|
dancnman
|
 |
« on: October 31, 2015, 03:10:05 PM » |
|
I have gone crazier and almost blind going through potential Darkside tires for my Interstate.
I think I have narrowed it down to the General Altimax RT43 in 205/65/16 or
The Hankook Optimo 426 in 205/65/16.
I think the Hankook tire (UTQG 380AA) is way softer rubber but I can't find the UTQG rating for the General. I am also not sure if the softer rubber would handle any better. I just don't know.
I would appreciate if anyone has any experience with these tires or even an opinion to share it.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is that thing which does not change simply because I choose to ignore it.
|
|
|
Disco
Member
    
Posts: 4913
Armed Man=Citizen; Unarmed Man=Subject
Republic of Texas
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 31, 2015, 03:40:36 PM » |
|
I'm sure they'd both be fine. They look about as neutral as you can get in an asymmetrical tire. But why get an asymmetrical tread pattern when there are symmetrical options?
I'm pretty sure most of us Altimax riders are on the symmetrical HP. It's a very good tire and I recommend it, but a quick search suggests it's not being offered now (anymore?).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2000 Bumblebee "Tourer", 98 Yellow & Cream Tourer, 97 Rescue blower bike 22 CRF450RL, 19 BMW R1250RT 78 CB550K 71 Suzuki MT50 Trailhopper .jpg) VRCC 27,916 IBA 44,783
|
|
|
|
old2soon
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 31, 2015, 03:41:08 PM » |
|
Had an Altimax. I'm on an A T T-Austone Taxi Tire-now and has to be THE best D/S tire I've run so far. B T W-near as I can tell over 71000 D/S miles RIDE SAFE.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Today is the tommorow you worried about yesterday. If at first you don't succeed screw it-save it for nite check. 1964 1968 U S Navy. Two cruises off Nam. VRCCDS0240 2012 GL1800 Gold Wing Motor Trike conversion
|
|
|
|
dancnman
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: October 31, 2015, 03:58:57 PM » |
|
Disco, I thought both of my choices were symmetrical. Did I miss something entirely?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is that thing which does not change simply because I choose to ignore it.
|
|
|
|
dancnman
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2015, 04:00:52 PM » |
|
Had an Altimax. I'm on an A T T-Austone Taxi Tire-now and has to be THE best D/S tire I've run so far. B T W-near as I can tell over 71000 D/S miles RIDE SAFE.
What size is the Austone? Also, what is better about it than the Altimax you ran?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is that thing which does not change simply because I choose to ignore it.
|
|
|
|
CajunRider
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2015, 04:07:29 PM » |
|
The Austone is a 175R16 tire and about 1 inch taller than a stock MC tire (26.9 overall diameter). You'll run about 500-700 rpm less at any given speed in 5th gear. It also lifts the back of the bike a bit making it turn in easier, and the narrow width makes for minimal "bump steer".
I though it worked great while I had one... also pulled a Uni-go trailer with one several times without problems.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Sent from my Apple IIe
|
|
|
|
Pappy!
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 31, 2015, 05:43:54 PM » |
|
I think there are a few running the Hankook tires here . Seems to me Smokin Joe or someone else that rides with that group has them. Maybe they will chime in . Do a search for Hankook in the meantime and it might pop up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Cracker Jack
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2015, 06:00:49 PM » |
|
The Austone is a 175R16 tire and about 1 inch taller than a stock MC tire (26.9 overall diameter). You'll run about 500-700 rpm less at any given speed in 5th gear. It also lifts the back of the bike a bit making it turn in easier, and the narrow width makes for minimal "bump steer".
I though it worked great while I had one... also pulled a Uni-go trailer with one several times without problems.
When I put my taxi tire on, I measured the original tire diameter and the taxi tire diameter and as I remember the difference was about one inch as you state. The difference in RPMs as I remember was considerably less than 200 at 70 MPH. The RPM difference will be greater the faster you go and less for slower speeds. The speedometer error will be increased by about 2 MPH at 70 MPH as the front wheel will turn faster at any given speed. You will see increased bike lean on the side stand compared to the original tire. Another difference you will notice is that the bike is easier to get up on the center stand if you have one. 
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 31, 2015, 06:16:42 PM by Cracker Jack »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
RainMaker
Member
    
Posts: 6626
VRCC#24130 - VRCCDS#0117 - IBA#48473
Arlington, TX
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: October 31, 2015, 07:10:22 PM » |
|
The Austone is a 175R16 tire and about 1 inch taller than a stock MC tire (26.9 overall diameter). You'll run about 500-700 rpm less at any given speed in 5th gear. It also lifts the back of the bike a bit making it turn in easier, and the narrow width makes for minimal "bump steer".
I though it worked great while I had one... also pulled a Uni-go trailer with one several times without problems.
The speedometer error will be increased by about 2 MPH at 70 MPH as the front wheel will turn faster at any given speed. I'm unsure why the change in the rear time would have any effect on the speedometer as the speedometer is driven off of the front wheel.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 2005 BMW R1200 GS 2000 Valkyrie Interstate 1998 Valkyrie Tourer 1981 GL1100I GoldWing 1972 CB500K1
|
|
|
|
Cracker Jack
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: October 31, 2015, 08:46:53 PM » |
|
The Austone is a 175R16 tire and about 1 inch taller than a stock MC tire (26.9 overall diameter). You'll run about 500-700 rpm less at any given speed in 5th gear. It also lifts the back of the bike a bit making it turn in easier, and the narrow width makes for minimal "bump steer".
I though it worked great while I had one... also pulled a Uni-go trailer with one several times without problems.
The speedometer error will be increased by about 2 MPH at 70 MPH as the front wheel will turn faster at any given speed. I'm unsure why the change in the rear time would have any effect on the speedometer as the speedometer is driven off of the front wheel. You're 100%right. It will not affect the speedometer. I was thinking of using the rear D404 on the front which is a SMALLER diameter tire which will affect the speedometer. The other comments I made are correct. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Whiskey
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 01, 2015, 06:19:16 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 01, 2015, 07:08:56 AM by Mr Whiskey »
|
Logged
|
Peace, Whiskey.
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 01, 2015, 07:10:21 AM » |
|
Ive run 205/60, 205/65, and now 195/60. It seems the "65" fit with the most clearance. I think maybe the taller tire lines up better with the dimple in the shaft housing ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mr Whiskey
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 01, 2015, 07:17:11 AM » |
|
Ya, I edited my original post, had the #'s in my head backwards 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Peace, Whiskey.
|
|
|
|
dancnman
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: November 02, 2015, 04:45:20 AM » |
|
Thanks guys for all the help.
I finally decided on the General Altimax RT43. One reason is I could not find the Hankook 205/65/16 on the Tire Rack site. I could find the 205/60 but not the 65.
Mr. Whiskey served it up to me. I just could not find it with my blindness from looking at tires and more tires.
If the General doesn't work well, I will get the Hankook.
Meathead, thanks for your input as well. It all helps.
Jerry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is that thing which does not change simply because I choose to ignore it.
|
|
|
|