BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« on: March 22, 2011, 04:24:50 PM » |
|
Please do your best to give me an honest answer. I know it so easy to exaggerrate-at least for me! Like , "yeah I can do 125 in 2nd gear"yada yada yada.... OK: For those with STOCK bikes with aftermarket pipes., shifting @ 7,000 rpm 1-4th, what is your speed @ 7,000 rpm the very intant you shift out of third ? Keep it real now- we all have Valks! Thanks for your input 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2011, 04:55:09 PM » |
|
I'm in for the night, so I'll have to get back with you. Topping off my tank tomorrow evening with non-ethanol for saturday's ride. I'll let you know tomorrow night.
Thanks Tundra, There used to be several stations around with no ethanol, but gone now. What octane do you run?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hoser
Member
    
Posts: 5844
child of the sixties VRCC 17899
Auburn, Kansas
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2011, 05:27:22 PM » |
|
Most Valks are up against the rev limiter by 6500 rpm. Horsepower peaks for mine at 6200 rpm. Hoser
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't want a pickle, just wanna ride my motor sickle  [img width=300 height=233]http://i617.photobucket.com/albums/
|
|
|
Slammer
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2011, 05:38:34 PM » |
|
7250 RPM. A stock Valk has quit making torque way before that.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2011, 06:16:56 PM » |
|
7250 RPM. A stock Valk has quit making torque way before that. [/quote Yes I noticed mine was slow going to 6500 to 7000.-but I haven't felt the rev limiter yet or maybe don't know what to expect. On my VTX 1800 when the rev limiter kicks in she just dies until you change gears, I actually thought something was wrong when I test rode it! Lol 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FryeVRCCDS0067
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2011, 06:40:08 PM » |
|
I never run mine past redline, at least not intentionally  . Power seems to fall off around 6000 RPM anyway so I shift by then. Rain here for the next week but I'll try to remember to check speeds at 6000 RPM when the weather breaks. I've got a stock motor with interstate carb springs and Mark "T" pipes made before the crossover was available.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And... moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.'' -- Barry Goldwater, Acceptance Speech at the Republican Convention; 1964 
|
|
|
Titan
Member
    
Posts: 819
BikeLess
Lexington, SC
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2011, 06:48:22 PM » |
|
Hmmmm... Actually I've never ridden my bike that hard so I wouldn't have a clue.  Have run it quite fast a whole bunch of times but don't ever redline it through the gears.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2011, 06:58:02 PM » |
|
I never run mine past redline, at least not intentionally  . Power seems to fall off around 6000 RPM anyway so I shift by then. Rain here for the next week but I'll try to remember to check speeds at 6000 RPM when the weather breaks. I've got a stock motor with interstate carb springs and Mark "T" pipes made before the crossover was available. [/quote Thanks for your answer, I shouldn't have pushed it as hard as I did. The redline starts at 6500 and it might be better to shift @ 6-6200. What does the interstate carb springs do? Is The crossover like a 3-1 and crossover to the same on the other side? Yeah I've got a lot of questions with this 6! lol Thanks
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dogg
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2011, 07:08:34 PM » |
|
Mine isnt tock but, at 7000 rpm in 2nd gear, Im running around 75. 3rd over 100, closer to 115. but then my motor redlines at 8400 rpm and floats the valves at 8800. but, thats just my bike. dont like doing it tho. much. unless a v-twinkie or a litre bike is gonna try me...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Smokinjoe-VRCCDS#0005
Member
    
Posts: 13833
American by Birth, Southern by the Grace of God.
Beautiful east Tennessee ( GOD'S Country )
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2011, 07:14:18 PM » |
|
shifting @ 7,000 rpm 1-4th Thanks for your input  Please someone remind me of this thread if he ever wants to sell his bike and I show any interest whatsoever 
|
|
|
Logged
|
 I've seen alot of people that thought they were cool , but then again Lord I've seen alot of fools.
|
|
|
Gator
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2011, 07:27:47 PM » |
|
Well, my memory is fading a little with this never ending winter, but I seem to recall a fast black 99 IS pulling about 90 mph indicated in 3rd at redline 6500 rpm on the way into 4th.
|
|
|
Logged
|
The shortest distance between points A & B is irrelevant on a Valk. 
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2011, 07:47:28 PM » |
|
shifting @ 7,000 rpm 1-4th Thanks for your input  Please someone remind me of this thread if he ever wants to sell his bike and I show any interest whatsoever  Don't worry, I'm gonna sell it locally anyway. It just has 8k, probably not broken in yet! This was the first and last time I'll ever hit it that hard. 6k-500 rpm less than tach says will be it. When a little V Star 1300 almost out ran me, something is wrong- and I just tuned her up today 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2011, 07:55:07 PM » |
|
Well, my memory is fading a little with this never ending winter, but I seem to recall a fast black 99 IS pulling about 90 mph indicated in 3rd at redline 6500 rpm on the way into 4th. THANK YOU Gator! You answered my question. The I/S is heavier than my 98 Standard and I turned 95 in 3rd so mine must be ok. Thanks man! 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
FryeVRCCDS0067
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2011, 08:06:23 PM » |
|
I never run mine past redline, at least not intentionally  . Power seems to fall off around 6000 RPM anyway so I shift by then. Rain here for the next week but I'll try to remember to check speeds at 6000 RPM when the weather breaks. I've got a stock motor with interstate carb springs and Mark "T" pipes made before the crossover was available. [/quote Thanks for your answer, I shouldn't have pushed it as hard as I did. The redline starts at 6500 and it might be better to shift @ 6-6200. What does the interstate carb springs do? Is The crossover like a 3-1 and crossover to the same on the other side? Yeah I've got a lot of questions with this 6! lol Thanks I've got a 97 standard. The interstate carb springs (made for a Valkyrie interstate) are supposed to give a performance boast over the stock springs. I honestly can't tell the difference. It's generally well accepted (my viewpoint) that after-market valk pipes with a crossover between the right and left banks increases horsepower. It's a mod I hope to make when I find myself with several hundred extra $$$. It may be a while.  Some bikes scream with ever increasing power right to redline, and thus, force the weak willed (like me  ) to take frequent excursions there. In my opinion, the Valkyrie isn't one of them and pulls harder by staying shy of the redline. Highly modified Valks are probably the exception but are beyond my experience.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice. And... moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.'' -- Barry Goldwater, Acceptance Speech at the Republican Convention; 1964 
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2011, 08:26:28 PM » |
|
I never run mine past redline, at least not intentionally  . Power seems to fall off around 6000 RPM anyway so I shift by then. Rain here for the next week but I'll try to remember to check speeds at 6000 RPM when the weather breaks. I've got a stock motor with interstate carb springs and Mark "T" pipes made before the crossover was available. [/quote Thanks for your answer, I shouldn't have pushed it as hard as I did. The redline starts at 6500 and it might be better to shift @ 6-6200. What does the interstate carb springs do? Is The crossover like a 3-1 and crossover to the same on the other side? Yeah I've got a lot of questions with this 6! lol Thanks I've got a 97 standard. The interstate carb springs (made for a Valkyrie interstate) are supposed to give a performance boast over the stock springs. I honestly can't tell the difference. It's generally well accepted (my viewpoint) that after-market valk pipes with a crossover between the right and left banks increases horsepower. It's a mod I hope to make when I find myself with several hundred extra $$$. It may be a while.  Some bikes scream with ever increasing power right to redline, and thus, force the weak willed (like me  ) to take frequent excursions there. In my opinion, the Valkyrie isn't one of them and pulls harder by staying shy of the redline. Highly modified Valks are probably the exception but are beyond my experience. Thanks FRYE, you are right staying shy of the redline. I could feel it losing power the closer I got to the redline. This is the first time I really hit her that hard and the last. How can I find out more about the crossover? Thanks 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Garfield
Member
    
Posts: 454
97 Standard
Phoenix, AZ
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: March 22, 2011, 10:04:12 PM » |
|
I go by the way she feels, and some times she likes it 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jabba
Member
    
Posts: 3563
VRCCDS0197
Greenwood Indiana
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: March 23, 2011, 02:33:51 AM » |
|
They should all be, essentially the same.
It's a function of drive line gear ratio and rear tire diameter.
Unless you have different gears, or a different size tire (Darksiders) that number will be the same.
I don't run mine to 7K either. Not on purpose. I have simply missed shifts before where it bumped the rev limiter.
Jabba
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
solo1
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: March 23, 2011, 04:22:34 AM » |
|
I can't remember the Valk's HP and torque curves but IMHO, revving past the peak TORQUE curve buys you nothing.
Just my .02
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Hoser
Member
    
Posts: 5844
child of the sixties VRCC 17899
Auburn, Kansas
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2011, 05:48:41 AM » |
|
I can't remember the Valk's HP and torque curves but IMHO, revving past the peak TORQUE curve buys you nothing.
Just my .02
Here is the curve on a stock tourer.... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
I don't want a pickle, just wanna ride my motor sickle  [img width=300 height=233]http://i617.photobucket.com/albums/
|
|
|
Ferris Leets
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2011, 06:00:21 AM » |
|
My Dyno curve looks (and feels) about the same. Except that I told the operator to take it to the limiter. I'll have to look at 'em but I think right before 7K it fell off the cliff. Mine peaked at about 6200 with 103hp and 98 lbs. 137 mph. right before mine they did a Victory Kingpin. I don't remember the exact numbers but he was in the 70's hp and 60's torque. 143mph. I don't believe that bike had the power to bet to 120 on the road. But, it made enough noise to scare a way the wolves on a dark and storemy night. We were talking right next to the Valk during my runs. Sorry got off topic. Next time I go out I'll give her a run in 3rd just to see. Need to clean out the winter gunk anyway. I think it is real close to 90. 4th could get me a bigger ticket than I can afford.
|
|
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 06:02:56 AM by Ferris Leets »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: March 23, 2011, 06:09:34 AM » |
|
I can't remember the Valk's HP and torque curves but IMHO, revving past the peak TORQUE curve buys you nothing.
Just my .02
Here is the curve on a stock tourer....  Thanks Hoser, That says it all! 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: March 23, 2011, 06:20:58 AM » |
|
My Dyno curve looks (and feels) about the same. Except that I told the operator to take it to the limiter. I'll have to look at 'em but I think right before 7K it fell off the cliff. Mine peaked at about 6200 with 103hp and 98 lbs. 137 mph. right before mine they did a Victory Kingpin. I don't remember the exact numbers but he was in the 70's hp and 60's torque. 143mph. I don't believe that bike had the power to bet to 120 on the road. But, it made enough noise to scare a way the wolves on a dark and storemy night. We were talking right next to the Valk during my runs. Sorry got off topic. Next time I go out I'll give her a run in 3rd just to see. Need to clean out the winter gunk anyway. I think it is real close to 90. 4th could get me a bigger ticket than I can afford.
The HP and torque =143mph? Doesn't make sense! I have a twin that I would love to run title for title, I'd like to add a Victory to the stable!  BTW, don't get a ticket!! Thanks 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: March 23, 2011, 07:10:01 AM » |
|
Thanks Jeff, I'm about right then 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Big Rig
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: March 23, 2011, 08:02:39 AM » |
|
Yes but what does that do to your fuel mileage? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: March 23, 2011, 08:07:08 AM » |
|
Yes but what does that do to your fuel mileage?  What fuel mileage? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Willow
Administrator
Member
    
Posts: 16633
Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP
Olathe, KS
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: March 23, 2011, 08:14:53 AM » |
|
Can I set my rev limiter? Probably not. It's a function of the Dyna 3000. BTW you got one tough bike turning 7500 rpm and 158,000 miles!! Not so much. It's just what Valkyries do.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
musclehead
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: March 23, 2011, 08:26:35 AM » |
|
I have to shift at 1700 rpms and I'm doing all of 10 MPH in second......... oh you mean my valk! I dunno I never get to ride it 
|
|
|
Logged
|
'in the tunnels uptown, the Rats own dream guns him down. the shots echo down them hallways in the night' - the Boss
|
|
|
Ferris Leets
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: March 23, 2011, 11:50:34 AM » |
|
My Dyno curve looks (and feels) about the same. Except that I told the operator to take it to the limiter. I'll have to look at 'em but I think right before 7K it fell off the cliff. Mine peaked at about 6200 with 103hp and 98 lbs. 137 mph. right before mine they did a Victory Kingpin. I don't remember the exact numbers but he was in the 70's hp and 60's torque. 143mph. I don't believe that bike had the power to bet to 120 on the road. But, it made enough noise to scare a way the wolves on a dark and storemy night. We were talking right next to the Valk during my runs. Sorry got off topic. Next time I go out I'll give her a run in 3rd just to see. Need to clean out the winter gunk anyway. I think it is real close to 90. 4th could get me a bigger ticket than I can afford.
The HP and torque =143mph? Doesn't make sense! I have a twin that I would love to run title for title, I'd like to add a Victory to the stable!  BTW, don't get a ticket!! Thanks  Not sure what you mean by it "doen't make sense" If you mean that that little of each would not get 143 then I agree. On the Dyno it isn't pushing any wind so speed is just a matter of gearing and rpms.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lakehunter
|
 |
« Reply #31 on: March 23, 2011, 03:53:55 PM » |
|
As we all know, Valk speedo's are off, even more off the faster you go. That said, as to your question, 98 standard with 82k miles, bike has Honda windshield that has a lot of resistance at speed. Test run, quickly to 105 on the gps @ 6000 rpm in 4th, she pulls very slowly after that ... 125 on the gps in 5th @ 6000 rpm, still pulling. Speedo read 128 in 4th and 140 in 5th. Have never ran her to limiter to find absolute top speed, this test was enough for me,  Lakehunter ( Mike )
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
czuch
|
 |
« Reply #32 on: March 23, 2011, 04:17:23 PM » |
|
135 maxxed in 5th. wouldnt get all the way to redline pushin the windshield. I figured if a javalina ran ouit in front we're were both gonna die. I also figured the gas wasnt touching the sides of the float bowl. It was as smoothe at 135 as it is at 35,btw. As far as the other gears, I'm busy with the road comin up fast so I cant worry about tach stuff. HAHAHAH
|
|
|
Logged
|
Aot of guys with burn marks,gnarly scars and funny twitches ask why I spend so much on safety gear
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #33 on: March 23, 2011, 05:25:05 PM » |
|
Ferris What i meant was the numbers don't add up. HP in the 70s, torque in the 60s= 143 mph? Torque sounds low too. All I can figure it must be geared high and is super light? 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Willow
Administrator
Member
    
Posts: 16633
Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP
Olathe, KS
|
 |
« Reply #34 on: March 23, 2011, 07:10:42 PM » |
|
As we all know, Valk speedo's are off, even more off the faster you go. That said, as to your question, 98 standard with 82k miles, bike has Honda windshield that has a lot of resistance at speed. Test run, quickly to 105 on the gps @ 6000 rpm in 4th, she pulls very slowly after that ... 125 on the gps in 5th @ 6000 rpm, still pulling. Speedo read 128 in 4th and 140 in 5th. Have never ran her to limiter to find absolute top speed, this test was enough for me, You're right, speedos are off. Yours seems to be a lot closer than most.
Unfortunately so are GPS's when you accelerate. A GPS will average your speed over several seconds so it lags during acceleration and deceleration.
I'd be surprised if you could reach the rev limiter in top gear. If you did you'd be be somewhere close to 157 mph and on a steep downhill.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ferris Leets
|
 |
« Reply #35 on: March 24, 2011, 05:25:55 AM » |
|
Ferris What i meant was the numbers don't add up. HP in the 70s, torque in the 60s= 143 mph? Torque sounds low too. All I can figure it must be geared high and is super light?  This is on the dyno. Just theoretical speed read off the computer. Not pushing any air or even the weight of the bike. Just how fast the tire is spinning against the dyno. Pure Math no real world inconveniences, like wind, passenger, woodchucks in the road. That bike probably would have had a hard time getting to 115 on the road. But it really was loud, so I guess he was happy. He also probably believed the 143 and went around bragging it up. Would have a perfect target for a title race.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
BIG--T
Member
    
Posts: 3002
1998 Standard, 2000 Interstate
The Twilight Zone
|
 |
« Reply #36 on: March 24, 2011, 06:25:10 AM » |
|
Ferris What i meant was the numbers don't add up. HP in the 70s, torque in the 60s= 143 mph? Torque sounds low too. All I can figure it must be geared high and is super light?  This is on the dyno. Just theoretical speed read off the computer. Not pushing any air or even the weight of the bike. Just how fast the tire is spinning against the dyno. Pure Math no real world inconveniences, like wind, passenger, woodchucks in the road. That bike probably would have had a hard time getting to 115 on the road. But it really was loud, so I guess he was happy. He also probably believed the 143 and went around bragging it up. Would have a perfect target for a title race.  on the race!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|