Inzane 17

Why Won't The Other Side Debate?

Started by G-Man, Mon 16, Dec 2019, 14:50:27

Previous topic - Next topic
Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Oss

#1
Mon 16, Dec 2019, 15:09:11
Thank you !

In 12 years can we dig the grave for AOC or is this like so many Hollywood idiots
promising to leave the country in 2016

If you don't know where your going any road will take you there
George Harrison

When you come to the fork in the road, take it
Yogi Berra   (Don't send it to me C.O.D.)

Alpha Dog

#2
Mon 16, Dec 2019, 15:35:20
Instead it is the science is settled, submit you subjects, and hand us all your money, and we will save you.  And that is what they want.   I could go on but we just got another 3 inches of global warming and more is on the way so I better get shoveling.

old2soon

#3
Mon 16, Dec 2019, 17:16:56
       Sooooo WHEN ZACKLY did the 12 year count down begin? Anybody? When my puter and/or the telebishion has Something I care Not to hear they both showed up with mute buttons. My cage-oh joy-also has a mute button. I use em-a LOT!  :cooldude: The why of them Not debating-if yer going fer a battle of wits THEY came unarmed.  :roll: RIDE SAFE.
Today is the tommorow you worried about yesterday. If at first you don't succeed screw it-save it for nite check.  1964  1968 U S Navy. Two cruises off Nam.
VRCCDS0240  2012 GL1800 Gold Wing Motor Trike conversion

RDAbull

#4
Mon 16, Dec 2019, 17:17:38
When you can't win a debate you just don't show up and then claim victory.

Simple as that.  BTW: The Sky Is Falling.  Truth.
2015 GoldWing Trike
1999 Valkyrie Interstate Trike, gone but not forgotten

F6Dave

#5
Tue 17, Dec 2019, 09:59:38
The climate alarmists rarely engage in serious debate.  Why should they?  Their narrative plays endlessly on the leftist media.  The so-called journalists don't dare question the fraudulent 'data' or ask why none of the scary predictions they made decades ago all proved to be false.  In a real debate the climate change narrative quickly collapses when faced with actual data.

Two months ago I attended one of the few debates between well known representatives from both sides.  At Colorado University in Boulder, Guy Benson moderated a debate between Alex Epstein and Robert Kennedy Jr.  Epstein, author of 'The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels', takes a somewhat unique approach by first stating we all want what's best for humans.  Few argue with that.  Then he proves that fossil fuels, despite some downsides, have made life immeasurably better for virtually everyone on the planet.

I actually found myself feeling embarrassed for Kennedy at times.  Early in the debate he went into a wild rant against vaccines.  He finally got more focused and attacked his usual villains, rich people and big corporations.  He also had silly anecdotes about catastrophes caused by climate change, like a boat dock that was wiped out in New England.  I'm glad he showed up, but he sure didn't help his cause.

It's a long but very good debate, available here:  https://youtu.be/jjE6tt8PoZE
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions