Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
July 21, 2025, 03:25:35 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
MarkT Exhaust
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Send this topic Print
Author Topic: New rear tire mounted on front  (Read 1929 times)
Warlock
Member
*****
Posts: 1280


Magnolia, Ms


WWW
« on: October 24, 2010, 05:46:17 PM »

Got back from my ride in the mountains and front tire worn out. I've had the Avon 130/90/17 rear tire for a couple months. Speedo seems to be reading about the same as the stock 150/80/17. Hoping to be running some roads in the next few days and will see how it does. I mounted it backwards as some has done. Looking at the pattern on my other bike which has a Cobra 150/80/17 on  it looks correct mounted backward. I didn't put beads in this one. I had beads in the Bridgestone and only got 9700 miles out of it. The last Bridgestone I ran on the other bike got 15000 miles and was balanced. Don't know if the beads caused this, but both bikes had beads and the mileage is down on both front tires. Anyway will take a picture tomorrow and post it.
David
Logged


I don't want to hear the labor pains, I just want to see the baby
Fla. Jim
Member
*****
Posts: 459


#166 White City Florida, VRCCDS0143


« Reply #1 on: October 27, 2010, 10:21:13 PM »

Welcome to the very exclusive club of rear front riders. Where milage and grip are king.  ( - =

Logged

Warlock
Member
*****
Posts: 1280


Magnolia, Ms


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2010, 07:14:55 AM »

Welcome to the very exclusive club of rear front riders. Where milage and grip are king.  ( - =


Know what you mean. Car tire on rear and rear tire on front.
David
Logged


I don't want to hear the labor pains, I just want to see the baby
Bonzo
Member
*****
Posts: 1219



« Reply #3 on: October 28, 2010, 05:07:37 PM »

Wow! I am intrigued. How is the handling? What kind of tire?
Logged

Woops, I'm sorry.
Warlock
Member
*****
Posts: 1280


Magnolia, Ms


WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 28, 2010, 07:15:10 PM »

Wow! I am intrigued. How is the handling? What kind of tire?
Handles great so far. Here's the link and tire I used
http://www.jakewilson.com/productDetail.do?navTitle=Motorcycle+Tires&webCatId=57&navType=type&webTypeId=443&prodFamilyId=22938&listingId=&sizeAttr=5396
David
Logged


I don't want to hear the labor pains, I just want to see the baby
GJS
Member
*****
Posts: 424


Today is the tomorrow you worried about yesterday.

Vancouver Island, BC, Canada


« Reply #5 on: October 28, 2010, 10:12:58 PM »

I too am intrigued by a BIGGER front tire. I think I might try this.
But, why would one mount it backwards?
Logged

The tragedy of life is not that it ends so soon, but that we wait so long to begin it.
- W. M. Lewis
Warlock
Member
*****
Posts: 1280


Magnolia, Ms


WWW
« Reply #6 on: October 29, 2010, 07:14:20 AM »

I too am intrigued by a BIGGER front tire. I think I might try this.
But, why would one mount it backwards?
The way the tire is made to take the torque when applying power from the engine while on the rear end. Once you put it on the front turning it backwards while applying brakes it's appling the force in the same direction that the tire was made for. Hope this makes since. The tire not really any bigger. By using the 90 size it keeps the speed reading the same. Also where our stock tires has lets say 7/32 thread depth these tires had  11/32 thread depth. Don't know yet if this tire gives more mileage. If I didn't have to work I would find out in a short period of time Grin.
David
Logged


I don't want to hear the labor pains, I just want to see the baby
Ricky-D
Member
*****
Posts: 5031


South Carolina midlands


« Reply #7 on: October 29, 2010, 07:28:53 AM »

Ok Warlock.

You chose the 90 because it's closer to oem diameter.

What about the 150-70-17.  Do you think the 90 is a larger diameter than the 150?

I agree that the added tread depth ought to translate into more miles.

A rear tire on the front is next in store for me also.

Thanks

***
Logged

2000_Valkyrie_Interstate
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13510


South Jersey


« Reply #8 on: October 29, 2010, 10:10:20 AM »

Got back from my ride in the mountains and front tire worn out. I've had the Avon 130/90/17 rear tire for a couple months. Speedo seems to be reading about the same as the stock 150/80/17. Hoping to be running some roads in the next few days and will see how it does. I mounted it backwards as some has done. Looking at the pattern on my other bike which has a Cobra 150/80/17 on  it looks correct mounted backward. I didn't put beads in this one. I had beads in the Bridgestone and only got 9700 miles out of it. The last Bridgestone I ran on the other bike got 15000 miles and was balanced. Don't know if the beads caused this, but both bikes had beads and the mileage is down on both front tires. Anyway will take a picture tomorrow and post it.
David

from the JW site that is a V-rated tire. V-rated tire will wear out faster, its a softer compound than H-rated which valkyrie OEM tires are. Also until a V-rated tires warms up it will have less traction than a H-rated tire. at elevated speeds, extended time at speed and elevated ambient temps a H-rated tire will wear faster than a V-rated tire.
FYI
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Send this topic Print
Jump to: