Throwing the wife out with the swamp water ?

[The emperor has no clothes]

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5826104184001/?#sp=show-clips

Man, it takes some real low character to get caught and then blame it on your wife. 

[Pete]

I am "flabber-gasted" (shocked) that any politician would blame someone else for anything.
Or that any politician would misuse funds.
Next thing you know he may actually lie about something.
What is the world coming to?

Please say it ain't so!
I will say that he has seen many examples in the past 6 decades.

[The emperor has no clothes]

I am "flabber-gasted" (shocked) that any politician would blame someone else for anything.
Or that any politician would misuse funds.
Next thing you know he may actually lie about something.
What is the world coming to?

Please say it ain't so!
I will say that he has seen many examples in the past 6 decades.

This might be a new low though. I don't recall any blaming their wives.

[old2soon]

             We recently have a Confessed MURDERER blame his wife. RIDE SAFE.

[f6john]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

[John Schmidt]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Bullseye! 

[baldo]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

[J.Mencalice]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Scumbags x2.  Give'em the FFPP...Federal Family Penitentiary Plan.

[Willow]

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5826104184001/?#sp=show-clips

Man, it takes some real low character to get caught and then blame it on your wife. 

Does it take low character as well to assume guilt before a person has had the opportunity to legally defend himself against the accusations?  I watched the video (waste of my time) and did not see where you interpret he blamed his wife.

[The emperor has no clothes]

http://video.foxnews.com/v/5826104184001/?#sp=show-clips

Man, it takes some real low character to get caught and then blame it on your wife. 

Does it take low character as well to assume guilt before a person has had the opportunity to legally defend himself against the accusations?  I watched the video (waste of my time) and did not see where you interpret he blamed his wife.

Maybe. I'll let you be the judge of my character.  when one distances themselves from an activity with their wife (whether it be right or wrong) and then says "they will look into what she did, but I didn't do anything " that pretty much spells out their character to me. But see it how you choose. 

[Rams]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

[The emperor has no clothes]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

[baldo]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I skimmed through an article quickly, saw Power of Attorney mentioned. She's been responsible for all financials since 2003? Where in the hell did he think the money was coming from? He's a lying scumbag, and it wouldn't surprise me if this whole "my wife did it" scenario isn't something they put together, together.

[Rams]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

You posted it.

Rams

[The emperor has no clothes]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

You posted it.

Rams

Well, I'm sorry you think of me that way. For the record, it was a post about a congressman's utter lack of character.

[Rams]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

You posted it.

Rams

Well, I'm sorry you think of me that way.

Why?   I made a judgement based on your past postings and made a correct call.   The fact that I called it correctly only indicates I have correctly identified your posting criteria.     Personally, I think that indicates that I and others have noted your predictable attitude.    Had this been about HRC, you would have approached it completely differently.

Rams

[The emperor has no clothes]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

You posted it.

Rams

Well, I'm sorry you think of me that way.

Why?   I made a judgement based on your past postings and made a correct call.   The fact that I called it correctly only indicates I have correctly identified your posting criteria.     Personally, I think that indicates that I and others have noted your predictable attitude.    Had this been about HRC, you would have approached it completely differently.

Rams

I guess you don't know me as well as you think you do.  You called nothing correctly.

[Rams]

Those dirty, rotten, shameless, Republicans!!!! I'll bet the Colorado killer is a closet Republican too.

It really has nothing to do with party. It has to do with character. Or, lack there of.

Didn't waste my time watching the obvious political jab.   
Apparently you discount the possibility that he might be telling the truth?

Rams

I'd say the odds aren't in his favor. If you didn't watch, how would you know it was a political jab ?

You posted it.

Rams

Well, I'm sorry you think of me that way.

Why?   I made a judgement based on your past postings and made a correct call.   The fact that I called it correctly only indicates I have correctly identified your posting criteria.     Personally, I think that indicates that I and others have noted your predictable attitude.    Had this been about HRC, you would have approached it completely differently.

Rams

I guess you don't know me as well as you think you do.  You called nothing correctly.

Ok, have it your way.....   


Rams

[Robert]

OK so why did we not hear anything about Obama, Im sure some will find that ok

President Barack Obama’s 2008 campaign was fined $375,000 by the Federal Election Commission for campaign reporting violations — one of the largest fees ever levied against a presidential campaign, POLITICO has learned.

As for blaming his wife he is a combat vet and away alot, she did and does handle the money, she is the campaign manager and with him away probably handles all the finances. Her doing this will be no secret and he is not throwing her under the bus. In an investigation and in some of the accusations she is mentioned and more than likely she is a signer on checks and the accounts.  Since she is the campaign manger and handles the finances, would you like him to lie and say he handled it all getting himself further in hot water?

There may be a problem there and he may have played a bit to fast and loose with the money but its hard to be the target of a political hit job and keep your composer when you are not a slime ball. The accusations come fast and furious and can ruffle anyone even some prepared for it.

The money is alleged and more than likely will be settled for much less. It is a tactic and that is about it, since many have problems in this area like Hillary funneling money through a couple of corporations then to the DNC then to her campaign. That is money laundering by the way and its been proven and that was millions, but wait I dont here anything about this either. I wonder why the media chooses not to pick up this story?

I love one story he told he had to call his wife to tell her he had no money to buy underwear and that the finance man made a big deal out of what his wife said. Wrong on so many levels but telling.

FEC hit with lawsuit over ignoring civil complaint accusing Clinton, DNC in election scheme
EXCLUSIVE: The Hillary Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee allegedly used state chapters as strawmen to launder as much as $84 million in an effort to circumvent campaign donation limits, and the Federal Election Commission ignored complaints exposing the practice, a lawsuit filed Monday claims.

[The emperor has no clothes]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
  With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

[Robert]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
  With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Very well said but just for consideration did you hear that a combat vet, on the campaign trail calls his wife and says he has no money for underwear, REALLY, I MEAN REALLY? This story was recounted by his finance guy, its in the video. That to me says more about his character than anything. I cannot imaging calling my wife and saying that. He is supposed to be a take charge guy.  Its nothing but a political hit job and he is not standing tall defending himself. He is probably just a regular Joe.


Barack Obama took nearly $2 Million in illegal campaign donations in 2008 He was fined one of the largest fees for campaign finance violations ever levied against a presidential campaign. And no one went to jail or even discussed impeachment.

[Rams]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
 With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Oh, you explained it well enough, I doubt anyone did not understand your intent.    
What you either fail to consider or refuse to acknowledged is that, 1) he may be telling the truth, or 2) your target audience (us) recognize that you always only make such allegations against the opposing side (right) of the political aisle.    But, what appears to be your real intent is to downgrade/belittle an opposing political figure.     The bias you mention is well represented in your initial posting.    That's not to suggest the rest of us are not bias'd.      I admit I lean to the right but, try to keep an open mind about such things.
I could go on about how much I dislike Dirty Harry, Pelowsi, Waters, HRC but, what would that accomplish?  
Anything I might post would reflect my own political bias.   

Rams

[Skinhead]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
 With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Oh, you explained it well enough, I doubt anyone did not understand your intent.    
What you either fail to consider or refuse to acknowledged is that, 1) he may be telling the truth, or 2) your target audience (us) recognize that you always only make such allegations against the opposing side (right) of the political aisle.    But, what appears to be your real intent is to downgrade/belittle an opposing political figure.     The bias you mention is well represented in your initial posting.    That's not to suggest the rest of us are not bias'd.      I admit I lean to the right but, try to keep an open mind about such things.
I could go on about how much I dislike Dirty Harry, Pelowsi, Waters, HRC but, what would that accomplish?  
Anything I might post would reflect my own political bias.    

Rams

Good point.  I don't recall any questions about dinghy Harry's  character  when he had the BLM slaughter cattle and tried to force a rancher off of land he historically had rights to use so that his own pockets could be lined with money from foreign energy companies.  Almost got a bunch of civilians killed in the process.  And  the dems character was on full display when a loser schmuck was jailed to try to deflect the blame of the Benghazi fiasco.  I'd have to search, but I don't recall a preponderance of posts by my head brother calling their character into question.  

[The emperor has no clothes]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
 With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Oh, you explained it well enough, I doubt anyone did not understand your intent.    
What you either fail to consider or refuse to acknowledged is that, 1) he may be telling the truth, or 2) your target audience (us) recognize that you always only make such allegations against the opposing side (right) of the political aisle.    But, what appears to be your real intent is to downgrade/belittle an opposing political figure.     The bias you mention is well represented in your initial posting.    That's not to suggest the rest of us are not bias'd.      I admit I lean to the right but, try to keep an open mind about such things.
I could go on about how much I dislike Dirty Harry, Pelowsi, Waters, HRC but, what would that accomplish?  
Anything I might post would reflect my own political bias.    

Rams

Good point.  I don't recall any questions about dinghy Harry's  character  when he had the BLM slaughter cattle and tried to force a rancher off of land he historically had rights to use so that his own pockets could be lined with money from foreign energy companies.  Almost got a bunch of civilians killed in the process.  And  the dems character was on full display when a loser schmuck was jailed to try to deflect the blame of the Benghazi fiasco.  I'd have to search, but I don't recall a preponderance of posts by my head brother calling their character into question.  

Would you like a run down of my thoughts on all politicians ? Seems many have faulty memories lately. Way before the last election I voiced my opinion that Hillary Clinton screwed the pooch with her email scandal. I was in favor of John Kasich as our next president. As far as chastising her for Benghazi. GIVE IT A BREAK ! Your guys investigated, and investigated, and investigated this and her for years. They were either too stupid to find anything, or there was nothing to find.
Back to the original post. I wonder if you were charged with embezzlement from the company you just retired from. Would you say "I didn't do anything, but maybe my wife did" ? (Paraphrasing again) I don't know you that well, but I think I know you have more character than that.

[MAD6Gun]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
 With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Oh, you explained it well enough, I doubt anyone did not understand your intent.    
What you either fail to consider or refuse to acknowledged is that, 1) he may be telling the truth, or 2) your target audience (us) recognize that you always only make such allegations against the opposing side (right) of the political aisle.    But, what appears to be your real intent is to downgrade/belittle an opposing political figure.     The bias you mention is well represented in your initial posting.    That's not to suggest the rest of us are not bias'd.      I admit I lean to the right but, try to keep an open mind about such things.
I could go on about how much I dislike Dirty Harry, Pelowsi, Waters, HRC but, what would that accomplish?  
Anything I might post would reflect my own political bias.   

Rams

I agree with Rams. Rob, if Dunkun Hunter did something wrong he should be punished period. But I personally think you started this thread to further show your bias against conservatives. 'See look another republican broke the law" but ignore all the crimes committed by the dems. Judging by your previous posts what are we supposed to think?

If a person commits a crime I don't care if they are conservative or liberal they desearved to be punished. But anyone who isn't blind can see that someone like Hillary can get away with anything because the media and most of the justice system will cover her ass, no matter what. Strock and Page are great examples of bias. Even liberal law professor Alan Dershowitz is on Trump's side in this.

[Gavin_Sons]

Has it ever crossed anyones mind that Hillary is just too powerful to be touched? Lots of people on both sides are working for her. She even said herself, if I go down I'll take half of Washington with me. Lets see it, lets take all the scum down and start over.

[MAD6Gun]

Has it ever crossed anyones mind that Hillary is just too powerful to be touched? Lots of people on both sides are working for her. She even said herself, if I go down I'll take half of Washington with me. Lets see it, lets take all the scum down and start over.

Yes Gavin it would appear she is. If you or I did anything she has done we would be in jail.  How many people that have gone against her family have either committed suicide or been a victim of violent crime. Things that make you go hmmmm. If the justice system finally goes after her and people on both sides get caught up in it so be it. Drain the entire swamp and start over.....

[The emperor has no clothes]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
 With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

Oh, you explained it well enough, I doubt anyone did not understand your intent.    
What you either fail to consider or refuse to acknowledged is that, 1) he may be telling the truth, or 2) your target audience (us) recognize that you always only make such allegations against the opposing side (right) of the political aisle.    But, what appears to be your real intent is to downgrade/belittle an opposing political figure.     The bias you mention is well represented in your initial posting.    That's not to suggest the rest of us are not bias'd.      I admit I lean to the right but, try to keep an open mind about such things.
I could go on about how much I dislike Dirty Harry, Pelowsi, Waters, HRC but, what would that accomplish?  
Anything I might post would reflect my own political bias.   

Rams

I agree with Rams. Rob, if Dunkun Hunter did something wrong he should be punished period. But I personally think you started this thread to further show your bias against conservatives. 'See look another republican broke the law" but ignore all the crimes committed by the dems. Judging by your previous posts what are we supposed to think?

If a person commits a crime I don't care if they are conservative or liberal they desearved to be punished. But anyone who isn't blind can see that someone like Hillary can get away with anything because the media and most of the justice system will cover her ass, no matter what. Strock and Page are great examples of bias. Even liberal law professor Alan Dershowitz is on Trump's side in this.

It is amazing to me how from my OP you think I am saying "ignore all crimes by the Democrats ".  The post really wasn't even so much about his guilt or anyone else's guilt. But, to use an overused phrase, how he "Threw his wife under the bus".

This and a couple other recent threads makes me wonder if there is not something else going on here.

[John Schmidt]

Re. the Benghazi investigation, the defenders that were actually there and went through that event weren't allowed to testify, weren't allowed to give actual first person testimony as to the nature of commands rec'd. from higher up, etc.. Once that was brought about, the investigators hands were tied, nothing left to do, nothing left to "discover."  A little research will reveal just where that order originated to not allow their testimony. My guess is the outcome of the investigation would have been much different had that not been done and more than Hillary's head would have rolled....which is probably why the men on scene weren't allowed to testify. The words "not allowed to testify" is their words....the men on scene.

[3W-lonerider]

It seems most are missing the point of the post. Evidently I didn't express it well, I'm completely mistaken about his character, or a bias is at work here keeping some from seeing his hypocrisy. I will try to explain it better as I see it.
My wife handles 99% of our finances. I'm happy with that, as I don't like doing it. About the only duties I have are our taxes each year. But even with that I have a pretty decent idea of where we are financially. We are probably considered lower middle class. Together we make about 85k. I'm sure there are many here who do much better, probably some less. It is what it is. We get by. If an extra 250k over 6 years were to be folded into the mix, I would feel it, see it, know it. I suspect even for those of you doing better than us would notice this extra money also.
  With that said. The whole point of the post was to point out his utter disregard for any accountability on his part and saying he didn't do anything but she might have. (Paraphrasing)

This is where the low moral character comes in, in my opinion. It has nothing to do with political party, it has nothing to do with Hillary Clinton. It has nothing to with Donald Trump. It has nothing to do with Barack Obama.

IT HAS EVERYTHING TO DO WITH DUNCAN HUNTER

this post is not in any way sympathizing with dunkin hunter.
but it is possible he might do the same thing I do.
my wife handles all the finances, we have 2 checking accounts which are direct deposit
I have no clue what is in either one. when I want something I whip out the bank card and pay for it.
the only time I know for sure how much is in the one account is when I go to a mac machine and withdraw money, which is probably twice a year.
if our finances were in question with one of our accounts I would have to do the same as he done. basically she would have to answer the questions.

[f6john]

Oh, oh now I get it! It was just a coincidence that the subject is Republican and all over the news! Now I'm going to hold my breath until Rob posts something about a Charlie Rangel or some such shining star of the Democratic side of the aisle.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Oh, oh now I get it! It was just a coincidence that the subject is Republican and all over the news! Now I'm going to hold my breath until Rob posts something about a Charlie Rangel or some such shining star of the Democratic side of the aisle.

Promise ?

[Westernbiker]

WAAAA WAAAA WAAAA! He has an answer for everything. 

[Rams]

This and a couple other recent threads makes me wonder if there is not something else going on here.

Conspiracy theory, collusion with the Russians, or just your bias'd imagination?   Please enlighten us....  

Rams

[Willow]

Perhaps rather than "throwing his wife under the bus" it was his way of saying that it may have taken place but he was yet unaware of it.

We see and interpret what we choose.  Guys on the other side tend to look bad to us no matter what they do.  It's part of what's wrong with the declining America.

[The emperor has no clothes]

Perhaps rather than "throwing his wife under the bus" it was his way of saying that it may have taken place but he was yet unaware of it.

We see and interpret what we choose.  Guys on the other side tend to look bad to us no matter what they do.  It's part of what's wrong with the declining America.

Perhaps 

[f6john]

Oh, oh now I get it! It was just a coincidence that the subject is Republican and all over the news! Now I'm going to hold my breath until Rob posts something about a Charlie Rangel or some such shining star of the Democratic side of the aisle.

Promise ?

I keep trying but I pass out from lack of oxygen. Hurry up, this is exhausting.