Ted Cruz Truth

[98valk]

http://dailycaller.com/2016/01/26/who-is-the-real-ted-cruz/

he is a globalist like hilldemon
his wife is a CFR member

that his spouse, Heidi, by all accounts a lovely wife and mother, has been employed by Goldman Sachs since 2005. She is on leave as managing director and regional head of private wealth management. Heidi is a proud member of the lefty Council on Foreign Relations, advocates of one world government and the New World Order.

basically he is not what he says he is see who else he surrounds himself with same as demonhillary

The time has come to ask Ted more questions.  Why did he hire  one of the head Viper’s of the Pernicious Nest of Snakes, Elliot Abrams to help craft his foreign relations?  Yes, Ted why?   Why did you add this Neo Con Globalist whose resume shines with all the venomous  years of serving the Council on Foreign Relations? Why did you choose Abrams who has  crafted many evils against the constitutional values you hold so dear to work with you on foreign relations?

Why did you surround your campaign with Neo Cons like James Woolsey to also be a foreign policy advisor?  I’m sure you realized that Woolsey  was a national security specialist and former Director of the CIA under the Clinton administration. You did read his resume of heading up many Neoconservative groups including being the Chairman of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, and Founding Member of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. Sure you did.  You liked that.

And why Ted have you surrounded your entire campaign with neocons?  Especially  General Michael Hayden, former director of the NSA?  The problem Ted, is that your entire inner circle is comprised of men and women experienced in growing government, supporting surveillance, and using American troops to achieve globalist NWO goals.

Could it be Ted that you have surrounded yourself with Neo Cons because you too are one? It is clear that you have lied to the American public and serve another agenda….one with a great big fat 21 at the end of it!
https://themarshallreport.wordpress.com/2016/01/05/cruz-why-is-your-foreign-policy-advisor-a-cfr-member-i-thought-you-hated-that-pernicious-nest-of-snakes/

[BradValk48237]

If it looks like a weasel... Quacks like a weasel..... must be a ......

Actually he looks like Granpa Munster......

B

[Oss]

Brad

I am outraged at that scandalous statement

I LOVED grandpa Munster and would have voted for him for Governor of New York     

OP I have no problem with your statements altho I have not fact checked them ..............yet

More important things to do, like Bonnie wants to go in the hot tub now

[Jersey mike]

Wow, I wonder how this other piece of news fits in then;

http://news.yahoo.com/caitlyn-jenner-offers-cruzs-trans-ambassador-210040888.html;_ylt=AwrC1CgCy9xWdzMAA9OamolQ;_ylu=X3oDMTBybGY3bmpvBGNvbG8DYmYxBHBvcwMyBHZ0aWQDBHNlYwNzcg--

[Patrick]

From what I find Cruz has the most conservative voting record.

But, there is still something about him I don't like.

[Serk]

But, there is still something about him I don't like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi07uRZsNn0

(I'm a full bore Cruz supporter, but I get it, something just isn't.... right... with his face... but the face isn't what we're voting for...)

[BF]

But, there is still something about him I don't like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi07uRZsNn0

(I'm a full bore Cruz supporter, but I get it, something just isn't.... right... with his face... but the face isn't what we're voting for...)

The face is a mirror into the soul.  And I don't trust his face. 

[Serk]

But, there is still something about him I don't like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi07uRZsNn0

(I'm a full bore Cruz supporter, but I get it, something just isn't.... right... with his face... but the face isn't what we're voting for...)

The face is a mirror into the soul.  And I don't trust his face. 

I've met him, face to face, and looked into his eyes...

I know it sounds silly, almost superstitious (Especially coming from someone non-religious), but I didn't see any lies in his eyes in person.

[Valker]

Listen to what they do, not what they say. I'm a Cruz supporter simply because I like the way he has voted. Trump's past shows me a lot more than what he says-and I like a lot of what he says. Both major Dems have histories that simply terrify me as they are almost exactly opposite to what I think.

[Firefighter]

You guys should work with the police or maybe TSA, or better yet you could make big money in Iraq looking at Muslim eyes and faces cause you would know which ones were with Isis!!

[Serk]

You guys should work with the police or maybe TSA, or better yet you could make big money in Iraq looking at Muslim eyes and faces cause you would know which ones were with Isis!!

...the fact that his voting record and history back up what I saw in person helps... a _LOT_...

[BIG Bopper]

A little insight to the four remaining

Marco - wasn't sure I would ever see bigger ears than Oslama, but you must admit they are close. Marco was elected as a tea party guy in 2010, but turned quickly to the establishment and hit bottom with the gang of 8 and Chuckie Schumer. He now comes to us and says I am the outsider I pretended to be in 2010 and hopes he can convince us. Not happening

John - been claiming the title "champion of the balanced budget". Yes he served as budget chairman during the last year we saw a balanced budget. He was in the right place at the right time, and I am surprised the others haven't pointed out the following, the budget balanced during the intersection of 2 trajectories. 1) Clinton and the Pubs were desperately trying to propose bigger reductions in spending than the other in part due to the very popular Newt "contract with America" and 2) the decade of the 90's gold rush of cash pouring in known as the .com revolution.

Trump - with that much money, he really needs to do something about the tanning booth eyes. Just not cool, but I do like the guy. He has a problem looking people in the eyes when he is close to them. Not sure why, but it is noticeable, and awkward. I like to hear a little more "we" "us" "ours" used in the conversation and speeches. He has guts, and at this time in history it is something this country can use.

Cruz - imagine him with silver face paint? Would he not be the perfect double for the Tin Man in the Wizard of Oz? Ted stood alone against Oslama care when the establishment, )many winning their elections saying they would repeal it) calling him every name they could legally use. 17% of the government was shutdown during this period. Did any teet sucking employees lose money? No all were fully compensated when they returned. Why did they not collect unemployeement during this time, we would. No, full restitution! Did any teet sucking welfare, or able bodied (a distinction and we all know it) disability collectors go without or not compensated. No, fully paid. What was the outcome of one mans stand against the Washington establishment of 2013. The only result which is never pointed out, the landslide win during the elections of 2014. Oh yea, that was the Pubs who won, wasnt it?The same ones who many today say they hate him. The truth is they can't look at themselves in the mirror because they didn't have the "you know what's" to do it themselves.

My order of endorsement as if anyone cares
1) Ted
2) Donald
3) Kasich (at least he addresses the budget issue)
4) Marco (holding my nose whil pulling the lever)

My three reasons why Hillary loses at another time

See everybody in June
Bungholio

[Robert]

interesting information about Cruz but what is also interesting is Glen Beck wants Cruz. He basically calls Trump, "Hitler" I would figure he would endorse Trump.

Glenn Beck On "Dangerous" Donald Trump This Week Abc FULL Interview
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISUQMH6H6so

[Willow]

My first preference is certainly Ted Cruz.

My second preference is whoever is running in the general election against Hillary or Bernie.

[Pappy!]

Have also watched Cruz for the last few years. He is a Constitutional Trooper. He will certainly get my primary vote.

[Alpha Dog]

Some good points here on Cruz.  I have liked him, liked him alot.  He is a true constitutionalist and Rush Limbaugh has said this quite a few times.  He said it again yesterday with Chris Wallace.  He is a true fiscal conservative and will put up the names of true constitutional judges for all courts.  He is the smartest candidate running.

However as the OP stated CFR influence and money is a bad thing.  He will not stop the free trade that is wiping out the middle class in this country.  I am also not convinced he will put up a fence.  I think he will.   Also as others have pointed out Cruz comes across as a shady character, it is that evangelical approach to his speeches and other demeanor.   Why or why any candidate thinks running 700 billion plus trade deficits is a good thing and want to expand it is beyond me. Not really I know the reason.  This was a CFR program brought on board and started in the Nixon era strictly for international bankers to get rich (er).  Pitting our middle class against 3rd world extremely low wage workers is disaster. Free trade only works with comparable countries like Canada and US, Europe, Japan, etc.  Now the Hi tech Bill Gates and Co. silicone valley giants want to put there high paid workers in this mix through HIB visas.

The only candidate that understands what is going on is Trump, but he has his other faults.  There is no perfect candidate.  Pull the lever and take your chances.  But we do know the true disaster that lies on the other side.  
Chuck

[Patrick]

But, there is still something about him I don't like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zi07uRZsNn0

(I'm a full bore Cruz supporter, but I get it, something just isn't.... right... with his face... but the face isn't what we're voting for...)

I like Kasich, the man has a good track record. I doubt he'll get the nod though.

I think any of the republicans would be far and away better than what the democrats are offering.

I like Trump and understand why so many like him. We certainly could use a good business man running this country, but, he acts far from 'presidential'. I've been hoping his demeanor would change, doesn't look like it will, and, I think that will kill him.

So, of the 2 [ Cruz, Rubio] other main candidates I would vote for either one if it came to that, but, I would probably vote for Cruz. The folks from Texas seem to like him, I like his voting record and the fact that many in Washington don't like him are check marks in the plus column.

[The emperor has no clothes]

My first preference is certainly Ted Cruz.

My second preference is whoever is running in the general election against Hillary or Bernie.

My first preference is Kasich.

My second preference is whoever is running in the general election against Trump.

[Rams]

And why Ted have you surrounded your entire campaign with neocons?  Especially  General Michael Hayden, former director of the NSA?  The problem Ted, is that your entire inner circle is comprised of men and women experienced in growing government, supporting surveillance, and using American troops to achieve globalist NWO goals.

This paragraph of your original post intrigues me.   I'm curious as to how you came up with the conclusion that Gen. Hayden is a neocon?   You do understand that anyone who filled the roles of Director of the CIA and Director of the NSA is going to support surveillance to protect American's military and homeland don't you?    This would be true regardless of political affiliation.   Kind of goes with the job IMHO.  

I think it's important to note that General Hayden was serving in these positions when the threat of attack was not only greatest but, in fact executed.    The intelligence community was far behind (technically) in ability to intercept known and suspected threats from a huge amount of communication devices, technologies/methods and data that had to be sifted through, decoded and then interpreted, all in a timely manner.    It was not until after 9/11 that funding was made available to increase their computing power and human skill sets/numbers in order to give our military the ability to catch or kill people like Osama Bin Laden.  

While many Americans think the NSA is spying on them, the NSA is spying on the world trying to protect our asses while not infringing on our rights.    That's a tough mission and not cross the line.    I highly recommend "Playing Close to the Edge" by General Hayden, even if you don't agree, you might learn something.  IOWs, the mission is the same regardless of whether it's a Dem or Republican in the job.   Some just do it better than others.

[98valk]

And why Ted have you surrounded your entire campaign with neocons?  Especially  General Michael Hayden, former director of the NSA?  The problem Ted, is that your entire inner circle is comprised of men and women experienced in growing government, supporting surveillance, and using American troops to achieve globalist NWO goals.

This paragraph of your original post intrigues me.   I'm curious as to how you came up with the conclusion that Gen. Hayden is a neocon?   You do understand that anyone who filled the roles of Director of the CIA and Director of the NSA is going to support surveillance to protect American's military and homeland don't you?    This would be true regardless of political affiliation.   Kind of goes with the job IMHO.  

I think it's important to note that General Hayden was serving in these positions when the threat of attack was not only greatest but, in fact executed.    The intelligence community was far behind (technically) in ability to intercept known and suspected threats from a huge amount of communication devices, technologies/methods and data that had to be sifted through, decoded and then interpreted, all in a timely manner.    It was not until after 9/11 that funding was made available to increase their computing power and human skill sets/numbers in order to give our military the ability to catch or kill people like Osama Bin Laden.  

While many Americans think the NSA is spying on them, the NSA is spying on the world trying to protect our asses while not infringing on our rights.    That's a tough mission and not cross the line.    I highly recommend "Playing Close to the Edge" by General Hayden, even if you don't agree, you might learn something.  IOWs, the mission is the same regardless of whether it's a Dem or Republican in the job.   Some just do it better than others.

the website came up with that conclusion not me.
and it has been proven the NSA is spying on everyone and has been for decades even before 9/11

[The emperor has no clothes]

That friggin Serk 

[Master Blaster]

More and more Cruz is looking like the better choice.  The main reason Trump is so popular is he is anti establishment.  Not   so much conservative, but Cruz is both.  The RNC dislikes him almost as much as Trump.   He got my respect when he was the only one that stood up against  Obamacare when the rest rolled over and said stick it to me.  If Trump is nominated, of course I will vote for him, but I am hoping it will be Cruz.