Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
November 21, 2025, 07:12:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: For you Obama / Hillary haters who think they want to destroy the 2nd Amendment  (Read 1637 times)
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #40 on: June 06, 2016, 11:22:52 AM »

I propose an Amendment to Oss's moratorium . Article IX Section B : let hearsaid moratorium begin June 6.
Logged
RP#62
Member
*****
Posts: 4114


Gilbert, AZ


WWW
« Reply #41 on: June 06, 2016, 04:24:22 PM »

After all, this is the time of year for booby posts.
-RP

Logged

 
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13661


South Jersey


« Reply #42 on: June 06, 2016, 05:56:15 PM »

from her own demon filled UN marxist dictator mouth...

While arguing for the government’s “right” to regulate the Second Amendment, Clinton twice refused to say the people have “a constitutional right” to keep and bear arms.

The first time Stephanopoulos asked if “an individual’s right to bear arms is constitutional” Clinton sidestepped the question, claiming instead the government’s “right” to regulate.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-refuses-say-right-bear-arms-constitutional/

Government has a right to regulate the Second Amendment, Hillary Clinton said in an interview on the June 5 airing of This Week With George Stephanopoulos,

Clinton contended that Americans have historically recognized the government’s “right” to regulate the bearing of arms, suggesting that it was not until District of Columbia v Heller (2008) that anyone thought otherwise.

Stephanopoulos asked, “Do you believe an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right? That it’s not linked to the service in the militia?”

Clinton responded:

    I think that for most of our history there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment, until the decision by the late Justice [Antonin] Scalia. And there was no argument until then that localities, and states, and the federal government had a right–as we do with every amendment–to impose reasonable regulations.


Hillary Clinton just isn’t sure if the Second Amendment guarantees the right to “keep and bear arms.”

Talking Sunday morning with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Clinton was as wiggly as could be answering the question.
http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/hillary-wont-say-if-second-amendment-guarantees-gun-rights

Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Jess from VA
Member
*****
Posts: 30865


No VA


« Reply #43 on: June 06, 2016, 06:30:49 PM »

Since she rarely tells the truth about anything, it really doesn't matter what she says, does it?

Logged
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13661


South Jersey


« Reply #44 on: June 06, 2016, 06:57:52 PM »

Since she rarely tells the truth about anything, it really doesn't matter what she says, does it?



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liar_paradox
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Alpha Dog
Member
*****
Posts: 1557


Arcanum, OH


« Reply #45 on: June 07, 2016, 04:57:47 AM »

from her own demon filled UN marxist dictator mouth...

While arguing for the government’s “right” to regulate the Second Amendment, Clinton twice refused to say the people have “a constitutional right” to keep and bear arms.

The first time Stephanopoulos asked if “an individual’s right to bear arms is constitutional” Clinton sidestepped the question, claiming instead the government’s “right” to regulate.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/06/05/hillary-clinton-refuses-say-right-bear-arms-constitutional/

Government has a right to regulate the Second Amendment, Hillary Clinton said in an interview on the June 5 airing of This Week With George Stephanopoulos,

Clinton contended that Americans have historically recognized the government’s “right” to regulate the bearing of arms, suggesting that it was not until District of Columbia v Heller (2008) that anyone thought otherwise.

Stephanopoulos asked, “Do you believe an individual’s right to bear arms is a constitutional right? That it’s not linked to the service in the militia?”

Clinton responded:

    I think that for most of our history there was a nuanced reading of the Second Amendment, until the decision by the late Justice [Antonin] Scalia. And there was no argument until then that localities, and states, and the federal government had a right–as we do with every amendment–to impose reasonable regulations.


Hillary Clinton just isn’t sure if the Second Amendment guarantees the right to “keep and bear arms.”

Talking Sunday morning with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Clinton was as wiggly as could be answering the question.
http://downtrend.com/robertgehl/hillary-wont-say-if-second-amendment-guarantees-gun-rights




I caught those out takes yesterday.  In another paraphrased if we have the right.  Well there you go.
Old White house pal Georgie was a really grilling her yesterday.  I will bet she got on the horn to Big Pappa Bill and told him ( or threw an ashtray according to Secret Service for old times sake ) to scold the heck out of George.  Does he not remember who he is talking to?  Stay on the script outlined for you George.  No Christmas gift for you this year.  Guess she will have to go see them folks over on pmsnbc for the next softball game.

According to some constitutional lawyers I have heard recently that Heller case in 2008 is one to be fearful of.  If they could get it revisited in some manner with the right court ( guess is would be a very very left court ) and go after the militia wording and prove there is no militia or need for one in this day then they could scrap it.  Now that is frightening.

Really liked what you wrote Jess - this is exactly what would happen.  There is no doubt the far left always has wanted to do away with the 2nd and will not rest until that happens.  Doubt me - when leftist take over they always come for the guns and that is historical all over the world.  The UN indeed will always be after us to get rid of those guns.

Shot straight and safe my friends.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: