Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ

[Robert]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

[old2soon]

I do NOT wanna git my hopes up-BUT!  I'd say sumpin else but dats enough fer now!  RIDE SAFE.

[baldo]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

[Robert]

We have been so programed by previous administrations that we have the expectation that nothing will happen. But Trump is not a politician and not of the swamp and we have seen so much happening with prosecutions and we see Comey, Lynch are just starting to accuse each other and its getting interesting. The last link is Congress's memo saying that there needs to be a criminal investigation. It states exactly what we all knew that Hillary got off because Comey made the decision before the end of the investigation. Its out in the open now, by congress acknowledging it.

He has already made a executive order freezing the assets of those who are in government and corrupt and are involved in human trafficking. A Saudi Prince was already taken out and there are many more who's assets have been frozen.

Also Recall that Sessions paired special prosecutor John Huber with DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz - falling short of a second Special Counsel, but empowering Horowitz to fully investigate allegations of FBI FISA abuse with subpoena power and other methods he was formerly unable to utilize.

The GOP letter's primary focus appears to be James Comey, while the charges for all include obstruction, perjury, corruption, unauthorized removal of classified documents, contributions and donations by foreign nationals and other allegations.

The letter also demands that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein "be recused from any examination of FISA abuse," and recommends that "neither U.S. Attorney John Huber nor a special counsel (if appointed) should report to Rosenstein." 

Executive Order Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-blocking-property-persons-involved-serious-human-rights-abuse-corruption/

I dont think its going to happen till Mueller finishes his investigation and Trump is cleared of any wrong doing. Muller's revelations may also be interesting and may not be what they think they are.

Robert Mueller's warning: 'Many' news stories on Trump-Russia probe are wrong
https://m.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/apr/16/robert-mueller-many-news-stories-trump-russia-prob/

"What I have been telling all reporters is that many stories about our investigation have been inaccurate," the Mueller spokesperson said. "Be very cautious about any source that claims to have knowledge about our investigation and dig deep into what they claim before reporting on it. If another outlet reports something, don't run with it unless you have your own sourcing to back it up."


18,000+ Sealed Indictments Now!
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/03/06/18000-sealed-indictments-now/

This below is the actual document and the first recommendation is James Comey the second is Hillary Clinton.

It even says in the first paragraph that they are aware of the dissimilar degrees of zealousness that has marked the investigation into Hillary Clinton compared to the investigation into Donald Trump.  
https://desantis.house.gov/_cache/files/8/0/8002ca75-52fc-4995-b87e-43584da268db/472EBC7D8F55C0F9E830D37CF96376A2.final-criminal-referral.pdf

[Robert]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

I said start 

[Serk]

I'll believe it when I see some perp walks... 

(And even then they'd just pull some of their connections and get off with a slap on the wrist...)

The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.
The pessimist fears it is.

[rocketray]

you need a revolution every 200 years because after 200 years governments become stale and corrupt--Ben Franklin

[Rams]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

This response is confusing.

I would think that if it is proven any of the accused had actually broken a law you would support prosecution.   Am I wrong on that?     Does it matter what party they claim?

I'll be breathlessly waiting for your response.

Rams

[Robert]

Well you know we were just talking about war with NK and everyone quaking in their boots and now NK is all nicey nice with everyone wanting to disarm. Miracles do happen 

[baldo]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

This response is confusing.

I would think that if it is proven any of the accused had actually broken a law you would support prosecution.   Am I wrong on that?     Does it matter what party they claim?

I'll be breathlessly waiting for your response.

Rams

Hi Ron,

You can relax and take a breath. My response is actually pretty simple. This 'action' is merely another desperate meaningless grasp by some conservatives in Congress to keep their masses riled up, making themselves appear to be relevant and 'on the case'. It will go nowhere and do nothing, like so many other noble efforts. As of this writing, no major news agency was reporting this. However, I did find several potential blockbuster sites like this example....

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/76344365/

As far as your question of fairness....yes, absolutely. Regardless of party, wrongdoers should face the consequences. As will be witnessed in the coming months.

Ride safe, the good weather is on it's way...(so they say)

[Robert]

As of this writing, no major news agency was reporting this. However, I did find several potential blockbuster sites like this example....

Do you really trust the news? I could understand if it was not an official document from the Congress (conspiracy) and I also understand that we will see how far it goes but you really think the news is going to report it. Come on really?

[The emperor has no clothes]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

This response is confusing.

I would think that if it is proven any of the accused had actually broken a law you would support prosecution.   Am I wrong on that?     Does it matter what party they claim?

I'll be breathlessly waiting for your response.

Rams

Hi Ron,

You can relax and take a breath. My response is actually pretty simple. This 'action' is merely another desperate meaningless grasp by some conservatives in Congress to keep their masses riled up, making themselves appear to be relevant and 'on the case'. It will go nowhere and do nothing, like so many other noble efforts. As of this writing, no major news agency was reporting this. However, I did find several potential blockbuster sites like this example....

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/76344365/

As far as your question of fairness....yes, absolutely. Regardless of party, wrongdoers should face the consequences. As will be witnessed in the coming months.

Ride safe, the good weather is on it's way...(so they say)

Hey, Bob. While I agree with what you say, I'm trying to avoid politics on here. But, I'm a little concerned. Tiger Droppings ? 

[baldo]

]Hey, Bob. While I agree with what you say, I'm trying to avoid politics on here. But, I'm a little concerned. Tiger Droppings ? 

LOL...I know, I felt I had to share that little nugget.

I'm avoiding political threads, too (for the most part). It's an exercise in futility. Every now and then I slip....

And Robert, I don't subscribe to the "lamestream media" mentality. I read everything with an eye toward believability (sp). But I know bullshit when I see it.

[Serk]

"House Oversight and Government Reform Committee member Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Florida, along with ten other colleagues sent the letter Wednesday to Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray"

So 11 representatives are behind this.

Keep in mind, back in December 58 Democrat representatives voted to impeach President Donald J. Trump because he's a big meanie. And you saw how far that went.

(Source - http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/363645-the-nearly-60-dems-who-voted-for-impeachment )

Eleven representatives is nothing.

Don't misunderestimate me, I'd love to see the swamp drained and the swamp creatures doing hard time (Gitmo has room I hear!) but it just ain't gonna happen...

[Pete]

And Robert, I don't subscribe to the "lamestream media" mentality. I read everything with an eye toward believability (sp). But I know bullshit when I see it.

Hummmmmmmmmmmmmmmm. I think I see a disconnect!

[Robert]

Don't misunderestimate me, I'd love to see the swamp drained and the swamp creatures doing hard time (Gitmo has room I hear!) but it just ain't gonna happen...

All Republicans voted with 126 Democrats to defeat the resolution. Those Democrats included Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (Calif.) and Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (Md.), who announced ahead of the vote they would vote to table the effort.

That is different than here with the DOJ under Trumps control and Sessions hopefully poised to prosecute. We saw much of Lynch and Holder doing the presidents bidding under Obama so lets see if Trump can get this done. There is always hope.

I would think that if the Tarmac meeting was released and it was as bad as they say it would be hard not to prosecute. Well as an added incentive to get this going Holder said he is thinking about running for president.

[The emperor has no clothes]

"House Oversight and Government Reform Committee member Rep. Ron DeSantis, R-Florida, along with ten other colleagues sent the letter Wednesday to Sessions and FBI Director Christopher Wray"

So 11 representatives are behind this.

Keep in mind, back in December 58 Democrat representatives voted to impeach President Donald J. Trump because he's a big meanie. And you saw how far that went.

(Source - http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/363645-the-nearly-60-dems-who-voted-for-impeachment )

Eleven representatives is nothing.

Don't misunderestimate me, I'd love to see the swamp drained and the swamp creatures doing hard time (Gitmo has room I hear!) but it just ain't gonna happen...

Misunderestimate ? Oxymoron, double entendres ? Do I need to brush up on my grammar ? Would that be the same as "go ahead and estimate me" ?  

[Serk]

Misunderestimate ? Oxymoron, double entendres ? Do I need to brush up on my grammar ? Would that be the same as "go ahead and estimate me" ?  

The term was the creation of George W. Bush, but since has somewhat entered the general lexicon. Novelist and critic Philip Hensher said the term was one of his "most memorable additions to the language, and an incidentally expressive one: it may be that we rather needed a word for 'to underestimate by mistake'."

misunderestimate
Verb

misunderestimate (third-person singular simple present misunderestimates, present participle misunderestimating, simple past and past participle misunderestimated)

(colloquial, malapropism or humorous) To underestimate by mistake.

[Willow]

... But I know bullshit when I see it.

LOL!  Apparently not so much.  I seem to remember an election prediction ...  

[dinosnake]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

This response is confusing.

I would think that if it is proven any of the accused had actually broken a law you would support prosecution.   Am I wrong on that?     Does it matter what party they claim?

I'll be breathlessly waiting for your response.

Rams

Hi Ron,

You can relax and take a breath. My response is actually pretty simple. This 'action' is merely another desperate meaningless grasp by some conservatives in Congress to keep their masses riled up, making themselves appear to be relevant and 'on the case'. It will go nowhere and do nothing, like so many other noble efforts. As of this writing, no major news agency was reporting this. However, I did find several potential blockbuster sites like this example....

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/76344365/

As far as your question of fairness....yes, absolutely. Regardless of party, wrongdoers should face the consequences. As will be witnessed in the coming months.

Ride safe, the good weather is on it's way...(so they say)

Hey, Bob. While I agree with what you say, I'm trying to avoid politics on here. But, I'm a little concerned. Tiger Droppings ?  

Don't forget the Kevin McCarthy interview by Hannity

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/30/dems-accuse-gop-leader-mccarthy-admitting-benghazi-panel-is-political.html

Plus this other one

https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/index.html

They've got the sheep all in a uproar: offer multiple (!) investigations and find NOTHING, but then continue to constantly claim "crime!" and "fraud!" and "criminal!".  All the while so you can distract the unwashed masses from your own slips, incompetence, greed and back-dealing.  It's the perfect smokescreen: find an 'enemy' and, like Goebbels, just keep prodding it while you do your own thing.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Misunderestimate ? Oxymoron, double entendres ? Do I need to brush up on my grammar ? Would that be the same as "go ahead and estimate me" ?  

The term was the creation of George W. Bush, but since has somewhat entered the general lexicon. Novelist and critic Philip Hensher said the term was one of his "most memorable additions to the language, and an incidentally expressive one: it may be that we rather needed a word for 'to underestimate by mistake'."

misunderestimate
Verb

misunderestimate (third-person singular simple present misunderestimates, present participle misunderestimating, simple past and past participle misunderestimated)

(colloquial, malapropism or humorous) To underestimate by mistake.

Damn ! I should have known it was a "W'ism". 

[Serk]

Damn ! I should have known it was a "W'ism". 

One might even say you...... misunderestimated... him...

[The emperor has no clothes]

Damn ! I should have known it was a "W'ism". 

One might even say you...... misunderestimated... him...

one might

[3fan4life]

This may be the start of the end for the corruption that was Washington and there may be actual indictments already in the works.

BREAKING: Lawmakers Make Criminal Referral on Clinton, Comey, Lynch to DOJ on Steele Dossier

https://saraacarter.com/breaking-lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/

This response is confusing.

I would think that if it is proven any of the accused had actually broken a law you would support prosecution.   Am I wrong on that?     Does it matter what party they claim?

I'll be breathlessly waiting for your response.

Rams

Hi Ron,

You can relax and take a breath. My response is actually pretty simple. This 'action' is merely another desperate meaningless grasp by some conservatives in Congress to keep their masses riled up, making themselves appear to be relevant and 'on the case'. It will go nowhere and do nothing, like so many other noble efforts. As of this writing, no major news agency was reporting this. However, I did find several potential blockbuster sites like this example....

https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/lawmakers-make-criminal-referral-on-clinton-comey-lynch-to-doj-on-steele-dossier/76344365/

As far as your question of fairness....yes, absolutely. Regardless of party, wrongdoers should face the consequences. As will be witnessed in the coming months.

Ride safe, the good weather is on it's way...(so they say)

Hey, Bob. While I agree with what you say, I'm trying to avoid politics on here. But, I'm a little concerned. Tiger Droppings ?  

Don't forget the Kevin McCarthy interview by Hannity

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/09/30/dems-accuse-gop-leader-mccarthy-admitting-benghazi-panel-is-political.html

Plus this other one

https://www.cnn.com/2015/10/14/politics/hillary-clinton-benghazi-committee/index.html

They've got the sheep all in a uproar: offer multiple (!) investigations and find NOTHING, but then continue to constantly claim "crime!" and "fraud!" and "criminal!".  All the while so you can distract the unwashed masses from your own slips, incompetence, greed and back-dealing.  It's the perfect smokescreen: find an 'enemy' and, like Goebbels, just keep prodding it while you do your own thing.

The news media has NEVER told the true story of Bengazi.

I have met and spoke with Mark "Oz" Geist who was there.

I'll believe his firsthand account:

http://www.historyvshollywood.com/reelfaces/13-hours/