News:

If you're new to this message board, read THIS!

Main Menu
VRCC Calendar Ad

Front Forks

Started by TrapperAH1G, Fri 09, Oct 2026, 08:44:34

Previous topic - Next topic

TrapperAH1G

Anyone ever "slipped" the front forks in the triple tree to lower the front?  I've done this on other bikes, thinking of doing it to my Valk, say about 3/4".

Thanks

calcruiser

should be no harm in trying, done in a couple minutes and see if you like the look.  curious if you went with a new shorter rear shock and, if so what length?  i was thinking 11.5" would be right.  whitewalls look odd with the 12.25" stock shocks.

Willow

Carefully done should work.  I believe 3/4 inch should be about the limit.  Someone more knowledgeable may want to confirm that.

WintrSol

It will affect handling, of course, by reducing rake and trail.
98 Honda Valkyrie GL1500CT Tourer
Photo of my FIL Jack, in honor of his WWII service

98valk

Quote from: TrapperAH1G on Fri 09, Oct 2026, 08:44:34Anyone ever "slipped" the front forks in the triple tree to lower the front?  I've done this on other bikes, thinking of doing it to my Valk, say about 3/4".

Thanks

can't do that much. check the fork with the lower triple clamp. the fork greatly reduces in diameter, meaning thinner wall which means it can't safely handle the clamping forces. this was reported 20 yrs ago.
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798

TrapperAH1G

AI says 3/4" ok, can't do 1", then AI says even up to 1" is ok!  Love confusing AI!  And yes, AI states all fork tubes vary in wall thickness "to save weight"......really, how much weight can that save?

Gonna try 3/4".  Says it will "quicken" steering in corners and feel more responsive at lower speeds but not good for high speed stability.  Have 11.5" Progressive shocks on rear, lowering front is supposed to help "attitude compatibility" of the bike.  Always knew Valks have an attitude!  LOL

Thanks to all.

WintrSol

A previous owner replaced the rear shocks on mine with the air shock system from a Goldwing, so I can confirm that adjusting the fore/aft tilt, IOW rake/trail, will change the steering response. Lower in back, cornering is stiff and can 'push'; higher in back, the Dragon is a lot more fun. I can change from stability on the highway while pulling a trailer, to carving canyons with the push of the button.
98 Honda Valkyrie GL1500CT Tourer
Photo of my FIL Jack, in honor of his WWII service

98valk

Quote from: TrapperAH1G on Sat 10, Oct 2026, 09:30:54AI says 3/4" ok, can't do 1", then AI says even up to 1" is ok!  Love confusing AI!  And yes, AI states all fork tubes vary in wall thickness "to save weight"......really, how much weight can that save?

Gonna try 3/4".  Says it will "quicken" steering in corners and feel more responsive at lower speeds but not good for high speed stability.  Have 11.5" Progressive shocks on rear, lowering front is supposed to help "attitude compatibility" of the bike.  Always knew Valks have an attitude!  LOL

Thanks to all.

AI is crap 90% of the time. unstable the valkyrie has 5.98 trail number a GW1500 was about 4.3? trail number.  with lower shocks good chance the tire is hitting the fender where it clears the upper shock towers cross brace.  tire diameters also affect trail number. there are websites with calculators to determine trail number. Putting interstate triples trees on a std/tourer which I did, lowers the trail number.
with it being lowered for looks expect hitting hard parts when cornering hard at over 40mph.
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798