Hillary

[Smokinjoe-VRCCDS#0005]

[Bighead]

Joe we are the ones that need Luck to keep the Hildabeast out of the WH.

[Smokinjoe-VRCCDS#0005]

Joe we are the ones that need Luck to keep the Hildabeast out of the WH.

The Republican Party better get its crap together and find that shining star that will save the world 'cause those couple of Waterheads that are in the running now ain't got a snowballs chance in hell against her.... I'm with you I'd hate to see her win the election.

[old2soon]

There is NO WAY in HELL I can picture that beeatch as potus or cic. EVERY cursed time she opens her pie hole someone/anyone needs to remind her of her words-what does it mater now! Mark my words-if she becomes potus-THAT and the dem agenda is what we WILL get.  RIDE SAFE.

[..]

It's being reported that this  hypocrite/liar will spend close to 2.5 BILLION dollars in her quest to become the Dem/Lib/Prog presidential candidate.

This from one who professes to be anti the rich !%. Where will the billions of dollars come from?

What a joke she is, as are those who are going to be lining up to support her.

I'd like to know exactly what she has achieved in her political career to make her worthy of striving to become the DNC presidential candidate and in turn the President of the USA..

Anyone???

[Jersey mike]

if anyone has ever seen the movie "The Manchurian Candidate", Hillary reminds me of the character played by Angela Lansbury.  There isn't much more than that which I can say about the woman, I believe that says it all.

If you've never seen the original movie w/ Lansbury and Sinatra, then you may not get the comparison.

I don't trust her,I don't like her.

[BF]

It's being reported that this  hypocrite/liar will spend close to 2.5 BILLION dollars in her quest to become the Dem/Lib/Prog presidential candidate.

This from one who professes to be anti the rich !%. Where will the billions of dollars come from?

What a joke she is, as are those who are going to be lining up to support her.

I'd like to know exactly what she has achieved in her political career to make her worthy of striving to become the DNC presidential candidate and in turn the President of the USA..

Anyone???

That would be Wall Street.  She's in their hip pocket. 

[PAVALKER]

There is NO WAY in HELL I can picture that beeatch as potus or cic. EVERY cursed time she opens her pie hole someone/anyone needs to remind her of her words-what does it mater now! Mark my words-if she becomes potus-THAT and the dem agenda is what we WILL get.  RIDE SAFE.

Picture this as your CINC?  Must be a campaign photo......

[Patrick]

As said before, I've been watching her since she was fired from the Watergate investigation for tampering, fraud and lying.  My wife had to work with her a couple times. She is a piece of crap.

I also have to wonder about anyone that changes their name. Why did Slyke Wylie change his name from Blythe to Clinton.

What has she accomplished ?  Only one thing, thats all. And that is increase her/their bank account.

Where does the money come from ?  Stupid people contributing to the Clinton Money Machine, their foundation.

There are people already standing in line to vote for her. People love these 2 for some strange reason.

Try to read what the former White House workers have to say about them while they were living there. Its interesting.

But, she is going to be the darling of the Dems. So at this point what difference does it make.

[Art708]

 I am afraid that no matter who the Dems run for prez it won't make any difference, they will win. The GOP hasn't had a capable candidate in many elections......and still don't. We have become a Liberal, Democrat nation and I don't see it getting any better but it can and will get worse.

[MP]

I am afraid that no matter who the Dems run for prez it won't make any difference, they will win. The GOP hasn't had a capable candidate in many elections......and still don't. We have become a Liberal, Democrat nation and I don't see it getting any better but it can and will get worse.

Not quite so sure they will win, but there is no doubt that the country keeps going left/liberal/progressive.

President Kennedy is an icon of the Democratic Party.  He would not stand a chance in Hades of even being nominated by the Dems of today.  In fact, he would be on the conservative side of the Republican Party!

Cutting taxes, strong defense, etc.

MP

[musclehead]

not everyone on the left is enamored with Hillary. some of the leftists on that other board I go to are against her (at least that's what they say, who knows for sure )

a hit piece from Salon.com 

http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/hillary_clinton_just_doesnt_get_it_shes_already_running_a_losing_campaign/

[MP]

not everyone on the left is enamored with Hillary. some of the leftists on that other board I go to are against her (at least that's what they say, who knows for sure )

a hit piece from Salon.com 

http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/hillary_clinton_just_doesnt_get_it_shes_already_running_a_losing_campaign/

True, but............ who else is there to vote for?  Will they vote for a Repub?  Hardly.  Usually what happens is that they either hold their nose, and vote for her, or they stay home.

Repubs do just the same thing.  The right wing either holds its nose, or stays home.  They did that to Romney.  If Romney had gotten as many votes as Dole did, he would have won.  But, a lot stayed home.

Will this happen to Hillary in enough numbers to affect the election in 2016?  Who knows.

MP

[..]

not everyone on the left is enamored with Hillary. some of the leftists on that other board I go to are against her (at least that's what they say, who knows for sure )

a hit piece from Salon.com 

http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/hillary_clinton_just_doesnt_get_it_shes_already_running_a_losing_campaign/

True, but............ who else is there to vote for?  Will they vote for a Repub?  Hardly.  Usually what happens is that they either hold their nose, and vote for her, or they stay home.

Repubs do just the same thing.  The right wing either holds its nose, or stays home.  They did that to Romney.  If Romney had gotten as many votes as Dole did, he would have won.  But, a lot stayed home.

Will this happen to Hillary in enough numbers to affect the election in 2016?  Who knows.

MP

Yep if the Ron Paul supporters hadn't gone off in a hissy fit..............................................

[..]

not everyone on the left is enamored with Hillary. some of the leftists on that other board I go to are against her (at least that's what they say, who knows for sure )

a hit piece from Salon.com 

http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/hillary_clinton_just_doesnt_get_it_shes_already_running_a_losing_campaign/

Reading the comments is an eye opener.

I've never seen so many derogatory childish names for those running for president on the right.

I know I use the term "liar in chief" BUT that's because it's truthful. 

[Patrick]

I am afraid that no matter who the Dems run for prez it won't make any difference, they will win. The GOP hasn't had a capable candidate in many elections......and still don't. We have become a Liberal, Democrat nation and I don't see it getting any better but it can and will get worse.

Not quite so sure they will win, but there is no doubt that the country keeps going left/liberal/progressive.

President Kennedy is an icon of the Democratic Party.  He would not stand a chance in Hades of even being nominated by the Dems of today.  In fact, he would be on the conservative side of the Republican Party!

Cutting taxes, strong defense, etc.

MP

JFK was conservative. I think he was a democrat only because of his family and what daddy said he was to be.  JFK hung around with republicans while in the senate and was great friends with the Nixon's. He never let Nixon know he was about to cut out his heart with a dull spoon during the televised debate which devastated Nixon. Family and politics means everything to the Kennedy's.
Kennedy was the first president to get caught using the IRS to go after his enemies.

[G-Man]

I also have to wonder about anyone that changes their name. Why did Slyke Wylie change his name from Blythe to Clinton.

Several present politicians in important offices have had aliases and name changes.  For example:

Bill de Blasio - born Warren Wilhelm, Jr 

[Serk]

While I agree with the jist of that image, the reality of the specific ID is false. That's been passed around as His Holiness' 1981 Columbia student ID, however in 1981 Columbia student IDs didn't have barcodes on them and had a totally different look to them. In other words, much like our current president, that ID is a fake.

(Not arguing that The Enlightened One, Most High Dear Leader didn't go by Barry Soetoro and was indeed a foreign student (How else did he travel to Pakistan during a time when a US passport was embargo'ed against travel to Pakistan?) but that ID isn't the proof of it.)

[Jess from VA]

[f6john]

    I would just like to urge everyone to keep an open mind when it comes to prospective candidates to go up against Hilliary. It's a long time till election day and I think we will wind up with an electable candidate this time. Of course the power brokers will still have their influence so we could still in up in a mess. I haven't ruled out anyone yet.

[musclehead]

not everyone on the left is enamored with Hillary. some of the leftists on that other board I go to are against her (at least that's what they say, who knows for sure )

a hit piece from Salon.com 

http://www.salon.com/2015/04/12/hillary_clinton_just_doesnt_get_it_shes_already_running_a_losing_campaign/

True, but............ who else is there to vote for?  Will they vote for a Repub?  Hardly.  Usually what happens is that they either hold their nose, and vote for her, or they stay home.

Repubs do just the same thing.  The right wing either holds its nose, or stays home.  They did that to Romney.  If Romney had gotten as many votes as Dole did, he would have won.  But, a lot stayed home.

Will this happen to Hillary in enough numbers to affect the election in 2016?  Who knows.

MP

spot on. I have a guy at work whose favorite pastime is to bitch and gripe about Obama, he stayed home last election. I drive him nuts about this every time he whines.

[musclehead]

    I would just like to urge everyone to keep an open mind when it comes to prospective candidates to go up against Hilliary. It's a long time till election day and I think we will wind up with an electable candidate this time. Of course the power brokers will still have their influence so we could still in up in a mess. I haven't ruled out anyone yet.

this is what happened last time, anyone that ran as a  conservative last time was beat about the head an shoulders so much they pretty much pulled out. meanwhile the MEDIA kept proclaiming louder and louder Romney was the only one that could beat Obama.  until..... Romney had the nomination then the rhetoric changed to 'there's no way Romney can beat Obama'

something similar will happen this time, the most electable in our view will vilified and denigrated by the media until some of our own will believe it.

[J.Mencalice]

I am afraid that no matter who the Dems run for prez it won't make any difference, they will win. The GOP hasn't had a capable candidate in many elections......and still don't. We have become a Liberal, Democrat nation and I don't see it getting any better but it can and will get worse.

Not quite so sure they will win, but there is no doubt that the country keeps going left/liberal/progressive.

President Kennedy is an icon of the Democratic Party.  He would not stand a chance in Hades of even being nominated by the Dems of today.  In fact, he would be on the conservative side of the Republican Party!

Cutting taxes, strong defense, etc.

MP

I just saw one of my burros unload a pile out back that quite resembles this ridiculous mention of JFK being a Republican at heart.  The Republicans HATED him, HATED his family and everything they stood for; he would chosen to stay on that island for the rest of his life than to be classified with that bunch.
They HATED  The Kennedys were the Clinton's of the 50's, 60's, 70's, and 80's.  Who was despised more by the GOP than Ted Kennedy?  Get outta town with that baloney.

Truth is, the Republicans only run losers for president because they have no cohesion or loyalty to their party; they can't unite over anything or anyone because they only have their regional favorite sons to run against a better campaign machine than a herd of good-ol-white-boy network of losers.

Try again, sir.

Most working class people don't like Hillary Clinton (and I include myself in that category), because I've been working since the age of 4.
So, anyone out there, please give me (a lifelong Democrat) a Republican candidate and three solid reasons why I should vote for him/her to be my president and make my life and the life of my family better in the four years after he/she is elected.
I can vote for anyone who gives me that vision for a better USA, but they have to be the real deal.

No more piles, please.

[Willow]

It's difficult to take seriously someone who isn't clever enough to type outside the quote box.   

Truthfully if someone hates everything the Republican party stands for he will vote for whomever the Democrats put up.

If someone hates everything the Democratic party stands for he will vote for whomever the Republicans put forward.

In actuality our elections are determined by that small group of voters in the middle who are truly willing to go either way, generally by whatever sound bite appeals or whatever promise of "your family will be better off financially" is believed.  That grouip may vote right, vote left, or stay home.  They determine the outcome in a national election.

[J.Mencalice]

It's difficult to take seriously someone who isn't clever enough to type outside the quote box.   

Truthfully if someone hates everything the Republican party stands for he will vote for whomever the Democrats put up.

If someone hates everything the Democratic party stands for he will vote for whomever the Republicans put forward.

In actuality our elections are determined by that small group of voters in the middle who are truly willing to go either way, generally by whatever sound bite appeals or whatever promise of "your family will be better off financially" is believed.  That grouip may vote right, vote left, or stay home.  They determine the outcome in a national election.

I apologize for not being as clever as someone who can't spell the word "group" properly, eh?
Glass houses, sir.  Hold your stones.

To quote the Waco Kid (Gene Wilder's character in "Blazing Saddles") about the plain townsfolk who inhabit Rock Ridge and their propensity for being so homespun and united in their total hatred for the new sheriff: "....you know, morons!" 
Is that what our swing vote electorate has come to with blind hatred?  Yes, that's why the country is in a mess.  Apathy and hatred.  I concur.
More piles.

[BF]

Truth is, the Republicans only run losers for president because they have no cohesion or loyalty to their party; they can't unite over anything or anyone because they only have their regional favorite sons to run against a better campaign machine than a herd of good-ol-white-boy network of losers.

The truth is, the democrats only run blatant liars, scoundrels, criminals, charlatans, carpet baggers and thieves. 

And you can't wait to line up to vote for them.   

[Romeo]

This is what happens to a nation full of selfish, self centered, me first, **** what anyone else thinks people. Which, in large part is what we have become. I grieve for my grandchildren.
   Anyone who thinks the politicians of the day don't mirror the public at large is either a blathering idiot, or have their head buried so deep in the sand they can hear Chinese.
Hillary Clinton vs. Rand Paul. Are you kidding me? 50 years ago they would have been laughed out of the country if they would have even thought of running.
   Where is Winston Churchill when we need him? Wait.........we don't deserve him.

[Chrisj CMA]

It's difficult to take seriously someone who isn't clever enough to type outside the quote box.   

Truthfully if someone hates everything the Republican party stands for he will vote for whomever the Democrats put up.

If someone hates everything the Democratic party stands for he will vote for whomever the Republicans put forward.

In actuality our elections are determined by that small group of voters in the middle who are truly willing to go either way, generally by whatever sound bite appeals or whatever promise of "your family will be better off financially" is believed.  That grouip may vote right, vote left, or stay home.  They determine the outcome in a national election.

Unfortunately I fear something has changed.  I truly believe that in the last two presidential elections, voters played ZERO percent in the outcome.  The machine that chose Obama as their point stole these last two elections and unless they have been upended (I doubt that) they will just do it again for their gal this time.  Its sad and hard to say but I actually agree with some of my friends that don't vote because they say it don't matter anyway.  I will vote, but I wonder, since I am a registered voter, how many times did I vote for Obama last time???????

[Patrick]

I don't know what Willopad is trying to pull in reply 22. That ain't mine.

What I said about JFK is as I wrote. Anyone that disagrees can look it up.  JFK also wanted out of Vietnam, LBJ escalated it.

[solo1]

Somewhere I read recently about "usefull idiots"  I believe that it's true.  It seems to me that the vast majority of voters, both legal and illegal, will keep voting for politicians who give them something.
The Democratic party is very good at 'giving' them something.

The media, by far, is biased toward the Democratic Party.  It makes no difference why they are. 

Lies are IN.  The truth is OUT!   1984 is here with its doublespeak.

The Republican Party is constantly able to snatch Defeat from the Jaws of Victory.  They are helped with this by the Media.

Talking about who is qualified for the office of the President is bullshit!  Qualifications aren't necessary.  Look who's in there now!  IMO, there ARE numerous runners in the Republican Party who are qualified.
Crap! they are all qualified under the present standards. 

I just stopped my cable TV.  I found myself nodding yes, every time that I agreed with Fox News commentators.  Then i realized that they are just commentators and unable to change the sequence of events. 

It boils down to how many voters who are informed enough to NOT vote for a Democratic candidate AND are not looking for a 'pie-in-the sky' but are seriously concerned about the direction our former Republic and now a Democracy is going.

For the most part, the members of the VRCC and like organizations, the Armed Forces, the Police in smaller cities, the NRA, veterans, etc, and least of all, the died-in-the- wool Republicans will determine if we have enough votes to overcome the illegal voting and the majority of ignorant and far Left voters believing the lies that are being generated across the board.

AND THAT's how i really think about this.
.

[Art708]

I don't know what Willopad is trying to pull in reply 22. That ain't mine.

What I said about JFK is as I wrote. Anyone that disagrees can look it up.  JFK also wanted out of Vietnam, LBJ escalated it.

  Wasn't it JFK who sent advisors to Vietnam in the first place? I wish someone had pulled us out of there...would have saved me some miserable time there....on a wasted war. Sad to think that 58,000 American men and women got killed there and the country ended up just like it would have if we'd stayed home and never set foot in that miserable country.

[MP]

After the French gave up on Vietnam, The US under Kennedy send in advisors to help.  Seems like years back I read that JFK was thinking about getting out, when he was killed.  But, that is just my rememberer, and it is getting old!

JFK is the one that got us in there in the first place. Would he have escalated like Johnson did?  We will never know.

MP

[Jess from VA]

Dwight D. Eisenhower (1890-1969), a Republican, was the popular 34th President of the United States, serving two terms from 1953 to 1961. Prior to his presidency, Eisenhower was a lifelong military man, commanding the D-Day invasion while serving as Supreme Allied Commander in Europe during World War II.

In February 1954, President Eisenhower refused to commit American troops to the Franco-Vietnamese War. In a press conference he stated, "I cannot conceive of a greater tragedy for America than to get heavily involved now in an all-out war in any of those regions."2 By April, however, his administration revisited the question of direct intervention in the war. Though he sent no U.S. troops to the region, he authorized military aid to the French. After France surrendered to the Viet Minh, Eisenhower's administration aided anti-communist leader Ngo Dinh Diem in consolidating power in Saigon. Throughout his second term as president, Eisenhower remained committed to Diem's often-tyrannical regime

Like the Bay of Pigs, JFK inherited a commitment to RVN (though he was the first to sent in advisers).  Historically, it is interesting to note that nearly everyone who was heavily involved in Korea knew involvement in an Asian land war was a big mistake. 

[Patrick]

Harry Truman was the first to get us involved in 1950 by sending aid.

Its been hard to determine [ at least for me] when the first were sent, but, it appears to be 1954.

1959 showed the first advisors there killed. One of the very first was from our little town.

JFK sent more advisors and apparently felt this wasn't worth the effort and wanted out of that country. Thats also one of the theories concerning his death. LBJ along with his 'Great Society' BS wanted in on Vietnam in a big way, he got what he wanted.

[..]

She's a blatant liar and doesn't care if you know it.

http://www.ijreview.com/2015/04/297921-clintons-coffee-shop-chat-featured-regular-iowans-actually-driven-town/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=organic&utm_content=conservativedaily&utm_campaign=Politics

Refelcting the standards and morals of the dem/lib/progs. What a joke.

[bigguy]

Take the poll. Would you vote for Hillary?

NO. 87% with 75K votes at the time I took it. Surprising results, especially considering it's on an MSNBC website.

[Patrick]

Take the poll. Would you vote for Hillary?

NO. 87% with 75K votes at the time I took it. Surprising results, especially considering it's on an MSNBC website.

It now appears 92K have answered with 87% being a big fat NO !    It is surprising coming from a dumb ass liberal bastion such as msnbc.

[BF]

Take the poll. Would you vote for Hillary?

NO. 87% with 75K votes at the time I took it. Surprising results, especially considering it's on an MSNBC website.

It now appears 92K have answered with 87% being a big fat NO !    It is surprising coming from a dumb ass liberal bastion such as msnbc.

Read some of the posts on that site. 

One guy named Ted thinks it's all a plot. 

"What right-wing wacko sent all of you conservatives over here to vote?"

[Jess from VA]

Take the poll. Would you vote for Hillary?

NO. 87% with 75K votes at the time I took it. Surprising results, especially considering it's on an MSNBC website.

It now appears 92K have answered with 87% being a big fat NO !    It is surprising coming from a dumb ass liberal bastion such as msnbc.

Read some of the posts on that site.  

One guy named Ted thinks it's all a plot.  

"What right-wing wacko sent all of you conservatives over here to vote?"

Reply:   Dude, it's YOUR left-wing wackos that drew all our votes.

PS:     If you plan to vote for her, you can probably get a blow job out of it if you play your cards right.

[Patrick]

Take the poll. Would you vote for Hillary?

NO. 87% with 75K votes at the time I took it. Surprising results, especially considering it's on an MSNBC website.

It now appears 92K have answered with 87% being a big fat NO !    It is surprising coming from a dumb ass liberal bastion such as msnbc.

Read some of the posts on that site.  

One guy named Ted thinks it's all a plot.  

"What right-wing wacko sent all of you conservatives over here to vote?"

Reply:   Dude, it's YOUR left-wing wackos that drew all our votes.

PS:     If you plan to vote for her, you can probably get a blow job out of it if you play your cards right.

I don't about that, but, I'm sure she'll screw you if you vote for her right along with the rest of the country.