News:

If you're new to this message board, read THIS!

Main Menu
Inzane 17

New Harley's

Started by Jack B, Tue 31, Jul 2018, 15:49:47

Previous topic - Next topic

Jack B

The new Harley's look great for a matter of fact they don't look like Harley's at all, I like them.

https://www.motorcyclistonline.com/2020-harley-davidson-streetfighter-preview
Let's RIDE

Earl43P

I wish them much success.
Although I'll likely never own one, their market dominance is good for the entire motorcycle industry, from mechanics to accessories markets.  I admit to admiring their style and finish.

However, here is where I think their effort will "go off the rails"....

Skeptics are likely to suggest Harley risks alienating core consumers, or diluting its legacy position, by trying to attract new riders.

Veteran industry consultant Robert Pandya said Harley's identity is both its strength and its liability. Appealing to a non-Harley consumer will require a top-to-bottom company re-education.

"If you're trying to draw a new young customer or a female customer, you might win them with the marketing campaign but lose them when they walk into the shop, unless there is a real overhaul," Pandya said. "Everyone in the entire organization has to buy in on the marketing message. That's asking a lot."

08 Goldwing
21 KTM390A
99 Valkyrie IS Sold 5/5/23
VRCC #35672 
VRCCDS # 0264

When all else fails, RTFM.

Beardo

As a former sport bike rider, I'll say most of them are interested in converting gasoline into horsepower and torque, not just noise. If Harley's 1000cc sport bike has less than 100 hp, I can't see it selling. Will likely just tick off their base who like to dress up like pirates to ride to the bar.

If they have decent performance, I wish them well and look forward to maybe taking one for a rip on a demo day when they come out.

¿spoom

Looks like the "New Buell", and that is probably going to thrill almost nobody. Is it going to smoke a similar displacement Ducati? It better at least be equal, or cost half as much. All kidding aside, Harley is losing domestic buyer for two simple reasons,
Cost.
Perceived quality.
When you've made the same basic engine type for decades, people expect it to be flawless. It ain't by a long shot.

The emperor has no clothes

Quote from: ¿spoom on Tue 31, Jul 2018, 17:58:57
Looks like the "New Buell", and that is probably going to thrill almost nobody. Is it going to smoke a similar displacement Ducati? It better at least be equal, or cost half as much. All kidding aside, Harley is losing domestic buyer for two simple reasons,
Cost.
Perceived quality.
When you've made the same basic engine type for decades, people expect it to be flawless. It ain't by a long shot.
That's not what any of the Harley riders I know expect. Image seems to be #1

Crackerborn

V-rod II would be my guess. Why make a reliable power plant when it is not in the "bad-a$$" image?
Life is about the ride, not the destination.
97 Valkyrie Tour
99 Valkyrie Interstate

Oldfishguy


Indian is putting into production the flat track bike they have been racing very effectively for a few years now.  Tested and proven.  Competition is good.

https://www.indianmotorcycle.com/en-us/ftr1200/

FryeVRCCDS0067

If they build one with V Max performance and Valkyrie comfort and dependability I'll be interested.
"Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice.
And... moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.''
-- Barry Goldwater, Acceptance Speech at the Republican Convention; 1964

Ken aka Oil Burner

H-D is getting into the adventure bike market, too. There's just as much competition there, so it better be good, and the price better be right.

https://www.harley-davidson.com/us/en/motorcycles/future-vehicles/pan-america.html

Valker

My local dealer basically ignored the Buells and V-Rods. Wouldn't take them in on trade or work on them. They won't work on a bike that is over a certain age even. I don't see them jumping on board here either.
I ride a motorcycle because nothing transports me as quickly from where I am to who I am.

¿spoom

Quote from: Crackerborn on Tue 31, Jul 2018, 19:16:14
V-rod II would be my guess. Why make a reliable power plant when it is not in the "bad-a$$" image?
The bike in the link doesn't resemble a V-Rod's at all.

Jess Tolbirt

Valkyrie member # 23084
Started out on old forum on day one but lost my member number.

LTD

the Harley adventure bike is great! the biggest critics will be other Harley riders probably just like they did to the vrod

¿spoom

#13
Sportster is interesting, but they need to fire whomever is in charge of headlamps. That person already destroyed the new Fat Bob  ;D

Crackerborn

Quote from: ¿spoom on Wed 01, Aug 2018, 18:11:48
The bike in the link doesn't resemble a V-Rod's at all.

I was not refering to looks. The V-rod was considered the red headed stepchild of a "real" Hardly even if it out performed every other thing HD makes. I had two and the forward controls on one made it almost comfortable for longish trips under 300 miles. Ear plugs were a must for anything over 25 miles on both. I lost money on both since they weren't really a Harley on the resale market.  >:(
Life is about the ride, not the destination.
97 Valkyrie Tour
99 Valkyrie Interstate

Hooter

#15
Quote from: LTD on Wed 01, Aug 2018, 20:14:26
the Harley adventure bike is great! the biggest critics will be other Harley riders probably just like they did to the vrod

The VRod power plant was German engineering that's why it was heavily criticised.
You are never lost if you don't care where you are!

¿spoom

Quote from: Crackerborn on Wed 01, Aug 2018, 21:05:37
Quote from: ¿spoom on Wed 01, Aug 2018, 18:11:48
The bike in the link doesn't resemble a V-Rod's at all.

I was not refering to looks. The V-rod was considered the red headed stepchild of a "real" Hardly even if it out performed every other thing HD makes. I had two and the forward controls on one made it almost comfortable for longish trips under 300 miles. Ear plugs were a must for anything over 25 miles on both. I lost money on both since they weren't really a Harley on the resale market.  >:(
Got it. You may be right. In some respects I feel the VRod was the bike nobody was asking for, yet burned up the funds that could have been used to expand and improve the existing line at the time. Maybe with that money, the waterhead models wouldn't have been such a poorly executed embarrassment. Then there's cutting out the back jug for heat management-genius.

Disco

Good to see them thinking outside their self-imposed box.  These may not be successful, but continuing to do what they've been doing won't be, either.

Just think where they might be today if the Nova project hadn't died on the vine.

https://thekneeslider.com/harley-davidson-v4-nova/
2000 Bumblebee Tourer, 98 Yellow & Cream Tourer, 97 Rescue blower bike
22 CRF450RL, 19 BMW R1250RT
78 CB550K, 07 Helix
71 MT50 Trailhopper


VRCC 27,916                  IBA 44,783

Jess from VA

I see these efforts of HD as too little, too late, and very likely too expensive and not competitive (with the new segments; ie sport, dual sport).  I wish them (and most all American companies) well. 

The emperor has no clothes

Quote from: Jess from VA on Thu 02, Aug 2018, 09:08:19
I see these efforts of HD as too little, too late, and very likely too expensive and not competitive (with the new segments; ie sport, dual sport).  I wish them (and most all American companies) well. 
Maybe, I don't know enough about manufacturing or marketing. But, I do know many (myself included) who thought HD was outdated 50 years ago. They seem to have done just fine without my input. I think the general buyer for Harley's looks at their purchase much differently than you or I do.

Serk

Quote from: meathead on Thu 02, Aug 2018, 10:10:09
They seem to have done just fine without my input. I think the general buyer for Harley's looks at their purchase much differently than you or I do.

The problem for Harley is that the people who are willing to pay extremely high prices for 100 year old technology are getting older and dying off and/or stopping riding.

Younger people who are or will be the future motorcycle buyers don't care for such stuff as much as their fathers and grandfathers did.

If they don't adapt and find something that younger people are willing to buy, they're doomed.
Never ask a geek 'Why?',just nod your head and slowly back away...



IBA# 22107 
VRCC# 7976
VRCCDS# 226

1998 Valkyrie Standard
2008 Gold Wing

Taxation is theft.

μολὼν λαβέ

Alpha Dog

This is stepping outside of their comfort zone and the competition is brutally good and priced fairly well.   No Harley driver that I know of, and I run with a hoard of them, would ever consider these bikes.  They have to convince this niche market to switch to these Harleys and get new riders to come on in, and this will be a daunting task.  I do wish them well.

¿spoom

Quote from: Disco on Thu 02, Aug 2018, 08:36:24
Good to see them thinking outside their self-imposed box.  These may not be successful, but continuing to do what they've been doing won't be, either.

Just think where they might be today if the Nova project hadn't died on the vine.

https://thekneeslider.com/harley-davidson-v4-nova/
They'd be out of business if they'd gone ahead with the Nova Project. They did not have the funds to do both the Nova AND update the then current Shovel. They did the right thing choosing the Evo, instead. There were some cool things about the modular design of the Nova, particularly the way it could easily have been made into a 6 or 8 cylinder, and there was some mild interest in it as a generic car engine. They had to make a choice, and they chose correctly. Think the VRod wasn't accepted? Image the "Harley Magna" hitting the showroom! A metric-looking bike at a time when metrics were being dropped from cranes and dangled over bonfires. BTW, the green Nova bike is still in Milw.

hubcapsc


They'd be out of business if they'd gone ahead with the Nova Project.

Yeah... I didn't know about the Nova Project, but the Evo era was when
you had to wait in line to buy a Harley at retail + 30% ...

-Mike