The disrespect this guy displays to the man asking the question is absolutely pathetic. Moran????? More like Moron...... OH listen closely to what the narrator says......."They did not want to take on trial lawyers. And the "proposed" bills were written by whom?????? LAWYERS...............
Now Question........Would Obama's being a "lawyer" and all his campaigns being financed by lawyers skew his view??? Of course not.
Also, the insurance companies contribute to EVERYONE's campaign. Therefore whoever wins,,,,,,,THEY WIN TOO.
All this mud slinging is doing is an attempt by Obama and Pelosi to divert people's attention by demonizing the opposition. All 300,000,000 of them.
And for Obama and his cronies to say...."We underestimated the deficit by 2 Trillion dollars or more." Yes, yes........Would it be safe to say.....Mr. Obama is underestimating the cost of this Obamanation called national healthcare???? Of course not......

Let a DEMOCRAT give you the low down on TORT reform and why it wont be addressed........
Oh yes......a couple of facts. One.....IF a limit were put on malpractice suits.....the savings would be astronomical. Malpractice insurance is one of the biggest expenses a medical provider faces. Malpractice insurance is so high because of absolutely out of control judgements against providers. Many suits are forced to be dropped because the "problem" the claimant is suing over RESOLVES before the parties go to trial. Two ....MOST law suits against medical providers are frivilous. The gamble is that the insurance will settle out of court. Three....A large portion of malpractice suits are brought by private pays and Medicaid recipients. People who DO NOT pay a thing for the service provided.