Harryc
|
 |
« on: August 18, 2016, 04:20:33 PM » |
|
Just looking for some advice. On a '97 Tourer with 21k miles...maintenance history unknown, would you consider replacing the timing belts based on age? I know the manual says check them at 100k, but doesn't mention age of the belts. I can get the Gates T275 belts on Amazon for $15 bucks each so cost is not the issue. It's just whether or not it should be done considering the belts might be 19 years old. I'm leaning towards yes, but was wondering what you'd do.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 18, 2016, 04:22:41 PM by Harryc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
flash2002
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2016, 04:32:53 PM » |
|
I bought a 98 with 42000 km I didn't want to take a chance because of age so I change them. They might be good for a long time but why take a chance. Belts are cheaper then a head rebuild.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Beardo
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2016, 04:38:56 PM » |
|
Yes. I replaced my original belts with 40,000 miles based on age. They looked fine but I like to replace things before they break, especially when it's $50 and a nice couple hours in the garage to give you a lot of price of mind.  I've replaced things like wheel bearings that were just fine, while I had everything apart, and I plan on doing the u-joint this winter during my rear end maintenance just because I don't want to wait for them to fail a couple thousand miles from home. I'd rather spend $50 or $100 on preventative maintenance here and there vs having a costly breakdown on the road.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Itinifni
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: August 18, 2016, 06:20:19 PM » |
|
I picked up a 97 with 30k this past spring, I'll do the belts this winter. It doesn't really have to be done but it's an easy, inexpensive job for piece of mind.
|
|
|
Logged
|
73? CT70 79 CB750K 82 GL1100 94 CBR1000F Kid Kid 97 Valkyrie Std. (May surpass the GL1100 as the best bike I've ever owned, I'll update in 50k miles)
|
|
|
Harryc
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: August 18, 2016, 06:55:47 PM » |
|
I picked up a 97 with 30k this past spring, I'll do the belts this winter. It doesn't really have to be done but it's an easy, inexpensive job for piece of mind.
Yup, I'll probably do the same ... winter project. Thanks guys.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Woton
Member
    
Posts: 410
1997 Tourer Pearl Green/Pearl Ivory "BRNHLDE"
Central North Carolina
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: August 19, 2016, 07:46:37 AM » |
|
I feel what you are reading here are similar comments to what I received when I considered doing this around 53K. Probably not necessary, relatively inexpensive if you do it yourself, and not that difficult - and all for peace of mind. Changed both the tensioners and belts - everything looked fine and the bike was running fine when I changed them. Probably not necessary, but it was something else I could do for the old girl for relatively little money as well as that that feel-good sensation.  Good luck - lots of past technical posts on this subject for your assistance and viewing pleasure. So, do a search if needed... 
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Ride Smart - Ride Safe"
|
|
|
Relax
Member
    
Posts: 322
Power & elegance...just like the Valk
Oslo, Norway
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: August 19, 2016, 01:04:45 PM » |
|
Just looking for some advice. On a '97 Tourer with 21k miles...maintenance history unknown, would you consider replacing the timing belts based on age? I know the manual says check them at 100k, but doesn't mention age of the belts. I can get the Gates T275 belts on Amazon for $15 bucks each so cost is not the issue. It's just whether or not it should be done considering the belts might be 19 years old. I'm leaning towards yes, but was wondering what you'd do.
"21' k miles....unknown history ,,,," ,,,on a 97 Valk ...? How come you know it's 21' miles.? Don't worry ....but do check the timing belt , oil, filters and rear end ... then brakes,, That's what I would do  ( To replace the belt is no big deal )
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Chrisj CMA
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: August 19, 2016, 01:15:42 PM » |
|
Just looking for some advice. On a '97 Tourer with 21k miles...maintenance history unknown, would you consider replacing the timing belts based on age? I know the manual says check them at 100k, but doesn't mention age of the belts. I can get the Gates T275 belts on Amazon for $15 bucks each so cost is not the issue. It's just whether or not it should be done considering the belts might be 19 years old. I'm leaning towards yes, but was wondering what you'd do.
There are things to check that would indicate that its really 121,000 miles, in that case, really needs new belts if really never done.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
98valk
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2016, 04:41:58 PM » |
|
if interested, I believe this the actual Gates belt design the timing belts are. http://www.gates.com/products/industrial/industrial-belts/synchronous-belts/powergrip-timing-beltsPowerGrip® Timing Belts have a trapezoidal tooth profile, making this belt well suited for use in positioning applications, such as office machines, machine tools, postage equipment, sewing machines, vending machines, agriculture, outdoor power equipment, food processing, HVAC, oil fields, wood, paper, sand and gravel applications. Fiberglass tensile cord provides high strength, excellent flex life, and high resistance to elongation. Neoprene body provides protection against grime, grease, oil, and moisture. Nylon tooth facing provides a durable wear surface for long service life. Eliminates lubrication and re-tensioning to reduce maintenance and labor required on drives. the design manual can be used to see how overly designed the honda belt actually is. http://www.gates.com/~/media/files/gates/industrial/power-transmission/manuals/powergripgt3drivedesignmanual.pdf
|
|
|
Logged
|
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C 10speed 1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp
"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other." John Adams 10/11/1798
|
|
|
Harryc
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2016, 02:57:06 AM » |
|
"21' k miles....unknown history ,,,," ,,,on a 97 Valk ...?
Well, I should probably clarify. I have one maintenance record from the first owner done at 10k miles (tires and fluids), and that was 3 years ago, and I know the guy I bought it from so I'm pretty sure the Odo is accurate. When I say unknown maint record, it is because I didn't speak to the first owner and the second owner is mechanically challenged so I did not get any meaningful info out of him. Judging by the condition of the maintenance items on the bike when I got it, all he did was change the oil....once maybe. That and the cosmetic condition was consistent with a bike that didn't see much road time. I have gone through every maintenance item on the bike except for timing belts...thus my question. Nothing in the things I went through made me suspicious that the bikes mileage was reported incorrectly on title transfer. @Chrisj CMA, what would those items to check be out of curiosity? The only things I can think of are maybe worn rubber on the foootpegs or a worn seat. Both of those have minimal wear. I can tell you this, I did remove the tank and the air filter had never been changed, and I could also tell the tank had never been removed because of the condition of the bolts and connectors. In fact all of the bolts on the bike looked unmolested except for the ones needed to change tires. You could eat off of the engine, it's that clean.
|
|
« Last Edit: August 20, 2016, 03:30:59 AM by Harryc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Patrick
Member
    
Posts: 15433
VRCC 4474
Largo Florida
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: August 20, 2016, 05:58:10 AM » |
|
I'm a believer in peace of mind and maintenance. For either one, I don't have problem with wanting to change the belts.
All the timing belts I've seen or replaced over the years, all look good right until the second they decide to break.
Just clean up the rubber buildup on the idlers and check them for smoothness. I also set the set freeplay a bit looser than the manual says. I set them at 3/8" which keeps them a bit quieter. Some will say to just use the spring on the tensioner, I don't.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: August 20, 2016, 06:04:57 AM » |
|
"21' k miles....unknown history ,,,," ,,,on a 97 Valk ...?
Well, I should probably clarify. I have one maintenance record from the first owner done at 10k miles (tires and fluids), and that was 3 years ago, and I know the guy I bought it from so I'm pretty sure the Odo is accurate. When I say unknown maint record, it is because I didn't speak to the first owner and the second owner is mechanically challenged so I did not get any meaningful info out of him. Judging by the condition of the maintenance items on the bike when I got it, all he did was change the oil....once maybe. That and the cosmetic condition was consistent with a bike that didn't see much road time. I have gone through every maintenance item on the bike except for timing belts...thus my question. Nothing in the things I went through made me suspicious that the bikes mileage was reported incorrectly on title transfer. @Chrisj CMA, what would those items to check be out of curiosity? The only things I can think of are maybe worn rubber on the foootpegs or a worn seat. Both of those have minimal wear. I can tell you this, I did remove the tank and the air filter had never been changed, and I could also tell the tank had never been removed because of the condition of the bolts and connectors. In fact all of the bolts on the bike looked unmolested except for the ones needed to change tires. You could eat off of the engine, it's that clean. If I were you I really wouldn't be concerned of the mileage 21k-121k or 221k these bikes can do it  I have seen many with over 100k that you would swear we're new. Chris' is one of the cleanest you will see ( very anal about it,it seems  ) nothing wrong with that. I get comments all the time about how new my Bee looks and people can't believe she is 19 
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
Harryc
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: August 20, 2016, 11:56:48 AM » |
|
If I were you I really wouldn't be concerned of the mileage 21k-121k or 221k these bikes can do it Yeah that's not really the issue, But I think you'd agree that on a Valk with 120k vs one with 20k it would be good for the owner to know which it is because some parts just wear out at 120k. I might want to replace said parts now vs when they leave me on the side of the road. Make sense?
|
|
« Last Edit: August 20, 2016, 01:04:45 PM by Harryc »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2016, 01:19:02 PM » |
|
Sure but just inspect the rear diff and drive line and not much more to really wear out. Other than the usual bearing brakes and so forth.
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
Harryc
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2016, 01:29:57 PM » |
|
Sure but just inspect the rear diff and drive line and not much more to really wear out. Other than the usual bearing brakes and so forth.
Yup, well that's another story well worth discussing over a brew next time I am near Madison Alabama. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2016, 03:10:35 PM » |
|
Bring it and ai will buy  I have ridden in your state many times  and enjoyed the country side of NY the City not so much 
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
Valk12183
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: August 22, 2016, 05:35:03 PM » |
|
I just bought a 2003 with only 19k on it. Went thru and did all maintenance and pondered about doing the timing belts also. I figured for a little bit of money it gained me a lot of piece of mind. Just did them last week. Went with the gates belts. Also did anti freeze and new plugs while I was at it. Now I feel I can ride her across the country without any worries...
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bighead
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: August 22, 2016, 05:37:56 PM » |
|
Go for it  I have a couple of times 
|
|
|
Logged
|
1997 Bumble Bee 1999 Interstate (sold) 2016 Wing
|
|
|
|