Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
June 16, 2025, 11:28:22 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
Inzane 25
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Send this topic Print
Author Topic: I/S Brake pads?  (Read 2565 times)
Ferris Leets
Member
*****
Posts: 484

Catskill Mountains, N.Y.


« on: August 20, 2009, 11:33:11 AM »

I just replaced the fronts and bought new rears.  Long story shortened. I ended up with a good used set of left hand fronts and a new pair of "Honda" brand rears left over.  Just for the hell of it and because I get curious.  I wondered what the difference was between the standard/tourer rear brakes and the I/S rear.  Well I laid the good front on top of the new rears and they are identical, except that the rear (special order) pads have 2 grooves and the others have 1 groove.

So anyone know why they are different?
Logged
Ricky-D
Member
*****
Posts: 5031


South Carolina midlands


« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2009, 11:49:20 AM »

They're not!

Just a difference because of different manufacturers wanting to differentiate their pads from other manufacturers.

The only difference than needs to be paid attention is pad construction material.  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.

Pad material affects rotor life.  Harder pads = better stopping & greater wear on rotors. Softer pad = normal stopping & longer life on rotors.

***
Logged

2000_Valkyrie_Interstate
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13439


South Jersey


« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2009, 11:53:21 AM »

I just replaced the fronts and bought new rears.  Long story shortened. I ended up with a good used set of left hand fronts and a new pair of "Honda" brand rears left over.  Just for the hell of it and because I get curious.  I wondered what the difference was between the standard/tourer rear brakes and the I/S rear.  Well I laid the good front on top of the new rears and they are identical, except that the rear (special order) pads have 2 grooves and the others have 1 groove. So anyone know why they are different?

I have been looking into new front pads for my bike. what I have found out is that the pads front and back are the same backing plate wise. Differences are the thinkness of the pads. rears being thicker. It seams that the friction material for front and rear pads are the same for our bikes. I don't know if the OEM pads use different FM. One company Ferodo offers front pads that are the same thinkness as the rear pads for the same price and actually lists the same pads for front and rear. I am trying to find out if they will fit our calibers. The difference on thinkness is 1.5mm each pad. If they fit then this will of course give longer pad life for the same $$.
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Ferris Leets
Member
*****
Posts: 484

Catskill Mountains, N.Y.


« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2009, 01:13:14 PM »

But, why is the E/S the only one that has the different brake pads listed?
Logged
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13439


South Jersey


« Reply #4 on: August 20, 2009, 05:15:19 PM »

But, why is the E/S the only one that has the different brake pads listed?

don't know why, and the I/S are listed cheaper than the std on directline. I remember a few yrs ago something came up about an addtional backing plate for the I/S rears which the std didn't require. so I surmise the I/S is a thinner pad hence the lower $. The extra plate would be for heat blockage to the pistons in the caliper.
 I checked Vesrah, EBC, Ferodo, DP and SBS and all list the same brake pads for all valkyrie models except rune. From some google searches it seams that Vesrah, a japanese co., is the supplier of OEM pads and are the same pads.
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
fudgie
Member
*****
Posts: 10613


Better to be judged by 12, then carried by 6.

Huntington Indiana


WWW
« Reply #5 on: August 20, 2009, 05:25:05 PM »

  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.


Which are better? I think the ones I have on now are sintered.
Logged



Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR
98valk
Member
*****
Posts: 13439


South Jersey


« Reply #6 on: August 20, 2009, 05:55:09 PM »

  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.



Which are better? I think the ones I have on now are sintered.


sintered. for street use nothing is better. OEM is sintered
http://www.sportbikesolutions.com/sintered_vs_organic.htm
Logged

1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798
Grandpot
Member
*****
Posts: 630


Rolling Thunder South Carolina Chapter 1

Fort Mill, South Carolina


« Reply #7 on: August 21, 2009, 10:49:19 AM »

I have a 99 I/S.

I had EBS and just went back to Honda.  The Honda pads stop better with less pressure.  They also have a better feel through the controls.

I didn't keep very good records about the life span of either brand.  Pads are inexpensive and easy to change, so I will stick with the better performing brakes (Honda).  Stopping in a controlled state is what it's all about anyhow. Grin
Logged

crazy2 Experience is recognizing the same mistake every time you make it.crazy2
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Send this topic Print
Jump to: