mmurffy03
Member
    
Posts: 791
03 standard
toms river new jersey
|
 |
« on: April 24, 2012, 08:14:34 AM » |
|
is there a chance you could use a set of the front blinker ends with the dual filliment 1157 bulb on the rear and just hookup the blinker and ground wires normal and tap the running light wires into the license plate wire ?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Valkpilot
Member
    
Posts: 2151
What does the data say?
Corinth, Texas
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: April 24, 2012, 08:48:21 AM » |
|
is there a chance you could use a set of the front blinker ends with the dual filliment 1157 bulb on the rear and just hookup the blinker and ground wires normal and tap the running light wires into the license plate wire ?
Yes, that would work very well. The only other consideration is that it's illegal in most, if not all, states to have amber rear running lights. You'll need either red lenses or clear lenses with red bulbs.
|
|
|
Logged
|
VRCC #19757 IBA #44686 1998 Black Standard 2007 Goldwing 
|
|
|
mmurffy03
Member
    
Posts: 791
03 standard
toms river new jersey
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: April 24, 2012, 08:56:01 AM » |
|
yes i have the clear lenses
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
redflash
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: April 24, 2012, 08:59:01 AM » |
|
I added Shiney Hiney teardrop LED brake/running lights to each hard bag a number of years ago for extra visibility. I disabled the blnker/flashing brake function as they were very confusing to drivers behind me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Willow
Administrator
Member
    
Posts: 16679
Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP
Olathe, KS
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: April 24, 2012, 09:22:21 AM » |
|
Electrical Connection markets an LED turn signal conversion kit (for running and brake lights for right at $50. That's likely less than buying a replacement set of housings and has the added benefit of additional brake lights. Link to Electrical Connection conversion kit
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
salty1
Member
    
Posts: 2359
"Flyka"
Spokane, WA or Tucson, AZ
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: April 24, 2012, 10:10:41 AM » |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: April 24, 2012, 10:13:15 AM by salty1 »
|
Logged
|
My rides: 1998 GL1500C, 2000 GL 1500CF,2006 GL 1800 3A  
|
|
|
Dozer
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: April 24, 2012, 10:18:12 AM » |
|
info for Texas riders regarding red bulbs....per the Tx DPS: (FWIW) http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/RSD/VI/lighting.htm:The bulb must have a "DOT" or appropriate SAE stamp on it. Currently, there are NO DOT approved "Red" bulbs. Vehicles that are equipped from the manufacturer with approved lenses which are clear and lighted by red L.E.D. lights will pass state inspection. Vehicles that are equipped with aftermarket lenses which are clear and lighted by a red bulb will be rejected. (Currently, there are NO DOT approved "Red" bulbs.)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
aslondon
Member
    
Posts: 63
VRCC #4321
Monticello, Fl
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: April 24, 2012, 10:22:24 AM » |
|
+1 on Electrical Connection. Have used them for years and they work great. Never had a problem.
Al VRCC #4321
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Valkpilot
Member
    
Posts: 2151
What does the data say?
Corinth, Texas
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: April 24, 2012, 09:12:01 PM » |
|
info for Texas riders regarding red bulbs....per the Tx DPS: (FWIW) http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/RSD/VI/lighting.htm:The bulb must have a "DOT" or appropriate SAE stamp on it. Currently, there are NO DOT approved "Red" bulbs. Vehicles that are equipped from the manufacturer with approved lenses which are clear and lighted by red L.E.D. lights will pass state inspection. Vehicles that are equipped with aftermarket lenses which are clear and lighted by a red bulb will be rejected. (Currently, there are NO DOT approved "Red" bulbs.) That's good info.
|
|
|
Logged
|
VRCC #19757 IBA #44686 1998 Black Standard 2007 Goldwing 
|
|
|
mmurffy03
Member
    
Posts: 791
03 standard
toms river new jersey
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: April 24, 2012, 10:08:41 PM » |
|
well state inspection in NJ was every 2 years had everything but emissions testing and registration price was about $11 bucks and last year registration jumped to $65.00 and inspection and plate stickers are no longer required
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
john
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2012, 10:14:03 PM » |
|
'' +1 on Electrical Connection '' 
|
|
|
Logged
|
vrcc # 19002
|
|
|
JaysGone
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2012, 03:20:07 PM » |
|
is there a chance you could use a set of the front blinker ends with the dual filliment 1157 bulb on the rear and just hookup the blinker and ground wires normal and tap the running light wires into the license plate wire ?
Its what I did on mine. As far as amber running lights. ????????????????? Thats all I have to say on that one. Both my bikes have amber lights. But on my RoadStar I used Dynamics LEDS. They are amber running, red turn. I have not had a single problem here in Florida in 6 years.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1999 Valk - SOLD 2005 Yamaha RoadStar 2010 GoldWing with Motor Trike Kit
|
|
|
|
JaysGone
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2012, 09:01:16 PM » |
|
Here in Florida. The only thing that Im aware of regarding lights is. No flashing red or blue FRONT lights<turn signals>. They are for law enforcement here only. Rear turn or running can be red or amber, or all red. The brake light itself must be red. LEDS themselves are not DOT approved. But most newer cars seem to have LED turn and brake rear lights?? Ive noticed on some cars the turn signals are amber on some all red??I I dont feel locals really care in any event. They are just happy that you actually use them...........
I should add for all its worth. We have no state inspection of any vehicles.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1999 Valk - SOLD 2005 Yamaha RoadStar 2010 GoldWing with Motor Trike Kit
|
|
|
X Ring
Member
    
Posts: 3626
VRCC #27389, VRCCDS #204
The Landmass Between Mobile And New Orleans
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: April 26, 2012, 06:56:21 AM » |
|
No rear amber running lights isn't necessarily a state law but it is a federal requirement. Federal regulations require red running lights on the rear.
Marty
|
|
|
Logged
|
People are more passionately opposed to wearing fur than leather because it's safer to harass rich women than bikers. 
|
|
|
Dozer
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: April 26, 2012, 01:23:55 PM » |
|
No rear amber running lights isn't necessarily a state law but it is a federal requirement. Federal regulations require red running lights on the rear.
Marty
GEE! Federal law usurping state laws!! Imagine that!  Contrary to popular belief, thats exactly what started the civil war. Being that the north won, the feds are still usurping states rights >:(but I am getting side tracked...sorry....back to running lights...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Mr.BubblesVRCCDS0008
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: April 27, 2012, 09:00:05 PM » |
|
I ran amber lens as running lights/ blinker for over 4 yrs in Texas and passed inspection every year without a hitch. Probably not legal but never was stopped or refused sticker because of them. I think amber lens show up better in bad weather or fog than the red ones. I now have red lens so big brother will be happy with me.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Dozer
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: April 29, 2012, 12:55:33 PM » |
|
I think that law rates up there along with heavily tinted front windows. I see lots of cars with it but no one ever checks the translucence at the inspection. I agree...amber is easier to see in the dark than red
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Valkpilot
Member
    
Posts: 2151
What does the data say?
Corinth, Texas
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: April 29, 2012, 01:06:03 PM » |
|
I think that law rates up there along with heavily tinted front windows. I see lots of cars with it but no one ever checks the translucence at the inspection. I agree...amber is easier to see in the dark than red
I think it's one of those things that, by itself, won't get you stopped unless the police need a reason to stop you. And, if they're already writing a ticket for something else, it might become an add-on.
|
|
|
Logged
|
VRCC #19757 IBA #44686 1998 Black Standard 2007 Goldwing 
|
|
|
Dozer
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: April 29, 2012, 01:21:57 PM » |
|
Funny what a LEO looks for when ya get stopped. The last ticket I got was for speeding (3 months ago) for 8 mph over. It was 43 in a 35 MPH zone:tickedoff: My safety inspection was out of date by 5 months but he wanted to know what was in my saddle bags. He never said a word about the expired sticker as he happily wrote me a ticket for speeding...go figure
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|