I have been interested in a crossover pipe. But on the stock set up there is no common chamber to do this. It is actually 6 individual runs. On my zx-14 I see they use balance tubes between the header pipes approx. 3/4 smaller. New idea: add balance tubes in a 45 bend to the outer 2 head pipes ( makes drilling easier ) And add tube across to connect remaining 2 head pipes. Would use the area after the double wall pipes behind covers so as not to be seen. I think it might help to balance these 6 cylinders. I like her quiet but want a boost! Thoughts?
what u want to do will require a lot of dyno tunning and carb work. A crossover will quiet it down, yet again carb work.
Re: CROSSOVER option available
Posted By: 98valk <
fitness7days@nospam.juno.com>
Date: 2/8/2005 at 17:44:40
In Response To: CROSSOVER option available (MarkT)
per a 11/91 circle track article, a same size crossover as the collector and in the case of the test was 3 1/2" provided the most torque in the 4500 to 5000 rpm range. no crossover the least torque. However no cross-over provided the best torque 3500 rpm and below although the 3 1/2" was not far behind, however in the 6000 to 6500 rpm range no cross-over made the most torque by a wide margin compared to the crossover. HP figures reacted the same also. As usual no free lunch. But, when using a crossover 1 inch smaller in this case 2 1/2" bottom rpm range was almost the same as no crossover, upper rpm range was also almost if not the same and in the midrange was only down about 5 lbs-ft. The 3 1/2" made 18 lbs-ft over no cross over. HP again follow the same pattern. Their testing also showed that the crossovers also leaned out the air/fuel ratio from 2 1/2" 13.0 to 13.5, 3" - 13.6 and the 3 1/2" - 13.4.
So to see a difference go one inch smaller than the collector and it looks like a re-jet on the mains would be in order or a Dial-A-Jet.