Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
June 17, 2025, 03:01:17 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Beating a dead horse..I know but...  (Read 5425 times)
mrtappan
Member
*****
Posts: 483


« Reply #40 on: August 20, 2015, 09:08:20 PM »

I understand, but for me its not how long they last.  I had crotch rockets that smoked tires in as little as 1500 miles.  I want a tire I can trust my life on at speed and in various weather conditions.  I feel I cannot trust the Dunlops in rain, since I spun up the rear tire attempting to pass a car.  I was probably in 3rd gear and held the throttle steady while the bike wanted to high side me.   Eventually the tire regained traction and I was very cautious on my 400 mile ride home in the rain.      

I'm not a tire snob so I don't really care about brand or mileage or any of that.  Really, this is the only part portion of this whole post I can comment on.  I put a cheap Shinko rear tire on my Valkyrie recently.  Last weekend I got in it with a mustang on the interstate.  Even at a sustained speed of slightly over 100mph the Shinko was fine.  If you hate your factory tire buy buy a cheap Shinko.  Maybe it's better.  Mine seems to work fine.  

I wasn't there and I cant say, but maybe any "performance" bike would have spun out "any tire" in that scenario.  Just saying, it happens.  If you think that's bad, you should have owned a Vmax........
« Last Edit: August 20, 2015, 09:50:52 PM by mrtappan » Logged

Profile deleted.
Robert
Member
*****
Posts: 16956


S Florida


« Reply #41 on: August 22, 2015, 04:59:02 AM »

I think I know where some confusion is, below I will post links to 3 charts. All are 60 to 61 load ranges but look at the difference. I'm not sure why the lower number on the first except to say its a miss print. The bottom 2 are the correct figure. So its a 16 lb difference between 60 and 60 load range index. Hope this clears some confusion.  Grin



http://www.webbikeworld.com/Motorcycle-tires/tire-data.htm
60    250    531
61    257    567
This is actually only 4 lbs difference in the 59 load index, this is the wrong listing.

http://www.maxxis.com/other-motorcycle-information/motorcycle-tire-school#motorcycle_tire_conversion_charts
60    551         
61    567

https://www.rockymountainatvmc.com/docs/Street-Tire-Load-Ratings.pdf
60 551 lbs             250 kg
61 567 lbs             257 kg


As for the spin out, its kind of unfair because  it was a brand new bike and it was on slightly wet good black top but when I was on a test run with a new Valk the rear did break loose. It was a OS moment, but it made me be careful when wet on the OEM tires till proven.
« Last Edit: August 22, 2015, 05:07:54 AM by Robert » Logged

“Some people see things that are and ask, Why? Some people dream of things that never were and ask, Why not? Some people have to go to work and don’t have time for all that.”
rusty
Member
*****
Posts: 86


milaca, mn


« Reply #42 on: August 25, 2015, 05:13:17 AM »

well dont leave us hanging .....tell us how it went with the mustang!
Logged

peace man
mrtappan
Member
*****
Posts: 483


« Reply #43 on: August 25, 2015, 01:00:11 PM »

They go faster than 125mph so not well.......
Logged

Profile deleted.
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: