I'm not big on the political stuff

[Rams]

That should say "FLAWED", not weak candidate.  Most of us knew the Clinton Machine would be tough to beat.

What drove the majority of conservative voters was not any of the reasons listed in that depiction.   We recognize evil when we see it.

Rams

[Gavin_Sons]

 
Famous last words "He will NEVER be President "........and my favorite from Baldo himself....."Get used to saying Madam President "        

Just for you, my friend.

 

[Skinhead]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

[f6john]

All it took was a candidate that everyone said would never be President, and another candidate that was waiting to be anointed by her minions.

[Gavin_Sons]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

Yes, only Baldo's news sources are the right ones. 

[G-Man]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

Yes, only Baldo's news sources are the right ones. 

There have been SOOOOOOO many "news reports" put out by the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, even Reuters and BBC, that have been walked back or corrected days later and on page 36 under the fold or the quickest mention going to commercial in the second half of the show.  All negative and fake news lies that these "news"organizations were too willing to run,  all having unnamed sources.  I would love to see the running list of all these BS stories and lies. 

[G-Man]

 
Famous last words "He will NEVER be President "........and my favorite from Baldo himself....."Get used to saying Madam President "        

Just for you, my friend.

If it was just one or two things, maybe I could get there and say that it or they may have had something to do with her loss, but there are just way too many reasons and excuses.  You know what all those reasons and excuses amount to................  An Election.  Plain and simple.  And some of her excuses are so out there.  So racist, sexist, and demeaning.  Imagine if Trump were to say HALF of what she's saying? 

White women vote the way their husbands tell them. 

Racist, sexist, demeaning to women all in one statement.  And there was no outrage by the liberal/progressives/democrats who pretend to be champions for the races and women.  (sorry, not the white race)

Thank goodness there is only ONE way to win a presidential election in this wonderful country.  Was she a bad candidate, YES.  She lost.  This country was polarized long before the campaigns even started.  Lines were drawn.   I wish they could find just one person who said that the FBI, or Russia, or Wiki changed or persuaded their vote.  Just one. 

[baldo]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

Yes, only Baldo's news sources are the right ones. 

There have been SOOOOOOO many "news reports" put out by the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, even Reuters and BBC, that have been walked back or corrected days later and on page 36 under the fold or the quickest mention going to commercial in the second half of the show.  All negative and fake news lies that these "news"organizations were too willing to run,  all having unnamed sources.  I would love to see the running list of all these BS stories and lies. 

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

[Tx Bohemian]

This part I don't get:

"...in an election she won..."

SHE DID NOT WIN???

Maybe she got more votes in a couple of states but that's not how the "system" works!
A "system" that's been in place forever!


I suppose I'd be PO'd too if I spent my entire life in a career and didn't have a clue what I was doing!
And then have a newcomer just blow me away!!

[f6john]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

Yes, only Baldo's news sources are the right ones. 

There have been SOOOOOOO many "news reports" put out by the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, even Reuters and BBC, that have been walked back or corrected days later and on page 36 under the fold or the quickest mention going to commercial in the second half of the show.  All negative and fake news lies that these "news"organizations were too willing to run,  all having unnamed sources.  I would love to see the running list of all these BS stories and lies. 

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

I have, but I suspect I watch a lot more Fox than yourself.

[¿spoom]

Oh no! Hillary won, and didn't bother taking the oath of office? Strange, indeed. Yes, she was never a weak candidate, just a horrible one. I hope she's healthy and lives a long life. In prison.

[RainMaker]

My wife would not watch the returns on election night because she was sure that Secretary Clinton would win.  At 2am, she woke up and looked and started whooping and screaming so much it woke the whole house up.   We were happy with the results.

You've brainwashed your wife.  Whooping and screaming, Oh sure, like she would ever be happy about Secretary Clinton losing, unless she voted for Trump because you told her to.  Afterall, that's what the failed-candidate stated.  And her cronies said there would be a special place in the afterlife for women who didn't vote for her.  So you must have coerced her somehow.

Shame on you!  

I feel so ashamed.... not.  And whatever I tell her to do , she does.  Yeah, right.  Just like the Queen bows to all your wishes. 

[Willow]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.  ...

And that would speak not to Mr. Baldo's integrity but to his extreme depth of lack of understanding.

Just above you may see where Mr. Baldo posted a graphic and text that is pure BS but he doesn't know it is.   ???

[Skinhead]

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

That's 'cause they don't make any.

[hubcapsc]

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

That's 'cause they don't make any.

Google sees plenty of them:

site:foxnews.com correction

-Mike

[MAD6Gun]

 
Famous last words "He will NEVER be President "........and my favorite from Baldo himself....."Get used to saying Madam President "        

Just for you, my friend.

 

 Ok for all those that voted for Trump and got a phone call,text or e-mail from the Russians saying to do so raise your hand....NO. Didn't think so.

 Baldo her loss had nothing to do with what you listed. It had to do with Bengazi,uranium one,calling us all deplorable,tarmac meeting with Linch. ect,ect,ect. Name one. If you look up the word coruption her picture is next to it. How about that she is a champion of women's rights. What a joke. She ruined the women that dare accuse her husband of rape. She said that Margerate Sanger the racist founder of planed parenthood was one of her hero's.  She lied repeatedly to the families of four dead Americans after begazi. Do I need to go on?  Nobody cost her the election. SHE DID THAT ALL BY HERSELF.....

[G-Man]

I don't post anything that I know is BS. If I've ever posted anything that turns out to be wrong, incorrect, a load of crap, I've owned up to it and apologized.

I don't take the "that's my opinion and I don't care what you say" even though it's total bullshit approach. If someone puts out a lie, willingly puts it out there, they should own up to it when challenged. It doesn't do anyone any good to keep putting lies out there for others to take as gospel and continue to spread. Now that one line of crap becomes a larger pile of crap, and so on and so on. That's how you get Fox and others.

And Obama and Clinton and Pelosi and Reid and on and on....

Yes, only Baldo's news sources are the right ones. 

There have been SOOOOOOO many "news reports" put out by the Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, even Reuters and BBC, that have been walked back or corrected days later and on page 36 under the fold or the quickest mention going to commercial in the second half of the show.  All negative and fake news lies that these "news"organizations were too willing to run,  all having unnamed sources.  I would love to see the running list of all these BS stories and lies. 

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

I've seen FOX correct themselves.  I remember O'Reilly and Baer making corrections, even apologizing for the error.

[Willow]

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

I've seen FOX correct themselves.  I remember O'Reilly and Baer making corrections, even apologizing for the error.

Any minute now we'll have baldo posting an apology.  He does that every time he discovers that he has inadvertently posted BS.

[MAD6Gun]

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

I've seen FOX correct themselves.  I remember O'Reilly and Baer making corrections, even apologizing for the error.

Any minute now we'll have baldo posting an apology.  He does that every time he discovers that he has inadvertently posted BS.

 You are being sarcastic right Carl.???

[czuch]

The revolution would already be over.
The tree of liberty would be well watered.

[baldo]

You're absolutely correct, I've seen the same thing. The funny thing is, barring the ones that rush to get the story out and have it wrong, the only ones I ever see correcting their errors are the non-Fox level sources. I've never seen Fox or Breitbart acknowledge an 'inaccurate' report.

I've seen FOX correct themselves.  I remember O'Reilly and Baer making corrections, even apologizing for the error.

Any minute now we'll have baldo posting an apology.  He does that every time he discovers that he has inadvertently posted BS.

Nope, this doesn't qualify. I'll let you know when it does...

[Pappy!]

Fox News doesn't HAVE to apologize as often........!!

[baldo]

Fox News doesn't HAVE to apologize as often........!!

They just don't bother.

[JFaje1]

Fox News!

https://youtu.be/7rJ9LCHxi8o

John

[Robert]

Pretty interesting that all that Smith could ask about was the president and ties to Russia and Wallace was getting tired of the question. They need to get rid of Smith or at least keep him on a shorter leash.

Ask the question get the answer and move on dont try to keep bringing the narrative back to that ONE question. It could have been such a better interview with so many more points on this historic interview but Smith lost the importance and openness of this moment. Sad really, just sad and to me it reflects the same hysterical fever pitch of the ultra left like Antifa.

What I only hear is the ones that in some trouble criticizing the president. These same people are the players that were sabotaging the US. Brennan and Mc Cain have no credibility.


The world wants open boarders but on their terms and control. This moment when 2 sovereign countries finally start talking without all the spooks, Clinton's and bankers of the world could be a historic moment to world wide trade and peace. Why is everyone so afraid of this, nothing was promised, nothing was traded, nothing was done to destabilize the world. It was a meeting much less grievous than when Obama visited Saudi Arabia and whats more its out in the open, not done under the table as a spook show and only certain parties controlling the narrative.

Its much less grievous than Irans  deal when Obama promised folded and lied to the American people about a deal that would promote world destabilization, was covered in graft and corruption, was supported by a plane loads of cash, and illeagal payments and WE did not know any of the terms or conditions and were not included on this at all.

Why did Hillary meet privately with the Russians and receive 140 million and give away 1/5 of our uranium under in closed doors and NO ONE SAID ANYTHING, if Russia was the bad boy on the block? Yet when Trump walks in the front door all the terror jockies come out and spew garbage and terror? IF it was done it secret with 140 mil wasn't that worse than Trump getting nothing except maybe a better relationship with Russia?

Man wouldn't it be something if the Russian hackers released all the information on the DNC servers and we saw all the corruption of the Democratic party, now I bet that would put the fear in them. There is so much more that should be revealed.

[G-Man]

Fox News doesn't HAVE to apologize as often........!!

They just don't bother.

Then you're calling me a liar?

 

[G-Man]

..... selling our country out to Russia. .....

Pray tell, how so?  And please, don't leave out the important details, like facts.  Oh, and please do leave out the unsubstantiated talking points of the left that were provided by unnamed sources.  OK?  Ready?  GO!

[Robert]

Right From Wikileaks HUMMMM

The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), founded in 1921, is a United States nonprofit think tank specializing in U.S. foreign policy and international affairs. It is headquartered in New York City, with an additional office in Washington, D.C. Its membership, which numbers 4,900, has included senior politicians, more than a dozen secretaries of state, CIA directors, bankers, lawyers, professors, and senior media figures.

The CFR meetings convene government officials, global business leaders and prominent members of the intelligence and foreign-policy community to discuss international issues. CFR publishes the bi-monthly journal Foreign Affairs, and runs the David Rockefeller Studies Program, which influences foreign policy by making recommendations to the presidential administration and diplomatic community, testifying before Congress, interacting with the media, and publishing on foreign policy issues.

In an anonymous piece called "The Sources of Soviet Conduct" that appeared in Foreign Affairs in 1947, CFR study group member George Kennan coined the term "containment". The essay would prove to be highly influential in US foreign policy for seven upcoming presidential administrations. Forty years later, Kennan explained that he had never suspected the Russians of any desire to launch an attack on America; he thought that it was obvious enough and he did not need to explain it in his essay. William Bundy credited the CFR's study groups with helping to lay the framework of thinking that led to the Marshall Plan and NATO. Due to new interest in the group, membership grew towards 1,000

Dwight D. Eisenhower chaired a CFR study group while he served as President of Columbia University. One member later said, "whatever General Eisenhower knows about economics, he has learned at the study group meetings."The CFR study group devised an expanded study group called "Americans for Eisenhower" to increase his chances for the presidency. Eisenhower would later draw many Cabinet members from CFR ranks and become a CFR member himself. His primary CFR appointment was Secretary of State John Foster Dulles. Dulles gave a public address at the Harold Pratt House in New York City in which he announced a new direction for Eisenhower's foreign policy:


"There is no local defense which alone will contain the mighty land power of the communist world. Local defenses must be reinforced by the further deterrent of massive retaliatory power." After this speech, the council convened a session on "Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy" and chose Henry Kissinger to head it. Kissinger spent the following academic year working on the project at Council headquarters. The book of the same name that he published from his research in 1957 gave him national recognition, topping the national bestseller lists.

In November 1979, while chairman of the CFR, David Rockefeller became embroiled in an international incident when he and Henry Kissinger, along with John J. McCloy and Rockefeller aides, persuaded President Jimmy Carter through the State Department to admit the Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, into the US for hospital treatment for lymphoma. This action directly precipitated what is known as the Iran hostage crisis and placed Rockefeller under intense media scrutiny (particularly from The New York Times) for the first time in his public life. In his book White House Diary, Carter wrote of the affair, "April 9 [1979] David Rockefeller came in, apparently to induce me to let the shah come to the United States. Rockefeller, Kissinger, and Brzezinski seem to be adopting this as a joint project..."


Hillary Clinton admits that the CFR runs the Government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LYq3TaBik64

Hillary says I wont have so far to go to receive my marching orders or how to think about the future. REALLY IM MEAN REALLY and NO ONE says anything.

So a bought entity is telling the US politicians and people what to do and we think we are a free society.

I thought it was the people of the US that had a say in their government. Like government by and for the people, not the Rockefellers, Soros, Clintons,Bushes, and all the players dividing up our country for their own gain.

We are the masses, we do have the power, we need unity to establish a government that works for us. But without the truth then we are doomed to the show and programing, Who are you, a fine Americans or a thinker?

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.–That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."

[baldo]

Fox News doesn't HAVE to apologize as often........!!

They just don't bother.

Then you're calling me a liar?

 

Where in the snuggle am I calling you a liar?

[G-Man]

Fox News doesn't HAVE to apologize as often........!!

They just don't bother.

Then you're calling me a liar?

 

Where in the snuggle am I calling you a liar?

I stated that I am witness to FOX apologizing and correcting items that were incorrectly reported in response to your assertion that they don't this.

Above, you doubled down by saying they don't bother (apologizing). 

So, you are either ignoring my testament, or calling me a liar.  Both are really the same.

[bscrive]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

[Moonshot_1]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

Baldo wasn't "responding to Pappy". Baldo was making a blanket statement about FOX news. Perfectly fine to respond to such a statement.

[The emperor has no clothes]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

Baldo wasn't "responding to Pappy". Baldo was making a blanket statement about FOX news. Perfectly fine to respond to such a statement.

When one quotes another member, generally they are responding to that statement. When one desires to make a blanket statement, they quote nobody. When one desires to be insulted they read something that wasn’t said.

[Wizzard]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

Baldo wasn't "responding to Pappy". Baldo was making a blanket statement about FOX news. Perfectly fine to respond to such a statement.

When one quotes another member, generally they are responding to that statement. When one desires to make a blanket statement, they quote nobody. When one desires to be insulted they read something that wasn’t said.

Why would anyone "desire" to be insulted???. Unless they are masochistic?

[The emperor has no clothes]

Good question Randy. I don’t know the answer. But I know it to be true.

[Moonshot_1]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

Baldo wasn't "responding to Pappy". Baldo was making a blanket statement about FOX news. Perfectly fine to respond to such a statement.

When one quotes another member, generally they are responding to that statement. When one desires to make a blanket statement, they quote nobody. When one desires to be insulted they read something that wasn’t said.

Wish to respond to a particular individual, use the message function. Whether you quote someone or not, what you post on an open forum is posted on an open forum for everyone's perusal and response.

[G-Man]

G-man,
I think you need a time out and stop seeing things that are not there.  Baldo was responding to Pappy, not you.

Baldo wasn't "responding to Pappy". Baldo was making a blanket statement about FOX news. Perfectly fine to respond to such a statement.

When one quotes another member, generally they are responding to that statement. When one desires to make a blanket statement, they quote nobody. When one desires to be insulted they read something that wasn’t said.

Wish to respond to a particular individual, use the message function. Whether you quote someone or not, what you post on an open forum is posted on an open forum for everyone's perusal and response.

Wow, at first I was just kidding around, which is why I used the emoji of the guy with the eyes bulging.  Baldo and I have NEVER gotten into it with each other.  Yes, we differ on EVERYTHING, but we've met, shook hands, maybe there was a bro-hug.  We've ridden together and broke bread together.  I have NO ill feelings or wishes towards Baldo.  I was even concerned when I saw he was in the car accident and was glad to see he is OK.

When he snuggled me in his reply, I just stated my thoughts.

I was never insulted and never, ever, look to be insulted.  When I am insulted, you'll know it.

But as usual, someone who wasn't part of it just had to chime in, because it's just what he does and who he is, and he knows who I am talking about.

[bscrive]

 

[The emperor has no clothes]

  = joking, kidding, etc.
  = WTF !

[Bighead]

= joking, kidding, etc.
  = WTF !

To you,but as opions differ so do interpretations.