News:

If you're new to this message board, read THIS!

Main Menu
Inzane 17

I/S Brake pads?

Started by Ferris Leets, Thu 20, Aug 2009, 13:33:11

Previous topic - Next topic

Ferris Leets

I just replaced the fronts and bought new rears.  Long story shortened. I ended up with a good used set of left hand fronts and a new pair of "Honda" brand rears left over.  Just for the hell of it and because I get curious.  I wondered what the difference was between the standard/tourer rear brakes and the I/S rear.  Well I laid the good front on top of the new rears and they are identical, except that the rear (special order) pads have 2 grooves and the others have 1 groove.

So anyone know why they are different?

Ricky-D

They're not!

Just a difference because of different manufacturers wanting to differentiate their pads from other manufacturers.

The only difference than needs to be paid attention is pad construction material.  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.

Pad material affects rotor life.  Harder pads = better stopping & greater wear on rotors. Softer pad = normal stopping & longer life on rotors.

***
2000_Valkyrie_Interstate

98valk

Quote from: Ferris Leets on Thu 20, Aug 2009, 13:33:11
I just replaced the fronts and bought new rears.  Long story shortened. I ended up with a good used set of left hand fronts and a new pair of "Honda" brand rears left over.  Just for the hell of it and because I get curious.  I wondered what the difference was between the standard/tourer rear brakes and the I/S rear.  Well I laid the good front on top of the new rears and they are identical, except that the rear (special order) pads have 2 grooves and the others have 1 groove. So anyone know why they are different?

I have been looking into new front pads for my bike. what I have found out is that the pads front and back are the same backing plate wise. Differences are the thinkness of the pads. rears being thicker. It seams that the friction material for front and rear pads are the same for our bikes. I don't know if the OEM pads use different FM. One company Ferodo offers front pads that are the same thinkness as the rear pads for the same price and actually lists the same pads for front and rear. I am trying to find out if they will fit our calibers. The difference on thinkness is 1.5mm each pad. If they fit then this will of course give longer pad life for the same $$.
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798

Ferris Leets

But, why is the E/S the only one that has the different brake pads listed?

98valk

Quote from: Ferris Leets on Thu 20, Aug 2009, 15:13:14
But, why is the E/S the only one that has the different brake pads listed?

don't know why, and the I/S are listed cheaper than the std on directline. I remember a few yrs ago something came up about an addtional backing plate for the I/S rears which the std didn't require. so I surmise the I/S is a thinner pad hence the lower $. The extra plate would be for heat blockage to the pistons in the caliper.
I checked Vesrah, EBC, Ferodo, DP and SBS and all list the same brake pads for all valkyrie models except rune. From some google searches it seams that Vesrah, a japanese co., is the supplier of OEM pads and are the same pads.
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798

fudgie

Quote from: Ricky-D on Thu 20, Aug 2009, 13:49:20
  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.


Which are better? I think the ones I have on now are sintered.


Now you're in the world of the wolves...
And we welcome all you sheep...

VRCC-#7196
VRCCDS-#0175
DTR
PGR

98valk

Quote from: fudgie on Thu 20, Aug 2009, 19:25:05
Quote from: Ricky-D on Thu 20, Aug 2009, 13:49:20
  Organic, sintered, metallic, kevlar, etc.


Which are better? I think the ones I have on now are sintered.

sintered. for street use nothing is better. OEM is sintered
http://www.sportbikesolutions.com/sintered_vs_organic.htm
1998 Std/Tourer, 2007 DR200SE, 1981 CB900C  10speed
1973 Duster 340 4-speed rare A/C, 2001 F250 4x4 7.3L, 6sp

"Our Constitution was made only for a Moral and Religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the goverment of any other."
John Adams 10/11/1798

Grandpot

I have a 99 I/S.

I had EBS and just went back to Honda.  The Honda pads stop better with less pressure.  They also have a better feel through the controls.

I didn't keep very good records about the life span of either brand.  Pads are inexpensive and easy to change, so I will stick with the better performing brakes (Honda).  Stopping in a controlled state is what it's all about anyhow. ;D
:crazy2: Experience is recognizing the same mistake every time you make it.:crazy2: