courts working to elect Trump...

[hubcapsc]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/09/court-no-right-to-carry-concealed-weapons-in-public.html

[Gavin_Sons]

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/09/court-no-right-to-carry-concealed-weapons-in-public.html

The blind leading the blind

[..]

Drip, drip, drip.

[Roadog]

  "Law abiding citizens carrying concealed weapons threatens the law abiding public" .  ???  Soooo  criminals will still be carrying their concealed weapons...soooo the law abiding public IS SAFER  .  !!  ??  I've said it before but it bears repeating.  "If a conservative does'nt like guns, they dont buy one,..if a liberal doesn't like guns they don't want ANYONE to have one " .  Gun control has very little to do with guns and everything to do with control.    If H gets in this is an example to what we can expect from a liberal supreme court .  JMHO.

Roadog

 

[..]

  "Law abiding citizens carrying concealed weapons threatens the law abiding public" .  ???  Soooo  criminals will still be carrying their concealed weapons...soooo the law abiding public IS SAFER  .  !!  ??  I've said it before but it bears repeating.  "If a conservative does'nt like guns, they dont buy one,..if a liberal doesn't like guns they don't want ANYONE to have one " .  Gun control has very little to do with guns and everything to do with control.    If H gets in this is an example to what we can expect from a liberal supreme court .  JMHO.

Roadog

 

Usual hypocrisy from the Lib/Dem/Progs.

Those hypocrites that can do carry and those who really are hypocrites will have armed people around them.

It's one rule for them and another for the masses.

[Jess from VA]

Who could expect any different from the notoriously liberal 9th Circuit?

The ruling was 7-4.  The seven are liars who abandoned their oaths of office.   They should be put under the jail.

A 4-4 split in SCOTUS would leave the ruling in place, for the states in the 9th circuit.  The decision has precidential value everywhere, but is not binding on the other Circuits.



How long do we have to wait for that BIG earthquake?  Come on mother nature, get with the program.

[Jersey mike]

1 judge abstained and I don't know why if you read the reason for not voting it seems that judge does not agree with the majority vote.

[FryeVRCCDS0067]

If there was ever a doubt about the gravity of the upcoming presidential election I don't see how there could be a doubt now.

The next president's Judicial pick will decide if this is wrong, or if this becomes the new interpretation of the 2nd Amendment for the whole country.

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people they evidently knew were unarmed. If the thugs and criminals nationwide were guaranteed all of us were unarmed when in public, what do you think would happen? Imagine your family, your wife, your daughters surrounded by thugs in the street who know none of you have the right to be armed?

That's the Hillary future.

[hubcapsc]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

[FryeVRCCDS0067]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

[Jess from VA]

If the money was followed to the end, I wouldn't be surprised if it was taxpayer money.

[hubcapsc]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

I just checked npr.org's political posts from yesterday, I didn't
see it there. I googled the subject, and people have been
talking about it for a few months... "it's true!" "it's false!"

-Mike

[FLAVALK]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

I just checked npr.org's political posts from yesterday, I didn't
see it there. I googled the subject, and people have been
talking about it for a few months... "it's true!" "it's false!"

-Mike

More info here

http://abcnews.com.co/donald-trump-protester-speaks-out-i-was-paid-to-protest/

[baldo]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

I just checked npr.org's political posts from yesterday, I didn't
see it there. I googled the subject, and people have been
talking about it for a few months... "it's true!" "it's false!"

-Mike

Well here you go....from those pesky liberals at Snopes and others....

http://www.snopes.com/craigslist-ad-trump-rally/

http://www.snopes.com/donald-trump-protester-speaks-out/

https://theintercept.com/2016/04/03/trump-campaign-spread-dirty-meme-paid-protesters/

[Wizzard]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

[baldo]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

[Gavin_Sons]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

[baldo]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

[Ramie]

NO, they don't want to take your guns.  They just don't want you to be able to use them to defend yourself or your family. 
Guns are scary looking and someone might get upset and have a traumatic experience if they saw one.

[Wizzard]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

You prove my point exactly,, you rely on snopes for whatever reason because it speaks TRUTH in your opinion. Many other sites that you say are BS are someone else's truth. Seems to me that we all have our own definition of truth and what we choose as truth is what fits our opinions closely.

Maybe Nicholson got it right,, "we can't handle the truth"   

[Roadog]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

I would like to see your proof that snopes IS reliable and TRUTHFUL.   

Roadog

[Gavin_Sons]

https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/snopes-com-exposed-left-wing-website-not-quite-the-impartial-arbiter-of-truth/

maybe i should snopes this? 

[baldo]

https://jdlong.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/snopes-com-exposed-left-wing-website-not-quite-the-impartial-arbiter-of-truth/

maybe i should snopes this? 

Gavin, did you miss the part when I asked for your link to 'proven to lie' ? We'll address this other a bit later. I'm out the door for work.

[The emperor has no clothes]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

You prove my point exactly,, you rely on snopes for whatever reason because it speaks TRUTH in your opinion. Many other sites that you say are BS are someone else's truth. Seems to me that we all have our own definition of truth and what we choose as truth is what fits our opinions closely.

Maybe Nicholson got it right,, "we can't handle the truth"   

Wizzard, I find it hard to believe that you think Infowars and Breitbart are arbiters of truth. 

[baldo]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

I just checked npr.org's political posts from yesterday, I didn't
see it there. I googled the subject, and people have been
talking about it for a few months... "it's true!" "it's false!"

-Mike

Well here you go....from those pesky liberals at Snopes and others....

http://www.snopes.com/craigslist-ad-trump-rally/

http://www.snopes.com/donald-trump-protester-speaks-out/

https://theintercept.com/2016/04/03/trump-campaign-spread-dirty-meme-paid-protesters/

For a little twist.....http://www.mediaite.com/online/bruce-campbell-calls-out-hoax-bloodied-trump-supporter-is-actually-an-evil-dead-actress/

[Wizzard]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

You prove my point exactly,, you rely on snopes for whatever reason because it speaks TRUTH in your opinion. Many other sites that you say are BS are someone else's truth. Seems to me that we all have our own definition of truth and what we choose as truth is what fits our opinions closely.

Maybe Nicholson got it right,, "we can't handle the truth"   

Wizzard, I find it hard to believe that you think Infowars and Breitbart are arbiters of truth. 

You might find it hard to believe a lot of stuff I don't speak about.
But we can still be friends. 

[The emperor has no clothes]

Yes we can 

[baldo]

How is it that snopes is the only authority? Every website is false except for snopes? I find that hard to believe. And some choose snopes to be the ONLY voice? Why?
I like to  research things as best I can, but to rely solely on one site as TRUTH?

When I Google things like this, Snopes is usually the first few hits. There are others, but usually from sites that I'm not familiar with. Then there are always the sites that Snopes is refuting. I don't think those are suitable, right? They're usually from the notoriously BS sites like Infowars and Breitbart that, shall we say, like to 'embellish' the story.

I'm sure if I were to spend more time, I could come up with others, but I just don't have that much time. You guys keep me pretty busy sometimes...

but snopes is a left leaning organization that receives money from liberals. They have been proven to lie. Point is, you can't trust anything on the internet for factual information. Even if it is factual the liberals won't see it as fact.

Gavin, I'd love to see your proof that Snopes has been 'proven to lie'. I've only seen assertions from folks that claim it to be so, but there's never any backup. I'm serious, I'd really like to see it.

You prove my point exactly,, you rely on snopes for whatever reason because it speaks TRUTH in your opinion. Many other sites that you say are BS are someone else's truth. Seems to me that we all have our own definition of truth and what we choose as truth is what fits our opinions closely.

Maybe Nicholson got it right,, "we can't handle the truth"   

Wizzard, I find it hard to believe that you think Infowars and Breitbart are arbiters of truth. 

You might find it hard to believe a lot of stuff I don't speak about.
But we can still be friends. 

You two should get a room.....

[The emperor has no clothes]

Uh Bob.... I don't know if you are aware of the tradition at Inzane. All rookies are put together with the more conservative members to keep them in line.    Seriously though you guys have a good time in WV. 

[baldo]

Uh Bob.... I don't know if you are aware of the tradition at Inzane. All rookies are put together with the more conservative members to keep them in line.    Seriously though you guys have a good time in WV. 

It would appear that there's been some slackin going on......

[Gryphon Rider]

You might find it hard to believe a lot of stuff I don't speak about.
But we can still be friends. 

You two should get a room.....

Is that what "friends" do in Massachusetts?  I'm glad my friends have a different idea of what friendship entails. 

[baldo]

You might find it hard to believe a lot of stuff I don't speak about.
But we can still be friends. 

You two should get a room.....

Is that what "friends" do in Massachusetts?  I'm glad my friends have a different idea of what friendship entails. 

GR, I think you've got something mixed up here. ...

[DK]

We've all seen the videos of the anti-Trump thugs attacking innocent people

I occasionally switch on NPR when I get in the car after work.

I did yesterday.

They were interviewing people who were paid ($20 or $50, I don't remember
which) to be disruptive protesters at a Trump rally...

-Mike

Unreal. Did they say who supplied the money?

Trump, most likely.