personal opinion here
1. I firmly believe that if you are in a motorized vehicle and kill someone in an accident that is your fault you should be chargable with murder. If you choose to drive dangerously or under the influence, you are also choosing to use a large blunt object in a dangerous manner.
2. I am in favor of the death penalty.
I have seen bumper stickers with "Kill a biker - Go to Jail", I woudl prefer "Take a life - Donate your life"
(sorry bad commute on i85/285 in Atlanta this week)

I can't recall when this happened, but the sentecing was just handed down. A young man chose to drink and drive and hit a motorcycle. Killed the man and his wife on the bike. They left behind 2 young children. He was 40, she was 30. I think the guy that killed them was in his early 20's.
Did I state that he KILLED them?
The sentence was 8 years.
Did I state that he KILLED them?
Eight years. That means each life was only worth 4 years.
I used to be involved in drugs. I undoubtably caused alot of pain and misery to other people. But, as far as I know, I didn't directly or indirectly kill anyone. I pray to God I didn't. The state of Illinois was pushing hard for 9 years. With the help of a lawyer, I didn't do anywhere close to that, but I DID learn my lesson. It's been over 10 years now.
My point is...does anyone see a problem here? I don't mean drug punishments are to severe. I mean murdering someone on a motorcycle has a penalty that is almost nonexistant. If he had killed only one of the couple, would that be 4 years then?
Did I state that he KILLED them?
Hell, if you choose to kill your wife, you would get a whole lotta time in the joint....unless you simply run her over on her motorcycle.

BTW...the young man who killed them cried at the sentencing. I wonder if they were tears of sorrow for what he'd done, tears of pity for himself, or tears of joy?