?????

[baldo]

Is there nothing that this fool won't say?

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-campaign-defends-2nd-amendment-comment-n626601

[The emperor has no clothes]

It appears not. I think Senator Warren might be right.
 Follow
 Elizabeth Warren  ✔@elizabethforma
.@realDonaldTrump makes death threats because he's a pathetic coward who can’t handle the fact that he’s losing to a girl.

[Bighead]

Didn't hear a threat at all from my point of view. Just many want to view it as a threat.

[f6john]

 schoolyard drivel from both sides. We should expect better from both sides.

[The emperor has no clothes]

schoolyard drivel from both sides. We should expect better from both sides.

Agreed 

[Robert]

[Pete]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

[The emperor has no clothes]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

[MP]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

Well, it boggles us how you can possibly side with a person who lies CONSTANTLY, put national security at risk, attacked women who DARED accuse her husband of sexual harrassment or rape, etc.

[MP]

"Assasination threat"  Really?

I have heard the left call for much more open violence against Trump, and it is Ho Hum.

All he said was 2nd Amendment people, might be able to do more.  It is called campaigning, etc.  You just keep taking EVERYTHING out of context, and stretching it to the max.

[Bighead]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

Where did you hear him imply violence? You are reading words into what he said to fit what you wanted to hear.

[The emperor has no clothes]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

Well, it boggles us how you can possibly side with a person who lies CONSTANTLY, put national security at risk, attacked women who DARED accuse her husband of sexual harrassment or rape, etc.

MP, I don't know how many times I have to say it. I AM NOT SUPPORTING CLINTON. I have stated my position numerous times yet it still the case, that if a person is against Trump they are for Clinton.   So I guess I will say it again. As it stands now I am voting for Gary Johnson. I wish more people would give him a look, but I don't know how to make that happen.

[The emperor has no clothes]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

Where did you hear him imply violence? You are reading words into what he said to fit what you wanted to hear.

So do you feel Pete is wrong ?

[Gavin_Sons]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

If Clinton tries to remove the second amendment and/or remove guns from law abiding citizens, she will be signing her own death warrant. It will be revolutionary war 2. Forget the terrorist,  us citizens will take care of them too, kiss your police forces good bye, no one will be there to protect you. Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list. Yeah thats the way my brain works, can't help it.

[The emperor has no clothes]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

If Clinton tries to remove the second amendment and/or remove guns from law abiding citizens, she will be signing her own death warrant. It will be revolutionary war 2. Forget the terrorist,  us citizens will take care of them too, kiss your police forces good bye, no one will be there to protect you. Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list. Yeah thats the way my brain works, can't help it.

Jesus F'ing Christ ! So now you are threatening me ? You guys are letting this guy take you down some dark places.

[MP]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

Well, it boggles us how you can possibly side with a person who lies CONSTANTLY, put national security at risk, attacked women who DARED accuse her husband of sexual harrassment or rape, etc.

MP, I don't know how many times I have to say it. I AM NOT SUPPORTING CLINTON. I have stated my position numerous times yet it still the case, that if a person is against Trump they are for Clinton.   So I guess I will say it again. As it stands now I am voting for Gary Johnson. I wish more people would give him a look, but I don't know how to make that happen.

There are TWO people in this race who have a chance of winning.  Gary Johnson does NOT.  So, either vote Trump, or vote Clinton.  THAT is the choice.  I wish we had better candidates on both sides.  I really do.

But, we do NOT.  Only these two have a chance.  I find Trump MUCh better than Hillary.  I remember the last Clinton administration.  The scandals from that STILL are around!  Anyone remember the futures trading Hillary did?  Put in a few dollars, and after just a few trades, had like 100k in profits, if I remember right.  She never traded again!  Insiders, who trade all the time, reconstructed her trades, and said she had to pcik each one right, and make all she could on each one.  She is the only one in HISTORY who has ever done so good!

Oh, and she happened to be involved with a company doing trading, and she did them favors!  Sound like the present, in the Clinton Foundation?

[Bighead]

Where did Gavin Threaten you ? you see things sideways man I mean really sideways.
again you are reading things that weren't said.

[Gavin_Sons]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

If Clinton tries to remove the second amendment and/or remove guns from law abiding citizens, she will be signing her own death warrant. It will be revolutionary war 2. Forget the terrorist,  us citizens will take care of them too, kiss your police forces good bye, no one will be there to protect you. Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list. Yeah thats the way my brain works, can't help it.

Jesus F'ing Christ ! So now you are threatening me ? You guys are letting this guy take you down some dark places.

Exactly where did I threaten you? Come on man, climb out of under that rock and get some sunlight. No one takes me to any place, these are my own thoughts, and anyone that wants the 2nd amendment gone deserves whatever they get. We can only hope she hits her head again.

[Gavin_Sons]

Where did Gavin Threaten you ? you see things sideways man I mean really sideways.
again you are reading things that weren't said.

if I ever threaten anyone it will be to their face not over some internet forum. But no I did not threaten you Meathead, youre really good at reading what is not there. Ever consider a job at the FBI instead of cutting meat?

[Gavin_Sons]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

If Clinton tries to remove the second amendment and/or remove guns from law abiding citizens, she will be signing her own death warrant. It will be revolutionary war 2. Forget the terrorist,  us citizens will take care of them too, kiss your police forces good bye, no one will be there to protect you. Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list. Yeah thats the way my brain works, can't help it.

Jesus F'ing Christ ! So now you are threatening me ? You guys are letting this guy take you down some dark places.

I guess since you're voting for that Johnson guy no one has ever heard about you will be safe. But if I were you I'd still choose my friends wisely, just Iin case. 

[Willow]

Is there nothing that this fool won't say?

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-campaign-defends-2nd-amendment-comment-n626601

Is there no limit to what the fools will creatively interpret and imply from what he says?  As clearly as I could see he said the supporters of the second amendment might be able to stop her extreme SCOTUS nominations.  

[Danny McMillin]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

[Willow]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I did.

Isn't it interesting that people who seem to complain the most about political posts practice starting their own inflammatory threads?

[The emperor has no clothes]

Gavin, your words were:
Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list.
I take that as a threat . Albeit a dumb one and one I'm not worried about in the least. But if you are not saying that then explain what you meant. Actually don't worry about it. I'm done with this conversation , carry on without me.

[Robert]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I did.

Isn't it interesting that people who seem to complain the most about political posts practice starting their own inflammatory threads?

 
I guess we just found a new definition for irony.


I rode today it was looking like rain most of the day but managed to get some time in. I sure miss it when I dont ride.

[..]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

No but I washed and did some chrome polishing.

[Psychotic Bovine]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I had a nice morning ride on my Triumph.  Very good weather, sunny, and not too hot until later in the day.

[Moonshot_1]

Is there nothing that this fool won't say?

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/trump-campaign-defends-2nd-amendment-comment-n626601

I suppose we can take this comment as racist since he didn't include the Black Lives Matter movement, just the 2nd Amend. folks in his "veiled threat".  The subject at the time was the 2nd Amendment. Clear to me there was no implied threat at all.

Where the real problem lies is the folks who intentionally ramp this up and incite the general public with disingenuousness. This kind of disingenuous reaction is going to get folks killed.

And I rode my Valk.

[Gavin_Sons]

Gavin, your words were:
Your only hope is friends with guns, and when they find out you voted for this you will be on their hit list.
I take that as a threat . Albeit a dumb one and one I'm not worried about in the least. But if you are not saying that then explain what you meant. Actually don't worry about it. I'm done with this conversation , carry on without me.

Oh don't worry Meaty, I'll never feel the need to explain myself to you, got better things to do, like walk barefooted through dog crap.

[baldo]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I did.

Isn't it interesting that people who seem to complain the most about political posts practice starting their own inflammatory threads?

I find your post amusing, Willow. I find it amusing because for every post that one of the 'libs/progs whatever' post on this forum that is considered "controversial", there are at least 10 from the other side. I never see you calling out any of the crazy batshit posts that show up here almost every day.

And Britman, referencing your deleted post, I don't appreciate being called a troll just because you don't like a post. I titled it that way because I would have just repeated it in the comment. To repeat
others here, you seem to find controversy whether it's there or not.

[..]

How many reports; written or videoed; have there been of Trump supporters physically attacking Clinton/Sanders supporters?

How may reports; written or videoed; have there been of Clinton/Sanders supporters attacking Trump supporters?

Yet you think the Trump supporters are ready to attack. Really???

[Hook#3287]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

Yeah, got a nice ride in while working.

Had to have a small hydraulic cylinder rebuilt, visit a potential job site for measurements and visit with my granite counter top guy about a quote.

Did about 60 miles.

I've gotten to the point I don't even listen to the news pertaining to the election.  The bias is terrible.

[..]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I did.

Isn't it interesting that people who seem to complain the most about political posts practice starting their own inflammatory threads?

I find your post amusing, Willow. I find it amusing because for every post that one of the 'libs/progs whatever' post on this forum that is considered "controversial", there are at least 10 from the other side. I never see you calling out any of the crazy batshit posts that show up here almost every day.

And Britman, referencing your deleted post, I don't appreciate being called a troll just because you don't like a post. I titled it that way because I would have just repeated it in the comment. To repeat
others here, you seem to find controversy whether it's there or not.

I didn't write that I didn't like your post. You really need to brush up on your reading comprehension skills.

Your thread title is "? ? ? ? ?". Please explain what "? ? ? ? ?" means in words rather than symbols. Then I and maybe others will learn not to open a thread you title "? ? ? ? ?" in the future knowing it will be a political one designed to cause a reaction among some forum members.

I find controversy? You make me laugh. thank you.

[baldo]

How many reports; written or videoed; have there been of Trump supporters physically attacking Clinton/Sanders supporters?

How may reports; written or videoed; have there been of Clinton/Sanders supporters attacking Trump supporters?

Yet you think the Trump supporters are ready to attack. Really???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ups4FeSuHvY

Yeah, he's a sweetie.

[98valk]

“By the way if she gets to pick her judges, nothing you can do, folks. Although the Second Amendment people, maybe there is, I don’t know,” Trump said.

If this is what you are referring to :

It has always been true, was in 1776 and is true today.
The fact that you 2 do not know, approve or understand, has zero effect.

An armed populace always gets to have the last vote. And by any stretch of the imagination America is an armed populace, more so today than ever.

Before you even say it, no one wants or is promoting an insurrection. But you can only push a armed free person so far before facing the consequences of those actions.

Trump was not the first to say so and will not be the last, he simply spoke the truth based on history of this country.

Reference the "battle of Athens, Tennessee" on the web.

That's fine. I understand it. But for a candidate to imply violence if he doesn't get elected is beyond the pale. You guys are going to follow this guy off the edge of the earth (figuratively). It is mind boggling to me how people can side with this guy.

The left wing UN marxist communist demos and repubs have been doing violence against u, your life style, your family and this country for decades. they just do it with laws and destruction of the dollar.

[Wizzard]

Anybody ride their Valk today?????

I did.

Isn't it interesting that people who seem to complain the most about political posts practice starting their own inflammatory threads?

That's the truest statement of this whole thread

[..]

How many reports; written or videoed; have there been of Trump supporters physically attacking Clinton/Sanders supporters?

How may reports; written or videoed; have there been of Clinton/Sanders supporters attacking Trump supporters?

Yet you think the Trump supporters are ready to attack. Really???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ups4FeSuHvY

Yeah, he's a sweetie.

Once again your reading comprehension skills are lacking.

[Crackerborn]

I finely got all the bugs off from my sojourn south, then promptly went out to collect more. Maybe all the political activists on this forum should learn the name Gary Johnson. He may have a better chance than the Republican buffoon. Please have someone explain the Electoral College to you if you believe Trump has a chance.

[scooperhsd]

The Electoral College is one those remnants from the Constitution that I WOULD like to see thrown out. One man, one vote, for the whole country. Your vote in California means no more than one from Kansas.

Problem, it would take an Amendment to make that happen.

[..]

A refresher

http://people.howstuffworks.com/question472.htm