For the Global warming crowd

[WilliamRS]

Yeah like reducing nukes of other countries we give them big money we don't have and they use that money to do what make more nukes to aim at us makes perfect sense it is clear as mud.

The 150 billion that Iran is getting is not our money and is not coming out of our pockets.

[MP]

Yeah like reducing nukes of other countries we give them big money we don't have and they use that money to do what make more nukes to aim at us makes perfect sense it is clear as mud.

The 150 billion that Iran is getting is not our money and is not coming out of our pockets.

I am sure that will be comforting to the families of those who are beheaded, burned to death, and otherwise tortured because that money is made available to terrorists.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Yeah like reducing nukes of other countries we give them big money we don't have and they use that money to do what make more nukes to aim at us makes perfect sense it is clear as mud.

The 150 billion that Iran is getting is not our money and is not coming out of our pockets.

I am sure that will be comforting to the families of those who are beheaded, burned to death, and otherwise tortured because that money is made available to terrorists.

I have no doubt Iran supports terrorism and plenty of other unsavory deeds. But if someone buys oil from them should they not pay for that oil ?

[..]

Yeah like reducing nukes of other countries we give them big money we don't have and they use that money to do what make more nukes to aim at us makes perfect sense it is clear as mud.

The 150 billion that Iran is getting is not our money and is not coming out of our pockets.

I am sure that will be comforting to the families of those who are beheaded, burned to death, and otherwise tortured because that money is made available to terrorists.

I have no doubt Iran supports terrorism and plenty of other unsavory deeds. But if someone buys oil from them should they not pay for that oil ?

Let's not be a user of that oil?

[The emperor has no clothes]

Yeah like reducing nukes of other countries we give them big money we don't have and they use that money to do what make more nukes to aim at us makes perfect sense it is clear as mud.

The 150 billion that Iran is getting is not our money and is not coming out of our pockets.

I am sure that will be comforting to the families of those who are beheaded, burned to death, and otherwise tortured because that money is made available to terrorists.

I have no doubt Iran supports terrorism and plenty of other unsavory deeds. But if someone buys oil from them should they not pay for that oil ?

Let's not be a user of that oil?

I agree. I don't think the U.S. purchased said oil. I believe it was mostly Asian countries that bought it.

[G-Man]

it was politicians that enacted laws that improved pollution from vehicles and power plants.

In the United States. There's a giant world out there moving from riding bicycles
to driving cars, and all that goes along with it, and unless it becomes cheap and
easy to drive hydrogen powered (or something) good cars, they're going to drive
gas powered good cars...

-Mike

Yes I agree. This is partly where politicians can come in. By creating treaties to help alleviate this.

So you don't think big brother is in your life enough now
And yeah we can come up with some GREAT agreement like the one with Iran over Nukes huh

Maybe you misunderstood me. I'm referring to treaties to reduce the pollution of other countries.

But why is it the American tax payers responsibility to clean up other countries?  The "treaties" you speak of is nothing more than another name for cap and trade, which is another name for redistribution of American wealth.

[G-Man]

In my opinion, global warming is like believing in a higher power. Can't prove it.....can't disprove it.
There is not a single person on the board that is smart enough to answer this question. That includes me.
Go for a ride.

Yet they want to tax Americans.

[G-Man]

The fact that the socialists have tied their wagon to this issue so tightly, used it to attack oil and gas production and use, taxed and regulated many businesses to near extinction, forced automakers to choke their cars with things that make them run bad and inefficiently, to justify putting 10 percent corn in gasoline, carbon credits, given away billions to alternative energy outfits that took the money and disappeared, and on and on, does nothing for the believability of the underlying theory.

You cannot believe them on almost any of their cockamamie theories, so why would anyone believe them on this one?  Science  (science unfettered by political agendas) certainly has not proved it.

I certainly support doing our best to not put vast pollution into the air (and water), but not to the point we cut our own throats or go back to horses, or line their pockets with vast amounts of our income in taxes so they can continue spending for all manner of foolishness and waste.

Can't go back to horses.  Horses fart, remember?

[Jess from VA]

Liars!

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/noaa-massively-ramps-up-their-temperature-fraud-ahead-of-paris/

[WilliamRS]

Liars!

https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/noaa-massively-ramps-up-their-temperature-fraud-ahead-of-paris/

that link would have more value if they spent a little time explaining why the two charts are different rather than just pointing a finger and saying 'liars'.  pointing out that there is a change isn't the same as explaining why the change itself is bogus.

here is why the 2014 and 2015 charts are slightly different:

http://www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/v3/techreports/Technical%20Report%20GHCNM%20No15-01.pdf

[RP#62]

Be careful.  The word must not be questioned.

http://dailycaller.com/2015/09/17/scientists-ask-obama-to-prosecute-global-warming-skeptics/#ixzz3m6i5gZfj

-RP