The purpose of this post was not to say the 97's were better then the rest, but built a little different because they didn't have all the EPA crap on them at the time, among other things...Motorcycle Cycle Consumer News does a professional test with professional personel doing the testing....they don't ask someone off the street to come in for the test....the factory sends them a bike to be tested...so if I am a factory rep. would I send any bike or would I test a few myself and send the top one???
A lot of companies do not want them to test their products because they risk a poor report, such as Dyna beads......if you line up two identical bikes and race them, one will almost always be alittle faster, when Honda builts these bikes they all have tolerance spec.s to follow, some are on the mark, others are within the spec.'s, some are better balanced then others.....but the main purpose of the post was to say 97's were made a little different and never reproduced to those spec.'s again...with that being said, my 2001 Supervalk will out run my 97, go figure..

