GLOBAL gun control scheme?

[98valk]

With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the U.N. to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty." (this has been passed around to get passed since Clintons first term)

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

http://www.nagr.org/UN_lp_survey2.aspx?pid=key02&gclid=CN2T59a8jKYCFcfe4AodzEN4og

[..]

More news of the weird here

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/toy-guns-will-have-to-be-licensed-in-queensland-under-new-firearms-laws/story-e6frfku0-1225900889228

[..]

With willing one-world accomplices in Washington, D.C., gun-grabbers around the globe believe they have it made.

In fact, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton just announced the Obama Administration would be working hand in glove with the U.N. to pass a new “Small Arms Treaty." (this has been passed around to get passed since Clintons first term)

Disguised as legislation to help in the fight against “terrorism,” “insurgency” and “international crime syndicates,” the U.N.’s Small Arms Treaty is nothing more than a massive, GLOBAL gun control scheme.

http://www.nagr.org/UN_lp_survey2.aspx?pid=key02&gclid=CN2T59a8jKYCFcfe4AodzEN4og

A rebuttal here

http://www.snopes.com/politics/guns/untreaty.asp

The rest of the story here
http://www.poa-iss.org/PoA/poahtml.aspx

[FryeVRCCDS0067]

Here's a link to a letter to the editor I had published in a local paper last Thursday on this subject.

http://www.thebraziltimes.com/story/1690329.html

[Jess from VA]

Excellent letter.

Time for the UN to be kicked out of NYC to some socialist venue overseas, and the US contribution of $ to be no more than any other country.

[fordmano]

Time for the UN to be kicked out of NYC to some socialist venue overseas, and the US contribution of $ to be no more than any other country.

Those are almost the exact words I used when my Father-In-Law and I talked about this yesterday. Except I said cut the cash off completly.

[Jess from VA]

There is actually a debate as to whether it is in US interests to remain a member at all.  The self interested State Department would point out that we are a member of the UN Security Counsel and that UN membership gives us a useful platform to push US interests and to try to obstruct policies we don't like.  This is fine when we have a Right thinking conservative government, but sucks when we have socialists in power.... since the UN is perpetually a socialist organization. 

Whether it is in US best interests to remain a member of the UN is unclear, but the US should kick the UN out of the US, and drop it's contribution to the de minimus amount contributed by other countries, or quit entirely.   

That we pay huge money to that socialist organization (and to all worldwide disasters) and then Zero invites it to denigrate the US for human rights violations is an intolerable insult to every US taxpayer.