Ah, I see the game your playing. This is what I said:
"So, our supreme king has decided that a law is not constitutional and that the Department of justice will not defend this particular law.What's up with that!? It doesn't matter what the law is, it's the fact that he made the decision. this is unprecedented and scary. What law will he decide not to enforce next??? "
Hey, look at that, I said "defend", not enforce, pertaining to this law and you decide to take the enforce part and apply it to the first part of my statement, how convenient,... and misleading. Take the focus off the meat of the matter, nice try. Do you live in Singapore?
When you say “What law will he decide not to enforce next???” it applies to the previous statements. The word “next” needs something to precede it. Here’s an example: “bigvalkriefan stated his views on Obama’s decision. What misinformed commentary will he make next?” The second sentence implies that the first was misinformed.
I think that qualifies as hyperbole
