Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
November 20, 2025, 05:58:33 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Hillary Clinton's Policy on Gun Control and Abortion................  (Read 1571 times)
G-Man
Member
*****
Posts: 7910


White Plains, NY


« Reply #40 on: October 24, 2016, 09:37:56 PM »

If I must contribute to the cost, in the billions, of something I don't agree with, then I can say whatever the phuk I want to say about it.  And that goes for everyone else who is forced to contribute.  And who do you think you are to try and tell us we should have no say.  Refund all of my tax dollars that has gone to the entire abortion industry, THEN you can tell me I don't have say.  Until then, don't want to hear it, DON'T LISTEN ! ! !
There, you see?  You make a sound, valid point and then I get to respond - democracy in a nutshell.  If you don't want to listen, then that's OK too but is completely your own problem  Smiley

OK, so you don't feel that you should have to put any money towards the payments of abortions.  That's fine!

Then women also get to refuse to help pay for men's issues, such as ED treatment and its medications like Viagra et al.  Your ED problems, your inability to perform in bed to your SO, is not a life-or-death issue by any means so there is absolutely, positively, no reason why the general public must contribute funds to solve your personal and private issue.  The ED treatment system is worth billions between advertising, doctor samples, giveaways and insurance costs - no reason to make one thin dime of that come from the public, right?

Simple.  If some individuals get to play the "I don't want to pay for _____!!", then everyone else does, too.

I agree 100% with you.  I don't think ED medications should be paid for by the public either.  And as long I have to pay for it, I can express my displeasure with that as well!  A "right" shouldn't have to reach into someone else's pocket to exist.  I shouldn't have be hurt financially for someone else to receive a perk.

Logged
G-Man
Member
*****
Posts: 7910


White Plains, NY


« Reply #41 on: October 24, 2016, 09:47:06 PM »

The gubmint pays for pecker meds???   uglystupid2

Do they have a clinic called Planned Erections?

Some insurance companies cover ED meds

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=91538

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/30/hobby-lobby-viagra_n_5543916.html

which is what we're talking about: only 15 states cover abortions on government assistance (Medicaid) and this is a choice of each individual state legislature

https://fundabortionnow.org/get-help/medicaid

The federal government does not "pay for" abortions, hasn't since the Hyde Amendment of 1977.  And since ACA, all costs should be via for-profit insurance companies.  Now, it can be argued that federal funds now pay for abortions via subsidies for low income individuals under ACA, but as I note we can then also include federal subsidies via ACA that pay for selective treatments for gender-specific problems, too (Hobby Lobby's coverage of vasectomies for example, if any Hobby Lobby employees are getting any form of ACA subsidy then we are subsidizing the availability of vasectomies to them)


1st you say that 15 states cover abortions on gov't assistance, then you say the federal government does not "pay for" abortions. You do know that gov't assistance is Medicaid which the federal gov't pays for, via our taxes.  Some states receive Medicaid money without contributing to the system at all, they take from states with larger tax bases to cover the costs.  And the federal gov't also funds planned parenthood, which provides abortions (regardless of its percentages related to other services).  I even remember that was a bribe to few Democrat senators that weren't on board with the ACA.  That their states wouldn't have to contribute into the Medicaid side of things, they would just get the checks.  The Dem senator from LA even boasted that she received more in the bribe than was reported by FOX.  My how soon they forget.

I don't agree with any gender covered services.  I surely don't agree about the military health care having to pay for gender re-assignments either.  Like I said, A "right" shouldn't have to be paid for by taking money out of my pocket for it to survive.  Let them persu their own happiness by saving up for it, like I saved up for the things that make me happy.  Can't afford it, tough schite, I can't afford a Bentley which I KNOW will make me happy.

« Last Edit: October 24, 2016, 09:54:26 PM by G-Man » Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: