Amazing, hope folks able, are watching Trump's UN speech.

[..]

Here's the segment when the laughter is heard.

At what point is the laughter and accompanying applause the loudest?

Y'all really need to try to pay attention and not believe what your biased news is reporting.

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/world-leaders-laugh-at-donald-trump-during-united-nations-speech/news-story/37e21def9463a5edea288c5c2a4d77d2

[Oss]

Watched the entire speech last night and thought it was well done

The thing about laughter is that it is noticed.

Consequences of the germans leadership will continue if they stay the present course.  I pray for our VRCC brothers and sisters in europe that their leaders wise up sooner rather than later.

Russia is a country that has a L O N G memory and they would really like to have Germany back in the fold and even France if they could.

The parts they didnt like were references to socialism and being beholden to Russia for oil  They are entitled to their opinion but I dont think we should rescue them next time on our dime.

[The emperor has no clothes]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

[..]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

[The emperor has no clothes]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter) 

[f6john]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

[baldo]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

[G-Man]

I guess it could be worst, last time he said he would 'totally destroy North Korea'.

You don't think that maybe, just maybe, his tough talk is what convinced Kim Jong Un to come to the negotiating table?

Well now, in the Liberal mind that couldn't have possibly worked.

They all know that groveling and kissing a$$ is the only way to go.

Last guy, and all the guys before didn't do that.  They, for lack of a better phrase, kicked the can down the road until this admin. HAD to do something about it.  And they mocked him EVERY step of the way.  

Wait....... can you hear that?  That's the sound of rockets NOT being launched.  That's the sound of our allies NOT being threatened by rocket man.  

How about that?  Can you hear it???  That's the sound of the Korean leaders shaking hands.

What about that sound???  The sound of the airplanes bringing home the remains of our soldiers.

ALL these wonderful sounds are brought to you by Donald J. Trump and NOBODY else, PERIOD

[G-Man]

Nervous laughter. He called 'em all out, told them he's no longer going to give them free money, and said they re going to have to pay for their own defenses. They can mock him, but he's the first one putting on the brakes as far as giving away my tax money!

He specifically called out the Germans.  He's been hammering them on becoming dependent on Russia for fuel while we pay billions to defend them from those they are becoming dependent on.  He's embarrassing them over that very stupid decision.

I very recently got a preview of some of the European Union issues that are of some importance and gaining steam.  There are several other countries threatening their own exit from the union.  I found a couple of discussions that declared the union is not considering any issues of the most eastern countries and they feel quite vulnerable with the deals being made with Russia.  One  representative from Hungry said the union could consist of only France and Germany by the middle of the century.

They also didn't count on the mass migration which is changing the historic nationalities and sovereignty of their countries and stressing their economies.

[G-Man]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

There's NO actual material available to ridicule Kavanaugh on so they latch on to the most watered down accusation of teenage touching at an high school drinking party that occurred on an unknown date, in and unknown house, hosted by unknown kids, with not one actual person witnessing it, 36 years ago, convicting him of a sex crime without any hearing or due process, and so they do dick jokes to make up for it.

I'm sorry, who provided them with this material?  

Again, when did it get so backwards?  Where's the ACLU's defense of this man's RIGHTS to due process?  Where's the Liberal's outrage over presuming guilt before innocence?

[f6john]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

[phideux]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter) 

There was tons of fruit to pick with the last administration, sadly though, when anybody did, they got the Racist label.

[The emperor has no clothes]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

I don’t recall your concern when Trump said he liked to grab women by the pussy  

[phideux]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

There's NO actual material available to ridicule Kavanaugh on so they latch on to the most watered down accusation of teenage touching at an high school drinking party that occurred on an unknown date, in and unknown house, hosted by unknown kids, with not one actual person witnessing it, 36 years ago, convicting him of a sex crime without any hearing or due process, and so they do dick jokes to make up for it.

I'm sorry, who provided them with this material?  

Again, when did it get so backwards?  Where's the ACLU's defense of this man's RIGHTS to due process?  Where's the Liberal's outrage over presuming guilt before innocence?

There is only outrage when it is happening to them.

[phideux]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

I don’t recall your concern when Trump said he liked to grab women by the pussy  

Where was the Dems outrage when one of their own actually went around the White House grabbing them by the pussy??? Sticking cigars in their pussy??? Or another one of their own on video fondling the breasts of a sleeping woman??? Actions speak louder than words.

[Willow]

I don’t recall your concern when Trump said he liked to grab women by the pussy  

That was almost twenty years ago.  I do hope when someone looks for ill in my words that they have to go back that far (they wouldn't).    

[MAD6Gun]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

 Kimmel. What a joke. Here is a man that is calling for the removal of another man's junk over a 35 year old accusation with absolutely no proof whatsoever. But there is proof of his perverted actions. Remember "The man show". I saw a clip of him standing on a corner asking a hooked to feel what's in his pants. Yeah class act there.

 Kavanaugh is a devoted family man and true patriot that treats women with respect and Kimmel is a worthless comedian who uses women as objects for his perverted humor. Yeah good example you got there liberals. Good job.....

[¿spoom]

Nervous laughter. He called 'em all out, told them he's no longer going to give them free money, and said they re going to have to pay for their own defenses. They can mock him, but he's the first one putting on the brakes as far as giving away my tax money!

He specifically called out the Germans.  He's been hammering them on becoming dependent on Russia for fuel while we pay billions to defend them from those they are becoming dependent on.  He's embarrassing them over that very stupid decision.

I very recently got a preview of some of the European Union issues that are of some importance and gaining steam.  There are several other countries threatening their own exit from the union.  I found a couple of discussions that declared the union is not considering any issues of the most eastern countries and they feel quite vulnerable with the deals being made with Russia.  One  representative from Hungry said the union could consist of only France and Germany by the middle of the century.

They also didn't count on the mass migration which is changing the historic nationalities and sovereignty of their countries and stressing their economies.

Very good points, ones that should be in all the media, 60 Minutes, 20/20 etc. but it no longer works that way.

[¿spoom]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

 Kimmel. What a joke. Here is a man that is calling for the removal of another man's junk over a 35 year old accusation with absolutely no proof whatsoever. But there is proof of his perverted actions. Remember "The man show". I saw a clip of him standing on a corner asking a hooked to feel what's in his pants. Yeah class act there.

 Kavanaugh is a devoted family man and true patriot that treats women with respect and Kimmel is a worthless comedian who uses women as objects for his perverted humor. Yeah good example you got there liberals. Good job.....

Kimmel followed the money. To be a late night star on a major network now, you need to grovel and lactate, and be an extension of the Democratic Party. Look at TBS's slow but steady "all TDS, all the time" programming, and the new Murphy Brown will just be the old Samantha Bee. Youth programming, it used to be called. Now we have a more sizeable population of permanent youth.

[..]

I guess it could be worst, last time he said he would 'totally destroy North Korea'.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-un-north-korean-leader-suicide-mission-n802596

Sad

Let's use the complete statement where Trump says the USA will defend its itself or its allies.

You'd rather sit back and not defend?

"The United States has great strength and patience, but if it is forced to defend itself or its allies, we will have no choice but to totally destroy North Korea."

[G-Man]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now. 

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies. 

[baldo]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

[3fan4life]

Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies. 

It is us "Conservatives" that are saying that now.

[Gavin_Sons]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

[MAD6Gun]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

 Yea,the FBI has done such a bang up job investigating Hilary they would be totally unbiased with Kavanaugh,right. Tell me a new one.  They couldn't find any legitimate reasons to stop him so they resorted to these tactics. Like my brother said. If this "train" crap even happened how did it take 35 years to come to light. Give me a break. They have gone below a new low even for democrats......

[G-Man]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Notice how you pick one thing and try to spin it around instead of actually replying to the post.  I'm not the one condemning a person over an accusation, remember?.

But tell me, why did you put Innocent Until proven Guilty in quotation marks?  Do you not believe this is what is right?  Do you not believe it's something that all people accused are entitled to?  Do you believe it should be the other way around, guilty until proven innocent?  Do you believe lives and careers should be harmed over just the accusation? 

And, if it would make everyone on the Left happy, yes, I support any and every investigation.  But on the accused time frames, not the accuser's.  Make the accusation, sit and prove it or kiss a$$ and walk away.  Also, the accusation should not be public, until proven true.  Any leaks negates the accusation.  Too many people good people are getting hurt because of these games.  Also, the loser has to pay ALL legal fees.

[baldo]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

"We" are not legal experts. Some on this board are, I know I'm not. It seems to me that if new, serious allegations come to light, then it's in the FBI'S purview to investigate. Enough people in the Senate, from both sides, are saying that the FBI should step in and investigate.

That's the way I understand it. Right or wrong?

[The emperor has no clothes]

It would be investigated by the FBI as part of their background check on him. Whether any charges could be brought to bear is doubtful with the statute of limitations. Even a meatcutter can understand this. (So Yes, you are correct Bob)

[baldo]

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Notice how you pick one thing and try to spin it around instead of actually replying to the post.  I'm not the one condemning a person over an accusation, remember?.

But tell me, why did you put Innocent Until proven Guilty in quotation marks?  Do you not believe this is what is right?  Do you not believe it's something that all people accused are entitled to?  Do you believe it should be the other way around, guilty until proven innocent?  Do you believe lives and careers should be harmed over just the accusation? 

And, if it would make everyone on the Left happy, yes, I support any and every investigation.  But on the accused time frames, not the accuser's.  Make the accusation, sit and prove it or kiss a$$ and walk away.  Also, the accusation should not be public, until proven true.  Any leaks negates the accusation.  Too many people good people are getting hurt because of these games.  Also, the loser has to pay ALL legal fees.

Gary,

I "pick one thing" because I don't really have time or interest to go chasing all over for these what-if'f.

I used quotes because I was quoting YOU. If you look at the thread, mine is right below yours. That's all, no other reason. Don't go looking for things that aren't there.

And I'm glad to hear that you think... "And, if it would make everyone on the Left happy, yes, I support any and every investigation." As far as the accused's time frame, whatever you mean by that, delay the confirmation process until the investigations are complete. Let the chips fall where they may. You don't confirm someone to a lifetime position until they've been vetted properly. That would be a travesty and illegitimize the Supreme Court. Do you agree?
'

[MAD6Gun]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

"We" are not legal experts. Some on this board are, I know I'm not. It seems to me that if new, serious allegations come to light, then it's in the FBI'S purview to investigate. Enough people in the Senate, from both sides, are saying that the FBI should step in and investigate.

That's the way I understand it. Right or wrong?

 I am going to ask a hypothetical question of those that believe this women.

Says there is this 13 year old girl in your neighborhood. Let's say for some reason she doesnt like you and tells her mother that you touched her inappropriately. You didn't but that doesn't matter.  The mother calls the cops and you are arrested. As a result of your arrest you lose your job and are chastised in the community all the while confessing your innocence. No one is listening. You are branded a pervert and face jail. Your word against hers right? Eventually she confesses that she made up the story but now your life is in ruins because of a false accusation. Is this right? Nope, but that is exactly what Brett Kavanaugh is going through right now..

[G-Man]

And I'm glad to hear that you think... "And, if it would make everyone on the Left happy, yes, I support any and every investigation." As far as the accused's time frame, whatever you mean by that, delay the confirmation process until the investigations are complete. Let the chips fall where they may. You don't confirm someone to a lifetime position until they've been vetted properly. That would be a travesty and illegitimize the Supreme Court. Do you agree?
'

Nope, I don't agree.  Not when the accusation comes at a strategic time, via a leak to the press by the politician who had the information for months.  THAT'S why I said, according to the accused time frame, not the accuser's...... meaning NO Games.  No stalling.  No bringing up an accusation, that you had for months, at the 11th hour (Billy Martin Pine Tar).  These games are a travesty and are illegitimizing and exploiting the process by which we choose a Supreme Court Justice.

Look how many lives have been ruined and what children have had to endure and what a wife has to hear and his career will now be defined, over an accusation.  And what about HER life and family and career?  Is this really the right way to do this?

And you really don't believe this is purely political?  Doesn't matter, the precedent is being set.  I can't wait until a democrat is "accused" of something.  The GOP is gonna swarm and give it right back.  I can see it now.  The dems will bitch and moan, the GOP will refer them back to Kavanaugh, and the dems will cry "why do you keep bringing him up, he's not running, yadda, yadda, yadda".  

[f6john]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

I don’t recall your concern when Trump said he liked to grab women by the pussy  

You say you are not a Democrat, but I’m sorry you have all the trademarks. Trumps comment noted above was not broadcast on national tv by himself,only media types wishing the worst possible reaction. I’ve heard worse in locker rooms and other places. If you equate the two equally then we would need to have no further discussion on the subject.

[G-Man]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

"We" are not legal experts. Some on this board are, I know I'm not. It seems to me that if new, serious allegations come to light, then it's in the FBI'S purview to investigate. Enough people in the Senate, from both sides, are saying that the FBI should step in and investigate.

That's the way I understand it. Right or wrong?

 I am going to ask a hypothetical question of those that believe this women.

Says there is this 13 year old girl in your neighborhood. Let's say for some reason she doesnt like you and tells her mother that you touched her inappropriately. You didn't but that doesn't matter.  The mother calls the cops and you are arrested. As a result of your arrest you lose your job and are chastised in the community all the while confessing your innocence. No one is listening. You are branded a pervert and face jail. Your word against hers right? Eventually she confesses that she made up the story but now your life is in ruins because of a false accusation. Is this right? Nope, but that is exactly what Brett Kavanaugh is going through right now..

When it happens to a Democrat, it's the girls fault.

When a Republican is accused, it's everyone who voted for Trumps fault.

[f6john]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

"We" are not legal experts. Some on this board are, I know I'm not. It seems to me that if new, serious allegations come to light, then it's in the FBI'S purview to investigate. Enough people in the Senate, from both sides, are saying that the FBI should step in and investigate.

That's the way I understand it. Right or wrong?

The key word in your statement, serious allegation, is what trips up this whole apple cart. Ford may be a credible person, but her claim is not. All the info that has come out since she went public with her and Fienstiens delay strategy says it didn’t happen. Anyone who says FBI investigation is just wanting to delay the process. It’s an excellent strategy if you have been on the losing team for almost two years. Too bad we don’t have refs to throw a flag.

[Bighead]

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

They don't give a S h i t about the kids.  Remember when that a$$hole Letterman went after Palin's kids.  It was disgusting back then and it's getting worse now.  

And these F U C K I N G morons are throwing away a person's right to innocence before being proven guilty.  It can never be proven that he touched that girl 36 years ago yet he's being spoken of and labelled a rapist, a sex offender, a sexual predator, is the subject of genital mutilation on a highly viewed TV show, in an age when perception is 99% of the truth.

Again, where are all the a$$hole liberals who marched and protested for equality and justice in the eyes of the law and society.  Where's the ACLU?  Where's the outrage over destroying a man's life over an accusation.

I asked this question once before on this board and I was shocked at some of the replies I got...........

Do we now ruin lives over accusations?  I can't recall exactly the story du jour that prompted my asking the question, but I am guessing it was about an accusation that couldn't ever be proven and one side wanted to hang him and the other side called B.S.  I guess we didn't learn anything then because we're doing it again.

Boy, liberalism and democrats sure have changed their tunes over the last decade or so.  Whatever happened to "100 guilty should be let go before one innocent man is convicted", or "I may not agree, but I'll defend your right to say it", or "innocent until proven guilty",  or "all equal in the eyes of the law/justice is blind", etc.?  Now they convict political opponents over a brand new 36 year old she said/he denies.  

"Innocent until proven guilty"

Do you support having the FBI conduct a thorough investigations of these claims?

Too bad the FBI won't investigate it. That is local PD jurisdiction. I think we have been through this several times. Why can't you understand this?

"We" are not legal experts. Some on this board are, I know I'm not. It seems to me that if new, serious allegations come to light, then it's in the FBI'S purview to investigate. Enough people in the Senate, from both sides, are saying that the FBI should step in and investigate.

That's the way I understand it. Right or wrong?

 I am going to ask a hypothetical question of those that believe this women.

Says there is this 13 year old girl in your neighborhood. Let's say for some reason she doesnt like you and tells her mother that you touched her inappropriately. You didn't but that doesn't matter.  The mother calls the cops and you are arrested. As a result of your arrest you lose your job and are chastised in the community all the while confessing your innocence. No one is listening. You are branded a pervert and face jail. Your word against hers right? Eventually she confesses that she made up the story but now your life is in ruins because of a false accusation. Is this right? Nope, but that is exactly what Brett Kavanaugh is going through right now..

Madgun I asked basically the same question when this thread started and there was no good answer then either. Someone said he didnt think it could happen. (Not his words but essentially what he meant)

[Jersey mike]

From a Bustle.com article:


When the laughter from the crowd subsided, Trump played off the reaction, saying, “Didn’t expect that reaction, but that’s OK.” Later on in the day, Trump responded to reporters and insisted that the line was deliberate and meant to be funny, saying, “Well that was meant to get some laughter, but it was great.”

Colbert didn't miss the opportunity to seize on the president's international gaffe. “Don’t worry, Mr. President, they’re not laughing at you,” the host said. “They’re laughing with each other at you.”

Ahhhhh did Colbert make a funny as well. Bless his heart.

I wouldn't pat him on the back too much. Comedians are living in a time of burgeoning fruit on the trees these days. (That wasn't meant to get some laughter)  

Yea, Colbert is hilarious. Kimmel is too, I’m still rolling in the floor laughing at his Kavanaugh penis joke. I fully expect our Presidents to be the subject of late night tv but the lack of class exhibited by the current crop of hucksters is pitiful.

I suspect it's the material that's available that they have to work with....

Kimmel is a dad, and got teary eyed talking about his sons health issues. Kavanaugh has two young daughters and Kimmel is talking and laughing on national tv about publicly cutting off his penis. I’m sure the girls weren’t up watching Kimmel but with social media and news reporting you can be sure they know about it. I think Kimmel and his kind could be more selective in picking from the “available material”.

Ah yes, Jimmy Kimmel who brought us “The Man’s Show” and girls bouncing on trampolines

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-mWq5B6sU0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

[baldo]

Ah yes, Jimmy Kimmel who brought us “The Man’s Show” and girls bouncing on trampolines

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-mWq5B6sU0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

I loved that show!

[The emperor has no clothes]

Ah yes, Jimmy Kimmel who brought us “The Man’s Show” and girls bouncing on trampolines

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-mWq5B6sU0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

I loved that show!

Me too ! But, I must correct Jersey. It was singular, “The Man Show”. Adam  Corolla was the funniest of the 2.

[Gavin_Sons]

Ah yes, Jimmy Kimmel who brought us “The Man’s Show” and girls bouncing on trampolines

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-mWq5B6sU0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

I loved that show!

This is exactly what we are talking about. Double standards. It was ok for the "man show" to exploit women they say they did but since allegations have been brought on from kavanaugh's youth of essentially the same thing he is automatically guilty. Why? Why is it like that?

[The emperor has no clothes]

Ah yes, Jimmy Kimmel who brought us “The Man’s Show” and girls bouncing on trampolines

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=5-mWq5B6sU0

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1gxf6flnvNA

I loved that show!

This is exactly what we are talking about. Double standards. It was ok for the "man show" to exploit women they say they did but since allegations have been brought on from kavanaugh's youth of essentially the same thing he is automatically guilty. Why? Why is it like that?

Yeah, showing women bouncing on a trampoline is equivalent to forcing a woman down on a bed and trying to remove her clothes.