How Small we are!

[Jay]

They do exist. They do visit earth. They do have superior technology. But I don't care unless they are willing to share that technology. There are 2 problems that they must have solved, 1) is control of gravity, apparently scientists are searching for a particle in everything that makes things attract to the earth, 2) is control of time, I'm not saying forward or back, just that you don't want to spend all day getting from here to the moon .

And 3) is build a new Valkyrie.

[DarkMeister]

They do exist. They do visit earth. They do have superior technology. But I don't care unless they are willing to share that technology. There are 2 problems that they must have solved, 1) is control of gravity, apparently scientists are searching for a particle in everything that makes things attract to the earth, 2) is control of time, I'm not saying forward or back, just that you don't want to spend all day getting from here to the moon .

And 3) is build a new Valkyrie.

Perfect! A 3) that incorporates numbers 1) and 2)

[Rocketman]

I'm just not okay with declaring ant position other than my own as absurd.    

That leaves the obvious conclusion:  You are perfectly fine with declaring your own position as absurd. (:

A common flaw in logic is to assume that the exclusion of one case implies the inclusion of the obverse case.  (I see that any is misspelled.)

I have no real problem with assuming and absurd position.  I have a problem with my position being declared absurd in conjunction with the implication that an opposing position is obviously true.

Logic?  How did you bring that into the discussion?  It hadn't been used before, so I thought it was banned.  Moderators can break whatever rules they want, I suppose.