old man
|
 |
« on: April 18, 2015, 05:52:29 AM » |
|
Can someone provide a comparison between the Mustang and Ultimate seats? Thanks.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jess from VA
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2015, 06:27:09 AM » |
|
They are pretty close, size and shape and firmness wise, except the Mustang is flatter and the Ultimate has a raised nose. Also, the Ultimate Lowrider is a bit firmer than the Ult Bigboy. And Ultimate makes different seats for Interstate vs Tourer/Std, but Mustang makes one for all. Not counting the King Boy Ultimate, the slab mount drivers backrests are interchangeable. Mustang make a larger sissy pad than Ultimate. There is some difference in seat heights; lowboy an inch under stock (new stock, not 17yo stock), Bigboy an inch over stock. Mustang stock or a bit taller.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bonzo
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2015, 06:32:53 AM » |
|
I am a fairly large guy, 6'1" 385, I have an Ultimate King Big boy and I am very happy with it. It moves me up and back and makes for a much more comfortable ride on my '98 tourer
|
|
|
Logged
|
Woops, I'm sorry.
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2015, 07:02:23 AM » |
|
I have a Mustang on both my Valks and like them been riding Mustang for 20 years. Tried to ride a friends with an Ultimate for comparison and the nose of the ultimate makes it uncomfortatable for me as it doesn't leave room for the nut sack so to speak  about a mile and had to get off that seat. I think it also is a bit softer than the Mustang but I prefer a stiffer seat.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
mike72903
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2015, 08:10:34 AM » |
|
Agree with Bighead. Don't buy the Ultimate without trying it first. That raised front is a well know problem for many people. I have a mustang on both my bikes.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lyle Laun
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2015, 08:43:09 AM » |
|
Comfort is good on both seats but I would think your height would be the biggest factor. I'm 6' 2" tall and have the King Big Boy on one of my bikes and a Mustang on the other. The Ultimate moves me up and back and it gives me a lot better riding position regarding my feet on the pegs. Bottom line - if you're 6' 1" or taller, you will prefer the Ultimate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Get out & Ride !! 97 Red/White Standard dressed as Tourer 98 Black "Rat Rod" Standard 99 Green/Silver Interstate
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2015, 09:06:50 AM » |
|
I have to disagree I am 6'2" and like the Mustang better 
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
MarkT
Member
    
Posts: 5196
VRCC #437 "Form follows Function"
Colorado Front Range - elevation 2.005 km
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2015, 09:35:02 AM » |
|
The fact is seating is a very personal thing and what works for another might not be true for you and vice-versa. I have had both Mustang and Ultimate Big Boy (still have). The Mustang was more comfortable after break-in. After a couple hours I need to get off the Ultimate and walk around. Not so with the Mustang. I'm 6 ft 280 31 inseam. The Ultimate looks better, I like the backrest better. I suspect the Mustang pillion backrest is better with it's moved forward, wedge shape. Sits the passenger on her ass instead of tailbone. But I don't have an Ultimate pass. backrest. On the Big Boy, it crowds the "boys" but I can generally adjust them or my position. I'm pretty comfortable, at least until a couple hours have passed, with feet up on the highway pegs, leaning back on the backrest, and with pullback risers. I also want to get off the bike about every 2 hours anyway, on cross country rides. I also had the stock seat which was good for about 20 minutes (98 std) and the Rood saddle mod, which was absolutely the best. Not had a Russell, would love one, might get one for the wing. http://www.horseapple.com/Valkyrie/Tech_Tips/Rood_Saddle_Mod/rood_saddle_mod.htmlBTW my Ultimate seat pan, it's not as sturdy as the other seats were. I might have to strengthen it. I also modified the latch plate, installed a longer one. I'd suggest, see if you can borrow friend's seats and take them on long rides.
|
|
« Last Edit: April 19, 2015, 02:20:23 PM by MarkT »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vicnelson
Member
    
Posts: 32
'99 Tourer in Smoky Mt.
Prescott, AZ
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2015, 10:12:20 AM » |
|
I purchased my '99 Valk Tourer with a mustang seat. I have traveled cross country several times to the North West on stock seats and was in pain within 60 miles and a 350 mile day was max on my prior bike(s). After purchasing my Valk with the Mustang seat the very next day I drove 750 miles and only stopped to eat and gas up the bike every 100 miles or so. I was shocked at how long I could ride with this seat. Not only did I travel 750 that day but completed the remainder of the 1200 miles over the next two days. I like the MUSTANG seat. Two weeks later, I undertook a trip from AZ to the Key West and back in 9 days. I believe the only way I could undertake that trip in that short or a time was because of the the seat and a great bike. Four days ago I picked up a Honda Magna and it has a Mustang seat, a big factor in purchasing it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Farther
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2015, 10:19:15 AM » |
|
Just to have a third option, the "newer" (post 2000 I think) Valkyrie seat is pretty good too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thanks, ~Farther
|
|
|
Hook#3287
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2015, 05:05:53 AM » |
|
Just to have a third option, the "newer" (post 2000 I think) Valkyrie seat is pretty good too.
I have all three and my go to seat is the ultimate. The mustang is good also, just stiffer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
R J
Member
    
Posts: 13380
DS-0009 ...... # 173
Des Moines, IA
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2015, 06:57:58 AM » |
|
I started on the stock seat.
Got a 2000 seat.
Got a Mustang,
Got a Ultimate.
Got a Russell Day Long.
Sold the bike to my son and he prefers the Ultimate.
Your BUTT tells ya what to use for a saddle.
My choice is the Russell Day Long (and or) the Ultimate.
|
|
|
Logged
|
44 Harley ServiCar 
|
|
|
old man
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2015, 09:26:04 AM » |
|
Great replies and I really appreciate each of you for offering your views. In summary: one really has to try each one before really understanding which is best suited, however one thing is clear, a OEM 1999 Valk seat is not one of the best.
Thanks again
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: April 19, 2015, 09:31:05 AM » |
|
Great replies and I really appreciate each of you for offering your views. In summary: one really has to try each one before really understanding which is best suited, however one thing is clear, a OEM 1999 Valk seat is not one of the best.
Thanks again
That about sums it up 
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
|