Do you believe? Moon landing and round earth

[Serk]

I'm just gonna leave this here for anyone who cares to read it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

[Rams]

I'm just gonna leave this here for anyone who cares to read it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

Ok Serk,

Read through the entire link.    Some what suspicious that no where in the provided link is there any discussion on how they got over the "ice mountains".     Skeptics Unite!!

Rams. 

[bscrive]

I'm just gonna leave this here for anyone who cares to read it:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third-party_evidence_for_Apollo_Moon_landings

I read it Serk and then I when to the JAXA site to look at the photos.  Nothing better there than the NASA photos.  Also, they do joint ventures with NASA and probably get money from the US, so I doubt they are a real third party.  Apparently, China has some good pictures, but they won't release them.  I wonder why??  Is it because they don't want to help confirm it, or are they using them as leverage???
I am really, serious when I say that if I saw real evidence I would change my mind.

I just keep hearing these words, though:

“If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”  Joseph Goebbels: On the “Big Lie”

[Psychotic Bovine]

Round earth - yep

moon landing - nope.  I use to believe that you guys did until I saw a documentary about three mile island disaster and wondered why they couldn't use space suits to clean it up.  I found out that space suits filter UV radiation, but not much else.  Also, past the Van Allen belt is a whole different ball game from what astronauts experience on the space station.  But, if some third party happens to go there and takes viewable pictures of the moon landing then I would change my mind again.  The pictures that NASA have are pretty much useless.

They found where the Van Allen belt was "thinnest" for want of a better word.  They also built up enough speed to not expose the astronauts to much radiation.  This has been proven for years.
We landed on the moon several times.  We have also sent probes that have photographed the equipment left there. 
If the radiation of the Van Allen belts is so bad, why doesn't it affect the deep space probes we have launched?  Cameras are affected by radiation, too (it shows up as white speckles similar to mild static).  The answer is shielding, also.  The astronauts were inside of a space craft.  They weren't launched to the moon wearing just their space suits and undies.

[Alpha Dog]

Round earth - yep

moon landing - nope.  I use to believe that you guys did until I saw a documentary about three mile island disaster and wondered why they couldn't use space suits to clean it up.  I found out that space suits filter UV radiation, but not much else.  Also, past the Van Allen belt is a whole different ball game from what astronauts experience on the space station.  But, if some third party happens to go there and takes viewable pictures of the moon landing then I would change my mind again.  The pictures that NASA have are pretty much useless.

They found where the Van Allen belt was "thinnest" for want of a better word.  They also built up enough speed to not expose the astronauts to much radiation.  This has been proven for years.
We landed on the moon several times.  We have also sent probes that have photographed the equipment left there. 
If the radiation of the Van Allen belts is so bad, why doesn't it affect the deep space probes we have launched?  Cameras are affected by radiation, too (it shows up as white speckles similar to mild static).  The answer is shielding, also.  The astronauts were inside of a space craft.  They weren't launched to the moon wearing just their space suits and undies.

Indeed.  This would be a conspiracy that would involve many thousands of people and I guarantee you more than a few would have come forward, especially on their death bed.

[Chrisj CMA]

Round earth - yep

moon landing - nope.  I use to believe that you guys did until I saw a documentary about three mile island disaster and wondered why they couldn't use space suits to clean it up.  I found out that space suits filter UV radiation, but not much else.  Also, past the Van Allen belt is a whole different ball game from what astronauts experience on the space station.  But, if some third party happens to go there and takes viewable pictures of the moon landing then I would change my mind again.  The pictures that NASA have are pretty much useless.

They found where the Van Allen belt was "thinnest" for want of a better word.  They also built up enough speed to not expose the astronauts to much radiation.  This has been proven for years.
We landed on the moon several times.  We have also sent probes that have photographed the equipment left there. 
If the radiation of the Van Allen belts is so bad, why doesn't it affect the deep space probes we have launched?  Cameras are affected by radiation, too (it shows up as white speckles similar to mild static).  The answer is shielding, also.  The astronauts were inside of a space craft.  They weren't launched to the moon wearing just their space suits and undies.

Indeed.  This would be a conspiracy that would involve many thousands of people and I guarantee you more than a few would have come forward, especially on their death bed.

And still yet several astronauts did die of cancer.  I never did hear if the cancer rate was higher than the general public, but it seemed so to me.

[Chrisj CMA]

Round earth - yep

moon landing - nope.  I use to believe that you guys did until I saw a documentary about three mile island disaster and wondered why they couldn't use space suits to clean it up.  I found out that space suits filter UV radiation, but not much else.  Also, past the Van Allen belt is a whole different ball game from what astronauts experience on the space station.  But, if some third party happens to go there and takes viewable pictures of the moon landing then I would change my mind again.  The pictures that NASA have are pretty much useless.

They found where the Van Allen belt was "thinnest" for want of a better word.  They also built up enough speed to not expose the astronauts to much radiation.  This has been proven for years.
We landed on the moon several times.  We have also sent probes that have photographed the equipment left there. 
If the radiation of the Van Allen belts is so bad, why doesn't it affect the deep space probes we have launched?  Cameras are affected by radiation, too (it shows up as white speckles similar to mild static).  The answer is shielding, also.  The astronauts were inside of a space craft.  They weren't launched to the moon wearing just their space suits and undies.

Indeed.  This would be a conspiracy that would involve many thousands of people and I guarantee you more than a few would have come forward, especially on their death bed.

And still yet several astronauts did die of cancer.  I never did hear if the cancer rate was higher than the general public, but it seemed so to me.

[Reb]

Round earth - yep

moon landing - nope.  I use to believe that you guys did until I saw a documentary about three mile island disaster and wondered why they couldn't use space suits to clean it up.  I found out that space suits filter UV radiation, but not much else.  Also, past the Van Allen belt is a whole different ball game from what astronauts experience on the space station.  But, if some third party happens to go there and takes viewable pictures of the moon landing then I would change my mind again.  The pictures that NASA have are pretty much useless.

They found where the Van Allen belt was "thinnest" for want of a better word.  They also built up enough speed to not expose the astronauts to much radiation.  This has been proven for years.
We landed on the moon several times.  We have also sent probes that have photographed the equipment left there. 
If the radiation of the Van Allen belts is so bad, why doesn't it affect the deep space probes we have launched?  Cameras are affected by radiation, too (it shows up as white speckles similar to mild static).  The answer is shielding, also.  The astronauts were inside of a space craft.  They weren't launched to the moon wearing just their space suits and undies.

I think the conspiracy theorist grab hold of the Van Allen belt being so deadly based on new evidence discovered in the past 20 years that it is always changing. Most of it is due to sun activity and even radio waves coming from earth have effected it's boundaries. If a solar flare was to erupt during the apollo missions then no doubt the astronauts would have been in serious danger.  Luckily they weren't, and Buzz Aldrin is still around throwing right hooks at those people...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbZlf4KDnGA

[98valk]

this is why we haven't gone back

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PlSttncY0BM