Calls on president to 'honor your oath of office' to defeat Deep-State coup

[98valk]

What startled me was, he kept talking about fraudulent votes, and then I heard Rudy Giuliani talking about fraudulent votes. It's not fraudulent votes.
 The American people must understand, we are talking about treason."

The oath must be fulfilled

McInerney said President Trump must be compelled by his supporters to "honor his oath of office" and employ the tools available to him to quash the insurrection that he believes is in progress.

He said U.S. Marshals should have immediately seized the voting machines in Georgia and every battleground state as soon as it became apparent that ballot numbers were skewed in favor of Joe Biden.

"When you coordinate six to ten states, using cyber warfare, to change the outcome of the election in favor of whoever you want, these are treasonous acts," McInerney said in a Nov. 29 interview with Brannon Howse of Worldview Weekend TV.

Not just fraudulent acts

"These are not just fraudulent acts, they are treasonous acts, because it means changing the government," the general said. "And then when you add Russia, China and Iran, foreigners into it, you complicate it and make it even more treasonous. So, cyber warfare, and the Dominion Voting Systems, which we're talking about in Georgia, Michigan and several other states, Pennsylvania as well, using Hammer and Scorecard [ballot manipulation software attacks]. Plus, has anyone seen the Justice Department or FBI in any of this? That is very worrisome."
Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney [U.S. Air Force Retired] said in a no-holds-barred interview that he doesn't believe the courts are likely to come through for President Trump.

Despite massive amounts of evidence of widespread irregularities, many judges appear either unable or unwilling to sort through allegations of rigged voting machines and dozens of affidavits from eyewitnesses to ballot stuffing, denial of Republican poll watchers from observing the process, evidence of more votes cast in hundreds of precincts than were registered to vote, and a host of other irregularities.

The general placed the burden squarely on President Trump to use the emergency powers at his disposal and put down what he described as a coup d'état in progress.

https://www.wnd.com/2020/12/treasonous-enemies-within-3-star-general-pushes-trump-use-emergency-powers/

[CajunRider]

The big question here would be whether the courts would see election cheating as treason...

The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States and, importantly, limits the offense of treason to only two types of conduct:
    (1) “levying war” against the United States; or
    (2) “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort.”

Would "levying war" include willful promotion of riots, threats, and propaganda??

Would "adhering to the enemies" include openly promoting and steadily attempting to install socialism into our Republic??


I fully agree that the willful attempt to subvert the American people, lie to the American people, and fundamentally change the government to something unconstitutional SHOULD be considered treason... 

But would the courts see it that way???

[Moonshot_1]

The big question here would be whether the courts would see election cheating as treason...

The Constitution specifically identifies what constitutes treason against the United States and, importantly, limits the offense of treason to only two types of conduct:
    (1) “levying war” against the United States; or
    (2) “adhering to [the] enemies [of the United States], giving them aid and comfort.”

Would "levying war" include willful promotion of riots, threats, and propaganda??

Would "adhering to the enemies" include openly promoting and steadily attempting to install socialism into our Republic??


I fully agree that the willful attempt to subvert the American people, lie to the American people, and fundamentally change the government to something unconstitutional SHOULD be considered treason... 

But would the courts see it that way???

I believe that a coordinated multi state effort to criminally usurp a free and fair election at the national level would precisely qualify as "levying war" against the Nation.

That is what it is.

[michaelyoung254]

Did it occur to that he didn't have the Marshalls seize the machines because it isn't necessary?

Remember, on the election night, Trump wasn't at The White House, or at home, he was in arguably one of the most advanced and secure cyber security facilities on the planet. Now think about that for a second. Why would President Trump spend the entire night of the election in a facility like that unless they already knew what was going to happen and had already planned for it?

There's a very good chance that they already have all of the evidence that they will ever need.

[Oss]

This is the bait the trap post I made weeks ago

There is very large risk but the reward is getting to stomp on all the actors at the end

I wish they would let us see the perp walks but understand why they will choose at this time to let it continue to play out.