came with either  a 343, 390, or 401, depending on the year and options.
Logged
Rio Wil
Member
*****
Posts: 1352



« Reply #49 on: July 27, 2022, 01:36:21 PM »



This is a fun little car I commuted in for 280K miles as a 4 cyclinder 2L engine. There is a TR8 version of this car with a 3.5 liter V8 derived from the old Olds 215 aluminum V8. I built this V8 into a 4.3L that ran like crazy and drove for another 100K miles.....a lot of fun. Its a long read but below is the saga of building the engine......this pic is the same color and has a full moon roof like my car.



Buick/Rover/TR8 Aluminum 215-V8 Conversion
By Wil Bridges (USA)
        Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996           Published: 22-may-98     
See also extract from HOTROD magazine (Aug, 1985).

In the summer of 1993 a friend presented me an article published in your 1985 ABC issue of ABC Magazine detailing how to rebuild the humble little Buick aluminum 215 V8 into a potent powerplant for street/race use.

Since I had been driving a 1977 Triumph TR7 for some 8 years and 280,000 miles, I saw a chance to build my own TR8 engine and convert the wimpy little TR7 to a real roadster.
I began the process of collecting three or four 215's. four sets of '64 Buick 300 aluminum heads and three 300 cranks. I could not bear to pass up on of these little engines in the local "Pick Your Part" salvage yards. As luck would have it, another friend told me of two 1980 Rover 3500 SDI sedans for sale as a pair. This engine is the 1961-63 Buick 215 with some minor block, head and rocker arm assembly changes. The nice thing is, it is multiport fuel injected and solved my problem of smogging in California. The friend that gave me the article decided he wanted a Rover to drive so we bought the pair, he got his driver and I got an engine, transmission, smog equipment and a 3:08 ring /pinion and cluster gear set to replace the 3:90 gear set in the stock TR7 rear end. Obviously, I now have a surplus of 215 parts! This began a 14 month saga of my friend rebuilding his Rover and me building the engine of my choice based on your menu of part mix and match. I decided on the stock bore, 300 crank and heads, Chevy 283/327 rods, Vega pistons and Nova flywheel (more about this later on). This combination yields 4.3 liter displacement.
   
Since there is some machining involved with this project it gave a a wonderful opportunity to justify to the wife the purchase of a used 15 X 40 inch metal lathe from the local Maritime Academy Training School who was updating their machine shop. The selection of engine internals was heavily influenced by the fact that this car would continue to be my daily commute vehicle in San Francisco Bay Area traffic. Of 32 miles one way, about 20 miles was stop-and-go clutch-foot numbing traffic, so, I wanted an engine that would behave decently in that environment but still have impressive go-power when stood on. The choice of fuel system was the stock Rover (Lucas) system and control unit with the modification of machining a new adjustable top for the fuel pressure regulator so the fuel pressure could be increased from 36 psi to about 45psi at zero vacuum. The fuel pump is from a 280Z just because a new one was available at the right price. I also used a stock TR8 inertia switch in-line with fuel pump supply voltage. The Cylinder heads selected were 1964 Buick 300 aluminum heads( slightly larger intake valves than stock Rover heads) milled .060 to produce a cylinder head volume of about 43cc and yield a compression ratio of 9.25:1. The rocker arm assemblies were from the Rover heads as the rockers are significantly beefier. I wanted to use adjustable Volvo rockers (a nice light-weight steel unit) and had machined a set of inserts to match the Rover shaft diameter but closer measurement of the rocker ratio showed t hey were 1.5 and not 1.6. The cam had already been ground based on a 1.6 ratio. The rocker assembly supports were shimmed .045 to give good valve stem end wipe geometry and about .050 preload of the hydraulic lifters. The lifters are aftermarkets that are supposedly good to 6800 RPM. The cam profile selected is identical to stock Rover and Buick 215/300 with the exception that lobe height (intake and exhaust) was increased to yield .440 lift at the valve and take advantage of the slightly larger intake valves and assist in venting exhaust through slightly smaller exhaust valves. To contradict the immediate preceding statement, the flow test of the Buick 300 heads show that between .300 and .440 valve lift that little gain in air flow is realized. The 300 heads have significantly larger diameter intake and exhaust ports than the Rover/TR8 heads-they must really be restricted. Original intake valves were retained and a set of exhaust valves were machined from used junk yard valves( gimme a break-I just bought a new lathe). Additional head work only included light port polishing, slight relieving in the intake port area for injector spray clearance and valve guide reconditioning (note no mention of replacing the valve seats---leaded vs unleaded).

Block preparation included usual cleaning at ABC Machine Shop in Dublin, Ca. and the machining of an adapter( oh darn) for the rear main oil seal. The Rover crank is larger in diameter than the Buick 300 crank at the oil seal area so the adapter/spacer is needed to house the Chevy big block rear main seal. The top of the adapter is screwed to the block and the bottom is secured to the rear main cap as in your article. I elected not to bore the block oversize this go round so the cylinders were only honed to assist ring seating. Using the Buick 300 crank required reducing main journals a total of .200 and was the single most expensive expenditure in the project ($200 at ABC Crank regrinding in San Leandro, Ca). The block was very slightly relieved in one spot to allow crank counterweight clearance. Not sure if this is necessary with the Buick/Olds block. All freeze plugs were replaced- since I could not readily obtain the rear cam plug I had to machine one (oh darn). Other block components were stock Vega pistons and rings, late model 283/early 327 rods milled a total of .100 for journal fit on the big end. The bore for the Vega engine is listed at 3.501 inches-between this and not too much cylinder wear in the Rover engine, piston clearance ended up at .0025-.003 inch. Main bearings are stock mail order Rover/TR8, rod bearings are stock 283/327 bearings machined (oh darn) to make a wide as possible bearing surface and chamfered for crank filet clearance. The stock Rover timing chain/oil pump/distributor housing was discarded in favor of an early model Buick V6 housing. This allowed using a high capacity '64 Buick 300 oil pump and direct replacement of the Rover (Lucas) distributor with a stock post '74 Buick
 HEI distributor. The stock Rover oil pump is about 25% greater capacity than the stock 215 but about 15% smaller than the high capacity Buick 300 pump. Pump by-pass pressure is set at about 50 psi hot at 2000 rpm. Oil delivery channels in the Rover block and pump housing were left stock dimensions. The rope oil seal in the Buick front cover was replaced with a press-in neoprene seal. The Rover pan did include a windage tray that was retained as was the stock oil pickup. Using the 300 crank required modifying the flywheel as follows to accommodate using the stock Rover/TR8 5 speed gearbox and bellhousing. The Rover flywheel ring gear was retained and installed on a remachined surface on a Chevy Nova flywheel. This flywheel has an offset toward the block that made it easy to reposition the starter ring back into its original relationship with the starter. No starter mods were needed. The machined surface on the flywheel was left about .030 larger than i.d. of the Rover ring gear. The ring gear was heated in an oven at 450 degrees for an hour then shrink cooled onto the flywheel with no other means of retaining. The clutch disk side of the flywheel has a stepdown where the clutch disk mates. The step was machined off and the remaining groove in the flywheel surface was left. The stock Rover/TR8 clutch disk diameter ends at the groove and does not affect clutch performance. One of the flywheel-to-crank mounting holes was relocated (enlarged) about 1/8 inch to mate with the corresponding thread in the crank. The stock Rover clutch cover mates perfectly with the Nova mounting holes. The three clutch cover locating pins must be redrilled. The 300 crank/Nova flywheel combo results in the flywheel clutch surface extending into the Rover/TR8 bellhousing an additional .200 in. from stock. There is adequate clearance inside the bellhousing to accommodate the flywheel/clutch cover combo with no interference and the hydraulic clutch actuation mechanism (slave cylinder, pivot pin, throwout arm, throwout bearing, etc) needs no modification.

The engine components were fully balanced by ABC Machine Shop using the stock Buick 300 harmonic damper and appropriate drillings in the flywheel for external balance. I was lucky enough to find a TR8 in one of the Bay Area self service junk yards--needless to say I stripped it from bumper to bumper. This find shortened the install process immensely by using stock components vs fabricating many brackets, motor mounts, and other fasteners. I did not change to power steering as the increased front end weight is minimal and steering is not really much affected. The Lucas alternator was discarded in favor of a GM 78 amp unit. Since just the radiator fans draw some 32 amps when running at high speed (80 amps on startup) a 100 amp unit probably would not be over-kill for an A/C equipped car in hot climates. For a couple of months I had both fans running at high speed any time they came on and they slowly cooked a 68 amp alt. The distributor has 12 volts supplied through a relay that is energized from the ignition switch lead for the old distributor. This is probably overkill since I later measured only 2-3 amps consumption by the distributor. There is some interference between the dist housing and block at the front intake manifold hold down bolt. The bolt can be replaced with a oval head or hex head and/or the dist housing can be relieved slightly. There is just enough clearance for the sparkplug wires to clear the hood (touch lightly).

You can also use a Buick water pump and I even mounted a flex fan on the water pump to assist air flow in the engine compartment when radiator fans are not running. The radiator was custom built from a Saab (as I remember-checked out a lot of rad's). It has a high fin density and is a 3 core unit. It was already the right height and only had to cut about 3 inched off the length on the radial arm saw (50 tooth carbide blade) and resolder the end plate. Slightly reshaped the end tanks from a bad TR8 radiator and soldered them on. Used the stock TR8 mounting position for the radiator and stock electric fans wired in a low speed(series)/high speed(parallel) configuration based on radiator temp (180) and high speed if block temp exceeds 190.
I have been driving the engine for some 18 months and 37K miles with the following problems showing up.
At about 8K miles the #3 exhaust valve spring broke( yes they were the original '64 Buick springs) so I replaced them with aftermarket springs that at installed/compressed height have spring pressures of 95/200 lb.
At 18 K one of the bolts holding the even bank rocker arm assembly stripped out (increased spring pressure?) allowing some flexing and eventual breakage of the rocker arm shaft before I could get it home in commute traffic. I re-tapped the hole to the next larger metric size and reused one of the Rover shafts. I was very disappointed with this shaft breaking because I was lucky enough to find two NOS 300 Buick shafts to put the beefier Rover/TR8 rockers on and now have to go back to a used shaft. That's life!

The last 21K miles have been problem free as far as the engine rebuild/conversion goes--had to recondition a throttle position potentiometer that had worn through the resist compound and was causing a slight flat spot when running at steady throttle pressure. Also replaced the ignition module in the GM distributor (yeah it was used too), it would tend to quit entirely for about a half second on really hot days.
Of course, considerable time has been spent tweaking engine timing (currently 10 deg BTDC) and choice of sparkplugs. I would like to experiment with advancing cam timing some 2 to 4 degrees but it is such a pain to do. I don't have verified specs but, 0-60 mph seems in the 5.5-6 sec range. The engine winds 6000 easily and still has significant "set you back in the seat power" when accelerating from 100 mph. I estimate top speed to be 150-160 mph.
One thing is for sure--it is a kick to drive and it gets 20 mpg in commute traffic. I can't wait for the next rebuild, maybe bore and re-sleeve it to 5.0 liter!

Logged
DIGGER
Member
*****
Posts: 3775


« Reply #50 on: July 27, 2022, 03:30:53 PM »



This is a fun little car I commuted in for 280K miles as a 4 cyclinder 2L engine. There is a TR8 version of this car with a 3.5 liter V8 derived from the old Olds 215 aluminum V8. I built this V8 into a 4.3L that ran like crazy and drove for another 100K miles.....a lot of fun. Its a long read but below is the saga of building the engine......this pic is the same color and has a full moon roof like my car.



Buick/Rover/TR8 Aluminum 215-V8 Conversion
By Wil Bridges (USA)
        Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996           Published: 22-may-98     
See also extract from HOTROD magazine (Aug, 1985).

In the summer of 1993 a friend presented me an article published in your 1985 ABC issue of ABC Magazine detailing how to rebuild the humble little Buick aluminum 215 V8 into a potent powerplant for street/race use.

Since I had been driving a 1977 Triumph TR7 for some 8 years and 280,000 miles, I saw a chance to build my own TR8 engine and convert the wimpy little TR7 to a real roadster.
I began the process of collecting three or four 215's. four sets of '64 Buick 300 aluminum heads and three 300 cranks. I could not bear to pass up on of these little engines in the local "Pick Your Part" salvage yards. As luck would have it, another friend told me of two 1980 Rover 3500 SDI sedans for sale as a pair. This engine is the 1961-63 Buick 215 with some minor block, head and rocker arm assembly changes. The nice thing is, it is multiport fuel injected and solved my problem of smogging in California. The friend that gave me the article decided he wanted a Rover to drive so we bought the pair, he got his driver and I got an engine, transmission, smog equipment and a 3:08 ring /pinion and cluster gear set to replace the 3:90 gear set in the stock TR7 rear end. Obviously, I now have a surplus of 215 parts! This began a 14 month saga of my friend rebuilding his Rover and me building the engine of my choice based on your menu of part mix and match. I decided on the stock bore, 300 crank and heads, Chevy 283/327 rods, Vega pistons and Nova flywheel (more about this later on). This combination yields 4.3 liter displacement.
   
Since there is some machining involved with this project it gave a a wonderful opportunity to justify to the wife the purchase of a used 15 X 40 inch metal lathe from the local Maritime Academy Training School who was updating their machine shop. The selection of engine internals was heavily influenced by the fact that this car would continue to be my daily commute vehicle in San Francisco Bay Area traffic. Of 32 miles one way, about 20 miles was stop-and-go clutch-foot numbing traffic, so, I wanted an engine that would behave decently in that environment but still have impressive go-power when stood on. The choice of fuel system was the stock Rover (Lucas) system and control unit with the modification of machining a new adjustable top for the fuel pressure regulator so the fuel pressure could be increased from 36 psi to about 45psi at zero vacuum. The fuel pump is from a 280Z just because a new one was available at the right price. I also used a stock TR8 inertia switch in-line with fuel pump supply voltage. The Cylinder heads selected were 1964 Buick 300 aluminum heads( slightly larger intake valves than stock Rover heads) milled .060 to produce a cylinder head volume of about 43cc and yield a compression ratio of 9.25:1. The rocker arm assemblies were from the Rover heads as the rockers are significantly beefier. I wanted to use adjustable Volvo rockers (a nice light-weight steel unit) and had machined a set of inserts to match the Rover shaft diameter but closer measurement of the rocker ratio showed t hey were 1.5 and not 1.6. The cam had already been ground based on a 1.6 ratio. The rocker assembly supports were shimmed .045 to give good valve stem end wipe geometry and about .050 preload of the hydraulic lifters. The lifters are aftermarkets that are supposedly good to 6800 RPM. The cam profile selected is identical to stock Rover and Buick 215/300 with the exception that lobe height (intake and exhaust) was increased to yield .440 lift at the valve and take advantage of the slightly larger intake valves and assist in venting exhaust through slightly smaller exhaust valves. To contradict the immediate preceding statement, the flow test of the Buick 300 heads show that between .300 and .440 valve lift that little gain in air flow is realized. The 300 heads have significantly larger diameter intake and exhaust ports than the Rover/TR8 heads-they must really be restricted. Original intake valves were retained and a set of exhaust valves were machined from used junk yard valves( gimme a break-I just bought a new lathe). Additional head work only included light port polishing, slight relieving in the intake port area for injector spray clearance and valve guide reconditioning (note no mention of replacing the valve seats---leaded vs unleaded).

Block preparation included usual cleaning at ABC Machine Shop in Dublin, Ca. and the machining of an adapter( oh darn) for the rear main oil seal. The Rover crank is larger in diameter than the Buick 300 crank at the oil seal area so the adapter/spacer is needed to house the Chevy big block rear main seal. The top of the adapter is screwed to the block and the bottom is secured to the rear main cap as in your article. I elected not to bore the block oversize this go round so the cylinders were only honed to assist ring seating. Using the Buick 300 crank required reducing main journals a total of .200 and was the single most expensive expenditure in the project ($200 at ABC Crank regrinding in San Leandro, Ca). The block was very slightly relieved in one spot to allow crank counterweight clearance. Not sure if this is necessary with the Buick/Olds block. All freeze plugs were replaced- since I could not readily obtain the rear cam plug I had to machine one (oh darn). Other block components were stock Vega pistons and rings, late model 283/early 327 rods milled a total of .100 for journal fit on the big end. The bore for the Vega engine is listed at 3.501 inches-between this and not too much cylinder wear in the Rover engine, piston clearance ended up at .0025-.003 inch. Main bearings are stock mail order Rover/TR8, rod bearings are stock 283/327 bearings machined (oh darn) to make a wide as possible bearing surface and chamfered for crank filet clearance. The stock Rover timing chain/oil pump/distributor housing was discarded in favor of an early model Buick V6 housing. This allowed using a high capacity '64 Buick 300 oil pump and direct replacement of the Rover (Lucas) distributor with a stock post '74 Buick
 HEI distributor. The stock Rover oil pump is about 25% greater capacity than the stock 215 but about 15% smaller than the high capacity Buick 300 pump. Pump by-pass pressure is set at about 50 psi hot at 2000 rpm. Oil delivery channels in the Rover block and pump housing were left stock dimensions. The rope oil seal in the Buick front cover was replaced with a press-in neoprene seal. The Rover pan did include a windage tray that was retained as was the stock oil pickup. Using the 300 crank required modifying the flywheel as follows to accommodate using the stock Rover/TR8 5 speed gearbox and bellhousing. The Rover flywheel ring gear was retained and installed on a remachined surface on a Chevy Nova flywheel. This flywheel has an offset toward the block that made it easy to reposition the starter ring back into its original relationship with the starter. No starter mods were needed. The machined surface on the flywheel was left about .030 larger than i.d. of the Rover ring gear. The ring gear was heated in an oven at 450 degrees for an hour then shrink cooled onto the flywheel with no other means of retaining. The clutch disk side of the flywheel has a stepdown where the clutch disk mates. The step was machined off and the remaining groove in the flywheel surface was left. The stock Rover/TR8 clutch disk diameter ends at the groove and does not affect clutch performance. One of the flywheel-to-crank mounting holes was relocated (enlarged) about 1/8 inch to mate with the corresponding thread in the crank. The stock Rover clutch cover mates perfectly with the Nova mounting holes. The three clutch cover locating pins must be redrilled. The 300 crank/Nova flywheel combo results in the flywheel clutch surface extending into the Rover/TR8 bellhousing an additional .200 in. from stock. There is adequate clearance inside the bellhousing to accommodate the flywheel/clutch cover combo with no interference and the hydraulic clutch actuation mechanism (slave cylinder, pivot pin, throwout arm, throwout bearing, etc) needs no modification.

The engine components were fully balanced by ABC Machine Shop using the stock Buick 300 harmonic damper and appropriate drillings in the flywheel for external balance. I was lucky enough to find a TR8 in one of the Bay Area self service junk yards--needless to say I stripped it from bumper to bumper. This find shortened the install process immensely by using stock components vs fabricating many brackets, motor mounts, and other fasteners. I did not change to power steering as the increased front end weight is minimal and steering is not really much affected. The Lucas alternator was discarded in favor of a GM 78 amp unit. Since just the radiator fans draw some 32 amps when running at high speed (80 amps on startup) a 100 amp unit probably would not be over-kill for an A/C equipped car in hot climates. For a couple of months I had both fans running at high speed any time they came on and they slowly cooked a 68 amp alt. The distributor has 12 volts supplied through a relay that is energized from the ignition switch lead for the old distributor. This is probably overkill since I later measured only 2-3 amps consumption by the distributor. There is some interference between the dist housing and block at the front intake manifold hold down bolt. The bolt can be replaced with a oval head or hex head and/or the dist housing can be relieved slightly. There is just enough clearance for the sparkplug wires to clear the hood (touch lightly).

You can also use a Buick water pump and I even mounted a flex fan on the water pump to assist air flow in the engine compartment when radiator fans are not running. The radiator was custom built from a Saab (as I remember-checked out a lot of rad's). It has a high fin density and is a 3 core unit. It was already the right height and only had to cut about 3 inched off the length on the radial arm saw (50 tooth carbide blade) and resolder the end plate. Slightly reshaped the end tanks from a bad TR8 radiator and soldered them on. Used the stock TR8 mounting position for the radiator and stock electric fans wired in a low speed(series)/high speed(parallel) configuration based on radiator temp (180) and high speed if block temp exceeds 190.
I have been driving the engine for some 18 months and 37K miles with the following problems showing up.
At about 8K miles the #3 exhaust valve spring broke( yes they were the original '64 Buick springs) so I replaced them with aftermarket springs that at installed/compressed height have spring pressures of 95/200 lb.
At 18 K one of the bolts holding the even bank rocker arm assembly stripped out (increased spring pressure?) allowing some flexing and eventual breakage of the rocker arm shaft before I could get it home in commute traffic. I re-tapped the hole to the next larger metric size and reused one of the Rover shafts. I was very disappointed with this shaft breaking because I was lucky enough to find two NOS 300 Buick shafts to put the beefier Rover/TR8 rockers on and now have to go back to a used shaft. That's life!

The last 21K miles have been problem free as far as the engine rebuild/conversion goes--had to recondition a throttle position potentiometer that had worn through the resist compound and was causing a slight flat spot when running at steady throttle pressure. Also replaced the ignition module in the GM distributor (yeah it was used too), it would tend to quit entirely for about a half second on really hot days.
Of course, considerable time has been spent tweaking engine timing (currently 10 deg BTDC) and choice of sparkplugs. I would like to experiment with advancing cam timing some 2 to 4 degrees but it is such a pain to do. I don't have verified specs but, 0-60 mph seems in the 5.5-6 sec range. The engine winds 6000 easily and still has significant "set you back in the seat power" when accelerating from 100 mph. I estimate top speed to be 150-160 mph.
One thing is for sure--it is a kick to drive and it gets 20 mpg in commute traffic. I can't wait for the next rebuild, maybe bore and re-sleeve it to 5.0 liter!



Manoman....you sure seem to know a lot about rebuilding engines and restoration projects.  Sure wish I had learned more about mechanics at a earlier age.
Logged
klb
Member
*****
Posts: 761


Hickory nc


« Reply #51 on: July 27, 2022, 05:00:07 PM »

Had a lot of old cars over the years but the only one I
held onto was this 1969 Ford LTD with a 429-4V. I bought
it from the original owner a retired North Carolina
State Trooper for $800.00 in 1991 after years of talking
him down from $4800.00. When I bought it it was running
on 6 cylinders because of two bad plugs. He had a full set
of new plugs but only let me have 2 to get it running right.
Every other car he had left had the GM 5/8 plugs in them.
Tightwad  Grin
The second one a 1977 Chevrolet Monza 2+2 came out with
a 305 2 Barrel. Gave $2100.00 for it in 1986 The guy I bought
it from took a 1969 350 LT1 engine bored it 30 over and put
TRW 13.1 pistons it over with a Crower cam. 350 Turbo with a
shift kit. Fastest car I ever owned. At 55 mph I could pull it
down into 2nd gear and ease the throttle to the floor and it
would tear the tires up. Better judgement made me sell it
before I got in trouble.

Logged

Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16181


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #52 on: July 28, 2022, 02:50:19 PM »


But in 1985 I got to purchase a car for myself.  Having owned the 1959 MGA and a 1963 Austin Healy 3000, (both used and.... )....   I wanted a sports car but wanted something different.  So, in 1985 I purchased a 1985 Pontiac Fiero.   

Great car.  Did a few Autocrosses  and a lot of road rallies, mostly in South Carolina.  Oh, funny thing is I was not living in Newberry at the time but that is where I purchased the car, local Pontiac dealer. Joined the Sports Car Club of America and it was sort of a blast. 

The image below is almost exactly like the car I owned.  I don't remember when it was sold but my daughter did drive it a few times, before she managed to have an "accident.

Oh and one more thing, I installed an oil pre-lube system.  It had a hose connected to the oil pan drain (yeah I know) and when you turned on the ignition and pushed a button, a pump would run and get the oil pressure up so you did not start the car with "dry" bearings.  Never an issue but in hindsight.....




Those were some truly fun days......

Yep, I got addicted to these for quite a while but all of mine were 88 Formulas, never had any engine oil pressure issues but, we did a bunch of different drivetrain swaps.   Four cylinders to V6s, V6s to V8s, you name it, if we could figure out a way to swap one, we tried it.   Over the 15 years I had Fieros, there were as many as nine on my property at one time.   My total count was 22 Pontiac Fieros.   Kind of miss the last one, we dropped a 3800 Supercharged engine coupled to a 5 speed manual.   Was a blast to drive and there wasn't much it didn't leave at the traffic lights.

After my last one left, I missed not having a fun car to drive so, I went and bought another (no longer produced) Pontiac Solstice convertible.   I love driving it and will most likely keep it until I can't drive any longer.   It's just a 4 cyl. 5 speed car for cruising.   But, have considered a turbo upgrade just for grins and giggles.  Wink

Rams
Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
Rio Wil
Member
*****
Posts: 1352



« Reply #53 on: July 28, 2022, 05:08:39 PM »

At one point I had 4 TR&'s and a TR6 that were destined for restoration except one......it had a chevy 350 with 4 barrel and auto trans....i would go like crazy straight line but turning corners/curves sucked!!!!!
Logged
3fan4life
Member
*****
Posts: 6958


Any day that you ride is a good day!

Moneta, VA


« Reply #54 on: July 30, 2022, 04:09:11 AM »

Had a lot of old cars over the years but the only one I
held onto was this 1969 Ford LTD with a 429-4V. I bought
it from the original owner a retired North Carolina
State Trooper for $800.00 in 1991 after years of talking
him down from $4800.00. When I bought it it was running
on 6 cylinders because of two bad plugs. He had a full set
of new plugs but only let me have 2 to get it running right.
Every other car he had left had the GM 5/8 plugs in them.
Tightwad  Grin
The second one a 1977 Chevrolet Monza 2+2 came out with
a 305 2 Barrel. Gave $2100.00 for it in 1986 The guy I bought
it from took a 1969 350 LT1 engine bored it 30 over and put
TRW 13.1 pistons it over with a Crower cam. 350 Turbo with a
shift kit. Fastest car I ever owned. At 55 mph I could pull it
down into 2nd gear and ease the throttle to the floor and it
would tear the tires up. Better judgement made me sell it
before I got in trouble.




At 16 I took a 69 Galaxy XL with a 429 Cobra Jet for a test drive.

A thunderstorm hit and the car hydroplaned.

I managed to bash in all 4 corners while bouncing off of a bridge.

It came back to the dealer on a hook.

The salesman was livid, until my brother (the one I always called when i was in a jam) pointed out to them that the car had 4 bald tires and a fresh inspection sticker.

They changed their tune when he threatened to call the state police.


A friend of mine in high school had a Monza 2+2, if I remember correctly his came from the factory with a 305 CI engine.

Still it was a fast car and it stuck to the road pretty well in the turns.
Logged

1 Corinthians 1:18

Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: