Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
November 13, 2025, 06:32:19 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
VRCC Calendar Ad
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Congressional record Mueller, Rosenstien Uranium Russia Gate  (Read 565 times)
Robert
Member
*****
Posts: 17375


S Florida


« on: March 15, 2019, 03:47:16 AM »

The corruption and lies is being found out and will soon be prosecuted. Part of a Congressional record Providing testimony that Mueller should never have been on a special counsel, he is about as dirty as they come along with Rosenstien. They played fast and loose with the Clintons.

This is way beyond any theory and will show what a sham things were and are in the investigation. So we spent milliions of dollars, heard mocking bird news hype people got all divided and now the truth comes out that Hillary, Mueller, Rosenstien among others to be shown were all dirty and trying to stop Trump in this insurance policy from finding them out and prosecuting them.

In another article if you are interested in reading it
https://www.hannity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf
ROBERT MUELLER: UNMASKEDby Congressman Louie Gohmert


Excerpt below:

CONGRESSIONAL  RECORD — HOUSE April 27, 2018
https://www.congress.gov/crec/2018/04/27/CREC-2018-04-27-pt1-PgH3740.pdf


I  had  hoped  that,  because  he  seemed  clearly to be a person who should never have  accepted  the  job  of  special  coun-sel,  that  he  was  recusable.  He  was  not  qualified  to  be  the  special  counsel  on  anything   involving   Russia,   and   cer-tainly  not  the  Trump  campaign  and  Russia. Yet Rod Rosenstein, as the dep-uty  AG,  who  had  been  involved  in  the  Russia illegal attempts to gain control of  U.S.  uranium—and  they  knew  that  Russia  was  committing  crimes  to  try  to  get  our  uranium—and  Mueller  was  the  head  of  the  FBI,  and  he  was  the  lead   law   enforcement   person   over-seeing  the  operation,  there  was  an  in-formant  within  the  system  that  was  providing  information  to  the  Justice  Department to Rosenstein and Mueller.

 CFIUS  that  approves  sales  that  are  sensitive  to  our  security,  they  surely  could  never  have  approved  the  sale  if  Rosenstein  and  Mueller  had  just  been  honest and open that there is an inves-tigation to Russia’s illegal attempts to get  our  uranium.  But,  if  they  had  spo-ken  up  about  that,  I  don’t  think  there  is any question that the Clinton Foun-dation  would  never  have  gotten  $145  million  in  contributions  from  people  involved with the uranium sale. And it is  quite  likely  that  Bill  Clinton  would  not have gotten $500,000 to speak for 20 minutes from Russia.


Background  and  reminder:  from  at  least  2008,  Robert  Mueller’s  FBI  were  investigating   Tenam,   the   U.S.-based   subsidiary  of  Tenex,  a  subsidiary  of  Rosatom,  the  Kremlin’s  (Putin’s)  en-ergy company. The same Rosatom that purchased Uranium One.’’ ‘‘Tenam  was  importing  Russian  ura-nium  into  the  U.S.  Between  2004–2014,  the  local  manager,  Mikerin,  engaged  with  U.S.  companies  Transport  Logis-tics  (TL)  and  NexGen  Security  in  a  racketeering,  wire  fraud,  bribery,  and  money laundering scheme.’’ ‘‘When  a  TL  insider,  William  Camp-bell,  blew  the  whistle  on  what  he  was  seeing,  Mueller’s  FBI  started  an  inves-tigation that led to at least four indict-ments by Holder’s DOJ.’’ ‘‘Remember—the   Tenam   investiga-tion is related to the Uranium One (U1) sale.  That’s  because  the  Tenam  inves-tigation was hidden from Congress and CFIUS’’—the  group  that  analyzes  and  approves or disapproves foreign invest-ments  in  the  U.S.—‘‘who  approved  the  U1  sale  in  October  2010.  If  either  had  known  about  it,  it’s  highly  unlikely  the U1 sale would have been approved.’’ ‘‘And   the   more   you   analyze   the   Tenam  investigation,  the  more  it  ap-pears  that  the  Obama  administration  and/or  Clintons  deliberately  wanted  it  hidden.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 04:41:41 AM by Robert » Logged

“Some people see things that are and ask, Why? Some people dream of things that never were and ask, Why not? Some people have to go to work and don’t have time for all that.”
Patrick
Member
*****
Posts: 15433


VRCC 4474

Largo Florida


« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2019, 05:54:31 AM »

I'll be surprised if this goes much farther. However if it does that'll go aways to restore my faith in some of our politicians and prosecutors.
Logged
Alberta Patriot
Member
*****
Posts: 1438


Say What You mean Mean What You Say

Rockyview County, Alberta 2001 Interstate


« Reply #2 on: March 15, 2019, 07:35:58 AM »

I'll be surprised if this goes much farther. However if it does that'll go aways to restore my faith in some of our politicians and prosecutors.
The Hollywood elite student entrance pipeline scandal might be the first salvo across the bow of elitists who spew their crap at venues like SNL.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 02:41:13 PM by 7th_son » Logged

Say what you mean, Mean what you say.
Willow
Administrator
Member
*****
Posts: 16758


Excessive comfort breeds weakness. PttP

Olathe, KS


WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 15, 2019, 09:02:00 AM »

Wow!  If there are so few real issues that we've begun worrying about wealthy people buying their children's way into school things must be going pretty well for us.   uglystupid2
Logged
JimC
Member
*****
Posts: 1826

SE Wisconsin


« Reply #4 on: March 15, 2019, 09:23:54 AM »

Wow!  If there are so few real issues that we've begun worrying about wealthy people buying their children's way into school things must be going pretty well for us.   uglystupid2

I agree.

Jim
Logged

Jim Callaghan    SE Wisconsin
¿spoom
Member
*****
Posts: 1447

WI


« Reply #5 on: March 15, 2019, 11:41:56 AM »

The corruption and lies is being found out and will soon be prosecuted. Part of a Congressional record Providing testimony that Mueller should never have been on a special counsel, he is about as dirty as they come along with Rosenstien. They played fast and loose with the Clintons.

This is way beyond any theory and will show what a sham things were and are in the investigation. So we spent milliions of dollars, heard mocking bird news hype people got all divided and now the truth comes out that Hillary, Mueller, Rosenstien among others to be shown were all dirty and trying to stop Trump in this insurance policy from finding them out and prosecuting them.

In another article if you are interested in reading it
https://www.hannity.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf
ROBERT MUELLER: UNMASKEDby Congressman Louie Gohmert


Excerpt below:

CONGRESSIONAL  RECORD — HOUSE April 27, 2018
https://www.congress.gov/crec/2018/04/27/CREC-2018-04-27-pt1-PgH3740.pdf


I  had  hoped  that,  because  he  seemed  clearly to be a person who should never have  accepted  the  job  of  special  coun-sel,  that  he  was  recusable.  He  was  not  qualified  to  be  the  special  counsel  on  anything   involving   Russia,   and   cer-tainly  not  the  Trump  campaign  and  Russia. Yet Rod Rosenstein, as the dep-uty  AG,  who  had  been  involved  in  the  Russia illegal attempts to gain control of  U.S.  uranium—and  they  knew  that  Russia  was  committing  crimes  to  try  to  get  our  uranium—and  Mueller  was  the  head  of  the  FBI,  and  he  was  the  lead   law   enforcement   person   over-seeing  the  operation,  there  was  an  in-formant  within  the  system  that  was  providing  information  to  the  Justice  Department to Rosenstein and Mueller.

 CFIUS  that  approves  sales  that  are  sensitive  to  our  security,  they  surely  could  never  have  approved  the  sale  if  Rosenstein  and  Mueller  had  just  been  honest and open that there is an inves-tigation to Russia’s illegal attempts to get  our  uranium.  But,  if  they  had  spo-ken  up  about  that,  I  don’t  think  there  is any question that the Clinton Foun-dation  would  never  have  gotten  $145  million  in  contributions  from  people  involved with the uranium sale. And it is  quite  likely  that  Bill  Clinton  would  not have gotten $500,000 to speak for 20 minutes from Russia.


Background  and  reminder:  from  at  least  2008,  Robert  Mueller’s  FBI  were  investigating   Tenam,   the   U.S.-based   subsidiary  of  Tenex,  a  subsidiary  of  Rosatom,  the  Kremlin’s  (Putin’s)  en-ergy company. The same Rosatom that purchased Uranium One.’’ ‘‘Tenam  was  importing  Russian  ura-nium  into  the  U.S.  Between  2004–2014,  the  local  manager,  Mikerin,  engaged  with  U.S.  companies  Transport  Logis-tics  (TL)  and  NexGen  Security  in  a  racketeering,  wire  fraud,  bribery,  and  money laundering scheme.’’ ‘‘When  a  TL  insider,  William  Camp-bell,  blew  the  whistle  on  what  he  was  seeing,  Mueller’s  FBI  started  an  inves-tigation that led to at least four indict-ments by Holder’s DOJ.’’ ‘‘Remember—the   Tenam   investiga-tion is related to the Uranium One (U1) sale.  That’s  because  the  Tenam  inves-tigation was hidden from Congress and CFIUS’’—the  group  that  analyzes  and  approves or disapproves foreign invest-ments  in  the  U.S.—‘‘who  approved  the  U1  sale  in  October  2010.  If  either  had  known  about  it,  it’s  highly  unlikely  the U1 sale would have been approved.’’ ‘‘And   the   more   you   analyze   the   Tenam  investigation,  the  more  it  ap-pears  that  the  Obama  administration  and/or  Clintons  deliberately  wanted  it  hidden.
Washington can't hide secrets very well, though if the dark state wants things to stay buried or at least ignored, they generally can. That said, some things are already public knowledge by those who don't care because they wanted xyz to get elected. The press will have to decide they just can't stomach it any more, and if they ever flip on the fetid meat they've been serving, it all comes out. Perhaps if no reason than some reporter is dying (literally?) to be the next Woodward or Bernstein. How long will some things be ignored? Who knows, but a river made a Grand Canyon.

WASHINGTON (AP) Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham says his panel will investigate a claim by former FBI Director Andrew McCabe that Justice Department officials once discussed using the Constitution's 25th Amendment to remove President Donald Trump from office.

McCabe has said that after former FBI Director James Comey was fired in May 2017, officials at the department, including McCabe and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, discussed bringing the Cabinet together to consider using the amendment to remove Trump. The Justice Department has not denied those discussions took place but said in February that department leaders did not believe there was any basis for invoking the 25th Amendment, which enables Cabinet members to seek a president's ouster if they believe the person is unfit for office.

Graham on Friday sent a letter to Attorney General William Barr requesting documents related to those discussions.

"The Committee is deeply concerned with these discussions and whether they essentially indicate that two of the highest ranking law enforcement officials in the United States were discussing what amounts to a coup against the President," Graham said. "Accordingly, the Committee plans to conduct oversight into these discussions and related matters."

Graham said he also has concerns about reports that Rosenstein had suggested wearing a wire to record conversations with Trump. The Justice Department has said that Rosenstein "never authorized" any recording.

The committee is requesting memos written by McCabe and all communications after Comey was fired that reference the 25th Amendment or recordings of the president, among other documents.

McCabe is a frequent target of Trump's ire. He was fired from the FBI last year after the Justice Department inspector general concluded he had lied during an internal investigation into a news media disclosure.

Those allegations, which McCabe has denied, have been referred for investigation to the U.S. attorney's office in Washington.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: