Valkyrie Riders Cruiser Club
November 22, 2025, 04:32:36 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Ultimate Seats Link VRCC Store
Homepage : Photostash : JustPics : Shoptalk : Old Tech Archive : Classifieds : Contact Staff
News: If you're new to this message board, read THIS!
 
Inzane 17
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: It appears that the Donald is taking his marbles and staying away from debate...  (Read 1942 times)
Karen
Member
*****
Posts: 2786


Boston MA


« on: January 26, 2016, 05:46:49 PM »

Not sure that I like what it says to me about him  Undecided
Logged
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2016, 05:50:09 PM »

He sure doesn't like Meghan Kelley does he ?
Logged
Serk
Member
*****
Posts: 21988


Rowlett, TX


« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2016, 05:53:47 PM »

I'm not a fan of his at all at this point... If he becomes the Republican nominee I'd vote for him just to stop Crazy Commie Sanders or Hillary, but Trump is FAR from my first choice...

Logged

Never ask a geek 'Why?',just nod your head and slowly back away...



IBA# 22107 
VRCC# 7976
VRCCDS# 226

1998 Valkyrie Standard
2008 Gold Wing

Taxation is theft.

μολὼν λαβέ
Patrick
Member
*****
Posts: 15433


VRCC 4474

Largo Florida


« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2016, 06:03:30 PM »

It'll be interesting to see how this works out. I'm liking him less as time goes on and he certainly doesn't like Ms Kelly. I think its a mistake to not participate.
Logged
Jess from VA
Member
*****
Posts: 30866


No VA


« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2016, 06:47:58 PM »

I'm not a fan of his at all at this point... If he becomes the Republican nominee I'd vote for him just to stop Crazy Commie Sanders or Hillary, but Trump is FAR from my first choice...

Exactly my take.  I want Cruz, but I'll take anybody but the communists. 

It's certainly a mistake for him to act like a king before the coronation.  (or a spoiled child)

But he is starting to remind me of a Teflon Don. 

Bombast seems to be working for him, but a little humility (in public) would do him some good.... with everyone.

Logged
Karen
Member
*****
Posts: 2786


Boston MA


« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2016, 07:08:58 PM »

Thanks, gentlemen, if he can't face Meghan Kelly, how will he do with Putin or any of the Middle East potentates? Not my first choice, but he's been looking almost inevitable, and would be preferable to either Bernie or Hillary. Maybe this is the pause that refreshes...  Wink
Logged
Alpha Dog
Member
*****
Posts: 1557


Arcanum, OH


« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2016, 07:49:42 PM »

I knew this was going to happen when they announced the moderators.  Kelly hates Trump and made it plain in her questioning in the first debate with some ridiculous questions. I know for a fact her purpose was to take him out - I know not why but it was obvious.  News came out this would be the end of Trump and Frank Luntz's focus group said as much.  Trump's numbers go up to where 65 percent of Republicans expect him to win now.

Fox has many people that could conduct that debate and I was surprised when they announced the same people, as they did not do near as good a job as the Fox Business network did.  Kelly, Bair, and Wallace are to full of themselves and Trump well he is also.  Doubt it will hurt him much.  I think he will do something else and donate a bunch of money to the Wounded Warrior Project.
Logged
Jersey mike
Member
*****
Posts: 11264

Brick,NJ


« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2016, 08:27:55 PM »

I wish Tony Snow was still alive for this election. He was an excellent news person. He would have brought some outstanding ability as a moderator for Fox in their debates.
Logged
Hef
Member
*****
Posts: 708

Opdyke, IL 62872


« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2016, 11:05:04 PM »

My take on this is Trump saying I know you're out to destroy me and I am not going to be your patsy. The idea that he is afraid of Kelly is ridiculous.  I like Cruz but he is really pushing the idea that Trump is afraid of Kelly and that turns me off on Cruz.  As for Kelly, I never watch her show. To me, she is an arrogant, egotistical, person who thinks she is the greatest thing since electricity. Fox needs Trump for ratings, Trump does not need Fox. Whether Trump wins or loses will not be decided by his skipping this bias debate.
Logged

DirtyDan
Member
*****
Posts: 3450


Kingman Arizona, from NJ


« Reply #9 on: January 26, 2016, 11:27:20 PM »

he might be dong well because he IS mixing it up with fox news

just a maybe

dan
Logged

Do it while you can. I did.... it my way
Xtracho
Member
*****
Posts: 1303


The Bosses

Florida's Emerald Coast


« Reply #10 on: January 27, 2016, 03:43:31 AM »

My take on this is Trump saying I know you're out to destroy me and I am not going to be your patsy.

The true definition of paranoia.

If Fox is out to destroy Trump I would think appearing on the news network over 130 times since he announced his candidacy already would have done that.
Logged

Mark

"To live you must be willing to die" - Amir Vahedi
My father gets smarter each day he is gone.

In the stable:
'84 GW Aspencade
'47 Indian Chief
'98 Valkyrie
Robert
Member
*****
Posts: 17398


S Florida


« Reply #11 on: January 27, 2016, 03:53:22 AM »

Maybe this is the exact reason we should like him he doesn't have to play to people like politicians. He has choices and does not have to worry about offending or playing up to anyone like Megan. We have said we are sick and tired of Political correctness maybe this is just one case of not cowering to every whim. Maybe he is not a media whore as we know some of the politicians are, speaking of great ideas to the media and later people finding out the promises are a paper tiger.

  He has a back bone people, he is a deal maker and business man and is used to going head to head with greater than Kelly. The important thing that has gripped the nation is how will he keep the promise and does he have what it takes to make America Great Again? Achieving this has not really been seen in our lifetime, and may look different than what we are used to, especially with the slime and vermin that are in media and government today.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 04:03:03 AM by Robert » Logged

“Some people see things that are and ask, Why? Some people dream of things that never were and ask, Why not? Some people have to go to work and don’t have time for all that.”
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #12 on: January 27, 2016, 04:12:42 AM »

My take on this is Trump saying I know you're out to destroy me and I am not going to be your patsy.

The true definition of paranoia.

If Fox is out to destroy Trump I would think appearing on the news network over 130 times since he announced his candidacy already would have done that.
cooldude
Logged
Skinhead
Member
*****
Posts: 8743


J. A. B. O. A.

Troy, MI


« Reply #13 on: January 27, 2016, 04:21:14 AM »

To me, it shows how little stock he puts in debates, Fox, and Kelly.  I have never put much stock in the debates myself.
Logged


Troy, MI
Ramie
Member
*****
Posts: 1318


2001 I/S St. Michael MN


« Reply #14 on: January 27, 2016, 05:01:29 AM »

Kelly hates Trump and made it plain in her questioning in the first debate with some ridiculous questions. I know for a fact her purpose was to take him out

I don't understand this, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC hate conservatives, but that doesn't stop them from going on and answering their questions, even if they're tough or unfair question.  I just don't understand this move by Trump, I've just lost some respect for him.
Logged

“I am not a courageous person by nature. I have simply discovered that, at certain key moments in this life, you must find courage in yourself, in order to move forward and live. It is like a muscle and it must be exercised, first a little, and then more and more.  A deep breath and a leap.”
G-Man
Member
*****
Posts: 7912


White Plains, NY


« Reply #15 on: January 27, 2016, 05:18:20 AM »

he might be dong well because he IS mixing it up with fox news

just a maybe

dan

Maybe,......
Logged
Xtracho
Member
*****
Posts: 1303


The Bosses

Florida's Emerald Coast


« Reply #16 on: January 27, 2016, 05:26:31 AM »

Maybe this is the exact reason we should like him he doesn't have to play to people like politicians. He has choices and does not have to worry about offending or playing up to anyone like Megan. We have said we are sick and tired of Political correctness maybe this is just one case of not cowering to every whim. Maybe he is not a media whore as we know some of the politicians are, speaking of great ideas to the media and later people finding out the promises are a paper tiger.

  He has a back bone people, he is a deal maker and business man and is used to going head to head with greater than Kelly. The important thing that has gripped the nation is how will he keep the promise and does he have what it takes to make America Great Again? Achieving this has not really been seen in our lifetime, and may look different than what we are used to, especially with the slime and vermin that are in media and government today.

While he does "march to the beat of his own drum", characterizing him as not being a media whore is laughable. He Tweets, he Instagrams, he uses every single media outlet, including social media, to share his views with the electorate.

Kelly turned his own words on him in August and he was unable to deal with it.

Don't get me wrong. His political incorrectness is fresh and a new paradigm injected into political campaigns. I like a lot of what he says no matter how politically naive it may be. And being the consummate business man and deal maker he is, he is not going to "put all his cards on the table" with regards to foreign policy, etc. until he determines it's the right time to do so. He is clearly becoming more and more savvy to the process as his campaign moves forward. Surely there is no denying that he resonates with so many of us that are numbed to the drone of politics as usual.

But in this case, I suspect it's all about thinking he can bully the media into him having his way. After all, he did not become the astute businessman he is by not getting what he wants.
Logged

Mark

"To live you must be willing to die" - Amir Vahedi
My father gets smarter each day he is gone.

In the stable:
'84 GW Aspencade
'47 Indian Chief
'98 Valkyrie
Varmintmist
Member
*****
Posts: 1228


Western Pa


« Reply #17 on: January 27, 2016, 05:36:00 AM »

He doesnt like Kelly because she put him on notice in their first meeting that she will look past his BS and ask him about what he has done VS what he is saying now, not accept everything on face value. From what I have heard of her, no one likes to be across from her, friend or foe, because its a knife fight and she is good with a blade. She was a working lawyer for quite a while and I believe she is published.

It doesnt show much ability to deal with people who you cant buy or order because they dont work for you and are not so impressed with you that he wont go into the debate because someone doesnt fawn over him. If the dictator of lower Bumfikia tells him no if he is pres. what will he do? Go away? Hide? Get on TV and call him names?

The other possibility is that Cruz might be closer in his internal polling than we see. Its getting closer and the hype and bombast is starting to mean less and you need a good answer, not a quip or a slander. Cruz is a natural debater who has answers for the questions. Trump might be better off using the old axiom that it is better to be thought the fool than to open your mouth and prove it.
Logged

However beautiful the strategy, you should occasionally look at the results.
Churchill
Jess from VA
Member
*****
Posts: 30866


No VA


« Reply #18 on: January 27, 2016, 06:31:33 AM »

These are all pretty good and interesting and well thought out opinions, and it warms my heart to see us all closely following what is going on, and hoping for the best for our currently mismanaged and abused country and citizens. 

Whether this is a decision based narrowly on a personal dislike/feud between Kelly and Trump, or whether Trump (and his advisers) figure that he's consistently running well ahead of everyone else, and is simply more likely to hurt than help himself further by appearing in this particular debate at this time is certainly unclear to me.

I like Kelly a lot, but if she is part of the mainstream Republican movement to dislodge Trump from his leading position, a decision to sidestep her is not necessarily a bad idea (from Trump's point of view).  It is a calculated risk, since it seems likely that sitting out a debate will probably result in one or more of his competitors coming up in the polls (for whatever they are worth). 
Logged
BnB Tom
Member
*****
Posts: 1708


Where'd old times go?

Frisco, TX


« Reply #19 on: January 27, 2016, 06:46:10 AM »

   Do you notice any similarities between Trump's latest rant and the "King" we're getting rid of?   tickedoff
              
                           "MY WAY OR THE HIGHWAY"!

  Makes you kinda wonder how many Executive Actions he would invoke if he were elected?  coolsmiley

  Could be an opportunity for Cruz and Rubio to take it up a notch.  Wink





Logged
Alpha Dog
Member
*****
Posts: 1557


Arcanum, OH


« Reply #20 on: January 27, 2016, 07:18:09 AM »

Kelly hates Trump and made it plain in her questioning in the first debate with some ridiculous questions. I know for a fact her purpose was to take him out

I don't understand this, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC hate conservatives, but that doesn't stop them from going on and answering their questions, even if they're tough or unfair question.  I just don't understand this move by Trump, I've just lost some respect for him.

I was tipped off before hand that Fox was laying a trap for him and they wanted to take him out.  The source did not say who the person would be, but it became quite apparent very quickly it was   barbie doll Kelly.  The others hit hard also and wanted to force arguments on stage.

While there are some true conservatives at FOX, they are basically an establishment Republican Network.  They bring on these nicely  tailored opinion writers from National Review, you know the Bill Crystal, Steve Hays,  George Will types that have hunkered down in bed with the Country Club
Republican deal makers for years, that could give a rats ass about getting real needed reform done as long as they can draw those 6 and 7 figure checks no matter who  is in office.  These folks do not get out in the real world to find out what base conservatives like myself and many fine riders on this website really think and how we are scared to death for the future of our children and grandchildren.

Oh and that source that tipped me off was the best known conservative in the country.
Chuck
Logged
..
Member
*****
Posts: 27796


Maggie Valley, NC


« Reply #21 on: January 27, 2016, 08:08:38 AM »

Back in 2102 Trump said that people who didn't come to a debate were cowards.

He also said that Megan was a much better moderator than he was.

Y'all are being slowly reeled in.

And for those of you who will say NOT TRUE without thinking here's a link

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=donald+trump+avoid+debate+cowardxs
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 08:21:18 AM by Britman » Logged
signart
Member
*****
Posts: 2095


Crossville, Tennessee


« Reply #22 on: January 27, 2016, 08:13:01 AM »

Not standing up for Trump, but why hasn't the media blasted the dem candidates for not debating at all on Fox net.
Also Rand Paul dropped out of the last debate, no big deal.
Logged
Romeo
Member
*****
Posts: 1612


J.A.B.O.A.

Romeo, Michigan


« Reply #23 on: January 27, 2016, 08:58:56 AM »

Just another example of his arrogance. At the bottom of my list as a republican candidate. Only two people below him on my list of presidential hopefuls are the Bern and the hildabeast.
Logged
Xtracho
Member
*****
Posts: 1303


The Bosses

Florida's Emerald Coast


« Reply #24 on: January 27, 2016, 09:02:04 AM »

Not standing up for Trump, but why hasn't the media blasted the dem candidates for not debating at all on Fox net.

Did you really have to ask that question to get an answer?  Wink
Logged

Mark

"To live you must be willing to die" - Amir Vahedi
My father gets smarter each day he is gone.

In the stable:
'84 GW Aspencade
'47 Indian Chief
'98 Valkyrie
signart
Member
*****
Posts: 2095


Crossville, Tennessee


« Reply #25 on: January 27, 2016, 09:49:19 AM »

Not standing up for Trump, but why hasn't the media blasted the dem candidates for not debating at all on Fox net.

Did you really have to ask that question to get an answer?  Wink
[/quote

You're right, should ask why GOP scheds debates on Clinton News Network
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 11:14:12 AM by signart » Logged
Crackerborn
Member
*****
Posts: 1079


SE Wisconsin


« Reply #26 on: January 27, 2016, 10:39:00 AM »


While there are some true conservatives at FOX, they are basically an establishment Republican Network.  They bring on these nicely  tailored opinion writers from National Review, you know the Bill Crystal, Steve Hays,  George Will types that have hunkered down in bed with the Country Club
Republican deal makers for years, that could give a rats ass about getting real needed reform done as long as they can draw those 6 and 7 figure checks no matter who  is in office.  These folks do not get out in the real world to find out what base conservatives like myself and many fine riders on this website really think and how we are scared to death for the future of our children and grandchildren.

Oh and that source that tipped me off was the best known conservative in the country.
Chuck

I generally refuse to get dragged into discussions with Trump supporters since beating my head against a brick wall seems a useless pursuit.

Ask your National Conservative radio host why Bob Dole, an ultimate Republican insider, is endorsing "the Donald"? Could it be Trump will make deals to their advantage while other top tier candidates will actually stand up to the status quo? And if the man can't take the pressure of a single network that might have an agenda, how will he fair when the entire Democratic machine starts to crank it up against him? I give "the Donald" credit, he has manipulated the media to his advantage very well up to now. I wonder how long that will last if he were to become the Republican nominee?

If Trump becomes the Republican nominee, the socialists have won. I know I will be looking at the best write-in candidate. I don't believe a candidate with a 45% negative rating with the general electorate has a chance, even Hillary has better numbers than that and the scary part...Bernie is the only candidate in the black.  
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 10:43:54 AM by crackerborn » Logged

Life is about the ride, not the destination.
97 Valkyrie Tour
99 Valkyrie Interstate
Xtracho
Member
*****
Posts: 1303


The Bosses

Florida's Emerald Coast


« Reply #27 on: January 27, 2016, 10:48:19 AM »

Not standing up for Trump, but why hasn't the media blasted the dem candidates for not debating at all on Fox net.

Did you really have to ask that question to get an answer?  Wink

You're right, should ask why GOP scheds debates on Clinton News Network

 cooldude

« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 10:53:21 AM by Xtracho » Logged

Mark

"To live you must be willing to die" - Amir Vahedi
My father gets smarter each day he is gone.

In the stable:
'84 GW Aspencade
'47 Indian Chief
'98 Valkyrie
Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16684


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #28 on: January 27, 2016, 02:20:20 PM »

Donald Trump is not my favorite candidate by a long shot.   But, I think not debating for his stated reasons is one heck of an idea and won't hurt his chances one iota.   

Those already in his corner don't care and this way, he doesn't get nailed by the hosts or the other candidates and gets to respond to any thing asked or accusations after some time to think (and get advice from his staff) after the debate.    He gets to do this while he says that he wasn't afraid of the narrators or network but, simply wasn't willing to put up with crap they would bring.    Personally, I think it's a brilliant move.    As I said, Trump is not my favorite candidate but, he's the one most likely to beat both the liar and the socialist IMHO.
Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
Moonshot_1
Member
*****
Posts: 5142


Me and my Valk at Freedom Rock


« Reply #29 on: January 27, 2016, 03:12:31 PM »

Donald Trump is not my favorite candidate by a long shot.   But, I think not debating for his stated reasons is one heck of an idea and won't hurt his chances one iota.   

Those already in his corner don't care and this way, he doesn't get nailed by the hosts or the other candidates and gets to respond to any thing asked or accusations after some time to think (and get advice from his staff) after the debate.    He gets to do this while he says that he wasn't afraid of the narrators or network but, simply wasn't willing to put up with crap they would bring.    Personally, I think it's a brilliant move.    As I said, Trump is not my favorite candidate but, he's the one most likely to beat both the liar and the socialist IMHO.

Pretty much agree with this assessment of it.

It's not like this was to be the only debate they are going to have. They have had many.
Given what came about at the last Fox debate it is unlikely they would get past that in this one.

Personally I think the play here would be to change the moderators. If they did that I would think Trump would participate as that would re-establish the integrity of the debate as a debate as opposed to a pissin' match.
Logged

Mike Luken 
 

Cherokee, Ia.
Former Iowa Patriot Guard Ride Captain
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #30 on: January 27, 2016, 03:33:57 PM »

Donald Trump is not my favorite candidate by a long shot.   But, I think not debating for his stated reasons is one heck of an idea and won't hurt his chances one iota.   

Those already in his corner don't care and this way, he doesn't get nailed by the hosts or the other candidates and gets to respond to any thing asked or accusations after some time to think (and get advice from his staff) after the debate.    He gets to do this while he says that he wasn't afraid of the narrators or network but, simply wasn't willing to put up with crap they would bring.    Personally, I think it's a brilliant move.    As I said, Trump is not my favorite candidate but, he's the one most likely to beat both the liar and the socialist IMHO.

Pretty much agree with this assessment of it.

It's not like this was to be the only debate they are going to have. They have had many.
Given what came about at the last Fox debate it is unlikely they would get past that in this one.

Personally I think the play here would be to change the moderators. If they did that I would think Trump would participate as that would re-establish the integrity of the debate as a debate as opposed to a pissin' match.
Megyn Kelly asked him a question about things he had said about women. Why should they change moderators ?
Logged
Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16684


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #31 on: January 27, 2016, 03:47:07 PM »

Donald Trump is not my favorite candidate by a long shot.   But, I think not debating for his stated reasons is one heck of an idea and won't hurt his chances one iota.    

Those already in his corner don't care and this way, he doesn't get nailed by the hosts or the other candidates and gets to respond to any thing asked or accusations after some time to think (and get advice from his staff) after the debate.    He gets to do this while he says that he wasn't afraid of the narrators or network but, simply wasn't willing to put up with crap they would bring.    Personally, I think it's a brilliant move.    As I said, Trump is not my favorite candidate but, he's the one most likely to beat both the liar and the socialist IMHO.

Pretty much agree with this assessment of it.

It's not like this was to be the only debate they are going to have. They have had many.
Given what came about at the last Fox debate it is unlikely they would get past that in this one.

Personally I think the play here would be to change the moderators. If they did that I would think Trump would participate as that would re-establish the integrity of the debate as a debate as opposed to a pissin' match.
Megyn Kelly asked him a question about things he had said about women. Why should they change moderators ?

"They" don't have to or need to, The Donald has already won this battle to most folks who support him and those that don't are NOT a big deal to him.   The only people he is interested in are those who will vote Republican and who are undecided.  People (most) either love or hate him.    Most Conservatives are not real keen on Fox News anyway so, whether or not they change moderators doesn't matter.   If they change, Trump wins, if they don't, Trump wins.    Fox should have been smarter about this.

Again, let me repeat, Trump is not my favorite candidate.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 03:52:57 PM by Rams » Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #32 on: January 27, 2016, 03:58:43 PM »

Rams, I understand. There is no doubt he knows how to work the media. But if he continues he will eventually need to answer questions from the media whether he likes them or not. He will not be able to pick and choose when he gets to the general election. But who knows, I've been wrong at every turn with this guy.  Smiley
Logged
Rams
Member
*****
Posts: 16684


So many colors to choose from yet so few stand out

Covington, TN


« Reply #33 on: January 27, 2016, 04:10:39 PM »

He will not be able to pick and choose when he gets to the general election. But who knows, I've been wrong at every turn with this guy.  Smiley

Apparently, this would be one of those times.    Megan Kelley will not be addressing Trump in this debate.   Who do you think won this battle?   While the debate may change some things, I doubt this will change Trump's supporters.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2016, 05:50:00 PM by Rams » Logged

VRCC# 29981
Learning the majority of life's lessons the hard way.

Every trip is an adventure, enjoy it while it lasts.
Xtracho
Member
*****
Posts: 1303


The Bosses

Florida's Emerald Coast


« Reply #34 on: January 27, 2016, 04:16:37 PM »

Trump is on O'Reilly tonight. That should be interesting.

And Meghan Kelly? She turned Trump on his ear with his own words. Blame her for what Trump said & having to explain why he said it?

That's just ridiculous.
Logged

Mark

"To live you must be willing to die" - Amir Vahedi
My father gets smarter each day he is gone.

In the stable:
'84 GW Aspencade
'47 Indian Chief
'98 Valkyrie
BF
Member
*****
Posts: 9932


Fort Walton Beach, Florida I'm a simple man, I like pretty, dark haired woman and breakfast food.


« Reply #35 on: January 27, 2016, 05:44:36 PM »

Megyn Kelly asked him a question about things he had said about women. Why should they change moderators ?

Because it wasn't just a simple question about his stand on issues or policies, it was a gotcha question. 

Sorta like asking do you still beat your wife meathead?

I like Trump...except when he opens his mouth.  Any other candidate is a vote for just more of the same old same old politics as usual.  I can't stand anymore politics as usual. 

Besides....sorta like Serk said, I'd vote for Donald Duck as long as it's a vote against the Hildabeast or Bernie the communist.   
 
Logged

I can't help about the shape I'm in
I can't sing, I ain't pretty and my legs are thin
But don't ask me what I think of you
I might not give the answer that you want me to
 

The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #36 on: January 27, 2016, 06:09:25 PM »

Megyn Kelly asked him a question about things he had said about women. Why should they change moderators ?

Because it wasn't just a simple question about his stand on issues or policies, it was a gotcha question. 

Sorta like asking do you still beat your wife meathead?

I like Trump...except when he opens his mouth.  Any other candidate is a vote for just more of the same old same old politics as usual.  I can't stand anymore politics as usual. 

Besides....sorta like Serk said, I'd vote for Donald Duck as long as it's a vote against the Hildabeast or Bernie the communist.   
 
I don't see how they were gotcha questions. They were things he said about women. We are all responsible for what we say and do, even if you are rich.
Logged
Moonshot_1
Member
*****
Posts: 5142


Me and my Valk at Freedom Rock


« Reply #37 on: January 27, 2016, 06:47:15 PM »


[/quote]Megyn Kelly asked him a question about things he had said about women. Why should they change moderators ?
[/quote]

The debate is supposed to be between the candidates. In this particular case it has become between one particular candidate and a particular moderator.

Since this is a forum for the candidates it would make sense for the integrity of the debate for the moderator to recuse him or herself from the event.

I would hold this true for any candidate and any moderator where there is less than a civil discourse in a public forum between the two.

Not only would it not be fair for the particular candidate to have to face a biased moderator but it would also be unfair for the other candidate in that the attention they should get and the focus on the issues would be shorted.

In the final analysis, this isn't about Ms. Kelly. It is about a Presidential Primary debate and the integrity of it.
 
Logged

Mike Luken 
 

Cherokee, Ia.
Former Iowa Patriot Guard Ride Captain
Moonshot_1
Member
*****
Posts: 5142


Me and my Valk at Freedom Rock


« Reply #38 on: January 27, 2016, 07:01:37 PM »


 
[/quote]I don't see how they were gotcha questions. They were things he said about women. We are all responsible for what we say and do, even if you are rich.
[/quote]

Yes, they were things Mr. Trump had said.

But she took a bunch of them, strung them all together totally out of any context, claimed it was his "war on Women" and gave him, what, 60 seconds to answer for all of it on the spot?

Don't recall any similar or similarly toned questions to the rest of the group.


Logged

Mike Luken 
 

Cherokee, Ia.
Former Iowa Patriot Guard Ride Captain
The emperor has no clothes
Member
*****
Posts: 29945


« Reply #39 on: January 28, 2016, 03:57:27 AM »


 
I don't see how they were gotcha questions. They were things he said about women. We are all responsible for what we say and do, even if you are rich.
[/quote]

Yes, they were things Mr. Trump had said.

But she took a bunch of them, strung them all together totally out of any context, claimed it was his "war on Women" and gave him, what, 60 seconds to answer for all of it on the spot?

Don't recall any similar or similarly toned questions to the rest of the group.



[/quote]There is a reason you don't see those questions asked of the rest of the group. THEY DIDNT SAY THOSE THINGS . HE DID  uglystupid2
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Print
Jump to: