In Case you need help voting tomorrow

[Skinhead]

I found this very informative

http://www.votesmart.org

[PAVALKER]

I already knew most of that (for my area of course).... but... it was nice to check it out and forward it.

No one person matched me 100%, of course, but it is nice to check out the comparison.  Assigning a weight value (issue importance to you) is interesting.

Thanks.

[Skinhead]

Your welcome.  With all the BS that has been flying around the last few days it was confusing trying to remember who was lying about what.  Thought that was an interesting way of clearing things up.

[TearlessTom]

Thanks for the site but I am a little confused how I could change my answers to the opposite answer and it would still give me the same candidates.

[Skinhead]

It didn't do that for me, I went back and tried it.  I guess I need one o them fast talkin' legal disclaimer dudes.

[Gangman036]

Might want to be careful about what exactly a 100% rating means.

US House 3 has a candidate Tom Metzger. In the bio section.........he doesn't mention that he was once the leader of WAR (White Aryan Resistance) a known hate group that used skinheads to commit assaults and murder. He also doesn't mention the time he and his son have spent in prison for hate crimes.

http://www.votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=127160

[TearlessTom]

It changed the percentage but not always the candidates. I think it may be due to the fact that some of the candidates have not commited to some issues when I looked a little futher into the research.

 It did change my mind on one candidate.

[Gangman036]

In Indiana

[Skinhead]

Might want to be careful about what exactly a 100% rating means.

US House 3 has a candidate Tom Metzger. In the bio section.........he doesn't mention that he was once the leader of WAR (White Aryan Resistance) a known hate group that used skinheads to commit assaults and murder. He also doesn't mention the time he and his son have spent in prison for hate crimes.

http://www.votesmart.org/bio.php?can_id=127160

I have no recollection of that incident, senator.

It changed the percentage but not always the candidates. I think it may be due to the fact that some of the candidates have not commited to some issues when I looked a little futher into the research.

 It did change my mind on one candidate.

Yes, I noticed the incumbents are reluctant to commit on some (most) issues, you need to look at whether they infered there response, or they did not respond at all.

[Gangman036]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Metzger

Just because a candidate responds to a group of questions..........means nothing. And any web page that post those results without backwashing the person to me means a lack of responsibility on their part as well as a preponderance to deception. Just like Valkyrie maintenance, best to do it yourself than to rely on someone else.   
I'm not trying to rain on anyones parade or sway your vote............just be sure who your voting for.

[Skinhead]

Read ya loud and clear, couldn't agree more.

[fstsix]

Still not sure?? Hummm??? I am still debating   

Jerry Brown admits he lies to get elected	powered by Aeva