hogg disgusting individual

[98valk]

Many of us sensed that there was something off, something not quite right about David Hogg.

Now we have some hard evidence that David Hogg is not a victim but rather someone who profits from the tragedy of others...........the very thing which he has been so busy accusing the NRA of.

What the conflicting accounts of his involvement on the day of the shooting show, is an individual deliberately attempting to position himself into a position of prominence for personal and political gain.

The level of hypocrisy is truly astounding and disgusting.

DAVID HOGG: On the day of the shooting, I got my camera and got on my bike and road as fast as I could three miles from my house to the school to get as much video and to get as many interviews as I could because I knew that this could not be another mass shooting.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/march-for-our-lives-39-days-how-parkland-students-turned-grief-into-action/

http://time.com/5161034/florida-school-shooting-survivor/
David Hogg, a senior at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, knows what gunshots sound like: His father worked in law enforcement, and taught him about weapons and how to handle them. So when Hogg heard a “pop” while sitting in an AP environmental science class around 2:30 p.m. Wednesday, he told his teacher it sounded strangely like a gunshot. But there had been a fire drill that very morning and talk of a “Code Red” exercise to prepare for an active shooter. This must just be a surprise drill, he reasoned.
And then the fire alarm sounded. Dutifully acting on it, Hogg and other students tried to exit the building. A janitor—Hogg doesn’t know his name but calls him an angel—knew where the shots were coming from and sent the students back. Then a culinary arts teacher, Ashley Kurth, pulled Hogg and others inside, locked the door, and made them hide in a closet. Checking Twitter and Instagram, Hogg—who’s an editor at the school’s TV station—found the news that the shooting was real and ongoing.

[Pete]

His foul mouth repeated use of the F word, was enough to cause me to not take him very seriously or listen to him.

[Ramie]

We have to understand, these kids have been brainwashed. 

There is no way this whole thing isn't being organized by other groups interested only in sowing discord and hatred. 

They don't really want solutions or answers. 

They are right about one thing, their government did fail them. 

The sheriff's department and the FBI failed big time and I'll bet right now their glad to have the distraction of young kids clambering about guns.

[G-Man]

Brainwashed is correct.

A recent discussion went like this:
"Guns only purpose is to kill something"
"Not true, guns can be a deterrent and never be fired"
"But they are a designed and built for the sole purpose to kill"
"Then 90% of the guns in the country must be defective, because they haven't killed anything"
"But that's their only purpose, to kill"
And on and on.

They believe that any gun, at any time, can be used to kill someone, by any one.  Law abiding means nothing.  "What if they had a bad day?"  What if bullied to a certain point?"  etc.  Any gun owner at any time can become a murderer.  This is where they are coming from, or have been lead to (depending on how you look at it).

And when suicide entered the conversation, it was proclaimed that there would be less completed suicides if there were no guns.  I don't know how that can be determined, but it was stated as fact to me.  When I stated that no guns just meant more overdoses, cut wrists, building/bridge jumpers, etc., I was told I was wrong, and that those kind of suicide attempts more often lead to the person being saved than suicide attempts with a gun.  How's that for a statistic?

[Gavin_Sons]

Bill Whittle, This man gets it exactly right. Listen closely to the part about the gazelle and cheetah.

https://youtu.be/avoFkTfNz2A

[Skinhead]

He's good.  And he's right, almost as right as Rush Limbaugh.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9DLGTYd5wE


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FOwy9OWfnAM

[MAD6Gun]

Brainwashed is correct.

A recent discussion went like this:
"Guns only purpose is to kill something"
"Not true, guns can be a deterrent and never be fired"
"But they are a designed and built for the sole purpose to kill"
"Then 90% of the guns in the country must be defective, because they haven't killed anything"
"But that's their only purpose, to kill"
And on and on.

They believe that any gun, at any time, can be used to kill someone, by any one.  Law abiding means nothing.  "What if they had a bad day?"  What if bullied to a certain point?"  etc.  Any gun owner at any time can become a murderer.  This is where they are coming from, or have been lead to (depending on how you look at it).

And when suicide entered the conversation, it was proclaimed that there would be less completed suicides if there were no guns.  I don't know how that can be determined, but it was stated as fact to me.  When I stated that no guns just meant more overdoses, cut wrists, building/bridge jumpers, etc., I was told I was wrong, and that those kind of suicide attempts more often lead to the person being saved than suicide attempts with a gun.  How's that for a statistic?

 Yep. That is exactly how it is to argue with a anti-gun liberal about guns. So if all guns suddenly disappeared, people would stop committing suicide. Yeah that makes sense,NOT. Anyone who is set on killing themselves isn't going to stop just because they don't have a gun. Nor is any wako going to stop killing just because they can't get a gun. Timothy McVeigh killed 168 people with a truck  bomb.

[¿spoom]

[solo1]

And when suicide entered the conversation, it was proclaimed that there would be less completed suicides if there were no guns.  QUOTE: Gman quoting a  liberal liar.

According to John Lott's Book "War on Guns" 2016 edition,  since 2000, firearm suicide rates have gone up 14%, NON firearm suicide rates have gone up 49%, and motor vehicle suicide rates have gone up a WHOOPING 53%  Statistics doesn't account for the why but it seems to me that school shootings might give a suicide bound person a brief claim to fame PLUS a chance to do a 'suicide by cop"


We most certainly have a epidemic of liberal LIARS plus young lying Hitlerites looking for fame in another way.

[Jess from VA]

And when suicide entered the conversation, it was proclaimed that there would be less completed suicides if there were no guns.  QUOTE: Gman quoting a  liberal liar.

According to John Lott's Book "War on Guns" 2016 edition,  since 2000, firearm suicide rates have gone up 14%, NON firearm suicide rates have gone up 49%, and motor vehicle suicide rates have gone up a WHOOPING 53%  Statistics doesn't account for the why but it seems to me that school shootings might give a suicide bound person a brief claim to fame PLUS a chance to do a 'suicide by cop"


We most certainly have a epidemic of liberal LIARS plus young lying Hitlerites looking for fame in another way.

I'm not sure these kids (the vast minority at all these marches) are after fame.  Just some (misguided and wrong headed) chance to contribute to the democratic process, and to feel important about themselves in their largely valueless (or mis-valued) culture.  Used by the left as pawns, and gloriously ignorant of it too.  Clearly, ignorance is bliss.

Boy Hogg is after the fame and attention, no question about it.  The left will reserve a place for him at their trough, and he knows it.

[The emperor has no clothes]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

[Wizzard]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

Agreed,, Name calling is not in order here, but most of it is because they give this kid so much air time. He is loving it. Remember, he is just a kid as we were at one time, and if I was stupid, I got told I was stupid. We just did not have his platform at the time. If I ever used the "F" bomb period,, I would have lost very many privileges at our house. I get the impression this kid is more interested in making a name for himself and fame than he is about any issue.

[Gavin_Sons]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

Have you heard any of his stupid speeches?  Him calling all adults f-ing morons. This little boy deserves all the backlash anyone can throw at him. It might be a good learning experience.  Everything that comes out of his mouth is either a lie or something the left has fed him to say. Do you really think these are his own thoughts?

[The emperor has no clothes]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

Agreed,, Name calling is not in order here, but most of it is because they give this kid so much air time. He is loving it. Remember, he is just a kid as we were at one time, and if I was stupid, I got told I was stupid. We just did not have his platform at the time. If I ever used the "F" bomb period,, I would have lost very many privileges at our house. I get the impression this kid is more interested in making a name for himself and fame than he is about any issue.

He might very well be, I don’t know. I’ve seen just a couple of his speeches. My point is, we are grown men acting more childish than these 17 year old kids. Don’t agree with them, fine state your views. But to call kids that have been shot at and traumatized the names that are spewing out here is shameful. Set a good example for these kids. They are trying to do what they think is right by expressing themselves.

[Psychotic Bovine]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

[The emperor has no clothes]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

Proud of yourself ?

[Psychotic Bovine]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

Proud of yourself ?

Nope, I am not proud of the fact I held back what I would have loved to say.  But, I have nothing nice to say about people who dance in the blood of victims, like he is doing.  I hate his stupid Nazi salute, and his whining about being forced to wear a clear backpack to school.  He's a spoiled little punk.
I would bet if you polled his peers they would probably say the same thing. 

[baldo]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

Proud of yourself ?

Nope, I am not proud of the fact I held back what I would have loved to say.  But, I have nothing nice to say about people who dance in the blood of victims, like he is doing.  I hate his stupid Nazi salute, and his whining about being forced to wear a clear backpack to school.  He's a spoiled little punk.
I would bet if you polled his peers they would probably say the same thing. 

[98valk]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

I just re-read every post before yours. which posts call these kids hateful names?  what kids are u talking about? only one kid was mentioned and that was hogg who has lied about were he was during the shooting.   u need to go see a doctor, because u see things written that are not there and then post that they are there. please get some professional medical help.

[Psychotic Bovine]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

Proud of yourself ?

Nope, I am not proud of the fact I held back what I would have loved to say.  But, I have nothing nice to say about people who dance in the blood of victims, like he is doing.  I hate his stupid Nazi salute, and his whining about being forced to wear a clear backpack to school.  He's a spoiled little punk.
I would bet if you polled his peers they would probably say the same thing. 

There he is!  The sun must have come out, since you can see MH's shadow!

[98valk]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

Agreed,, Name calling is not in order here, but most of it is because they give this kid so much air time. He is loving it. Remember, he is just a kid as we were at one time, and if I was stupid, I got told I was stupid. We just did not have his platform at the time. If I ever used the "F" bomb period,, I would have lost very many privileges at our house. I get the impression this kid is more interested in making a name for himself and fame than he is about any issue.

He might very well be, I don’t know. I’ve seen just a couple of his speeches. My point is, we are grown men acting more childish than these 17 year old kids. Don’t agree with them, fine state your views. But to call kids that have been shot at and traumatized the names that are spewing out here is shameful. Set a good example for these kids. They are trying to do what they think is right by expressing themselves.

again what posts are u reading? nobody is calling kids who were shot at and traumatized names. where are the posts that did that.  you make things up to cause discord on this board. u really need some medical help.  do yourself a favor and get some help, your seeing and reading things that are not there.

[The emperor has no clothes]

This is what we have stooped to ? Disagreeing with these kids is one thing, calling them hateful names is another. You would think old men would have better sense.

He is a lying, opportunistic child.  One of the most foul-mouthed attention-whores I have seen in recent memory.
His cue-ball headed best friend is an admitted bully, bragged how they ostracized the psycho shooter.  Both her and Hogg are reprehensible excuses for human beings.  No wonder the left, the media, and the anti gunners love them.
(Did I leave anything out about how I feel about the little fish taco-waffles?)

Proud of yourself ?

Nope, I am not proud of the fact I held back what I would have loved to say.  But, I have nothing nice to say about people who dance in the blood of victims, like he is doing.  I hate his stupid Nazi salute, and his whining about being forced to wear a clear backpack to school.  He's a spoiled little punk.
I would bet if you polled his peers they would probably say the same thing. 

There he is!  The sun must have come out, since you can see MH's shadow!

You seem to have a lot of anger pent up in that head of yours ?

[Serk]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

[RP#62]

Its funny now hearing young Mr Hogg whine about how unfair it is, even possibly interfering with his first amendment rights, that the school will now require that only clear backpacks be worn so that the contents can be seen.  He said its not fair that they be punished for what others had done.  Evidently, the irony escapes him.

-RP

[The emperor has no clothes]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

[Psychotic Bovine]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

[The emperor has no clothes]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

One class act.

[Psychotic Bovine]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

One class act.

oh, thank you kind sir.  That made my day.

[baldo]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

[Robert]

Hogg Hitler! The little dictator in the making.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRi-UouACL8&bpctr=1522279860

Report: Only 10 Percent of D.C. March for Our Lives Protesters Were Under 18

"Contrary to what's been reported in many media accounts, the D.C. March for Our Lives crowd was not primarily made up of teenagers," Fisher wrote. "Only about 10 percent of the participants were under 18."

"The average age of the adults in the crowd was just under 49 years old, which is older than participants at the other marches I've surveyed but similar to the age of the average participant at the Million Moms March in 2000, which was also about gun control," she continued.

Fisher found that the march did manage to draw in a higher-than-average percentage of first-time protesters, about 27 percent. But of those first-timers, only 12 percent said they were motivated by the issue of gun control, with over half saying they were motivated by Trump or "peace" in general.

Gun Rights Provocateur David Hogg Rejected By Four Colleges To Which He Applied

David Hogg Changes Story, Wasn't At School When Cruz Opened Fire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=37zoQLgqEy0

[Psychotic Bovine]

Hogg Hitler! The little dictator in the making.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRi-UouACL8&bpctr=1522279860

that was awesome.

[MAD6Gun]

Hogg Hitler! The little dictator in the making.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRi-UouACL8&bpctr=1522279860

 HEIL HOGG......HEIL HOGG....HEIL HOGG.....

[Gavin_Sons]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

Says the guy that wussed out on sending me a pm about what he really thinks of me.  

[Bighead]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

Prove his comments wrong

[baldo]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

Says the guy that wussed out on sending me a pm about what he really thinks of me.  

LOLOL...Hey Einstein. You need to check out the other thread, the one where you got all tough guy....

[Bighead]

Look when will we start blaming the finger that pulls the trigger of a gun (which never killed anyone by itself) instead of blaming the gun? The gun didnt get up and say hey I am gonna kill 20 people today. The sick preverted bastard that picked the gun up ( that never caused death by itself) did on his own accord. Our generation is partially to blame.  We were not as strict on our kids as our parents were on us ( dont blame me I have no kids) and our kids are less strict on their kids. There is no sense of responsibility these days........98% of the problem.IMHO

[Serk]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

I know you're working hard to stay within the Rules of the Road, I am too... I can not put into words my utter contempt and disgust with these little puppet wanna be tin pot dictators, and the evil forces behind them pulling their strings, whispering in their ears, and giving them aid and comfort.

[Psychotic Bovine]

"Kid" or not, once you step into the political arena, especially when you come out fighting against civil rights, the gloves come off, and they're fair game.

I would agree that it's fair to dispute the things they want done. I don't think it's right to call them "liberal liars, young hitlerites, cue balls, etc." If your argument is so weak that you (not you specifically) need to resort to that, you have probably already lost the debate.

First rule of a fight:  you get hit, you hit back 10 times as hard.  I make no apologies for what I said about those turd-blossoms.

I know you're working hard to stay within the Rules of the Road, I am too... I can not put into words my utter contempt and disgust with these little puppet wanna be tin pot dictators, and the evil forces behind them pulling their strings, whispering in their ears, and giving them aid and comfort.

Yeah, pretty much.