|
dinosnake
|
 |
« Reply #40 on: November 24, 2016, 04:15:50 PM » |
|
I usually do not like to jump into the middle of a viper pit but, lest you forget, allow me to remind you of something: The man hasn't even officially been elected much less sworn in and the Lefties are already arm chair quarterbacking Trump's administration as if the can read the future.
...
Trump is in Clinton out. That's more than enough for me right now. How bout we give him a chance to take the reins and see how he does.
Ah. I think "Don't treat him like they did Obama", is what you meant to say.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chrisj CMA
|
 |
« Reply #41 on: November 24, 2016, 05:33:32 PM » |
|
I usually do not like to jump into the middle of a viper pit but, lest you forget, allow me to remind you of something: The man hasn't even officially been elected much less sworn in and the Lefties are already arm chair quarterbacking Trump's administration as if the can read the future.
...
Trump is in Clinton out. That's more than enough for me right now. How bout we give him a chance to take the reins and see how he does.
Ah. I think "Don't treat him like they did Obama", is what you meant to say. You think wrong
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Moonshot_1
|
 |
« Reply #42 on: November 24, 2016, 06:04:31 PM » |
|
I usually do not like to jump into the middle of a viper pit but, lest you forget, allow me to remind you of something: The man hasn't even officially been elected much less sworn in and the Lefties are already arm chair quarterbacking Trump's administration as if the can read the future.
...
Trump is in Clinton out. That's more than enough for me right now. How bout we give him a chance to take the reins and see how he does.
Ah. I think "Don't treat him like they did Obama", is what you meant to say. And the media is not treating Trump like they did Obama. I don't see the media fawning and gushing over him at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mike Luken
Cherokee, Ia. Former Iowa Patriot Guard Ride Captain
|
|
|
Valker
Member
    
Posts: 3035
Wahoo!!!!
Texas Panhandle
|
 |
« Reply #43 on: November 24, 2016, 06:25:12 PM » |
|
...and when Obama was elected, I don't remember ANY opponents rioting, burning, destroying, etc.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I ride a motorcycle because nothing transports me as quickly from where I am to who I am.
|
|
|
|
Serk
|
 |
« Reply #44 on: November 24, 2016, 06:36:16 PM » |
|
...on this day of thanks, I am truly thankful for many, MANY things, not the least of which is: 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never ask a geek 'Why?',just nod your head and slowly back away...  IBA# 22107 VRCC# 7976 VRCCDS# 226 1998 Valkyrie Standard 2008 Gold Wing Taxation is theft. μολὼν λαβέ
|
|
|
|
Pappy!
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: November 25, 2016, 06:36:58 AM » |
|
Whats this about California contributing so much? Wasn't it California that, not too long ago, was about to declare bankruptcy? I think a couple of its major LIBERAL cities led the way and had to be bailed out. BTW - out of those 2 mil votes that the Beast supposedly beat Trump with how many were your illegals??
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: November 25, 2016, 06:53:02 AM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
RP#62
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: November 25, 2016, 07:04:12 AM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
Do you have something that shows how much each state pays to the Federal government? The assertion was "We pay far more to the federal government than we receive." Without knowing how the above rankings were derived, there's no way to prove or disprove the assertion. -RP
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: November 25, 2016, 07:13:23 AM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
Do you have something that shows how much each state pays to the Federal government? The assertion was "We pay far more to the federal government than we receive." Without knowing how the above rankings were derived, there's no way to prove or disprove the assertion. -RP I will look later. I'm messing with my tank emblems right now.  I didn't copy and paste that chart well. As I understood it, the first set of numbers are the amount of money per capita for personal money received from the Feds. The second set was the number per capita the State government got from the Feds. (At least that's how I understood it)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gavin_Sons
Member
    
Posts: 7109
VRCC# 32796
columbus indiana
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: November 25, 2016, 07:27:48 AM » |
|
Everything I read california is highly dependent on the government. They can not make it on their own.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: November 25, 2016, 07:30:47 AM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
Do you have something that shows how much each state pays to the Federal government? The assertion was "We pay far more to the federal government than we receive." Without knowing how the above rankings were derived, there's no way to prove or disprove the assertion. -RP If the Table is titled "Dependent on the Federal government", wouldn't it be safe to assume that means they pay more into than take back? Why would numbers matter? The chart shows it.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: November 25, 2016, 07:36:08 AM » |
|
Whats this about California contributing so much? Wasn't it California that, not too long ago, was about to declare bankruptcy?
Yes, when it had a Republican governor. Shwarzenegger was guv from '03-'11. Jerry Brown from '11 to current. From what I've read in the past, Calif is doing pretty damn well right now. He's done alot to straighten out the state. Some members here from Cali might have more insight on this, I'm out the door for work....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oss
Member
    
Posts: 12764
The lower Hudson Valley
Ossining NY Chapter Rep VRCCDS0141
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: November 25, 2016, 09:48:17 AM » |
|
so it would seem against their interest that all those people dependent on the federal gov. voted for Trump, or if you prefer against Clinton
To me it says that many of those good people would rather work than receive money for nothing
Romney was wrong that % will vote for a Republican and it does matter
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you don't know where your going any road will take you there George Harrison
When you come to the fork in the road, take it Yogi Berra (Don't send it to me C.O.D.)
|
|
|
|
RP#62
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: November 25, 2016, 11:42:01 AM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
Do you have something that shows how much each state pays to the Federal government? The assertion was "We pay far more to the federal government than we receive." Without knowing how the above rankings were derived, there's no way to prove or disprove the assertion. -RP If the Table is titled "Dependent on the Federal government", wouldn't it be safe to assume that means they pay more into than take back? Why would numbers matter? The chart shows it..... Just the opposite. If they pay in more than they receive, then they wouldn't be dependent on the federal government. If they're on the list at all, then we just talking about to what degree they're dependent, whereas the assertion was that they aren't dependent at all. I'll have to read the article though and see how they define dependent. -RP
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: November 25, 2016, 12:08:53 PM » |
|
This is the ranking of states from most dependent on the Federal Government to the least.
Rank (1 = Most Dependent) State Total Score ‘State Residents’ Dependency’ Rank ‘State Government’s Dependency’ Rank 1 Mississippi 62.08 11 1 2 New Mexico 55.45 2 8 3 Alabama 53.00 5 9 4 Louisiana 51.29 39 2 5 Tennessee 50.07 20 3 6 Montana 49.51 12 6 7 South Dakota 49.34 19 4 8 Kentucky 47.37 10 12 9 West Virginia 46.64 7 16 10 Missouri 45.07 30 5 11 Georgia 44.12 26 7 12 Maine 44.03 13 10 13 Arizona 42.64 14 14 14 South Carolina 40.98 4 30 15 North Dakota 40.49 1 50 16 Wyoming 40.39 24 11 17 Idaho 39.73 18 15 18 Indiana 39.52 15 20 19 Oregon 38.96 27 13 20 Oklahoma 38.83 16 17 21 Vermont 36.74 21 21 22 Maryland 36.22 6 33 23 Rhode Island 35.39 31 18 24 Michigan 33.16 34 23 25 Ohio 32.97 45 19 26 North Carolina 32.89 33 25 27 Arkansas 32.77 37 22 28 Pennsylvania 31.68 17 29 29 Texas 31.67 41 24 30 Florida 31.43 29 28 31 Iowa 30.22 40 27 32 Nebraska 30.22 42 26 33 Utah 27.81 22 31 34 Wisconsin 24.93 23 36 35 Colorado 23.89 28 35 36 Washington 23.49 25 37 37 Hawaii 23.38 3 49 38 Massachusetts 22.94 43 32 39 Virginia 22.59 9 47 40 Alaska 21.69 8 48 41 New York 21.07 46 34 42 New Hampshire 19.57 44 38 43 Minnesota 17.31 48 39 44 Nevada 17.10 32 43 45 Illinois 16.36 47 40 46 California 16.25 36 42 47 Kansas 15.78 38 44 48 New Jersey 14.76 49 41 49 Connecticut 13.42 35 46 50 Delaware 12.90
Do you have something that shows how much each state pays to the Federal government? The assertion was "We pay far more to the federal government than we receive." Without knowing how the above rankings were derived, there's no way to prove or disprove the assertion. -RP If the Table is titled "Dependent on the Federal government", wouldn't it be safe to assume that means they pay more into than take back? Why would numbers matter? The chart shows it..... Just the opposite. If they pay in more than they receive, then they wouldn't be dependent on the federal government. If they're on the list at all, then we just talking about to what degree they're dependent, whereas the assertion was that they aren't dependent at all. I'll have to read the article though and see how they define dependent. -RP Good point......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pappy!
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: November 25, 2016, 03:55:57 PM » |
|
Whats this about California contributing so much? Wasn't it California that, not too long ago, was about to declare bankruptcy?
Yes, when it had a Republican governor. Shwarzenegger was guv from '03-'11. Jerry Brown from '11 to current. From what I've read in the past, Calif is doing pretty damn well right now. He's done alot to straighten out the state. Some members here from Cali might have more insight on this, I'm out the door for work.... Wrong again, Baldo! Here is a list of the top five largest cities....... The 5 Biggest Municipal Bankruptcies In U.S. History. ... Detroit, Michigan (2013) ... Jefferson County, Alabama (2011) ... Orange County, California (1994) ... Stockton, California (2012) ... San Bernardino County, California (2012) Now lets see here....Who was in charge in 2012? Of course am sure you will blame it on Arnold. Hmmm....it seems most are LIberal left leaning cities.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: November 25, 2016, 04:03:24 PM » |
|
Whats this about California contributing so much? Wasn't it California that, not too long ago, was about to declare bankruptcy?
Yes, when it had a Republican governor. Shwarzenegger was guv from '03-'11. Jerry Brown from '11 to current. From what I've read in the past, Calif is doing pretty damn well right now. He's done alot to straighten out the state. Some members here from Cali might have more insight on this, I'm out the door for work.... Wrong again, Baldo! Here is a list of the top five largest cities....... The 5 Biggest Municipal Bankruptcies In U.S. History. ... Detroit, Michigan (2013) ... Jefferson County, Alabama (2011) ... Orange County, California (1994) ... Stockton, California (2012) ... San Bernardino County, California (2012) Now lets see here....Who was in charge in 2012? Of course am sure you will blame it on Arnold. Hmmm....it seems most are LIberal left leaning cities. I believe we're talking about states, not cities and counties. Try and keep up.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pappy!
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: November 25, 2016, 04:04:53 PM » |
|
LOL wrong yet again!! Go back and read my post............. Oh, and try and keep up will ya'? 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: November 25, 2016, 04:09:42 PM » |
|
LOL wrong yet again!! Go back and read my post............. Oh, and try and keep up will ya'?  YOU'RE the only one talking about cities. Everyone else , including the original post, is talking about states.. Try to focus.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Moonshot_1
|
 |
« Reply #60 on: November 25, 2016, 04:28:32 PM » |
|
LOL wrong yet again!! Go back and read my post............. Oh, and try and keep up will ya'?  YOU'RE the only one talking about cities. Everyone else , including the original post, is talking about states.. Try to focus. Well, cities are smaller than states. So that means he's KEENLY focused! 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Mike Luken
Cherokee, Ia. Former Iowa Patriot Guard Ride Captain
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #61 on: November 25, 2016, 04:59:12 PM » |
|
LOL wrong yet again!! Go back and read my post............. Oh, and try and keep up will ya'?  YOU'RE the only one talking about cities. Everyone else , including the original post, is talking about states.. Try to focus. Well, cities are smaller than states. So that means he's KEENLY focused!  Lol....forests and trees come to mind... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Pappy!
|
 |
« Reply #62 on: November 25, 2016, 05:14:14 PM » |
|
Was talking about states and cities based on a comment from Daddy0 that mentioned California contributing so much. Pretty much turned to states after my post. Anyway, as usual, you ignore the facts and try to change the focus point.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2016, 05:36:25 PM » |
|
Huge drain? How do you figure? We pay far more to the federal government than we receive. That's the main reason we can't leave, y'all can't afford to pay for yourselves so you need California to pick up the tab.
Was talking about states and cities based on a comment from Daddy0 that mentioned California contributing so much. Pretty much turned to states after my post. Anyway, as usual, you ignore the facts and try to change the focus point.
It doesn't appear Daddie O said anything about cities. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2016, 05:59:24 PM » |
|
Huge drain? How do you figure? We pay far more to the federal government than we receive. That's the main reason we can't leave, y'all can't afford to pay for yourselves so you need California to pick up the tab.
Was talking about states and cities based on a comment from Daddy0 that mentioned California contributing so much. Pretty much turned to states after my post. Anyway, as usual, you ignore the facts and try to change the focus point.
It doesn't appear Daddie O said anything about cities.  Don't try and confuse things with facts, MH.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
baldo
Member
    
Posts: 6961
Youbetcha
Cape Cod, MA
|
 |
« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2016, 06:00:58 PM » |
|
Was talking about states and cities based on a comment from Daddy0 that mentioned California contributing so much. Pretty much turned to states after my post. Anyway, as usual, you ignore the facts and try to change the focus point.
Again, YOU'RE the only one that ever mentioned cities, so just give it up. Maybe eat some turkey???
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Romeo
Member
    
Posts: 1612
J.A.B.O.A.
Romeo, Michigan
|
 |
« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2016, 06:38:00 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have. He's NOT HILARY CLINTON.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #67 on: November 25, 2016, 08:42:33 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have. He's NOT HILARY CLINTON.
I hadn't heard anything about him being homophobic. I thought he was pretty accepting of gays.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dinosnake
|
 |
« Reply #68 on: November 25, 2016, 09:37:32 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have.
And the problem with "us deplorable conservatives" is that you see that as a positive. A lack of understanding of history, as usual. I suggest you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson"Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic"? Possibly not even close. And Jackson's 'reign' wasn't a happy one for the American public, ending in the Panic [steep recession / depression] of 1837 which outlasted his very presidency by 4 years. Read the "Legacy and memory" section - does the character analysis by Alexis de Tocqueville sound familiar? Essentially, he was a jerk. His years were full of controversies, as the records show. But the people of the 'budding' United States thought that was a positive, seen as "forceful" and "decisive", and they paid for it, in the case of the Native Americans with their lives and in the case of the white Americans with years of impoverishment. Hopefully things won't turn out as bad, but Trump isn't even in his administration yet and the news is full of his controversies. And so we never learn, do we? "Those Who Fail to Heed the Lessons of History..."
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 25, 2016, 09:52:18 PM by dinosnake »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Gavin_Sons
Member
    
Posts: 7109
VRCC# 32796
columbus indiana
|
 |
« Reply #69 on: November 26, 2016, 07:25:10 AM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have.
And the problem with "us deplorable conservatives" is that you see that as a positive. A lack of understanding of history, as usual. I suggest you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson"Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic"? Possibly not even close. And Jackson's 'reign' wasn't a happy one for the American public, ending in the Panic [steep recession / depression] of 1837 which outlasted his very presidency by 4 years. Read the "Legacy and memory" section - does the character analysis by Alexis de Tocqueville sound familiar? Essentially, he was a jerk. His years were full of controversies, as the records show. But the people of the 'budding' United States thought that was a positive, seen as "forceful" and "decisive", and they paid for it, in the case of the Native Americans with their lives and in the case of the white Americans with years of impoverishment. Hopefully things won't turn out as bad, but Trump isn't even in his administration yet and the news is full of his controversies. And so we never learn, do we? "Those Who Fail to Heed the Lessons of History..." It's cute how you believe everything yoy read on the internet. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dinosnake
|
 |
« Reply #70 on: November 26, 2016, 08:46:56 AM » |
|
It's cute how you believe everything yoy read on the internet.  It is far cuter that, using for example a topic like climate change, people go into absolute denial mode when reality does not jive with their pre-conceived political, ideological or religious agenda. And then these people call other people "entitled". 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Willow
Administrator
Member
    
Posts: 16769
Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP
Olathe, KS
|
 |
« Reply #71 on: November 26, 2016, 08:52:11 AM » |
|
It's cute how you believe everything yoy read on the internet.  It is far cuter that, using for example a topic like climate change, people go into absolute denial mode when reality does not jive with their pre-conceived political, ideological or religious agenda. And then these people call other people "entitled".  Wow! The accusations some make. I'm pretty sure reality does not jive with anyone who disagrees with me. I see several people driven by their preconceived political, ideological or irreligious agenda insisting that a twisted or nonexistent reality supports their preconceived agenda.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 26, 2016, 08:54:57 AM by Willow »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Patrick
Member
    
Posts: 15433
VRCC 4474
Largo Florida
|
 |
« Reply #72 on: November 26, 2016, 08:54:06 AM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Romeo
Member
    
Posts: 1612
J.A.B.O.A.
Romeo, Michigan
|
 |
« Reply #73 on: November 26, 2016, 02:18:03 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have. He's NOT HILARY CLINTON.
I hadn't heard anything about him being homophobic. I thought he was pretty accepting of gays. i have read numerous comments and posts on facebook accusing him of it, even as he appoints homosexuals to his team. Smh
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Romeo
Member
    
Posts: 1612
J.A.B.O.A.
Romeo, Michigan
|
 |
« Reply #74 on: November 26, 2016, 02:22:12 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have.
And the problem with "us deplorable conservatives" is that you see that as a positive. A lack of understanding of history, as usual. I suggest you read https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson"Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic"? Possibly not even close. And Jackson's 'reign' wasn't a happy one for the American public, ending in the Panic [steep recession / depression] of 1837 which outlasted his very presidency by 4 years. Read the "Legacy and memory" section - does the character analysis by Alexis de Tocqueville sound familiar? Essentially, he was a jerk. His years were full of controversies, as the records show. But the people of the 'budding' United States thought that was a positive, seen as "forceful" and "decisive", and they paid for it, in the case of the Native Americans with their lives and in the case of the white Americans with years of impoverishment. Hopefully things won't turn out as bad, but Trump isn't even in his administration yet and the news is full of his controversies. And so we never learn, do we? "Those Who Fail to Heed the Lessons of History..." possibly, you misuderstood me. Possibly I didnt really explain myself very well. What I was trying to say was, I knew exactly what I was getting when voting for Trump. He is plenty transparent, and anyone who thinks him a conservative, in my opinion, is mistaken. He ran on a populist agenda and appealed to those of us who have been marginalized, even though we are in the majority. And besides, HE ISNT HILLARY CLINTON.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: November 26, 2016, 02:23:41 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have. He's NOT HILARY CLINTON.
I hadn't heard anything about him being homophobic. I thought he was pretty accepting of gays. i have read numerous comments and posts on facebook accusing him of it, even as he appoints homosexuals to his team. Smh Well, I don't know much about Facebook. But I do know many people accuse people of doing something that has no basis in fact. IT HAS EVEN HAPPENED ON HERE. Can you imagine that ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Romeo
Member
    
Posts: 1612
J.A.B.O.A.
Romeo, Michigan
|
 |
« Reply #76 on: November 26, 2016, 02:31:58 PM » |
|
Just hilarious to me how certain people somehow think they know what we all are thinking, and believing. Donal Trump IS NOT HILARY CLINTON. That is precisely why most of us deplorable conservatives voted for him. Whats's also hilarious to me is how the effing leftist media is still trying to make him out as a racist, homophobic whatever. Donal Trump is Well, Donald Trump. Probably the most open book president elect in the history of the republic. We all know who he is and so do you. We always have. He's NOT HILARY CLINTON.
I hadn't heard anything about him being homophobic. I thought he was pretty accepting of gays. i have read numerous comments and posts on facebook accusing him of it, even as he appoints homosexuals to his team. Smh Well, I don't know much about Facebook. But I do know many people accuse people of doing something that has no basis in fact. IT HAS EVEN HAPPENED ON HERE. Can you imagine that ? Here? Really? No way!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
dragonslayer
|
 |
« Reply #77 on: November 26, 2016, 04:21:24 PM » |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
2k IS 98 Tour 2001 Stand
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #78 on: November 26, 2016, 04:37:28 PM » |
|
This is what he said last January : Donald Trump makes a comment about his current momentum at a campaign stop in Sioux City, Iowa on Saturday. "You know what else they say about my people? The polls, they say I have the most loyal people. Did you ever see that? Where I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters, okay? It’s like incredible," Trump said.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The emperor has no clothes
|
 |
« Reply #79 on: November 26, 2016, 04:42:34 PM » |
|
8 months later in Sept. He said this : "She's being so protected. She could walk into this arena right now and shoot somebody with 20,000 people watching," Trump said mimicking a gun with his hand, "right smack in the middle of the heart and she wouldn't be prosecuted, OK?" That's the way I remember events. If you remember them differently, I'm willing to listen. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|