Talk about being out of touch????? Warning Hillary centric.

[Pete]

Hillary Clinton complains about being held to a higher standard than everybody else.

She needs to stop taking those loonie pills.

[RainMaker]

But she is correct - she is held to a different standard.  Just check the FBI - anyone else would have been charged.  Look at her past statements - against gay marriage, then for it.  In favor of NAFTA, then never for it.  For the TPP, then against it.  And the media doesn't care.  A republican plagiarized a speech and it's a national story.  Hillary flip-flops on multiple issues and no one cares.  So yes, it is a different standard.

[Moonshot_1]

The "Clinton Standard" as I believed Mrs. Clinton called it, is quite unfair.

I think she should only be held to the "Nixon Standard" as she was on the staff of the independent counsel during the Nixon era, or maybe the "Petraeus Standard"

[Pete]

The "Clinton Standard" as I believed Mrs. Clinton called it, is quite unfair.

I think she should only be held to the "Nixon Standard" as she was on the staff of the independent counsel during the Nixon era, or maybe the "Petraeus Standard"

Or the "I lied on the Nixon independent council and was fired" standard.

[Patrick]

The "Clinton Standard" as I believed Mrs. Clinton called it, is quite unfair.

I think she should only be held to the "Nixon Standard" as she was on the staff of the independent counsel during the Nixon era, or maybe the "Petraeus Standard"

Or the "I lied on the Nixon independent council and was fired" standard.

Thats a quote ?

When did she ever admit that ?

I understand Watergate started her illicit career or at least made the country aware of her, but, I can't say I recall her admitting to any wrong doings.

[MP]

The "Clinton Standard" as I believed Mrs. Clinton called it, is quite unfair.

I think she should only be held to the "Nixon Standard" as she was on the staff of the independent counsel during the Nixon era, or maybe the "Petraeus Standard"

Or the "I lied on the Nixon independent council and was fired" standard.

Thats a quote ?

When did she ever admit that ?

I understand Watergate started her illicit career or at least made the country aware of her, but, I can't say I recall her admitting to any wrong doings.

Don't know if she "admitted" to it, but she WAS fired for it!

[The emperor has no clothes]

The "Clinton Standard" as I believed Mrs. Clinton called it, is quite unfair.

I think she should only be held to the "Nixon Standard" as she was on the staff of the independent counsel during the Nixon era, or maybe the "Petraeus Standard"

Or the "I lied on the Nixon independent council and was fired" standard.

Thats a quote ?

When did she ever admit that ?

I understand Watergate started her illicit career or at least made the country aware of her, but, I can't say I recall her admitting to any wrong doings.

Don't know if she "admitted" to it, but she WAS fired for it!

Its been posted numerous times and been proven wrong just as many. Yet some continue the false story.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/clintons/zeifman.asp
When living in a bubble a person should come out for fresh air on occasion .

[Pete]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.

As for Snopes they are no more believable than any other Internet site. And have been wrong before, without admitting it. Kinda like a certain democrat politician (you pick you favorite).

Anyone that accepts and or cites a single Internet site as the truth teller well ............. might want to wake up.
 
Yes she was fired by the lead council, the allegation was because she was lying repeatedly and yes there are multiple reports/reporters.

Was I there to observe it no but it is not as if she has a record of NEVER lying.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.

As for Snopes they are no more believable than any other Internet site. And have been wrong before, without admitting it. Kinda like a certain democrat politician (you pick you favorite).

Anyone that accepts and or cites a single Internet site as the truth teller well ............. might want to wake up.
 
Yes she was fired by the lead council, the allegation was because she was lying repeatedly and yes there are multiple reports/reporters.

Was I there to observe it no but it is not as if she has a record of NEVER lying.

believe what you want 

[Pete]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.

As for Snopes they are no more believable than any other Internet site. And have been wrong before, without admitting it. Kinda like a certain democrat politician (you pick you favorite).

Anyone that accepts and or cites a single Internet site as the truth teller well ............. might want to wake up.
 
Yes she was fired by the lead council, the allegation was because she was lying repeatedly and yes there are multiple reports/reporters.

Was I there to observe it no but it is not as if she has a record of NEVER lying.

believe what you want 

Do not worry I will. Having done more research on the issue than you or Snopes there is no doubt in my mind. Granted some of it is he said/she said and it no longer really matters. But it does speak to what she is now and how she got there.

And no they did not use the word fired when she was "released", as you know they (lawyers) seldom do.

Have fun but please quite accepting Snopes as the proof of anything with additional verification.
And yes you may believe what you want also.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.

As for Snopes they are no more believable than any other Internet site. And have been wrong before, without admitting it. Kinda like a certain democrat politician (you pick you favorite).

Anyone that accepts and or cites a single Internet site as the truth teller well ............. might want to wake up.
 
Yes she was fired by the lead council, the allegation was because she was lying repeatedly and yes there are multiple reports/reporters.

Was I there to observe it no but it is not as if she has a record of NEVER lying.

believe what you want  

Do not worry I will. Having done more research on the issue than you or Snopes there is no doubt in my mind. Granted some of it is he said/she said and it no longer really matters. But it does speak to what she is now and how she got there.

And no they did not use the word fired when she was "released", as you know they (lawyers) seldom do.

Have fun but please quite accepting Snopes as the proof of anything with additional verification.
And yes you may believe what you want also.

Would you care to cite some of your proof ?

[Pete]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.

As for Snopes they are no more believable than any other Internet site. And have been wrong before, without admitting it. Kinda like a certain democrat politician (you pick you favorite).

Anyone that accepts and or cites a single Internet site as the truth teller well ............. might want to wake up.
 
Yes she was fired by the lead council, the allegation was because she was lying repeatedly and yes there are multiple reports/reporters.

Was I there to observe it no but it is not as if she has a record of NEVER lying.

believe what you want 

Do not worry I will. Having done more research on the issue than you or Snopes there is no doubt in my mind. Granted some of it is he said/she said and it no longer really matters. But it does speak to what she is now and how she got there.

And no they did not use the word fired when she was "released", as you know they (lawyers) seldom do.

Have fun but please quite accepting Snopes as the proof of anything without additional verification.
And yes you may believe what you want also.

Would you care to site some of your proof ?

NO I will not do your research for you and you know it. it would make no difference, most only believe there own research anyway, me included. Notice I do not ask for your research or reference sites.
 
I am really not trying to convince you of anything. There is as much or more reports and persons on one side as there is on the other. As for PROOF (you word), who knows either way except a few lawyers that probably cannot or will not remember it correctly or truthfully, her included.

Based on her recent history, would you believe anything she says?

[Roadog]

Has she ever admitted to any wrong doing anywhere, anytime.
It is un-democratic for any democrat to ever admit wrong doing.



Based on her recent history, would you believe anything she says?

..........NO answer to that one ??   THAT will never be answered by the left.

 I think it is russia's fault..no , it could be Bush's fault. Bush did it .


Roadog