The courts have granted constitutional rights to illegal immigrants making it impossible to remove them out of the country. We have the ACLU and the 9th circuit to thank for this ruling that will be appealed. Even though by law were prohibited from ruling on these type of cases. The courts not politicians gave the many groups there victory, its time to STOP RULING BY COURT DECREE.
As it is with many rulings so it is that when the people are not favorable to a position held by the progressives, the courts will bend to their demands and institute laws over the will of the people. Even if it not only invalidates a majority vote by the people but breaks the law by ruling on the issue.
National Guard’s Border Deployment Led To 23,034 Arrests, 35,000 Pounds Of Drugs Seized
Illegal Alien With Lengthy Criminal Record Arrested For Murder Of California Woman; 9 ICE Detainers Were Ignored.
The article from Zero Hedge below.
We’ve seen over and over again how lower courts create a legal, political, and policy momentum for creating new rights. If they are not nipped in the bud and delegitimized immediately, they wind up growing and eventually being codified, even if initially reversed by the Supreme Court. This has happened with almost every phantom right created by the courts and has already begun with immigration law. We are at the cusp of the courts doing with immigration what they did with abortion and gay marriage, even though it took years for the Left to win in those cases. All of the justices except for Clarence Thomas succumb to pressure to varying degrees and will eventually go along with much of the anti-sovereignty doctrine building in the lower courts.
There is something much bigger occurring here. Putting aside particular smaller areas of immigration law, the legal profession has now pulled the trigger on a long-standing goal of what they refer to as “applying constitutional norms” to foreign nationals, not just in terms of criminal proceedings, but in the context of immigration claims themselves.
It’s truly hard to overstate the outrageously harmful effects of Thursday’s Ninth Circuit ruling. For the first time in our history, the courts have fabricated a constitutional right for those denied asylum to appeal to federal courts for any reason.
In past cases, the courts merely twisted statutes and contorted their plain meaning. In this case, for the first time ever and in direct contrast to a ruling by the Third Circuit in 2016, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the immigration statute that denies the federal courts jurisdiction to hear such appeals is unconstitutional under the constitutional requirement of habeas corpus, thereby giving 7.8 billion people in the world habeas corpus access to our courts. This will allow numerous illegal aliens, including the brand-new ones entering now, to stay indefinitely while they litigate themselves into status. The ACLU, which of course led this lawsuit on behalf of a Sri Lankan migrant denied asylum, wasn’t kidding when it proclaimed, “The historical and practical importance of this ruling cannot be overstated.”
What is so outrageous about this case is that Congress explicitly stripped the courts of any jurisdiction to hear such claims. The reason why the district judge, who was an Obama appointee, refused to even hear this case is because 8 U.S.C. §1252(e)(2) prohibits the federal courts (not to be confused with DOJ administrative courts) from hearing habeas corpus claims against expedited removal of those denied their credible fear claims unless of course they have a claim that they are a citizen or a legal permanent resident.
While Everyone Sleeps, The Courts Are Abolishing All Immigration Enforcement
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-03-13/while-everyone-sleeps-courts-are-abolishing-all-immigration-enforcement
