Thanks, Grumpy!

[Hoser]

I did a dyno run last year, turned 94 hp, 93 lbs torque.  I was very pleased.  Did it again yesterday, only change done to bike was a pair of Grumpy's wide mouth tips, on the same truck stacks, over cut piggies, rear baffles drilled that I ran last year.  No other tuning, not even new plugs.  Check out this dyno run, same dyno, same operator.  Hoser
   

Thanx again, Grumpy 

[MP]

I wish it was easier to compare between dynos.  I do not trust that one says X, and the same bike on the second dyno says X + 7hp.  You really need the same dyno, and hopefully the same operator, to compare.
I just dyno'd my 97, and came up with just over 90 each hp and torque.  But, hard to compare to your numbers.
Maybe me can swap bikes for a few miles this summer, Hoser, and compare.
MP

[Hoser]

It was the same dyno,MP, same operator, too.  Hoser
( I'll be on the Interstate at Inzane, the dyno run was on the Tourer.)

[MP]

Yours were good.  I meant comparing my dyno readout to yours.  My mistake for not being clear.
MP

[mikehallbackhoe]

dyno readings will change from day to day, even different time of day. changes in outdside temperature, humidity, no way to really compare two dyno readings a year apart

[Hoser]

I agree with that, all the same, I'm very happy with the results, only other cruiser that ran better numbers was a new M109 Suzuki, at 107 horse.  What a brute!  Hoser

[Grumpy]

  Well I will not take credit for that, have to see a few more runs with and with out the tips.  But if that is the case, that the tips helped so much the better.
Like they say if you are pleased with them, Great !