Trumps epic letter to the Dems on impeachment

[Robert]

WOW, I really liked this letter to the Dems which was not vindictive but straight forward, concerned about the country and moving forward and accomplishing something while in office. So many past presidents were wishy washy in letters and statements made and did not reflect their responsibility to the people. Its like a breath of fresh air to see this type of plain no double speak letter.

These are excerpts from the letter but in the link below you can read it in its entirety.

Excerpts:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/impeachment-inquiry-white-house-not-comply-pelosi

President Trump and his administration reject your baseless, unconstitutional efforts to overturn the democratic process," the letter stated. "Your unprecedented actions have left the president with no choice. In order to fulfill his duties to the American people, the Constitution, the Executive Branch, and all future occupants of the Office of the Presidency, President Trump and his administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances."

The document concluded: "The president has a country to lead. The American people elected him to do this job, and he remains focused on fulfilling his promises to the American people."

"President Trump and his Administration cannot participate in your partisan and unconstitutional inquiry under these circumstances."

You can read the whole letter here:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/read-it-white-house-letter-announcing-noncompliance-with-impeachment-inquiry

[Oss]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

The fake whistleblower scam is one more lunatic raving of a party which is imploding from within.

The audacity of Schiff !
Too bad the FBI is spineless to arrest him for perjury and also go after Pelosi and Biden for covering up the fraud (a la Hillary play book)  Biden and his son were caught, Ukraine admits it freely.
The Executive must govern and protect us from enemies WITHIN AND WITHOUT

Trumps is correct in refusing to comply  He has no choice

There is no moderation of the Dems and soon what will be left is socialists only

[98valk]

pelosi is trying to cover up her crimes

https://thefederalistpapers.org/opinion/pelosis-ukraine-dilema-son-worked-board-gas-company

she is a well trained behind the scenes mafia/mob boss like her father was. this is why she moved to calif since nobody there knew about her.

https://thefederalistpapers.org/us/revealed-jfk-worried-pelosis-dad-associated-organized-crime

[The emperor has no clothes]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

I see our President banty around the term "treason" seemingly without knowing its meaning in our Constitution. For those that don't know, (per Wikipedia) ;                                                                               In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

[Moonshot_1]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

I see our President banty around the term "treason" seemingly without knowing its meaning in our Constitution. For those that don't know, (per Wikipedia) ;                                                                               In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

You really going to take on an actual lawyer on the topic? Okdoky.

Personally, I do believe some of the actions of the Democrat leadership could be defined as Treason. Government officials usurping the laws and rights of citizens can be construed as an act of war. Civil war. They have crossed the line at times. One day there'll be no going back.

[Skinhead]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

I see our President banty around the term "treason" seemingly without knowing its meaning in our Constitution. For those that don't know, (per Wikipedia) ;                                                                               In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

[The emperor has no clothes]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

I see our President banty around the term "treason" seemingly without knowing its meaning in our Constitution. For those that don't know, (per Wikipedia) ;                                                                               In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

You really going to take on an actual lawyer on the topic? Okdoky.

Personally, I do believe some of the actions of the Democrat leadership could be defined as Treason. Government officials usurping the laws and rights of citizens can be construed as an act of war. Civil war. They have crossed the line at times. One day there'll be no going back.

My Attorney friend from New York can handle it. The Constitution is pretty clear in this matter. Usurping the laws and rights of the citizens ? When I had U.S. Government in 7th grade, we were instructed we have 3 equal branches of government. Enshrined in the Constitution is a section regarding Congress’s responsibilities towards impeachment. Pelosi is following those responsibilities (reluctantly I might add)

[The emperor has no clothes]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

[Wizzard]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

Your Attorney friend from NY does not seem to have much use for the "Democratic Party" as is either.  

Now on the news this morning that the Ukraine investigation into Biden was started months before the phone call. That should stir the pot

[98valk]

Pelosi should be expelled from the House, indicted and jailed without bail for treason.

I see our President banty around the term "treason" seemingly without knowing its meaning in our Constitution. For those that don't know, (per Wikipedia) ;                                                                               In the United States, there are both federal and state laws prohibiting treason.[1] It was defined in Article III, Section 3 of the United States Constitution. Most state constitutions include similar definitions of treason, specifically limited to levying war against the state, "adhering to the enemies" of the state, or aiding the enemies of the state, and requiring two witnesses or a confession in open court.[2] Fewer than thirty people have ever been charged with treason under these laws.[3]

democrats are not protecting the states from invasion, hence the democrats are committing treason by allowing the invasion across the boarders and have for decade provide aid and comfort to them via free everything to them.

 U.S. Constitution - Article 4 Section 4
Article 4 - The States
Section 4 - Republican Government

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

 U.S. Constitution - Article 3 Section 3
Article 3 - The Judicial Branch
Section 3 - Treason

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

[Robert]

trea·son
ˈtrēzən

The crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

Seems to me to trying to impeach a duly elected president, taking the FISA court and telling multiple lies about the fake dossier and other issues, having this dossier made by a company paid for by Hillary and other parties and the collaboration on the part of Schiff, Pelosi, and most of the Dems to bring this to a FISA court and lying about the sources and content, so as to oust a duly elected president, not on merits of a case since the Mueller investigation found none and in fact, it was found the real Collusion was on the part of the Dems all for the PURPOSE to remove Trump a duly elected president just because they don't like his policies not on any point of law and want to put in their own president,

 IS THE EXACT DEFINITION OF TREASON.


SINCE BY COLLUSION, LIES, MANIPULATION, FALSE STORIES, FALSE INVESTIGATIONS, THEY ARE TRYING TO OVERTHROW THE GOVERNMENT BY REMOVING A DULY ELECTED PRESIDENT WITH NO GROUNDS.

Some wars come with bullets, some with lies and words and manipulations without a shot fired this is one of them.

These people are betraying their oath of office and every moral code by NOT doing their jobs and following a duly elected president. They are betraying the American Public especially the ones that elected them and the president. The ones that did not elect him they are setting up a dangerous pattern that could be done to them.

This goes way beyond political likes and dislikes and now

has become a breaking of the law,

not honoring oaths and a real break down of the governmental system including those on check and balances. This is third world type of stuff happening here in the US, if we dont get a handle on it we can kiss all we know about freedom goodbye.

Because of the obsession on impeachment there are no debates on finances,boarders,budget, and a whole host of other issues. Its very much a blessing that Trump has supported and done so much and a shame that it was accomplished with NO cooperation from those that should have had a debate about these issues. HE is almost ruling in absentia since the Dems have effectively abdicated their role in government.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Webster’s dictionary seems to hold more importance than our Constitution to some. 

[98valk]

Webster’s dictionary seems to hold more importance than our Constitution to some. 

just provided two Articles to you. which don't u believe in?

[Robert]

This is the Constitutions definition of treason and a very narrow one it was done by the founding fathers for reasons of the time. That is why few and even proven ISIS operatives were not really charged under this. There are enough other charges more easily proven for specific crimes more easily brought and established than treason. Like lying under oath, lying to Congress, accepting bribes, not protecting classified material all much more easily proven and easier to charge them with.

Al Capone was brought  charged with tax evasion not the numerous murders, extortion and other crimes he committed. Does it mean he did not do them, NO it just means it was the best chance at prosecution.

“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

[Newstart2k]

So if I understand the arguments to this point then the republican leaders of the House that attempted to impeach Clinton were committing treason?

[The emperor has no clothes]

So if I understand the arguments to this point then the republican leaders of the House that attempted to impeach Clinton were committing treason?

I think you got it.

[Robert]

So if I understand the arguments to this point then the republican leaders of the House that attempted to impeach Clinton were committing treason?

Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of

perjury to a grand jury (by a 228–206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221–212 vote).

charges that stemmed from a sexual harassment lawsuit filed against Clinton by Paula Jones. The catalyst for the president's impeachment was the Starr Report, a September 1998 report prepared by Independent Counsel Ken Starr for the House Judiciary Committee.

I did not have sex with that woman.

In court on transcripts easily proven and why we had the likes of Hillary and others doing a dance when in front of Congress, when questioned about their various activities. 


If you really want to follow a thought Flynn was not taken out for any action he did but for lying under oath, that it seems may be reversed. That is the trick in depositions not the actual crime but to get someone caught in lying under oath.

[Skinhead]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

Especially what you consider.

[f6john]

While our Trump haters spent 2 years waiting for the Mueller report to impeach the President which fell flat on its face, I’m waiting on the IG’s and Attorney Generals investigation report. You may have noticed there has been little info on their progress but I think when it is done we will find there there is no shortage of “shenanigans “ on the left side of of the ledger.

[98valk]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

please provide your list of the shenanigans of the President or go away.

[Patrick]

I'd say all these 'shenanigans' are guarantying our Presidents re-election.

[F6Dave]

The democrats are masters at twisting our language to advance their causes.  Illegal aliens are 'undocumented immigrants'.  Abortion is simply a 'choice'.  And a rifle with a detachable magazine and a differently shaped grip is an 'assault weapon'.  We'll surely be seeing some creative definitions of treason in the media.

[Oss]

The socialist (communist) handbook is no secret.
IT has been attempted and used repeatedly over time and it is a proven working model of how to destabilize an otherwise prosperous society.  The soviets have bragged for over 60 years about how they will destroy us and if you take the trouble to read you can see for yourself.  The islamic jihadist groups have studied the book and now employ it as a weapon against us and all democratic republics

Like a virus these anti-groups infect the host, multiply and spin off to infect other parts of the organism (country)

You want to know how to recognize sign of infection?

Look for demonification, demands to isolate and calls of racism.

Which group(s) call who a racist?
Which group is calling for isolation of those with whom they disagree instead of integration into society under the laws of the host country?
Which group rather than do that for which they were elected (govern and help the US) is hell bent on removal of the other side by any means possible  Never before has impeachment been sought before inauguration and continued as an agenda/ It is nauseating
Which group wants to push reparations to be paid by a country wherein not one person existed at time of slavery while ignoring the black and arab contributions to slavery In fact slavery STILL exists today but where is the human rights outrage?
Which group wants to push end of the rights afforded in the Bill of Rights?
Which group wants to open the border and guaranty voting rights and health care rights to people who are here ILLEGALLY and whom may not support the Constitution of this country
Which group wants to smother industry in the name of global warming when the USA is at the bottom of polluters China, Africa, Indonesia are at the top by the way
Hint   It is the modern democratic party  led by Pelosi and Clinton (can that woman ever be put in jail?)

[Bighead]

AMEN OSS!

[John Schmidt]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

Shenanigans of the president? Hmmm....and where were you during the previous eight years. If I saved it, I can show you a list nearly a page long of stuff obama was engaged in, many of which he had no jurisdiction over but still pulled the bully act to get his way. And his staff....good grief! What a bunch of unqualified hoodlums and ne'er do-wells...unless it was for personal benefit. As for the well oiled pelosi following the proper procedure for impeachment....nope, not by a long shot. Makes little difference at this point, she's not running the show anyway....it's that group of nutjobs like AOC and her minions. 

[Smokinjoe-VRCCDS#0005]

When the left waterheads fall on their face on yet another never ending witch hunt what do they do next ? Kill the president ?

[Patrick]

"Kill the President" [end quote] ?  ???  It may be all they have left, after-al, they talked about it enough. Didn't madonna want to bomb the White House and johnny depp talked about assassinating the President.

[Robert]

This is really pretty scary actually, it seems that the Congress we know is very sick and media is playing along with the illness. Led on by a few members of Congress that Congress themselves cannot throw out and actually know how far off they are. The story lines or media feeds are lies that Congress know are lies and its just a travesty and makes it seem that the Congress has failed due to corruption.

We are in big trouble, when an institution that is suppose lead has lost the ability to do just that. The focus being for some the removal of a president rather than the leading the free world, putting Congress in an bad position of being ineffective and lost at a time when admiration and respect from the people and each other in Congress would have gone a long way to solve some of this countries problems. 

Rep. Zeldin Slams Dems On Impeachment: “This Entire Thing Is A Political Charade”

https://youtu.be/8D8CSiG6q-w

Members of Congress finally speak out about the travesty that certain members have become.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVCgeM9AcRo

When the Speaker of the house declares the president violated the law with no power or evidence to do so is very dark.

Kevin McCarthy
United States Representative lays it out plain and also talks about Biden and Nadler and thier corruption.

https://youtu.be/tVCgeM9AcRo?t=604

Biden said he would hold up a billion dollars unless they did not fire a prosecutor looking into his son and possible corruption.

[phideux]

I consider 99% of the democrat party, some of the FBI, IRS, and members of the supreme court, enemies of the state, and they are engaged in a non-shooting war with 50% or more of the people in this country.  Therefore TRAITORS!

I know you do Skin, I know you do ! I consider 74.6% of the Republican Party to have turned a blind eye towards the shenanigans of our President. Therefore not upholding their oaths. (What you and I consider doesn’t really mean squat though)

please provide your list of the shenanigans of the President or go away.

The hell with shenanigans, I want to see someone come up with something he did that was Treasonous, criminal, traitorous, or impeachable. Something real, not an anonymous source, or someone said something, something he really did.
There are countless offenses, real ones, on the other side, ones with witnesses and proof, but somehow that is OK.

[Bighead]

"Kill the President" [end quote] ?  ???  It may be all they have left, after-al, they talked about it enough. Didn't madonna want to bomb the White House and johnny depp talked about assassinating the President.

And did either go to  jail ? No and I think speaking of assassination of the POTUS would qualify for some time in the pokey.

[Robert]

Good news the DOJ report will be out:

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1183451850403659777/video/1

The DOJ IG Report will be out this Friday and covers 'MORE than just FISA abuse'

"It’s as thick as a telephone book."
-@MariaBartiromo


It is finally being acknowledged:

Bill Barr Flames ‘Unremitting Assault’ On Religion, Traditional Values During Notre Dame Visit

Attorney General Bill Barr: "Among the militant secularism are many of the so-called progressives, but where is the progress? We are told we are living in a post-Christian era, but what has replaced the Judeo-Christian moral system?"

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1182842021653950464


Dem. Presidential Candidate Beto O’Rourke:
End Tax-Exempt Status for Any Church Opposing Gay Marriage

During a CNN presidential town hall last night, Democratic hopeful Beto O’Rourke was asked:

“Do you think religious institutions like colleges, churches, charities, should lose their tax-exempt status if they oppose same-sex marriage?”

Without missing a beat, he responded, “Yes.”

He went on to say, “There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for anyone or any institution, any organization in America, that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us.”

And if that wasn’t enough, he made a pledge to make it one of his priorities as president to strip churches of their tax-exempt status for simply following thousands of years of religious teaching doctrine.

[Oss]

Thank you Britman for sending me the unclassified transcript

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trumps-ukraine-call-transcript-read-the-document

This is precisely the type of communication that an honest President
makes to another President when something smells rotten

Also it is why the main fake news media will not cover it properly

Pelosi needs to be brought in for questioning, but in Cuba

[98valk]

Good news the DOJ report will be out:

https://twitter.com/bennyjohnson/status/1183451850403659777/video/1

The DOJ IG Report will be out this Friday and covers 'MORE than just FISA abuse'

"It’s as thick as a telephone book."
-@MariaBartiromo


It is finally being acknowledged:

Bill Barr Flames ‘Unremitting Assault’ On Religion, Traditional Values During Notre Dame Visit

Attorney General Bill Barr: "Among the militant secularism are many of the so-called progressives, but where is the progress? We are told we are living in a post-Christian era, but what has replaced the Judeo-Christian moral system?"

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1182842021653950464


Dem. Presidential Candidate Beto O’Rourke:
End Tax-Exempt Status for Any Church Opposing Gay Marriage

During a CNN presidential town hall last night, Democratic hopeful Beto O’Rourke was asked:

“Do you think religious institutions like colleges, churches, charities, should lose their tax-exempt status if they oppose same-sex marriage?”

Without missing a beat, he responded, “Yes.”

He went on to say, “There can be no reward, no benefit, no tax break for anyone or any institution, any organization in America, that denies the full human rights and the full civil rights of every single one of us.”

And if that wasn’t enough, he made a pledge to make it one of his priorities as president to strip churches of their tax-exempt status for simply following thousands of years of religious teaching doctrine.

beto's comment originally was out in the democrat political circles during the clinton administration, it was quickly hammered by the American people. now the UN globalist democrats feel its time to bring it out again including gun confiscation also beto and the socialist who was raised in canada and learned nothing about America during her 11-12 yr old to high school graduation, that would be harris the anchor baby.

[Patrick]

chicken shiff is now saying the whistleblower shouldn't or may not have to testify.  And of course any republican will not be allowed to testify or present evidence. This gets crazier by the hour and we actually pay these people for this crap.

[Bighead]

Uh the accused has the right to face his accuser.

[Big Rig]

Uh the accused has the right to face his accuser.

That is silly, who would want to do that... (sarcasm font)

[scooperhsd]

Uh the accused has the right to face his accuser.

Fine - as long as it is during the open hearings.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Uh the accused has the right to face his accuser.

Fine - as long as it is during the open hearings.

If and when it gets to the trial phase in the Senate, he will have every opportunity to "face his accusers".

[Oss]

I am against it for a multitude of reasons

1st  The people who lied about the prior Russia hoax are still free
there is no credibility while the Congress allows that, nor while they sit by and continue to give Hillary a free pass on destroying tens of thousands of emails AFTER acknowledging the subpoena  There is no objectivity out of the swamp of Congress, and many Republicans are also complicit by their failure of intestinal gumption

2nd  The Executive can not be challenged on heresay and whistleblower anonymity under the Constitution  The remedy is the next election. And to be fair I thought the manner in which Clinton was trapped, having answered falsely a question that had no business being asked of him was beneath any dignity to our country
Remember most of us voted a 2nd time even tho we all knew he did Monica in the oval office. Our vote meant nothing then and now under the new socialist/liberal congressional agenda.

 To even broach the impeachment subject is insanity if you have read the declassified transcript as I have or have any sense of history.

   To lobby to do otherwise is to destroy the Executive function  You liberals would be screaming at the top of your lungs were Obama subjected to this depravity.   Remember  the questions about his birth, his college admissions and transcipts were sealed by Obama ! Talk about impeding an investigation and corruption ! The liberals and socialists were all complicit by their silence even when the nomination was stolen from Bernie and even when the cash went to Iran and China continued to steal our intellectual property.

3rd  The party of the donkey has since the election been braying for impeachment, death of the sitting Executive and using all tools legal and illegal. God help the next Democrat, if there ever is one again, who attains the office as this present Senate has doomed him or her or it (hey it could be a transgender he/she)

Is this what the Democrats want for america?  I think yes and I thinks I will continue to what I can do so they never win another election. If that means continuing to write to editors and senators so be it  I will happily share letters for members to send if anyone ever wants to PM me.

[Patrick]

Uh the accused has the right to face his accuser.

Fine - as long as it is during the open hearings.

If and when it gets to the trial phase in the Senate, he will have every opportunity to "face his accusers".

Hahahahaha. Not without a fight.