Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
July 05, 2025, 05:41:08 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Las Vegas Unfriendly To Motorcyclists  (Read 1928 times)
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« on: November 18, 2010, 06:57:03 AM »

Apparently the Las Vegas Metro Police has been harassing motorcyclists.  Guess they want us to take our business elsewhere.

http://www.quickthrottle.com/DigitalMagazines/SW_November2010/133810/default1.html?seq=120572&path=100429014907?startpage=10

Marty
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
DIGGER
Member
*****
Posts: 3784


« Reply #1 on: November 18, 2010, 07:04:48 AM »

I can't read the small print.   I'm opposed to Police harrasing all bikers but if they are only arresting or harrasing bikers breaking the law I got no problem with it.
Logged
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« Reply #2 on: November 18, 2010, 07:22:40 AM »

You have to click the magnifying glass icon in the upper right corner to blow it up.

Marty
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
Pete
Member
*****
Posts: 2673


Frasier in Southeast Tennessee


« Reply #3 on: November 18, 2010, 07:36:25 AM »

I read the entire article. It did not indicate any illegal activities, tickets, etc.

I am not sure what to make of it. Needs investigation.
Logged
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« Reply #4 on: November 18, 2010, 07:47:25 AM »

Why would a cop follow you into a bathroom unless they were hoping to catch you doing something?  Cops don't use public restrooms unless they don't have a choice.

Marty 
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
DIGGER
Member
*****
Posts: 3784


« Reply #5 on: November 18, 2010, 08:12:04 AM »

now I can read it......sounds like harrasment to me.
Logged
MacDragon
Member
*****
Posts: 1970


My first Valk VRCC# 32095

Middleton, Mass.


« Reply #6 on: November 18, 2010, 08:41:33 AM »

Yes, they were harrassed. Angry  The cop didn't have any right to make him take off his shirt... or to inspect his tats.   and to tell them to leave Nevada and never return... sounds like an old western.
Logged


Ride fast and take chances... uh, I mean... ride safe folks.
Patriot Guard Riders
Westernbiker
Member
*****
Posts: 1464


1st Place Street Kings National Cruiser Class

Phoenix


« Reply #7 on: November 18, 2010, 08:56:18 AM »

So, somebody chime in with 'What were the bikers rights?' 'What should they have done?' I think we all will benifit from these questions if answered by someone that knows what he or she is talking about.
Logged



May the Lord always ride two up with you!
Varmintmist
Member
*****
Posts: 1228


Western Pa


« Reply #8 on: November 18, 2010, 09:48:05 AM »

Perhaps walking into a crowded public restroom and calling everyone using the can "b1tches" and ordering them to hurry up is considered bad form in NV. According to the artical, which is PRO the bikers, NOTHING happened until that happened and they brought attention to themselves.

I think that whoever was covering the other bowls might have been a tad harassed first. If my kid was taking a dump, I would be cheering the police for giving a ettiquette lesson.

I am not saying that the NV sherriff isn't harrassing bikers, however, the moral of this story is if you don't want to get jacked up, don't act like a jacka$$.
Logged

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Churchill
fudgie
Member
*****
Posts: 10613


Better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6.

Huntington Indiana


WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 18, 2010, 09:55:55 AM »

Perhaps walking into a crowded public restroom and calling everyone using the can "b1tches" and ordering them to hurry up is considered bad form in NV. According to the artical, which is PRO the bikers, NOTHING happened until that happened and they brought attention to themselves.

Jezz, who hasnt done that!  Wink
Logged



Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR
Westernbiker
Member
*****
Posts: 1464


1st Place Street Kings National Cruiser Class

Phoenix


« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2010, 01:18:00 PM »

Perhaps walking into a crowded public restroom and calling everyone using the can "b1tches" and ordering them to hurry up is considered bad form in NV. According to the artical, which is PRO the bikers, NOTHING happened until that happened and they brought attention to themselves.

Jezz, who hasnt done that!  Wink

 cooldude
Logged



May the Lord always ride two up with you!
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2010, 01:24:15 PM »

Perhaps walking into a crowded public restroom and calling everyone using the can "b1tches" and ordering them to hurry up is considered bad form in NV. According to the artical, which is PRO the bikers, NOTHING happened until that happened and they brought attention to themselves.

I think that whoever was covering the other bowls might have been a tad harassed first. If my kid was taking a dump, I would be cheering the police for giving a ettiquette lesson.

I am not saying that the NV sherriff isn't harrassing bikers, however, the moral of this story is if you don't want to get jacked up, don't act like a jacka$$.

What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
Hoser
Member
*****
Posts: 5844


child of the sixties VRCC 17899

Auburn, Kansas


« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2010, 01:40:50 PM »

Las Vegas is unfriendly to everybody that has lost thier money, they want em to go home and get some more.  Sad hoser
Logged

I don't want a pickle, just wanna ride my motor sickle

[img width=300 height=233]http://i617.photobucket.com/albums/
Varmintmist
Member
*****
Posts: 1228


Western Pa


« Reply #13 on: November 18, 2010, 02:51:20 PM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.
Logged

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Churchill
fudgie
Member
*****
Posts: 10613


Better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6.

Huntington Indiana


WWW
« Reply #14 on: November 18, 2010, 02:53:06 PM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.

cooldude
Logged



Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR
Hoser
Member
*****
Posts: 5844


child of the sixties VRCC 17899

Auburn, Kansas


« Reply #15 on: November 18, 2010, 07:33:47 PM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.

cooldude
+1 If you give consent it's gonna happen, if you don't it won't, at least not legally.  Hoser Shocked
« Last Edit: November 18, 2010, 07:36:59 PM by Hoser » Logged

I don't want a pickle, just wanna ride my motor sickle

[img width=300 height=233]http://i617.photobucket.com/albums/
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« Reply #16 on: November 18, 2010, 08:54:16 PM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.


Not quite correct.  If the Police ASK for permission and you submit it's one thing; however, it they order you and you submit, it's still a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Marty
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
Gunslinger
Member
*****
Posts: 404


Brian Huntzinger, EMT-P

Wamego, KS


« Reply #17 on: November 19, 2010, 02:22:25 AM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.


Not quite correct.  If the Police ASK for permission and you submit it's one thing; however, it they order you and you submit, it's still a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Marty

While that is accurate Marty, the unfortunate truth is that what the officer says and what the officer DOCUMENTS that he said may or may not be the same.

It sounds to me like these guys had a brief case of rectal-cranial inversion and brought attention to themselves. That comment in the Head (restroom) doesn't excuse the way (this article describes) that they were treated. (never trust the Media any further than you can toss a politician of the same size and B.S. content. They are in the job to make money, and controversy sells. Unfortunately the media is often more than happy to 'modify' the story to suit their agenda)
Logged

VRCC#   26468
VRCCDS# 0228

"Some learn by listening, Others learn by watching...
The rest of us have to pee on the electric fence ourselves"
X Ring
Member
*****
Posts: 3626


VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204

The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans


« Reply #18 on: November 19, 2010, 05:55:21 AM »

The media in this case is a volunteer magazine that is distributed through motorcycle shops for free.  We have similar ones in my parts of the country, Thunder Roads and Full Throttle.

This also dovetails with pretty well with what I've heard from non motorcyclists about how LVMPD operates.

Marty
Logged

People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers.           
fudgie
Member
*****
Posts: 10613


Better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6.

Huntington Indiana


WWW
« Reply #19 on: November 19, 2010, 03:14:46 PM »


What I wonder is WHY the cop followed them into the bathroom in the first place.  Ordering the one guy to remove his clothing so they could see his tattoos is a clear violation of his 4th Amendment Right to be secure in his person.

Marty
Perhaps they were acting up outside the head. Remember, this is a one sided story with a pro biker bend.

BTW, the biker consented to the search, no violation of the 4th ad., no different than if you consent to have your car searched. If the biker had refused and the cops held him down and took his shirt off, then you have a violation unless they have a warrant.

This is basic stuff guys. If you consent you don't have a leg to stand on.


Not quite correct.  If the Police ASK for permission and you submit it's one thing; however, it they order you and you submit, it's still a violation of the 4th Amendment.

Marty
If they submit to it then their rights are not violated. If he is being 'detained' he has to show them. Cause I choose to open carry my firearm does not mean a cop has the right to ask for my LTCH. I have not commited a crime. Carring a firearm is not a crime. Now if I'm being detained due to a complaint, then I have to show him.
I have alot of people ask to see my ink before.  Cheesy
Logged



Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR
Serk
Member
*****
Posts: 21827


Rowlett, TX


« Reply #20 on: November 19, 2010, 03:17:47 PM »

I am not saying that the NV sherriff isn't harrassing bikers, however, the moral of this story is if you don't want to get jacked up, don't act like a jacka$$.


(Warning - Bad Language)

Reminds me of this classic instructional video...

Chris Rock - How not to get your ass kicked by the police!powered by Aeva
Logged

Never ask a geek 'Why?',just nod your head and slowly back away...



IBA# 22107 
VRCC# 7976
VRCCDS# 226

1998 Valkyrie Standard
2008 Gold Wing

Taxation is theft.

μολὼν λαβέ
Detn8er
Member
*****
Posts: 1222


South Carolina


« Reply #21 on: November 19, 2010, 03:24:37 PM »

The media in this case is a volunteer magazine that is distributed through motorcycle shops for free.  We have similar ones in my parts of the country, Thunder Roads and Full Throttle.

This also dovetails with pretty well with what I've heard from non motorcyclists about how LVMPD operates.

Marty
NOTHING is free.....it may not cost you to pick up a copy but you can bet your ass the publisher and the writers make a butt load of money.......Can you say ADVERTISING??? Money is money no matter which end it comes from.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: